Full-root aortic valve replacement with stentless xenograft achieves superior regression of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to pericardial stented aortic valves.

BACKGROUND: Full-root aortic valve replacement with stentless xenografts has potentially superior hemodynamic performance compared to stented valves. However, a number of cardiac surgeons are reluctant to transform a classical stented aortic valve replacement into a technically more demanding full-root stentless aortic valve replacement. Here we describe our technique of full-root stentless aortic xenograft implantation and compare the early clinical and midterm hemodynamic outcomes to those after aortic valve replacement with stented valves. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the pre-operative characteristics of 180 consecutive patients who underwent full-root replacement with stentless aortic xenografts with those of 80 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with stented valves. In subgroups presenting with aortic stenosis, we further analyzed the intra-operative data, early postoperative outcomes and mid-term regression of left ventricular mass index. RESULTS: Patients in the stentless group were younger (62.6 ± 13 vs. 70.3 ± 11.8 years, p < 0.0001) but had a higher Euroscore (9.14 ± 3.39 vs.6.83 ± 2.54, p < 0.0001) than those in the stented group. In the subgroups operated for aortic stenosis, the ischemic (84.3 ± 9.8 vs. 62.3 ± 9.4 min, p < 0.0001) and operative times (246.3 ± 53.6 vs. 191.7 ± 53.2 min, p < 0.0001) were longer for stentless versus stented valve implantation. Nevertheless, early mortality (0% vs. 3%, p < 0.25), re-exploration for bleeding (0% vs. 3%, p < 0.25) and stroke (1.8% vs. 3%, p < 0.77) did not differ between stentless and stented groups. One year after the operation, the mean transvalvular gradient was lower in the stentless versus stented group (5.8 ± 2.9 vs. 13.9 ± 5.3 mmHg, p < 0.0001), associated with a significant regression of the left ventricular mass index in the stentless (p < 0.0001) but not in the stented group (p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Our data support that full-root stentless aortic valve replacement can be performed without adversely affecting the early morbidity or mortality in patients operated on for aortic valve stenosis provided that the coronary ostia are not heavily calcified. The additional time necessary for the full-root stentless compared to the classical stented aortic valve replacement is therefore not detrimental to the early clinical outcomes and is largely rewarded in patients with aortic stenosis by lower transvalvular gradients at mid-term and a better regression of their left ventricular mass index.

Inflammatory pseudotumor of the lung with high FDG uptake.

We present the case of a 23-year-old woman with 2 episodes of hemoptysis. Computed tomography showed a small mass lesion with an adjacent cyst in the left lower lobe. On whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, the lesion had a high focal fluorodeoxyglucose-uptake (SUVmax 21.0). Differential diagnosis included tuberculosis, fungal infection, and tumors such as bronchial carcinoma, sarcoma, or rare entities like endometriosis. Bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsies failed to deliver a conclusive diagnosis. Lobectomy was performed, and histopathology presented an inflammatory myofibroblastic pseudotumor.

Left ventricular mass regression following implantation of MIRA bileaflet valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that determine the course of left ventricular mass regression in a homogeneous group of patients following aortic valve replacement by use of the mechanical Edwards MIRA bileaflet prosthesis. Furthermore, we examined if the 19-mm valve leads to an equally good outcome when compared with larger 21- and 23-mm valves. We included 79 patients (49 men) with a mean age of 65+/-9 years operated on for isolated aortic valve replacement with the MIRA valve prosthesis. The analyses included preoperative and postoperative echocardiograms during a follow-up of at least 18 months (995+/-439 days) after valve surgery. Indication for valve replacement was aortic stenosis in 59 and combined disease (aortic stenosis and regurgitation) in 20 patients. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 28 patients. Left ventricular mass index declined from 155.6+/-47 g/m(2) to 128.8+/-35 g/m(2) (P<0.001) at final visit and normalized in 49% of the patients. Female sex and a preoperatively highly elevated left ventricular mass index were identified as risk factors for residual hypertrophy. However, age and valve size did not have a predictive value for completeness of left ventricular mass regression. This study supports the evidence that an extensive preoperative left ventricular hypertrophy results in an incomplete postoperative mass regression in patients with aortic bileaflet valves. It shows that the slightly elevated pressure gradient in MIRA 19-mm valves does not affect left ventricular mass regression.