Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 38(11): 1082-8, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22902571

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess the rates of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, pelvic lymphoceles, and prolonged drainage duration in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) receiving perioperative bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, 114 RP patients receiving bridging therapy with 60 mg (n = 63) or ≥80 mg (n = 51) Enoxaparin/d were compared to 1327 consecutive RP patients receiving 40 mg Enoxaparin/d. Logistic regression models were used to test the effect of LMWH dosage on all three outcomes. Covariables included age, body mass index (BMI), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), prostate volume, pelvic lymph node dissection, and pathological stage. RESULTS: The RBC transfusion rates in patients treated with 40, 60 and ≥80 mg were 4.9, 9.5 and 19.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). The respective lymphocele rates were 6.4, 3.2 and 2.0% (p = 0.26). The respective rates of drainage duration of ≥4 days were 6.7, 4.8 and 16.7% (p = 0.088). After adjusting for confounding factors, patients receiving ≥80 mg were 4.1-fold more likely to be transfused than patients receiving prophylactic LMWH (p = 0.02). Similarly, patients receiving ≥80 mg were 3.2-fold more likely to have a drainage duration of ≥4 days than patients receiving prophylactic LMWH (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a perioperative bridging with LMWH in RP are more likely to receive a RBC transfusion and to have prolonged drainage duration. Conversely, bridging therapy was not associated with an increased risk of lymphocele formation.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Drenagem , Enoxaparina/administração & dosagem , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Linfocele/etiologia , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Enoxaparina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pelve , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 38(7): 624-9, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22531769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2011 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for prostate cancer recommend a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical prostatectomy (RP) in all individuals with a nomogram predicted lymph node invasion (LNI) risk of >7%. METHODS: To test the performing characteristics for several thresholds (1-14%) and to examine the overall accuracy and calibration plot of the EAU nomogram at our institution. The study population consisted of 3081 patients treated with RP and PLND limited to the obturator fossa and the external iliac vein between 2008 and 2010 at a single European institution from Germany. More extensive PLNDs were performed at the surgeon's discretion. RESULTS: Overall, 260 patients (9.2%) had LNI. The 7% threshold would have avoided 30% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing 8% of patients with LNI. The use of 8% and 9% threshold would have allowed the avoidance of respectively 39% and 48% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing respectively 12% and 14% of patients with LNI. The accuracy of the LNI nomogram was 78%, and the unadjusted departure from ideal calibration was 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed adequate accuracy and calibration of the LNI nomogram. The 7% cut-off may be overly conservative. Better trade-offs between avoided PLNDs and missed LNI cases may be achieved with a limit of 8 or even 9%.


Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Nomogramas , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Calibragem , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Europa (Continente) , Alemanha , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pelve , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/imunologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas
3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 38(1): 80-7, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21996370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To examine the use of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), as well as intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for years 1998-2007. Patients with non-metastatic kidney cancer who underwent OPN or LPN were identified. Propensity-based matching was performed to adjust for potential baseline differences between the two groups. The rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications, blood transfusions, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality were assessed for both procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 7990 (93.9%) and 523 (6.1%) patients underwent OPN and LPN, respectively. Use of LPN increased 19-fold over the study period (P < 0.001). For OPN and LPN respectively, the following rates were recorded: blood transfusions, 9.3 vs. 3.8% (P < 0.001); intraoperative complications, 2.9 vs. 1.5% (P = 0.06); postoperative complications, 15.4 vs. 11.3% (P = 0.01); length of stay ≥5 days, 46.7 vs. 20.8% (P < 0.001); in-hospital mortality, 0.4 vs. 0.4% (P = 0.98). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, LPN patients were less likely to have a blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR]: 0.40, P < 0.001), to experience any postoperative complication (OR: 0.74, P = 0.03), and to be hospitalized for more than 5 days (OR: 0.32, P < 0.001). Post-propensity score matched analyses revealed virtually the same results. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for potential selection biases, LPN is associated with fewer adverse outcomes than OPN. However, the current results should be interpreted with caution, given the lack of tumor characteristics. Furthermore, statistical adjustment is not a substitute for a needed randomized trial.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Viés , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Nefrectomia/mortalidade , Período Pós-Operatório , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Ann Oncol ; 23(4): 973-80, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21890909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We assessed the distribution of site-specific metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) according to age. Moreover, we evaluated recommendations proposed by guidelines and focused specifically on bone and brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) were abstracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2007). Age was stratified into four groups: <55, 55-64, 65-74 and ≥ 75 years. Cochran-Armitage trend test and multivariable logistic regression analysis tested the relationship between age and the rate of multiple metastatic sites. Finally, we examined the rates of brain or bone metastases according to the presence of other metastatic sites. RESULTS: In 11,157 mRCC patients, the rate of multiple metastatic sites decreased with increasing age (P < 0.001). This phenomenon was confirmed in patients with lung, bone, liver and brain metastases (all P ≤ 0.01). The rate of bone metastases was 10% in patients with exclusive abdominal metastases and 49% in patients with abdominal, thoracic and brain metastases. The rate of brain metastases was 2% in patients with exclusive abdominal metastases and 16% in patients with thoracic and bone metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with multiple metastatic sites is higher in young patients. The rates of bone (10%-49%) and brain (2%-16%) metastases are nonnegligible in mRCC patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco
6.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 37(5): 429-34, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21492776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: On average, patients remain hospitalized no more than 2 days after MIRP. The aim of our study was to examine the temporal trends in length of stay ≥ 3 days and to test the relationship between annual surgical volume (ASV) and annual hospital volume (AHV) and length of stay ≥ 3 days in patients undergoing MIRP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the Florida Hospital Inpatient Datafile, 2439 men who were treated with MIRP for prostate cancer between 2005 and 2008 were identified. Temporal trends were assessed and uni and multi-variable logistic regression models tested the relationship between ASV, AHV and length of stay ≥ 3 days. RESULTS: The average length of stay decreased from 2.4 in 2005 to 1.7 days in 2008. Length of stay ≥ 3 days was recorded in 13.6% of patients and the proportion of patients staying more than ≥ 3 days decreased over time (25.5-12.2%; Chi Square trend p < 0.001). After stratification into low (<1-15 MIRPs) vs. intermediate (16-63 MIRPs) vs. high ASV tertiles (≥ 64 MIRPs) the proportion of patients with length of stay ≥ 3 days were 29.1; 13.2 and 11.1%. In multivariable logistic regression models predicting length of stay ≥ 3 days, ASV, year of surgery and comorbidities achieved independent predictor status and MIRP patients operated by highest ASV tertile surgeons were 71% (p < 0.001) less likely to be hospitalized for more than 3 days. CONCLUSION: The length of stay after MIRP decreased between 2005 and 2008. Surgical expertise represented one of the main determinants of shorter length of stay.


Assuntos
Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Florida , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA