Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obes Surg ; 24(12): 2048-54, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913243

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of morbid obesity and its co-morbidities is dramatically increasing, as is the extent of weight loss surgery. A large number of patients after various bariatric procedures need revisional intervention for various reasons. We investigated the efficacy and the safety of revisional laparoscopic Roux Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) among our patients, who were revised as a consequence of inadequate weight loss or weight regain after previous bariatric interventions. METHODS: A comparative, double-centre, match pair study was performed comparing the data of 44 patients after revisional surgery with 44 patients after primary gastric bypasses, focusing on weight loss, life quality and improvement of co-morbidities. Matching criteria were age, gender, preoperative BMI and follow-up period. Previous procedures consisted of 23 gastric bandings, 13 sleeve resections, 4 LRYGB and 4 vertical banded gastroplasties. RESULTS: Extra weight loss (EWL) was significantly reduced after revisional gastric bypasses compared to primary intervention (EWL 66 vs. 91 %, p<0.05). Life quality scores were also decreased in the revisional group compared to the control group without statistical significance (SF 36 score 635 vs. 698.5, p=0.22; Moorehead-Aldert II score 1.4 vs. 2.0, p=0.10). The resolution rate of co-morbidities (T2DM, hypertension, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER), osteoarthrosis, sleep apnoea) was also higher after primary gastric bypasses. CONCLUSIONS: Revisional LRYGB is an effective and safe method for patients with inadequate weight loss after previous bariatric surgery concerning weight reduction, life quality and improvement of co-morbidities. Our results indicate lower efficacy of revisional compared to primary LRYGB reaching statistical significance in regard to weight loss.


Assuntos
Anastomose em-Y de Roux/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Reoperação , Adulto , Áustria , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Humanos , Hungria , Hipertensão/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Osteoartrite/complicações , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
2.
Obes Surg ; 21(10): 1592-6, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21538176

RESUMO

The laparoscopic Roux Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the most often performed bariatric surgical intervention. Intraoperative gastroscopy (IOG) seems to be reliable to decrease the leakage rate of gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) and of gastric pouch (GP). Our aim was to test the efficacy and the safety of this method. Two hundred fifty-two LRYGB operations were performed in our institution between 1 January 2008 and 1 January 2010. IOG is routinely made to test the integrity of GJA and of GP. Patients' dates were retrospectively analysed. The intragastric pressure developed during gastroscopy in humans was measured and compared with pressure values led to destruction (positive air test) of the GJA and/or GP in animal models (hybrid pigs). Stomach and bowel wall samples from the test animals without pressure strain, with pressure strain developed at gastroscopy in humans and with pressure strains led to destruction of GJA and/or GP were histologically examined. IOG resulted in six of our cases (2.3%) positive air test. There was no anastomosis insufficiency in postoperative period. Mean pressure during IOG was 32 mmHg, mean time of examination was 3.8 min and mean maximal pressure was 43 mmHg in humans. The mean pressure leading to positive air test in pigs was 150 mmHg. We could not detect any microscopical difference between stomach and jejunum samples without pressure strain and after pressure strain developed in humans during the gastroscopy. We conclude that intraoperative gastroscopy is an effective and safe method to test the integrity of GJA and GP in LRYGB surgery.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Derivação Gástrica , Gastroscopia , Jejuno/cirurgia , Estômago/cirurgia , Adulto , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Magy Seb ; 64(1): 12-7, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21330258

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The incidence of severe obesity and its co-morbidities are growing all over the world. Good long term results can be achieved in only in 5% of the patients by conservative treatment, so bariatric surgical procedures to decrease body weight are more often applied recently. The most often performed bariatric surgical intervention is the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which effectively decreases body weight in addition to having a favourable effect on the relatively frequent co-morbidities associated with severe obesity (such as diabetes type II, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux and locomotor diseases). METHOD: The authors report the results of 47 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and details of the applied surgical procedure are also described. The indication was a Body Mass Index (BMI) higher than 40 kg/m2 and with type II diabetes and severe gastro-esophageal reflux with BMI higher than 35. During the intervention a gastric pouch of 50 ml, an alimentary loop of 1.5 m and a bilio-pancreatic loop of 1 m in length were prepared. Data were collected from our hospital database and questionnaires filled in by the patients after a mean follow-up period of 15.7 months. RESULTS: The mean loss of weight was 51.9 kg, patients gave up 88% of their extra weight. 10 patients suffered from type II diabetes, after the intervention 9 of them became normoglycaemic without diet and medical treatment. The rate of the hypertension, GER and locomotor diseases were significantly improved. There was no mortality and anastomotic insufficiency. 94% of the patients were satisfied with the post-operative results. DISCUSSION: The LRYGB is an effective bariatric surgical procedure that affects favourably type II diabetes, hypertension, GER and locomotor diseases. As regards the biochemical background of the beneficial effects of this surgical intervention on the diabetes further examinations are necessary.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Redução de Peso , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etiologia , Feminino , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/etiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/etiologia , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Obes Surg ; 21(3): 288-94, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20628831

RESUMO

The laparoscopic Roux Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and the laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection are frequently used methods for the treatment of morbid obesity. Quality of life, weight loss and improvement of the co-morbidities were examined. Match pair analysis of the prospectively collected database of the 47 gastric bypass and 47 gastric sleeve resection patients operated on in our hospital was performed. The quality of life parameters were measured with two standard questionnaires (SF 36 and Moorehead-Ardelt II). The mean preoperative and postoperative BMI was in gastric bypass group 46.1 and 28.1 kg/m(2) (mean follow-up: 15.7 months) and in gastric sleeve group 50.3 and 33.5 kg/m(2) (mean follow-up: 38.3 months). The SF 36 questionnaire yielded a mean total score of 671 for the bypass and 611 for the sleeve resection patients (p = 0.06). The Moorehead-Ardelt II test signed a total score of 2.09 for gastric bypass versus 1.70 for gastric sleeve patients (p = 0.13). Ninety percent of the diabetes was resolved in the bypass and 55% in the sleeve resection group. Seventy-three percent of the hypertension patients needed no more antihypertensive treatment after gastric bypass and 30% after sleeve resection. Ninety-two percent of the gastro-oesophageal reflux were resolved in the bypass group and 25% in the sleeve (with 33% progression) group. Ninety-four percent of the patients were satisfied with the result after gastric bypass and 90% after sleeve resection. The patients have scored a high level of satisfaction in both study groups. The gastric bypass is associated with a trend toward a better quality of life without reaching statistical significance, pronounced loss of weight and more remarkable positive effects on the co-morbidities comparing with the gastric sleeve resection.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Feminino , Gastrectomia , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Análise por Pareamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA