Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for occupational exposure of hairdressers to hair dye ingredients.

Occupational exposure of hairdressers to hair dyes has been associated with the development of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) involving the hands. p-Phenylenediamine (PPD) and toluene-2,5-diamine (PTD) have been implicated as important occupational contact allergens. To conduct a quantitative risk assessment for the induction of contact sensitization to hair dyes in hairdressers, available data from hand rinsing studies following typical occupational exposure conditions to PPD, PTD and resorcinol were assessed. By accounting for wet work, uneven exposure and inter-individual variability for professionals, daily hand exposure concentrations were derived. Secondly, daily hand exposure was compared with the sensitization induction potency of the individual hair dye defined as the No Expected Sensitization Induction Levels (NESIL). For PPD and PTD hairdresser hand exposure levels were 2.7 and 5.9 fold below the individual NESIL. In contrast, hand exposure to resorcinol was 50 fold below the NESIL. Correspondingly, the risk assessment for PPD and PTD indicates that contact sensitization may occur, when skin protection and skin care are not rigorously applied. We conclude that awareness of health risks associated with occupational exposure to hair dyes, and of the importance of adequate protective measures, should be emphasized more fully during hairdresser education and training.

Self-testing for contact sensitization to hair dyes--scientific considerations and clinical concerns of an industry-led screening programme.

The cosmetic industry producing hair dyes has, for many years, recommended that their consumers perform 'a hair dye allergy self-test' or similar prior to hair dyeing, to identify individuals who are likely to react upon subsequent hair dyeing. This review offers important information on the requirements for correct validation of screening tests, and concludes that, in its present form, the hair dye self-test has severe limitations: (i) it is not a screening test but a diagnostic test; (ii) it has not been validated according to basic criteria defined by scientists; (iii) it has been evaluated in the wrong population group; (iv) skin reactions have been read by dermatologists and not by the targeted group (consumers and hairdressers); (v) hair dyes contain strong and extreme sensitizers that are left on the skin in high concentrations, potentially resulting in active sensitization; and (vi) recommendations and instructions on how to perform the hair dye self-test vary greatly even among products from the same company, again suggesting that the basis for safe use of the test has not been determined. If the use of a hair dye self-test to predict contact sensitization becomes widespread, there is severe risk that a tool has been marketed that may cause morbidity in European consumers.

Is cocamidopropyl betaine a contact allergen? Analysis of network data and short review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: There is no general agreement on whether cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) is a skin sensitizer. OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence for CAPB being a (non-)sensitizer. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data on patch testing with CAPB 1% aqua collected by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology from 1996 to 2009, with a focus on the patch test reaction profile, and demographic and clinical features of CAPB positives, supplemented by a literature review. RESULTS: Eighty-three thousand eight hundred and sixty-four patients were patch tested with CAPB 1% aqua, yielding 2.16% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06-2.26%] positive (2.03% + and 0.13% + + /+ + + ) and 4.6% non-allergic reactions. Thus, the reaction index was-0.368 and the positivity ratio was 94.2%. Reproducibility on synchronous patch testing (n = 6534) was poor [Cohen's kappa: 0.29 (95% CI 0.25-0.32)] and results upon retesting (n = 1157) were almost non-reproducible [kappa: 0.12 (95% CI 0.05-0.19]. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed an increased risk associated with being male and aged ≥40 years, with atopic dermatitis, with scalp dermatitis, with being a hairdresser, and with a 48-hr patch test application. When only + + or + + + reactions were used as a conservative outcome, only the elevated risk in males and in patients with atopic dermatitis remained significant. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of positive reactions to CAPB are presumably false positive. Allergic reactions are very rare. This would support the notion of CAPB being 'not a significant skin sensitizer', in line with current classification systems.

Nickel allergy is still frequent in young German females - probably because of insufficient protection from nickel-releasing objects.

BACKGROUND: Nickel contact allergy is still frequent both in patch-tested patients and in the general population. Objectives. To explain this observation by relating clinical epidemiological data with recent chemical analyses of nickel release from costume jewellery. METHODS: (i) The trend of nickel allergy was analysed using data registered between January 1994 and December 2009 in the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. (ii) In 2008, different parts of items of costume jewellery purchased at random on the German market (n = 609) were analysed for nickel release according to EN 1811:1998 + A1:2008 in five official German laboratories of food and non-food INVESTIGATION. RESULTS: (i) Between 1994 and 2009, nickel allergy decreased in men (18-30 years) and in women (1-17 and 18-30 years); however, after 2000, there was no significant decrease in nickel allergy in the women aged 1-17 years. (ii) Of the post-assemblies, 28.0% exceeded the migration limit of ≥0.2 µg/cm(2) per week, and 5% released ≥26.8 µg/cm(2) per week. In articles with direct and prolonged contact with the skin, 12.8% of decorative parts and 17.1% of clasps exceeded the migration limit. If an adjustment factor was applied, according to the above norm, about half of the items otherwise rejected became acceptable. CONCLUSION: Exposure to nickel-containing products exceeding the (unnecessarily relaxed) permitted limit may explain why nickel contact allergy remains a problem.

Genetic factors in contact allergy--review and future goals.

