Patterns of Care and Utilization of Radiation for Women With Good-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Purpose/objective(s) Lumpectomy followed by whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) provides a 50% recurrence rate reduction in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients when compared to lumpectomy alone. Certain factors increase the risk of recurrence, including higher nuclear grade, large size, age less than 50, and close margins. RTOG 9804 demonstrated a reduction in local failure after WBRT with the use of adjuvant radiation in women with "good-risk disease" (mammographically detected, measuring less than or equal to 2.5 cm, with a predominant nuclear grade of 1 or 2, and a margin of greater than or equal to 1 cm, or a negative re-excision). The purpose of this study is to retrospectively identify the patterns of care in women with low-risk DCIS utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We hypothesize that with the utilization of hypofractionation, there may be an increase in the delivery of RT for these "good-risk" patients. Materials/methods The National Cancer Database was queried to identify women treated with lumpectomy for <2.5 cm, nuclear grade 1 or 2 DCIS of the breast from 2004 to 2016. Data were collected regarding age, tumor size, endocrine therapy use, ER receptor status, race, insurance type, and distance from the treatment center. The distance was stratified into quartiles consisting of 0-3.9, 4-8, 8.1-15.8, and > 15.8 miles, respectively. Radiation fractionation was collected and categorized as hypofractionation, standard fractionation, or other if fractionation could not be ascertained. Clinical and patient-related factors were compared between patients who received radiation and those who received no radiation. The frequency distributions between categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify covariables that impacted the receipt of radiation. Results The eligibility criteria were met by a total of 12,846 patients. Of those, 6,600 (51.4%) received adjuvant WBRT. On multivariable regression, patients whose tumors were ER (OR 1.24, P<0.001) and those who had not received endocrine therapy (OR 2.24, P<0.001) were more likely to receive WBRT. Factors less likely to receive WBRT included increasing age over 50 (age 50-65 OR 0.83, P<0.001; age>65 OR 0.58, P<0.001), and distance of >15.8 miles (OR 0.78, P<0.001). The fractionation technique was categorized as standard or hypofractionated in 52.2% of patients. Of those, the use of hypofractionation increased from 0.4% in 2004 to 8.9% in 2010 and to 53.8% in 2016. Conclusion This NCDB analysis demonstrated that patients who meet the RTOG 9804 criteria for "good-risk" DCIS are less likely to receive RT as time progresses despite an increase in the utilization of hypofractionation techniques. Overall, slightly more than half of these patients receive adjuvant RT.

Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Low-Lying Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Rectum.

PURPOSE: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the rectum is a unique entity that lacks definitive guidelines regarding prognosis and treatment. This study aimed to analyze patterns of care and survival for SCC and adenocarcinoma (AC) of the rectum. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with stage I-III SCC or AC of the rectum treated from 2004 to 2016 from the National Cancer Database. The treatment groups analyzed were surgery alone (S), chemoradiation followed by surgery (CRT + S), surgery followed by chemoradiation (S + CRT), and definitive chemoradiation (CRT). Patient- and clinical-related factors were compared. Overall survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression models. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 21,587 (97.1%) were AC and 640 (2.9%) were SCC. Among patients with AC, most (n = 8549, 59.4%) received chemoradiation followed by surgery; those with SCC (n = 305, 66.4%) received definitive chemoradiation. Among patients who received surgery, the majority (69.2%) with AC histology had a low anterior resection while the majority (52.1%) of SCC had an abdominoperineal resection. Five-year overall survival of AC versus SCC in the entire cohort was 61.6% versus 56.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis for AC, CRT + S (HR 0.61, p < 0.001), or S + CRT (HR 0.67, p < 0.001) had improved survival compared to S alone while those who had definitive CRT (HR 1.55, p < 0.001) had worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: SCC of the rectum tends to be treated like anal cancers with definitive chemoradiation, with similar survival to historical reports of anal cancer. AC of the rectum is most commonly treated under the rectal cancer paradigm.

Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities and Survival of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in epidemiology of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with regards to human papillomavirus (HPV), race, and socioeconomic status (SES) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in survival of OPSCC have been previously acknowledged. However, the distribution of HPV-related cancers and its influence on survival in conjunction with race and SES remain unclear. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All patients with OPSCC in the NCDB with known HPV status from 2010 to 2016 were included. Differences in presentation, HPV status, treatment, and outcomes were compared along racial and socioeconomic lines. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 45,940 patients met criteria. Most were male (38,038, 82.8%), older than 60 years (23,456, 51.5%), and white (40,156, 87.4%), and lived in higher median income areas (>$48,000, 28,587, 62.2%). Two-thirds were HPV positive (31,007, 67.5%). HPV-negative disease was significantly more common in lower SES (<$38,000, 2937, 41.5%, P < .001) and among blacks (1784, 55.3%, P < .001). Median follow-up was 33 months. Five-year overall survival was 81.3% (95% CI, 80.5%-82.1%) and 59.6% (95% CI, 58.2%-61.0%) in HPV-positive and HPV-negative groups, respectively. In univariable and multivariable analyses controlling for HPV status, age, stage, and treatment, black race (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.34; P < .001) and low SES (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.45-1.72; P < .001) were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in HPV status exist between socioeconomic and racial groups, with HPV-negative disease more common among blacks and lower SES. When controlling for HPV status, race and SES still influence outcomes in oropharyngeal cancers.

Patterns of Care and Survival of Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare, aggressive variant of breast cancer, usually triple negative disease and chemotherapy refractory. Despite this, the standard of care remains the same as invasive ductal breast cancer. We sought to analyze patterns of care and outcomes among patients with metastatic MBC. METHODS: Patients over 18 years diagnosed with metastatic MBC from 2004-2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinical and demographic details were compared between two groups (chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy). Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of receiving chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival (OS) and Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of covariates on OS. RESULTS: There were 7,580 patients with MBC of which 417 (5.5%) presented with metastatic disease. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54-76) and median follow up for living patients was 48 months (IQR 31-77). One hundred and fifty-six (37.4%) patients received chemotherapy. On multivariable logistic regression analyses, treatment at an academic facility was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving chemotherapy (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.95-5.03, p<0.001) while age ≥65 years (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86, p=0.009) and receipt of hormonal therapy (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.85, p=0.021) were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, higher Charlson-Deyo score (hazard ratio (HR) 1.35-1.78, p<0.05) was associated with worse survival while receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.99, p=0.041) and having insurance (HR 0.34-0.47, p<0.05) were associated with improved survival. Patients who received chemotherapy had improved median (twelve versus eight months), one-year (51% versus 38%), and two-year (35% versus 21%) OS, as compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy (p=0.006).  Conclusions: In this study of MBC patients, there was a survival benefit with palliative chemotherapy in the setting of metastatic disease. As expected, treatment was most often given to younger patients.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Fractionation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States.

Introduction This study aims to analyze the patterns of care, including fractionation and utilization, of hypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with HCC from 2004 to 2014 and treated with SABR in three, four, or five fractions in 15-20Gy, 10-13Gy, or 6-12Gy per fraction, respectively. Patients with stage IV and Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index > 0 were excluded in order to avoid bias resulting from the selection of poorer prognosis patients. The patients were then stratified based on several characteristics including biologically equivalent doses (BEDs) of =/> 100 Gy and <100 Gy to determine whether there was an association with overall survival (OS) and a multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to assess for potential confounding factors.  Results There were 462 patients identified in whom the most common SABR fractionation regimen was 10Gy x five fractions (25.3%), followed by 8Gy x five fractions (17.7%), and 15-16Gy x three fractions (26.4%). A total of 152 patients were treated to a BED < 100Gy, which was associated with a median OS of 20.8 months (95% CI 14.55-27.11). Three hundred and ten patients were treated to a BED =/> 100Gy, which was associated with a median OS of 30.8 months (95% CI 5.25-32.08). On MVA, BED =/> 100Gy was not significantly associated with improved OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.14, p = 0.28). Factors that were associated with significantly worse survival were tumor size in the largest quartile (HR 2.197 CI 1.440-3.354, p < 0.0001) and T3a disease (HR 2.474 CI 1.472-4.158, p = 0.001 compared to T1).  Conclusion SABR fractionation schemes vary widely, but are most commonly 10Gy x five fractions followed by 8Gy x five fractions and 15Gy x three fractions. BED of at least 100Gy is not associated with improved OS. Further studies are needed to best identify the optimal SABR dose and fractionation.

Patterns of Care and Survival of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma of the Head and Neck.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the patterns of care and survival of cutaneous angiosarcomas of the head and neck. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National Cancer Database. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to select patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck between 2004 and 2015. For survival analysis, patients were included only if they received definitive treatment and complete data. Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 693 patients diagnosed with head and neck angiosarcomas during the study period. The majority were male (n = 489, 70.6%) and elderly (median, 77 years). A total of 421 patients (60.8%) met the criteria for survival analyses. These patients were treated with surgery and radiation (n = 178, 42.3%), surgery alone (n = 138, 32.8%), triple-modality therapy (n = 48, 11.4%), surgery and chemotherapy (n = 29, 6.9%), and chemoradiation (n = 28, 6.7%). With a median follow-up of 29 months, the 3-year survival was 50.1%. Patients undergoing surgery had better median survival than those who did not (38.1 vs 21.0 months, P = .04). Age, comorbidity, tumor size, and surgical margins were significant factors in univariate analyses. On multivariable analysis, age ≥75 years (hazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.80-3.88; P < .001) and positive margins (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.44-2.51; P < .001) predicted worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: Angiosarcoma of head and neck is a rare malignancy that affects the elderly. Surgical treatment with negative margins is associated with improved survival. Even with curative-intent multimodality treatment, the survival of patients aged ≥75 years is limited.

Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Node-Positive Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The literature has been conflicting on the superiority of adjuvant chemoradiation over chemotherapy for node-positive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas following definitive surgery. We aimed to evaluate the patterns of care and outcomes of these two treatment options using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic, node-positive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas from 2006 to 2014 who received oncologic resection with negative margins were identified in the NCDB. Patient- and clinical-related factors were compared between those who received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (aC) versus adjuvant chemoradiation (aCRT). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of adjuvant chemoradiation use. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival (OS) and Cox regression analysis was used to assess impact of covariables on OS. RESULTS: There were 3609 patients who met the study criteria, of which 2988 (82.8%) received chemotherapy alone and 621 (17.2%) who received chemoradiation. Median follow up for living patients was 33.8 months (IQR 22-51). On multivariable logistic regression, those who received treatment in more recent years of diagnoses (OR 0.21-0.37, p < 0.001) were less likely to receive aCRT over aC. Two-year OS for those who received chemo alone was 44.9% and for chemoradiation was 42.6% (p = 0.169). This finding was sustained on multivariable survival analysis (HR 0.99, p = 0.867). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy alone for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is the predominant treatment of choice among US hospitals. There was no overall survival benefit noted in those who were treated with adjuvant chemoradiation.

Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes in the Treatment of Anal Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Anal mucosal melanoma is an uncommon malignancy of the anal canal, with few large studies available to establish clear trends in the treatment modalities presently available. The primary goal of this study was to identify the patterns of care in the treatment of anal melanoma and secondarily to determine outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB). A total of 787 patients diagnosed with anal melanoma between 2004 and 2014 were selected, of which 398 had staging information. The four treatment groups analyzed were surgical excision alone, surgical excision and radiation therapy, surgical excision and immunotherapy/chemotherapy, and radiation therapy plus minus immunotherapy/chemotherapy. Treatment was grouped by extent of disease; the Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze overall survival and multivariate Cox proportional model was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: The majority of patients presented with either node-positive (39.4%) or metastatic disease (37.4%). Patients with surgical excision and radiation therapy had the highest median survival at 32.3 months. This is in contrast with those receiving surgical excision alone (22.9 months), surgery and immunotherapy/chemotherapy (18.4 months), and radiation without surgery (5.1 months) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with surgical excision was the most common initial treatment with no single modality superior over another in this rare entity.

Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess treatment choices among men with prostate cancer who presented at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center multidisciplinary (MultiD) clinic compared with nationwide trends. METHODS: In total, 4451 men with prostate cancer who presented at the MultiD clinic from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. To assess nationwide trends, the authors analyzed 392,710 men with prostate cancer who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary endpoint was treatment choice as a function of pretreatment demographics. RESULTS: Univariate analyses revealed similar treatment trends in the MultiD and SEER cohorts. The use of procedural forms of definitive therapy decreased with age, including brachytherapy and prostatectomy (all P < .05). Later year of diagnosis/clinic visit was associated with decreased use of definitive treatments, whereas higher risk grouping was associated with increased use (all P < .001). Patients with low-risk disease treated at the MultiD clinic were more likely to receive nondefinitive therapy than patients in SEER, whereas the opposite trend was observed for patients with high-risk disease, with a substantial portion of high-risk patients in SEER not receiving definitive therapy. In the MultiD clinic, African American men with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease were more likely to receive definitive therapy than white men, but for SEER the opposite was true. CONCLUSIONS: Presentation at a MultiD clinic facilitates the appropriate disposition of patients with low-risk disease to nondefinitive strategies of patients with high-risk disease to definitive treatment, and it may obviate the influence of race.

Patterns of Care and Comparison of Outcomes Between Primary Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Anal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The management of adenocarcinoma of the anus can be challenging because there are few data on outcomes and trends in its treatment to date. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare and analyze the patterns of care and survival outcomes of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma and anal adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTING: This study was performed by utilizing the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS: We selected a total of 19,539 patients between 2004 and 2014 with stage II to III squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the anus. INTERVENTION: The treatment groups analyzed were surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation, or definitive chemoradiation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient- and clinical-related factors were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess overall survival. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 18,346 (93.9%) had primary squamous cell carcinoma and 1193 (6.1%) had primary adenocarcinoma of the anus. The 5-year overall survival for stage II squamous cell carcinoma was 69.2%, and, for stage II adenocarcinoma, 5-year overall survival was 54.2% (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival for stage III squamous cell carcinoma was 55.2%, and, for stage III adenocarcinoma, 5-year overall survival was 32.9% (p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, treatment with chemoradiation alone (HR, 0.67; p = 0.008) was associated with improved survival in squamous cell carcinoma. For the adenocarcinoma group, stage III disease (HR, 2.26; p < 0.001) and high tumor grade (HR, 1.59; p < 0.011) had a negative impact on survival, but there were no differences in survival based on the type of treatment received. LIMITATIONS: The National Cancer Database does not include information on specific chemotherapeutic or immunotherapy agents given to patients, nor does it provide the exact cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: Anal adenocarcinoma in comparison to anal squamous cell carcinoma had a lower 5-year overall survival stage for stage. Anal adenocarcinoma appears to be treated similarly to the rectal cancer paradigm, with frequent use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B50. PATRONES DE EL CUIDADO Y COMPARACIÓN DE RESULTADOS ENTRE EL CARCINOMA DE CÉLULAS ESCAMOSAS ANAL PRIMARIO Y EL ADENOCARCINOMA ANAL: El tratamiento del adenocarcinoma del ano puede ser un desafío ya que hasta la fecha, hay pocos datos sobre los resultados y las tendencias en su tratamiento.Comparar y analizar los patrones de el cuidado y resultados de supervivencia de pacientes con carcinoma anal de células escamosas y adenocarcinoma anal.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo.Este estudio se realizó utilizando la Base de Datos Nacional de Cancer (National Cancer Database, NCB).Seleccionamos un total de 19,539 pacientes entre el 2004-2014 con carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio II-III o adenocarcinoma del ano.Los grupos de tratamiento analizados fueron solo cirugía, quimiorradiación neoadyuvante seguida por cirugía, cirugía seguida por quimiorradiación adyuvante o quimiorradiación definitiva.Se compararon los factores clínicos y de pacientes entre los dos grupos. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Kaplan-Meier y Cox para evaluar la supervivencia general.18,346 (93.9%) tenían carcinoma primario de células escamosas y 1,193 (6.1%) tenían adenocarcinoma primario del ano. La supervivencia global a 5 años para el carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio II fue del 69.2% y para el adenocarcinoma en estadio II fue del 54.2% (p < 0.001). La supervivencia global a cinco años para el carcinoma de células escamosas en estadio III fue del 55.2% y para el adenocarcinoma en estadio III fue del 32.9% (p < 0.001). En la regresión de Cox multivariable, el tratamiento con quimiorradiación sola (proporción de riesgo 0.67, p = 0.008) se asoció con una mejor supervivencia en el carcinoma de células escamosas. Para el grupo de adenocarcinoma, la enfermedad en estadio III (proporción de riesgo 2.26, p < 0.001) y el alto grado tumoral (proporción de riesgo 1.59, p < 0.011) tuvieron un impacto negativo en la supervivencia, pero no hubo diferencias en la supervivencia según el tipo de tratamiento recibido.La Base de Datos Nacional de Cancer no incluye información sobre agentes quimioterapéuticos o de inmunoterapia específicos que se administran a los pacientes, ni proporciona la causa exacta de la muerte.El adenocarcinoma anal en comparación con el carcinoma anal de células escamosas tuvo una supervivencia general inferior a 5 años, etapa por etapa. El adenocarcinoma anal parece tratarse de manera similar al paradigma del cáncer rectal, con el uso frecuente de quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Vea el video del resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B50.

