Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
Popul Health Manag ; 27(1): 44-48, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37922423

RESUMO

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common reason for emergency department (ED) utilization that could potentially be treated by a primary care provider (PCP). This study assessed patient perceived value of a home UTI test kit plus educational materials and its impact on ED utilization for a UTI symptom episode. Women aged 18-75 years with Medicaid insurance and a history of 1-3 uncomplicated UTIs in the past year were prospectively identified and randomized to the intervention, intervention plus (intervention plus a patient portal message before its delivery), or standard of care group. A telephone survey was conducted 3-5 months after the mailing. Site of care for each UTI symptom episode was measured 12 months before and 6 months after the intervention. Test kit packages were mailed to 266 intervention individuals, and 150 responded to the telephone survey. Utilization outcomes were compared between a combined intervention group and a control group. Approximately one-third of the intervention patients experienced UTI symptoms within 5 months, and 73% used the test kit. Of those who experienced UTI symptoms, 58% contacted their PCP to seek care and 96% reported that the test kit was helpful. ED utilization was not significantly different in the intervention groups before and after the intervention, nor between the intervention and control groups postintervention. A home UTI test kit plus educational materials mailed to patients with a history of uncomplicated UTI was deemed helpful but did not have a measurable impact on ED utilization.


Assuntos
Infecções Urinárias , Feminino , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Percepção , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
2.
JMIR Dermatol ; 6: e41194, 2023 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37647114

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory disease caused by a type 2 T helper cell-mediated immune response to environmental antigens. Approximately 1 in 5 patients with AD presents with moderate to severe disease, and treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration include emollients, topical glucocorticoids, and calcineurin inhibitors. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, improves AD via inhibition of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to characterize the prescribing patterns of dupilumab for AD in adults at a large university-affiliated health system. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted using electronic data from the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics database, assessing data from the University of Colorado Medical Campus and its affiliates. The outcome measured was the prevalence of dupilumab prescribed for adults with AD (n=6421), between March 28, 2013, and March 28, 2021. We assessed whether the characteristics of patients who received dupilumab were different from those who did not. Each patient characteristic was assessed using a univariate logistic regression with the binary outcome of receiving or not receiving dupilumab. RESULTS: We found a population prevalence of 5.6% (6421/114,476) for AD. In our cohort, Black patients with AD were more than twice as likely to have received dupilumab compared to White patients (odds ratio 2.352, 95% CI 1.58-3.39). Patients with a diagnosis of atopic neurodermatitis were approximately twice as likely to have received dupilumab compared to those with other diagnostic variants of AD (odds ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.01-3.22). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that both patient racial characteristics and specific AD diagnoses were associated with variations in dupilumab prescription patterns.

3.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 107(10): e4004-e4014, 2022 09 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35945152

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Studies on cardiometabolic health in transgender and gender-diverse youth (TGDY) are limited to small cohorts. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to determine the odds of cardiometabolic-related diagnoses in TGDY compared to matched controls in a cross-sectional analysis, using a large, multisite database (PEDSnet). METHODS: Electronic health record data (2009-2019) were used to determine odds of cardiometabolic-related outcomes based on diagnosis, anthropometric, and laboratory data using logistic regression among TGDY youth vs controls. The association of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) with these outcomes was examined separately among TGDY. TGDY (n = 4172) were extracted from 6 PEDSnet sites and propensity-score matched on 8 variables to controls (n = 16 648). Main outcomes measures included odds of having cardiometabolic-related diagnoses among TGDY compared to matched controls, and among TGDY prescribed GAHT compared to those not prescribed GAHT. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, TGDY had higher odds of overweight/obesity (1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3) than controls. TGDY with a testosterone prescription alone or in combination with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) had higher odds of dyslipidemia (1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3 and 3.7; 95% CI, 2.1-6.7, respectively) and liver dysfunction (1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9 and 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3) than TGDY not prescribed GAHT. TGDY with a testosterone prescription alone had higher odds of overweight/obesity (1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.1) and hypertension (1.6 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) than those not prescribed testosterone. Estradiol and GnRHa alone were not associated with greater odds of cardiometabolic-related diagnoses. CONCLUSION: TGDY have increased odds of overweight/obesity compared to matched controls. Screening and tailored weight management, sensitive to the needs of TGDY, are needed.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Pessoas Transgênero , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Estradiol , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Humanos , Obesidade , Sobrepeso , Testosterona/uso terapêutico , Congêneres da Testosterona
4.
Am J Manag Care ; 28(6): e221-e227, 2022 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35738229

