Traditional versus Laterally Extended Upper Blepharoplasty Skin Excisions: Objective and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Different skin excision shapes may result in different aesthetic outcomes after upper blepharoplasty. METHODS: Two skin-only excision shapes were evaluated objectively and subjectively in 28 matched patients with laterally extended skin excision (group A) or traditional elliptical skin excision (group B). The pretarsal show, lateral eyebrow height, amount of scarring (evaluated with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale), and patient-reported aesthetic results (evaluated using FACE-Q) were scored and compared at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In both groups, pretarsal show improved significantly after blepharoplasty. The homogeneity of pretarsal show improved significantly in the lateral extension group (group A) together with slightly more pretarsal show (0.5 to 0.8 mm at central pupil region) at 6 and 12 months of follow-up compared with group B ( P = 0.004). A trend was observed in the exocanthion 45-degree measurement, in which group A had 0.6 mm greater pretarsal show 6 months postoperatively. Homogeneity of the pretarsal show had improved significantly in group A, but not in group B, at 12 months after blepharoplasty. No other significant differences were observed between the groups regarding pretarsal show measurements or FACE-Q scores. Both groups showed descent of the lateral eyebrow, but this was only significant in group B. Group B showed 1.4 to 2.0 mm more descent compared with group A. Scarring and adverse effects scores were low in both groups and did not differ. CONCLUSION: Laterally extended skin excision and traditional elliptical skin excision both result in positive aesthetic results, but the laterally extended skin excision technique is accompanied by a slightly more favorable outcome. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Patients' appreciation of pre-implant augmentation of the severely resorbed maxilla with calvarial or anterior iliac crest bone:a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of bone graft harvesting for pre-implant augmentation of the maxilla from a patient's perspective. To assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) related to augmentation of the extremely resorbed edentulous maxilla with calvarial or anterior iliac crest bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this randomised controlled trial, 20 consecutive edentulous patients needing extensive pre-implant surgery of the maxilla were randomly assigned to either calvarial (n = 10) or anterior iliac crest (n = 10) bone harvesting. Patient reports on procedure-related satisfaction, questionnaires on oral functionality (denture satisfaction, chewing ability) and oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-49NL) and subjective donor site-related outcomes (e.g. of post-operative pain, scar formation, physical mobility) were assessed. RESULTS: Irrespective of the harvesting site, patients were generally satisfied (median VAS score 93 (86-99) mm, p = 0.400) with the procedure and its final results. Post-operative pain was mild (median 40 (20-40) mm) and decreased to no pain (4 (0-16) mm) within 14 days. Early post-operative pain was significantly higher following anterior iliac crest harvesting (p < 0.00). Impact on physical mobility, daily functioning and satisfaction with the scar formation were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The assessed PROMs confirmed that bone graft harvesting from the calvarium or anterior iliac crest is an appropriate procedure, reflected by high levels of satisfaction, minor long-term sequela and improvement of perceived oral health. For clinical decision-making, decisions can be based on individual features and preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR, NTR3968 , registered 1 July 2013.

Immediate dental implant placement in calvarial bone grafts to rehabilitate the severely resorbed edentulous maxilla: A prospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the surgical technique of immediate dental implant placement in calvarial grafts for augmentation of the severely resorbed maxilla and to assess the treatment results. METHODS: In 13 patients the maxilla was augmented with calvarial bone followed by simultaneous dental implant placement (total: 68 implants). In the frontal "knife edge" region, implants were inserted in the buccal plated area. In the maxillary sinus area, implants were inserted into alveolar bone that was plated buccally or palatally through the sinus window. After 4 months, the implants were retrieved and subsequently loaded. Per-operative and post-operative variables were scored. One bone biopsy sample was taken for histological analysis. RESULTS: The surgical procedure and wound healing was uneventful. During abutment connection after 4 months, all implants were fully osseointegrated with no signs of graft resorption. Radiographically, the mean (±SD) peri-implant bone loss after 1 year of functional loading was 0.23 ± 0.44 mm. No implants were lost. Histological examination revealed vital calvarial and maxillary bone with active remodeling. CONCLUSION: Immediate dental implant placement in calvarial bone grafts to rehabilitate severely resorbed maxilla is technically feasible and seems to have a high success rate.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Wound Dehiscence After Intraoral Bone Grafting in the Nonirradiated Patient: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: In maxillofacial surgery, hyperbaric oxygen treatment is used almost exclusively as adjunctive therapy for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible in irradiated patients. It also is used to prevent the occurrence of osteoradionecrosis in the irradiated patient when dental surgery is indicated. Theoretically, hyperbaric oxygen therapy should benefit the nonirradiated patient in maxillofacial surgery (eg, patients with persistent intraoral wound dehiscences after bone grafting). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six nonirradiated patients underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy because of compromised wound healing after intraoral bone grafting of the maxilla as a preimplant procedure. All patients were treated 7 to 26 times with hyperbaric oxygen therapy at 2.5 ATA. RESULTS: All patients healed uneventfully. In retrospect, almost all patients had a history of chronic maxillary sinusitis or trauma to the operated area. CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy seems to be an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of nonirradiated patients with compromised intraoral maxillary bone graft healing. Chronic maxillary sinus problems or a history of trauma could predispose to wound dehiscence after bone grafting.