Survival benefits and predictors of use of chemoradiation compared with radiation alone for early stage (T1-T2N0) anal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). However, the necessity of CRT over radiation alone for T1-2N0 disease is less certain. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients who received CRT, defined as initiation of chemo and RT within 14 days of each other, or RT alone (without any chemo during initial treatment phase) for cT1-2N0M0 SCC of the anus. The cohort was limited to patients less than 70 years old with Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index of 0, receiving a radiation dose range of 4,500-5,940 cGy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to assess for predictors of CRT usage. Five-year overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log rank test both for the full cohort and then on the subsets of T1 and T2 patients. RESULTS: We identified 4,564 patients, of whom 4,371 (95.8%) received CRT and 193 (4.2%) received RT alone. Median follow up was 49.8 months. About 33.5% of patients had cT1N0 disease, while 66.5% of patients had cT2N0 disease. On multivariable logistic regression, patients were more likely to receive CRT if they had T2 disease [OR 2.318 (1.732-3.102), P<0.0001]. Five-year OS was 86.6% for CRT and 79.1% for RT (P=0.001). For T1 patients, 5-year OS was 90.3% with CRT and 84.7% with RT (P=0.114). For T2 patients, 5-year OS was 84.7% with CRT and 72.8% with RT (P<0.0001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed association between OS and CRT use [HR 0.588 (95% CI: 0.430-0.804), P=0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients under age 70 without significant comorbidities are treated with CRT over radiation alone for early stage anal SCC, with better survival associated with CRT.

Patterns of care and outcomes of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for anal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiation is the standard of care for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly becoming the preferred technique in order to reduce treatment related toxicity. The objective of this study is to evaluate practice patterns and total radiation treatment times of two radiation modalities. METHODS: A total of 6,966 patients with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus who received definitive chemoradiation were queried from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004-2013. Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of IMRT receipt. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 3,868 (55.5%) received 3DCRT and 3,098 (44.5%) received IMRT. Total radiation treatment time was <7 weeks for 54.3% of patients treated with 3DCRT versus 63.8% of patients treated with IMRT. On multivariable logistic regression, positive clinical nodes (OR =1.20, P=0.001) and treatment at an academic facility (OR =1.23, P<0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of receiving IMRT. The 5-year OS was 73.0% for 3DCRT and 73.9% for IMRT (P=0.315). On multivariable analysis, total radiation treatment time ≥7 weeks (HR =1.33, P<0.001) was associated with worse survival while radiation modality (3DCRT vs. IMRT) did not impact survival (HR =0.98, P=0.763). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT has dramatically increased in utilization from 2% to 65% during the study time period. IMRT was less likely than 3DCRT to have prolonged radiation treatment times, which was associated with worse survival.

Survival of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Small cohort studies have suggested oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) could be associated with worse prognosis in individuals younger than 40. METHODS: We compared the survival of all OTSCC cases in the National Cancer Database under 40 years old with those older than 40, excluding patients over 70. Cox regression and propensity score matched (PSM) survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 22 930 OTSCC patients were identified. The under 40 group consisted of 2566 (9.9%) cases; 20664 were 40 to 70 (90.1%). Most were male (13 713, 59.8%), stage I-II (12 754, 72.4%), and treated by surgery alone (13 973, 63.2%). Survival in patients under 40 was higher (79.6% vs 69.5%, P < .001). In PSM analysis (n = 2928) controlling for all 10 significant factors in multivariate regression, patients under 40 had a 9% higher 5-year survival (77.1% vs 68.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Contrary to the prior reports, younger patients with OTSCC did not have worse survival in the National Cancer Database.

Patterns of Care and Outcome of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

OBJECTIVE: Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare salivary gland malignancy, believed to be generally low grade. We investigated CCC epidemiology and clinical behavior, using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: NCDB. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All CCCs of the salivary glands were selected between 2004 and 2015. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival were analyzed. Cox regression analyses were performed in treated patients. RESULTS: We identified 268 patients with CCC. Median age was 61 (21-90) years. Most were female (145, 54%). The most common site was oral cavity (119, 44%), followed by major salivary glands (68, 25%) and oropharynx (41, 15%). Most tumors were low grade (81, 68%) and stages I to II (117, 60.6%). Nodal (36, 17.5%) and distant metastases (6, 2.4%) were rare. Most were treated by surgery alone (134, 50.0%), followed by surgery and radiotherapy (69, 25.7%). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 77.6% (95% CI, 71.4%-84.2%). In univariate analysis, older age, major salivary gland and sinonasal site, stages III to IV, high grade, and positive margins were associated with worse OS. In multivariate analysis, only high tumor grade (hazard ratio [HR], 5.76; 95% CI, 1.39-23.85; P = .02), positive margins (HR, 4.01; 95% CI, 1.20-13.43; P = .02), and age ≥60 years (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.39-8.55; P = .01) were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSION: We report the largest series of clear cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Outcomes are generally favorable following surgical-based treatments. In this series, pathologic tumor grade is associated with worse survival. Routine evaluation and reporting of tumor grade might better guide physicians in recommending appropriate treatments in this rare malignancy.

Patterns of care and outcomes of postoperative radiation for low-grade gliomas in United States hospitals.