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Patient and Caregiver Support for Serious Illness (PACSSI), a per-member per-month (PMPM) alternative reimbursement structure for palliative care (PC) services, has been described as overly generous by HHS. We developed a modified version, PACSSI-Flexible (PACSSI-F), by modeling reimbursement for PC based on the changes in patient functional status. We estimated reimbursement for the first year that an organization might implement the PACSSI-F for PC services. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis using data from the Statin Discontinuation in Advanced Illness Trial. METHODS: We evaluated the PACSSI vs the PACSSI-F in 3 phases. In the first phase, we calculated variable-appropriate frequencies/relative frequencies or means/SDs for the study population's available demographics and comorbidities, focusing on age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, race and ethnicity, gender, and continued statin use. Exploratory analyses specific to reimbursement were conducted in a second phase. For each payment structure, we calculated the (1) mean (SD) total reimbursement and (2) number of weeks that a health care system would receive reimbursement, with both weekly and PMPM (4-week) averages. The third phase was designed to quantify any within-person (paired) differences in reimbursement between the original PACSSI and the PACSSI-F. RESULTS: PACSSI-F provides reimbursement for sustainable PC services and was cost-advantageous over PACSSI by $69.92 PMPM for 28.6% of the seriously ill population. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling of the PACSSI-F using secondary data provides a novel example of economic forecasting for alternative reimbursement structures in PC. Alternative reimbursement payment policies are necessary to expand PC for the seriously ill population.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Cuidados Paliativos , Comorbidade , Humanos
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(10): 1884-1894, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34272262

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We described the demographics, cancer subtypes, comorbidities, and outcomes of patients with a history of cancer and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Second, we compared patients hospitalized with COVID-19 to patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and patients hospitalized with influenza. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using eight routinely collected health care databases from Spain and the United States, standardized to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership common data model. Three cohorts of patients with a history of cancer were included: (i) diagnosed with COVID-19, (ii) hospitalized with COVID-19, and (iii) hospitalized with influenza in 2017 to 2018. Patients were followed from index date to 30 days or death. We reported demographics, cancer subtypes, comorbidities, and 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: We included 366,050 and 119,597 patients diagnosed and hospitalized with COVID-19, respectively. Prostate and breast cancers were the most frequent cancers (range: 5%-18% and 1%-14% in the diagnosed cohort, respectively). Hematologic malignancies were also frequent, with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma being among the five most common cancer subtypes in the diagnosed cohort. Overall, patients were aged above 65 years and had multiple comorbidities. Occurrence of death ranged from 2% to 14% and from 6% to 26% in the diagnosed and hospitalized COVID-19 cohorts, respectively. Patients hospitalized with influenza (n = 67,743) had a similar distribution of cancer subtypes, sex, age, and comorbidities but lower occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of cancer and COVID-19 had multiple comorbidities and a high occurrence of COVID-19-related events. Hematologic malignancies were frequent. IMPACT: This study provides epidemiologic characteristics that can inform clinical care and etiologic studies.


Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Pediatrics ; 148(3)2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34049958

