RESUMO
Despite the growing knowledge on the (epi)genetic background of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), the substantial variability in disease severity that exists between FSHD patients is not fully understood. We hypothesized that smoking and alcohol consumption are disease modifiers in FSHD and contribute to the variability in disease severity, because they are both associated with higher levels of oxidative stress in muscle tissue. Oxidative stress is known to influence FSHD muscle tissue. One hundred and ninety-eight genetically confirmed FSHD patients completed a questionnaire from which the number of packyears of smoking and the lifetime cumulative alcohol units consumed were calculated. Disease severity was determined by the FSDH evaluation score. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that both the number of packyears and the amount of alcohol consumption did not influence disease severity (respectively Bâ¯=â¯0.025, ΔR2=0.006, pâ¯=â¯0.231; and Bâ¯=â¯0.000, ΔR2=0.004, pâ¯=â¯0.406). Although smoking and excessive alcohol consumption are unhealthy habits which should be discouraged, these results show that smoking and alcohol consumption have no clinically meaningful modifying effect on disease severity in FSHD patients. However, prospective data should show whether alcohol consumption and smoking influence disease progression rate.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Distrofia Muscular Facioescapuloumeral/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is characterized by large variability in disease severity, that is only partly explained by (epi)genetic factors. Clinical observations and recent in vitro work suggest a protective effect of estrogens in FSHD. The aims of this study were to assess whether the lifetime endogenous estrogen exposure contributes to the variability in disease severity in female patients, and whether female patients experience changes in disease progression during periods of hormonal changes. We calculated the lifetime endogenous estrogen exposure by subtracting periods with high progesterone levels (in which estrogens are counteracted) from the reproductive life span. Multiple linear regression in 85 patients did not show a contribution of the lifetime endogenous estrogen exposure to disease severity (B = 0.063, P-value = 0.517, ΔR2 = 0.003). The majority of women reported an unchanged rate of disease progression through periods of hormonal changes, like menarche, pregnancy or menopause. Women that noticed differences reported accelerations as well as decelerations. These results indicate that differences in estrogen exposure do not have a clinically relevant modifying effect on disease severity. However, a clinically relevant protective effect of greater differences in estrogen levels, or a protective effect caused by a more complex interplay with other reproductive hormones, cannot be ruled out.