It is unclear whether there is a survival benefit with postoperative radiation for low-grade gliomas deemed to be high-risk. We sought to analyze patterns of care and outcomes of radiation use. We accessed the National Cancer Database to identify patients with WHO grade II oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma between 2010 and 2012. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of radiation use and multivariable Cox regression was used to identify covariables associated with differences in survival. There were 1952 patients included in this study, of which 518 (26.5%) received postoperative radiation. The majority had oligodendroglioma histology (n = 1121, 57.4%) compared to astrocytoma (n = 831, 42.6%). There were 1626 patients who were either ≥40 years old or underwent a subtotal resection ("high-risk"), and from these 495 (30.4%) received postoperative radiation. On multivariable logistic regression treatment at an academic facility (OR 0.72) was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving postoperative radiation. Astrocytoma histology (OR 2.08), age ≥40 years (OR 2.23), tumor size ≥6 cm (OR 1.64), subtotal resection (OR 1.55), and chemotherapy use (OR 3.93) were associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative radiation. On multivariable analysis, astrocytoma histology (HR 3.49, p < 0.001) and receipt of radiation (HR 2.06, p < 0.001) were associated with worse overall survival. GTR (HR 0.51, p = 0.001) was associated with improved overall survival. Patients treated in United States hospitals are not routinely referred for postoperative radiation for high-risk, low-grade gliomas. Patients who received radiation did not do better than those who did not receive radiation.

Adjuvant treatment of meningioma with stereotactic radiation surgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiation surgery: Patterns of care and survival in a large, hospital database.

OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiation surgery (HF-SRS) have become an alternative to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the adjuvant treatment of meningiomas. The purpose of this study was to identify national treatment patterns and survival outcomes for meningiomas on the basis of radiation treatment modality in the adjuvant setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with meningioma diagnosed between 2010 and 2012. World Health Organization grade I disease with subtotal resection and all cases of grade II disease regardless of the extent of the resection were included. Logistic regression was used to determine factors that were associated with receipt of SRS/HF-SRS compared with EBRT. Cox regression was used to determine covariables associated with differences in overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 802 patients met the inclusion criteria of which 173 patients received SRS/HF-SRS (22%) and 629 patients (78%) received EBRT. The 3-year OS rate was 97.3% for the SRS/HF-SRS group and 93.4% for the EBRT group (P = .018). On subgroup analysis by grade, for grade I the 3-year OS rate was 98.3% for the SRS/HF-SRS group versus 96.7% for the EBRT group (P = .117). For grade II disease, the 3-year OS rate was 94.4% in the SRS/HF-SRS group versus 92.4% in the EBRT group (P = .199). On multivariable analysis, World Health Organization grade II histology (odds ratio [OR]: 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.56; P < .001) and gross total resection (OR: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15-0.57; P < .001) were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving SRS/HF-SRS but private insurance (OR: 8.89; 95% CI, 1.15-68.47; P = .036) and Medicare (OR: 10.03; 95% CI, 1.28-78.69; P = .028) were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving SRS/HF-SRS. Year of diagnosis was not associated with receipt of SRS/HF-SRS. The multivariable Cox regression demonstrated a trend toward improved OS for treatment with SRS/HF-SRS (hazard ratio: 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06-1.03; P = .055). CONCLUSIONS: SRS and HF-SRS are associated with similar survival as EBRT; however, SRS/HF-SRS is used infrequently and usage has not increased over time.

Association of Nadir Prostate-specific Antigen >0.5 ng/mL after Dose-escalated External Beam Radiation with Prostate Cancer-specific Endpoints.