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, in-hospital treatments, and health outcomes among children and adolescents diagnosed or hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to compare them in secondary analyses with patients diagnosed with previous seasonal influenza in 2017-2018. METHODS: International network cohort using real-world data from European primary care records (France, Germany, and Spain), South Korean claims and US claims, and hospital databases. We included children and adolescents diagnosed and/or hospitalized with COVID-19 at age <18 between January and June 2020. We described baseline demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, 30-day in-hospital treatments, and outcomes including hospitalization, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and death. RESULTS: A total of 242 158 children and adolescents diagnosed and 9769 hospitalized with COVID-19 and 2 084 180 diagnosed with influenza were studied. Comorbidities including neurodevelopmental disorders, heart disease, and cancer were more common among those hospitalized with versus diagnosed with COVID-19. Dyspnea, bronchiolitis, anosmia, and gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in COVID-19 than influenza. In-hospital prevalent treatments for COVID-19 included repurposed medications (<10%) and adjunctive therapies: systemic corticosteroids (6.8%-7.6%), famotidine (9.0%-28.1%), and antithrombotics such as aspirin (2.0%-21.4%), heparin (2.2%-18.1%), and enoxaparin (2.8%-14.8%). Hospitalization was observed in 0.3% to 1.3% of the cohort diagnosed with COVID-19, with undetectable (n < 5 per database) 30-day fatality. Thirty-day outcomes including pneumonia and hypoxemia were more frequent in COVID-19 than influenza. CONCLUSIONS: Despite negligible fatality, complications including hospitalization, hypoxemia, and pneumonia were more frequent in children and adolescents with COVID-19 than with influenza. Dyspnea, anosmia, and gastrointestinal symptoms could help differentiate diagnoses. A wide range of medications was used for the inpatient management of pediatric COVID-19.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/complicações , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Masculino , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Sintomas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
medRxiv ; 2020 Oct 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33140074

RESUMO

Objectives To characterize the demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, in-hospital treatments, and health outcomes among children/adolescents diagnosed or hospitalized with COVID-19. Secondly, to describe health outcomes amongst children/adolescents diagnosed with previous seasonal influenza. Design International network cohort. Setting Real-world data from European primary care records (France/Germany/Spain), South Korean claims and US claims and hospital databases. Participants Diagnosed and/or hospitalized children/adolescents with COVID-19 at age <18 between January and June 2020; diagnosed with influenza in 2017-2018. Main outcome measures Baseline demographics and comorbidities, symptoms, 30-day in-hospital treatments and outcomes including hospitalization, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi-system inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C), and death. Results A total of 55,270 children/adolescents diagnosed and 3,693 hospitalized with COVID-19 and 1,952,693 diagnosed with influenza were studied. Comorbidities including neurodevelopmental disorders, heart disease, and cancer were all more common among those hospitalized vs diagnosed with COVID-19. The most common COVID-19 symptom was fever. Dyspnea, bronchiolitis, anosmia and gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in COVID-19 than influenza. In-hospital treatments for COVID-19 included repurposed medications (<10%), and adjunctive therapies: systemic corticosteroids (6.8% to 37.6%), famotidine (9.0% to 28.1%), and antithrombotics such as aspirin (2.0% to 21.4%), heparin (2.2% to 18.1%), and enoxaparin (2.8% to 14.8%). Hospitalization was observed in 0.3% to 1.3% of the COVID-19 diagnosed cohort, with undetectable (N<5 per database) 30-day fatality. Thirty-day outcomes including pneumonia, ARDS, and MIS-C were more frequent in COVID-19 than influenza. Conclusions Despite negligible fatality, complications including pneumonia, ARDS and MIS-C were more frequent in children/adolescents with COVID-19 than with influenza. Dyspnea, anosmia and gastrointestinal symptoms could help differential diagnosis. A wide range of medications were used for the inpatient management of pediatric COVID-19.

8.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 44(6): 353-360, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29793886

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States; however, CRC screening reduces both incidence and mortality rates. Patient decision aids (DAs) are an evidence-based strategy to support patients making health-related decisions. CRC screening DAs can be unsuccessful due to provider preferences for colonoscopy and lack of effective DA implementation strategies within clinical settings. METHODS: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness study was conducted testing the feasibility of using an existing centralized preventive health screening outreach infrastructure to implement a novel CRC DA across a health care system. Participants included primary care patients at one of three study clinics. Implementation was assessed by determining whether patients remembered receiving the DA and were aware of CRC screening options. Effectiveness was measured by comparing overall screening rates between the control and intervention groups. RESULTS: Using a centralized delivery system was a feasible and efficient method for implementing DAs to a large academic health system. More than 90% of the intervention group remembered receiving the DA, and 80% found it helpful in their decision-making process. The DA was successful in improving CRC screening knowledge; however, overall CRC screening rates significantly decreased between the control and intervention periods (50.8% vs. 39.2%, respectively; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Centralized delivery is a feasible method for DA implementation. Although DAs increase knowledge, the true effectiveness of CRC DAs in clinical settings is unknown, as a result of the number in screening tests, diversity in DA format, and the variability in dissemination and implementation practices.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Educação em Saúde/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Idoso , Colonoscopia/métodos , Colonoscopia/psicologia , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sangue Oculto
12.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 57(1): 116-9, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17499388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Thomson Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factor, the most common measure of journal status, is based on crude citation counts that do not account for the quality of the journals where the citations originate. This study examines how accounting for citation origin affects the impact factor ranking of dermatology journals. METHODS: The 2003 impact factors of dermatology journals were adjusted by a weighted PageRank algorithm that assigned greater weight to citations originating in more frequently cited journals. RESULTS: Adjusting for citation origin moved the rank of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology higher than that of the Archives of Dermatology (third to second) but did not affect the ranking of the highest impact dermatology journal, the Journal of Investigative Dermatology. The dermatology journals most positively affected by adjusting for citation origin were Contact Dermatitis (moving from 22nd to 7th in rankings) and Burns (21st to 10th). Dermatology journals most negatively affected were Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (5th to 14th), the Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (19th to 27th), and the Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings (26th to 34th). LIMITATIONS: Current measures of dermatology journal status do not incorporate survey data from dermatologists regarding which journals dermatologists esteem most. CONCLUSION: Adjusting for citation origin provides a more refined measure of journal status and changes relative dermatology journal rankings.


Assuntos
Bibliometria , Dermatologia , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Algoritmos , Internet , Editoração/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 98(21): 1538-46, 2006 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17077356

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Large randomized, controlled clinical trials of lovastatin and gemfibrozil for heart disease prevention have reported statistically significantly lower melanoma incidences in persons receiving these medications. Results of in vitro animal model and human case-control studies also suggest that statins and fibrates may reduce the risk of melanoma. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of trials that randomly assigned participants to receive statins or fibrates versus an alternative therapy for a minimum of 6 months. Trials were identified by searching five electronic databases and the reference lists of eligible publications. Unpublished data were solicited from trial investigators and pharmaceutical companies. A meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effects model, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate pooled treatment effects. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We obtained data on incident melanomas from 20 of 36 qualifying randomized controlled trials (12 statin trials and eight fibrate trials), with a total of 70,820 participants. A total of 127 melanomas occurred among the 39,426 participants in the statin trials (59 among the 19,872 statin group participants and 68 among the 19,554 control group participants). A total of 27 melanomas occurred among the 31,394 participants enrolled in the fibrate trials (seven among the 12,324 fibrate group participants and 20 among the 19,070 control group participants). Overall, incidence of melanoma was not statistically significantly associated with the use of either statins (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.23) or fibrates (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.20 to 1.01). In a subgroup analysis by drug, only lovastatin use (in one trial) was statistically significantly associated with lower incidence of melanoma (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not validate the possibility that statins or fibrates prevent melanoma.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Atorvastatina , Bezafibrato/uso terapêutico , Clofibrato/uso terapêutico , Genfibrozila/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Heptanoicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Incidência , Lovastatina/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Pravastatina/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sinvastatina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Arch Dermatol ; 141(8): 959-62, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16103323