Donor site morbidity of anterior iliac crest and calvarium bone grafts: A comparative case-control study.

PURPOSE: Notwithstanding its donor site morbidity, autogenous bone graft harvesting is still considered the gold standard for cases of extreme resorption of the alveolar ridge. The aim of this study was to assess donor site morbidity of calvarium and anterior iliac crest harvesting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 27 edentulous patients who had undergone calvarial bone harvesting were matched with 27 edentulous patients in which anterior iliac crest bone was harvested. All patients had been treated between March 2011 and December 2013. Patients were matched according to age, sex, and duration of follow-up. Donor site morbidity was assessed by medical records, patient questionnaires, and physical examination. Patients were recalled to assess persisting morbidity of the harvesting procedure. RESULTS: Exposure of the dura occurred in three patients in the calvarial group. Postoperative pain (based on a visual analog scale) after harvesting was significantly higher in the anterior iliac crest group. Scars were significantly longer and contours deficits were significantly more prominent after calvarial harvesting, although not bothersome to the patients. Long-term pain was negligible in both groups, and satisfaction with the procedure did not differ. CONCLUSION: Both harvesting techniques were accompanied by low long-term donor site morbidity and high patient satisfaction.

Safe harvesting of outer table parietal bone grafts using an oscillating saw and a bone scraper: a refinement of technique for harvesting cortical and "cancellous"-like calvarial bone.

Calvarial bone is a readily available source of bone for preimplantation augmentation procedures of the alveolar process. However, the calvaria consist mostly of cortical bone, and cancellous bone of the diploic space is scarce. A bone scraper (Safescraper Twist; META, Reggio Emilia, Italy) was used to create a beveled trough around the calvarial outer table graft to facilitate its removal with an oscillating saw. Using the scraper, copious amounts (>10 mL) of "cancellous"-like bone could be collected. This new application of the Safescraper Twist obviated milling down additional cortical pieces.

Ultrasound to stimulate early bone formation in a distraction gap: a double blind randomised clinical pilot trial in the edentulous mandible.

OBJECTIVE: In a double blind randomised clinical pilot trial, it was investigated whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy stimulates early bone formation in a distraction gap created in a severely resorbed mandible. DESIGN: Eight patients underwent a mandibular vertical distraction over an average distance of 6.6+/-1.1mm. Ultrasound self-therapy or placebo therapy was started on the first day of distraction and continued daily until the implants were inserted. After 31+/-3.8 days of consolidation, the distraction device was removed, a transmandibular biopsy was taken, and two endosseous implants were inserted. RESULTS: All patients complied well with ultrasound therapy. During an average of 30.1+/-4.1 months follow-up, no complications did occur. Microradiographic examination of the biopsies revealed a comparable mean area of mineralised tissue in the distraction gap of 1.9+/-1.7mm(2) in the ultrasound treatment group and 1.9+/-1.3mm(2) in the placebo treatment group. Histological examination indicated that active woven bone was present within the distraction gap just adjacent to the osteotomy plane, with no apparent differences between the treatment groups. The lamellar bone formation outside the distraction gap appeared to have started as well. CONCLUSION: During a 31-day consolidation period, ultrasound treatment does not appear to stimulate bone formation in the severely resorbed vertical distracted mandible and it seems that this period is too short to evaluate properly if there is an effect. Therefore, a longer consolidation period has to be studied.

Ultrasound to stimulate mandibular bone defect healing: a placebo-controlled single-blind study in rats.

PURPOSE: Because of the limitations of the body to heal large maxillofacial bone defects, an attempt was made to stimulate mandibular defect healing with low intensity pulsed ultrasound in rats. This ultrasound consists of a 1.5-MHz pressure wave administered in pulses of 200 microsec, with an average intensity over space and time of 30 mW. cm(-2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 72 rats, a 5.0-mm-diameter circular mandibular defect was created. Three groups were studied: an ultrasound treatment group, a placebo treatment group, and a control group. Ultrasound and placebo treatment involved a daily treatment for 20 minutes at the site of the defect under general anesthesia. At 2 and 4 weeks, the region of bone growth within the defect was measured using microradiographs and the amount of defect healing was expressed as the percentage of defect closure. RESULTS: At 2 and 4 weeks, there was no statistical significant difference in the percentage of defect closure between the groups. CONCLUSION: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound does not stimulate bone defect healing in the case of a large mandibular defect in the rat.