Objective Prior studies have suggested that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir of 0.5 ng/mL is an important surrogate endpoint for prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. This study analyzed our well-followed patient cohort to assess whether this endpoint was associated with differences in prostate cancer-specific endpoints in patients receiving dose-escalated radiation. Methods Patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (≥T2b, or prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/mL, or Gleason score ≥7) who were treated with external beam radiation to a minimum dose of 7560 cGy +/- androgen deprivation between 2003 and 2011 were identified. Biochemical control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between those who achieved a nadir PSA ≤0.5 ng/mL with those who did not via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was performed on all endpoints to assess their impact on OS. Results There were 367 patients identified with a median follow-up of 99.5 months. Two hundred five patients (55.9%) received androgen deprivation for a median of 24 months (range 1-81 months). Most patients (n = 308, 83.9%) achieved a nadir PSA ≤0.5 ng/mL, which was associated with improvement across all endpoints at 10 years. This included biochemical control (68.0% versus 24.0%, p < 0.001), DMFS (89.6% versus 80.8%, p = 0.019), PCSS (91.1% versus 85.7%, p = 0.01), and OS (55.7% versus 45.8%, p = 0.048). On multivariable analysis, nadir PSA >0.5 ng/mL remained strongly associated with worse outcomes across all endpoints. Conclusions Achievement of nadir PSA ≤0.5 ng/mL after completion of dose-escalated radiation therapy was associated with improvement of all prostate cancer endpoints.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in local-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A National Cancer Database analysis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess patterns of care and outcomes with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive radiation in local-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with T3-4N2 or T1-4N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, propensity-score matching, and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for demographic and disease-specific prognostic factors. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2014, a total of 1,731 patients were identified, including 504 patients (27%) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used more frequently in years 2008 to 2010 (34%) and 2011 to 2014 (30%) compared with 2004 to 2007 (22%) (χ2 P = .001). At a median follow-up of 36.6 months, patients had 3-year OS of 66% in the neoadjuvant group compared with 70% in those who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (log rank P = .29). On subgroup analysis by histology, T stage, and N stage, there remained no differences in OS between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant survival difference associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.25, P = .54). In a propensity score-matched population of 1,008 patients (504 with neoadjuvant therapy and 504 without), there was no significant survival difference associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (H: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.93-1.38, P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used in over 25% of patients, and its use is increasing. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with any differences in survival compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 128:2770-2777, 2018.

Post-mastectomy Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Nodal Micrometastases.

BACKGROUND: Recent data support the use of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in women with one to three positive lymph nodes; however, the benefit of PMRT in patients with micrometastatic nodal disease (N1mi) is unknown. We evaluated the survival impact of PMRT in patients with N1mi within the National Cancer Database. METHODS: The pattern of care and survival benefit of PMRT was examined in women with pT1-2N1mi breast cancer who underwent mastectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were employed for survival analysis, and subanalyses of high-risk patients and a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort were completed. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2014, we identified 14,019 patients who fitted the study criteria. PMRT was delivered in 18.5% of patients and its use increased over the study period. Patients treated with PMRT were younger, had better performance status and larger primaries, were estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, had higher grade, lymphovascular invasion and positive surgical margins, and more often received systemic therapy. PMRT was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) in univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75 [0.64-0.89]), but was not significant in multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 1.01 [0.84-1.20]). There was no survival benefit to PMRT in ER-negative, high-grade, and/or young patients. There were 2 (0.9%) death events in the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) + PMRT group versus 21 (2.9%) in the SLNB-alone group (log-rank p = 0.053), and 8 (3.9%) death events in the axillary lymph node biopsy (ALNB) + PMRT group versus 27 (3.6%) in the axillary lymph node dissection-alone group (p = 0.82). There was no significant association between PMRT and OS within the PSM subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this largest reported retrospective study, no OS differences were associated with PMRT, which suggests that PMRT may not benefit every patient with microscopic nodal disease.

Patterns of stereotactic radiotherapy utilization and fractionation for acoustic neuroma in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery is a commonly offered modality utilized for the treatment of acoustic neuromas. In this study we sought to analyze the national practice patterns and utilization of GK compared to LINAC based radiosurgery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with an acoustic neuroma between 2004-2013 and treated with LINAC or GK radiosurgery in 1-5 fractions were identified in the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: There were 2,705 patients analyzed, of which 2,222 (82.1%) received GK and 483 (17.9%) received LINAC based radiosurgery. Single fraction treatment was observed in 98.8% of GK patients, versus 19.5% of LINAC patients. LINAC based radiosurgery use increased from 3.5-3.7% in 2004-2005 to 15-26% from 2007-2013. On multivariable logistic regression the use of 3-5 fractions was strongly associated with LINAC based radiosurgery (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: GK remains the predominant modality for delivering radiosurgery to acoustic neuroma. LINAC based radiosurgery is being cautiously adopted and often utilizes a hypofractionated approach.