The genetics of contact allergy are still only partly understood, despite decades of research; this might be a consequence of inadequately defined phenotypes used in the past. A recommendation is to study an extreme phenotype, namely, polysensitization (sensitization to three or more unrelated allergens). Another approach to unravel the genetics of contact allergy is the study of candidate genes. In this review, we summarize studies on the associations between genetic variation (e.g. single-nucleotide polymorphisms) in certain candidate genes and contact allergy. Polymorphisms and mutations affecting the following proteins were studied: (i) filaggrin; (ii) N-acetyltransferase (NAT) 1 and 2; (iii) glutathione-S-transferase (GST) M and T; (iv) manganese superoxide dismutase; (v) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE); (vi) tumour necrosis factor (TNF); and (vii) interleukin-16 (IL-16). The polymorphisms of NAT1, NAT2, GSTM, GSTT, ACE, TNF and IL-16 were shown to be associated with an increased risk of contact allergy. In one of our studies, the increased risk conferred by the TNF and IL-16 polymorphisms was confined to polysensitized individuals. Other relevant candidate genes may be identified by studying diseases related to contact allergy in terms of clinical symptoms, a more general pathology (inflammation), and possibly an overlapping genetic background, such as irritant contact dermatitis.

Occupational contact allergy in the building trade in Germany: influence of preventive measures and changing exposure.

PURPOSE: Since 1993, assiduous efforts have been made in Germany to lower the incidence of allergic cement dermatitis by reducing the content of hexavalent chromium (Cr VI). Usage of epoxy resin systems has considerably increased in the building trade in the same period. We analysed data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) to evaluate the influence of these changing occupational exposures on frequencies of sensitization. METHODS: IVDK data of 1,153 men working in the building trade (bricklayers, tile setters etc.) presenting with occupational skin disease in the years 1994-2008 were analysed, taking into consideration not only the year of patch testing, but also beginning and duration of work in the building trade. RESULTS: While contact sensitization to chromate decreased from 43.1 to 29.0%, sensitization to epoxy resin increased from 8.4 to 12.4%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared to those who had already worked before 1994, patients having started to work in building trade after 1999 had a significantly decreased risk of chromate sensitization (odds ratio 0.42) and a significantly increased risk of sensitization to epoxy resin (odds ratio 2.79). Additionally, risk of thiuram sensitization increased with the duration of employment. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that reducing Cr VI content of cement is useful in preventing allergic cement eczema, as previously found in Scandinavia. In contrast, the increasing prevalence of contact sensitization to epoxy resin components in the building trade is alarming. Preventive measures, which have already been implemented, have to be enforced.

Meteorological conditions and the diagnosis of occupationally related contact sensitizations.

OBJECTIVES: An accurate diagnosis of (occupational) contact sensitization by patch testing is a prerequisite for efficient preventive management. However, previously observed seasonal fluctuations in patch-test reactions indicate some influence of meteorological conditions. The present analysis aims at quantifying the possible impact of temperature and humidity on patch-test reactions to occupationally related allergens. METHODS: Clinical data from 61 780 patients tested with standard series allergens potentially related to occupational exposure from 1993 through 2001 were collected by a contact sensitization surveillance network.The association between the patch-test results and meteorological data (air temperature and humidity) collected at the time and the approximate location of the testing was analyzed in a multinomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: For three allergens (a dye and two biocides), the odds of irritant or doubtful allergic reactions increased during cold and arid conditions. Two of them (pphenylenediamine and formaldehyde) also showed an association between weak positive allergic reactions and such weather. In contrast, reactions to various adhesive, plastic, and rubber-related allergens were not associated with weather conditions. CONCLUSIONS: An overall increase in skin irritation, brought on by cold and dry conditions, may instigate an increase in positive reactions by leading doubtful allergic reactions to be (falsely) categorized as allergic for at least two of the considered allergens. For the most part, however, weather conditions were not associated with reactions to occupational allergens. Thus the validity of patch testing does not largely seem to be compromised by ambient meteorological conditions.

Cytokine gene polymorphisms in allergic contact dermatitis.

Susceptibility to contact allergy may be influenced by genetically determined alterations in the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. This report focuses on functional polymorphisms in the genes encoding for several cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of contact allergic responses, including tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (G-238 A, G-308 A), interleukin (IL)-1beta (C-511G, T+ 3953C), its natural antagonist, the IL-1 receptor antagonist (VNTR intron 2), and IL-6 (G-174C). Polymorphisms were investigated by PCR techniques among polysensitized individuals, defined as individuals with confirmed contact sensitization to para-substituted aryl compounds and at least one other structurally unrelated allergen (n = 86), and healthy control individuals without a history of eczema (n = 310). The distribution of TNFA-308 genotypes was significantly different in these groups (Padjusted= 0.0378). Compared with carriers of 2 wild-type alleles (TNFA-308*1/1 (*G/G)), carriers of the TNFA-308*1/2 (*G/A) and TNFA-308*2/2 (*A/A) genotypes tended to be more common among polysensitized individuals [OR = 1.54, 95% CI (0.92-2.55) and OR = 2.36 (0.84-6.51), respectively]. No significantly different distribution of genotypes was detected at any other polymorphic loci among control individuals without eczema and polysensitized subjects. These findings suggest a possible relationship between the TNFA-308 polymorphism and contact allergy. The results need to be confirmed in future studies.