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe youth access to indoor UV tanning and youth discount pricing incentives in 4 states with different age restrictions: Colorado (no age restrictions), Texas (age 13 years), Illinois (age 14 years), and Wisconsin (age 16 years). DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey conducted in October 2003 using a standardized script to assess the practices of randomly selected UV tanning operators. PARTICIPANTS: Randomly selected licensed indoor UV tanning facility operators in Colorado, Texas, Illinois, and Wisconsin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of facilities (1) complying with indoor UV tanning minimum age regulations for a 12-year-old potential patron and a 15-year-old potential patron and (2) offering youth discounts. RESULTS: For a 12-year-old potential patron, 62% of facilities in states with minimum age restrictions prohibiting 12-year-olds had an operator report that they would not permit indoor tanning (Texas, 23%; Illinois, 74%; and Wisconsin, 89%) compared with 18% in Colorado, a state without youth access regulations. For a 15-year-old patron, most facilities in Wisconsin, the only state with a minimum age restriction for 15-year-olds, prohibited access (77%). Overall, 15% of operators offered youth discounts: Texas, 23%; Illinois, 14%; Wisconsin, 11%; and Colorado, 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Tanning facilities in 4 states offered price incentives directed at youths. State youth access regulations were associated with decreased youth access to indoor tanning. High compliance levels in states with long-standing youth access regulations (Illinois and Wisconsin) demonstrate the potential for successful tanning industry youth access regulation.


Assuntos
Indústria da Beleza/legislação & jurisprudência , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Comportamento Cooperativo , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Estados Unidos
15.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 51(5): 814-6, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15523366

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adolescents frequently use indoor tanning facilities, but little is known about tanning facility operator opinions regarding this use. Objective To assess indoor tanning operator attitudes and stated practices regarding youth access. METHODS: We electronically surveyed 89 indoor tanning facilities and 130 spas with active e-mail addresses. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 21% for both indoor tanning facilities (19/89) and spas (27/130). Most tanning operators (92%) felt that a client can be too young to receive indoor tanning, and most felt that written parental permission should be required (80%). Most facilities required adult accompaniment (92%), and most operators had discouraged a customer from receiving indoor tanning based on age (77%). The reported age of the youngest patron receiving indoor tanning ranged from 5 to 21 years. CONCLUSION: Our sample of indoor tanning facility operators believed that minimum age and parental consent regulations for indoor tanning should be required.


Assuntos
Fatores Etários , Indústria da Beleza , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adolescente , Humanos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
17.
Am J Ther ; 10(3): 203-10, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12756427

RESUMO

Although numerous second-generation isoprenylation inhibitors are proposed or under investigation for the treatment and/or prevention of cancer (eg, R115777, SCH 66336, L-778,123, BMS-214662), the chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive potential of commonly prescribed first-generation isoprenylation inhibitors, the statins, and other classes of lipid-lowering medications, the fibrates, has yet to be seriously explored. Two lipid-lowering medications, lovastatin and gemfibrozil, have been associated with a decreased incidence of melanoma in large, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical cardiology trials. This article reviews melanoma biology and the clinical evidence for the use of lipid-lowering medications for melanoma chemoprevention and/or adjuvant chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Anticarcinógenos/uso terapêutico , Genfibrozila/uso terapêutico , Lovastatina/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/prevenção & controle , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Humanos , Metanálise como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
18.
Arch Dermatol ; 139(4): 443-8, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12707090

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare laws governing youth access to UV irradiation at indoor tanning facilities with laws governing youth access to tobacco. DESIGN: Tobacco and UV irradiation youth access laws were assessed via correspondence with public health offices and computerized legal searches of 6 industrialized nations with widely differing skin cancer incidence rates. SETTING: National, provincial, and state legal systems in Australia, Canada, France, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Public health, legal, information science, and medical professionals and government and tanning industry representatives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statutes specifying age restrictions for the purchase of indoor tanning services or tobacco products. RESULTS: The 5 English-speaking countries with common law-based legal systems unilaterally prohibit youth access to tobacco but rarely limit youth access to UV irradiation from tanning salons. Only very limited regions in the United States and Canada prohibit youth access to indoor tanning facilities: Texas, Illinois, Wisconsin, and New Brunswick prohibit tanning salon use by minors younger than 13, 14, 16, and 18 years, respectively. In contrast, French law allows minors to purchase tobacco but prohibits those younger than 18 years from patronizing tanning salons. CONCLUSIONS: Youth access laws governing indoor tanning display remarkable variety. Uniform indoor tanning youth access laws modeled on the example of tobacco youth access laws merit consideration.


Assuntos
Indústria da Beleza/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação como Assunto , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Canadá , França , Humanos , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA