Mechanical activation of lung epithelial cells through the ion channel Piezo1 activates the metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 and promotes growth factor and adhesion molecule release.

In the lung, pulmonary epithelial cells undergo mechanical stretching during ventilation. The associated cellular mechanoresponse is still poorly understood at the molecular level. Here, we demonstrate that activation of the mechanosensitive cation channel Piezo1 in a human epithelial cell line (H441) and in primary human lung epithelial cells induces the proteolytic activity of the metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 at the plasma membrane. These ADAMs are known to convert cell surface expressed proteins into soluble and thereby play major roles in proliferation, barrier regulation and inflammation. We observed that chemical activation of Piezo1 promotes cleavage of substrates that are specific for either ADAM10 or ADAM17. Activation of Piezo1 also induced the synthesis and ADAM10/17-dependent release of the growth factor amphiregulin (AREG). In addition, junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A) was shed in an ADAM10/17-dependent manner resulting in a reduction of cell contacts. Stretching experiments combined with Piezo1 knockdown further demonstrated that mechanical activation promotes shedding via Piezo1. Most importantly, high pressure ventilation of murine lungs increased AREG and JAM-A release into the alveolar space, which was reduced by a Piezo1 inhibitor. Our study provides a novel link between stretch-induced Piezo1 activation and the activation of ADAM10 and ADAM17 in lung epithelium. This may help to understand acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) which is induced by ventilation stress and goes along with perturbed epithelial permeability and release of growth factors.

Bioprinting-associated pulsatile hydrostatic pressure elicits a mild proinflammatory response in epi- and endothelial cells.

During nozzle-based bioprinting, like inkjet and microextrusion, cells are subjected to hydrostatic pressure for up to several minutes. The modality of the bioprinting-related hydrostatic pressure is either constant or pulsatile depending on the technique. We hypothesized that the difference in the modality of hydrostatic pressure affects the biological response of the processed cells differently. To test this, we used a custom-made setup to apply either controlled constant or pulsatile hydrostatic pressure on endothelial and epithelial cells. Neither bioprinting procedure visibly altered the distribution of selected cytoskeletal filaments, cell-substrate adhesions, and cell-cell contacts in either cell type. In addition, pulsatile hydrostatic pressure led to an immediate increase of intracellular ATP in both cell types. However, the bioprinting-associated hydrostatic pressure triggered a pro-inflammatory response in only the endothelial cells, with an increase of interleukin 8 (IL-8) and a decrease of thrombomodulin (THBD) transcripts. These findings demonstrate that the settings adopted during nozzle-based bioprinting cause hydrostatic pressure that can trigger a pro-inflammatory response in different barrier-forming cell types. This response is cell-type and pressure-modality dependent. The immediate interaction of the printed cells with native tissue and the immune system in vivo might potentially trigger a cascade of events. Our findings, therefore, are of major relevance in particular for novel intra-operative, multicellular bioprinting approaches.