Reduction of Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Healthcare Utilization and Socioeconomic Disparities: Longitudinal Benefits of Quality Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in emergency department (ED) utilization after gastrostomy (G-) tube placement were previously demonstrated at our children's hospital. We aimed to reduce postoperative G-tube dislodgements and ED visits with a particular focus on socially vulnerable children. METHODS: Our improvement team implemented a G-tube care bundle (6/2018-9/2019) targeting caregiver preparedness and standardizing care in the pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods. Patients who had G tubes placed between 1/2011-8/2022 were categorized to either pre- or post-intervention groups. Primary outcomes were tracked prospectively. National area deprivation index (ADI) was assigned retrospectively and employed to evaluate social risk. Univariate comparisons were made between pre- and post-intervention groups, and between High ADI (≥80) and Low ADI (<80) subgroups in both pre- and post- intervention periods. We used statistical process control methods to further analyze change over time. RESULTS: 396 children were included (188 pre-intervention, 208 post-intervention). The post-intervention cohort demonstrated a lower rate of outpatient dislodgement at 90 days following G-tube placement (21.3 % vs 10.1 %, p = 0.002) and fewer G-tube-related ED visits per G-tube placed within one year of placement (mean 0.8 visits vs 0.6 visits, p = 0.012). Pre-intervention, children from high ADI neighborhoods had significantly greater healthcare utilization compared to those from lower ADI neighborhoods. Post-intervention, previously statistically significant disparities were no longer present. Outpatient G-tube dislodgements within 90 days were particularly mitigated. CONCLUSIONS: A longstanding quality improvement initiative has led to sustained reductions in overall G-tube-related health care utilization. Care standardization and improvement may mitigate outcome disparities related to socioeconomic advantage. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study and Prospective Quality Improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Implementation and Qualitative Analysis of Peer Support for New Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Families.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) insertion in children has frequent complications, including dislodgment and return to the system, which are associated with emotional burden for caregivers. To address these issues, we developed a peer support program for caregivers of children with new G-tubes and aimed to explore program feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: The G-tube Buddy Program is a peer support program that pairs an experienced G-tube caregiver with new G-tube caregivers. Between April 2022 and December 2022, seven mentors and 21 mentees participated in the program. Five mentors and ten mentees participated in semi-structured focus groups and interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using both inductive and deductive qualitative methods. RESULTS: We identified five prominent domains: peer support relationship dynamics; mentor and mentee-specific factors; determinants of program success; mentor and mentee perception of the program; and suggestions for program improvement. These domains encompassed main themes: support consisted primarily of assistance with daily life and social and emotional support; texting was usually the preferred communication method; mentee satisfaction is rooted in humanness, teaching, and generation of hope; mentors participated due to positive feelings regarding helping new caregivers with financial motivation being less important; and, participants perceived the program as a valuable source of support for new caregivers that complements and expands the reach of care they receive from clinical providers. CONCLUSIONS: A peer support model for families with new G-tubes appears feasible and acceptable from participant perspectives. Responses validate the program's potential to add value to the postoperative care of children with G-tubes and will guide program optimization.

Quality Improvement Interventions to Enhance Vaccine Uptake in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients, because of their compromised immune responses, face a higher risk of preventable infections, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite this, vaccination rates among these patients are suboptimal, and research on effective interventions to improve vaccination rates is limited. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed and Cochrane Library for studies investigating quality improvement (QI) interventions targeting vaccine uptake in cancer patients. Two authors independently screened, extracted data, and analyzed studies, resolving any discrepancies through consensus. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, published between 2014 and 2022. Seven studies focused on the influenza vaccine, five on the pneumococcal vaccine, and one on both. Twelve studies used multiple interventions, whereas one used a single intervention. Most interventions aimed to enhance patient and family knowledge and identify eligible patients before their appointments. All studies demonstrated improved vaccine uptake after implementing the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of QI interventions have effectively increased pneumococcal and influenza vaccine uptake among cancer patients. Future research should address roadblocks to implementation and explore the effect of these interventions on other vaccines.

Reducing Unplanned Intubations in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit After Children's Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned intubation following children's surgery is associated with increased postoperative mortality. In response to being a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program - Pediatric (NSQIP-P) high outlier for postoperative unplanned intubation, we aimed to reduce postoperative unplanned intubation events by 25% in one year. METHODS/INTERVENTION: A multidisciplinary team of stakeholders was assembled in 2018. Most unplanned intubation events occurred in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Based on apparent causes of unplanned intubations identified in case reviews, an extubation readiness checklist and a postoperative pain management guideline emphasizing non-opioid analgesics were implemented for NICU patients in September 2019. Postoperative unplanned intubation events were tracked prospectively and evaluated using quality improvement statistical process control methods. RESULTS: Unplanned intubations in the NICU decreased from 0.27 to 0.07 events per patient in the post-intervention group (September 2019-June 2022, n = 145) compared to the pre-intervention group (January 2016-August 2019, n = 200), representing a 76% reduction. Postoperative opioid administration decreased significantly, while acetaminophen usage increased significantly over time. Balancing measures of postoperative pneumonia rate (1.5% vs 0.0%, p = 0.267) and median hospital length of stay [40 (IQR 51) days vs 27 (IQR 60), p = 0.124] were not different between cohorts. The 30-day mortality rate for postoperative patients in the NICU significantly declined [6.5% (n = 13) vs 0.7% (n = 1), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative unplanned intubation rates for NICU patients decreased following a quality improvement effort focused on opioid stewardship and extubation readiness. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective Quality Improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Implementation of a gastrostomy care bundle reduces dislodgements and length of stay.

PURPOSE: Pediatric gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are associated with considerable utilization of healthcare resources. G-tube dislodgement can result in tract disruption and abdominal sepsis. We aimed to reduce early G-tube dislodgement by 25%. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team convened to identify key drivers of G-tube dislodgement and implement initiatives to reduce this complication. A G-tube care bundle was implemented in 2018. Rates of early G-tube dislodgement (within 90 days of insertion) were tracked. 15 months of cases after bundle implementation were compared to 20 months of cases before implementation. Length of stay (LOS, balancing measure) and bundle compliance (process measure) were tracked. RESULTS: G-tube dislodgements decreased 47% after bundle implementation. Overall, dislodgements after G-tube insertion decreased from 43% to 19% dislodgements per tube inserted, p = 0.004. Reductions were observed for dislodgements occurring in both the inpatient (14% vs. 1.5%) and outpatient (29% vs. 18%) settings. Median LOS was reduced from 15.3 to 7.1 days following implementation, p = 0.004. Process measures demonstrated 75% or greater compliance one year after implementation. CONCLUSION: An interdisciplinary team using quality improvement science methodology can significantly reduce G-tube dislodgement and improve value after pediatric gastrostomy tube insertion. TYPE OF STUDY: Longitudinal cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Implementation of a Pediatric Orthopaedic Bundle to Reduce Surgical Site Infections.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) cost an estimated $27,288 per case. An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data at the University of Rochester Medical Center suggested that rates of SSIs could be lowered in comparison with both peers and baseline. The aim of this study was to reduce the number of SSIs to zero through the implementation of a "bundle" or a combination of practices. Meetings were held with the multidisciplinary care team that includes surgeons and staff from pediatric pharmacy, pediatric infectious diseases, anesthesia, and nursing to create a care bundle for all pediatric orthopaedic surgery patients. Bundle elements included use of chlorhexidine gluconate wipes the night before surgery and the day of surgery, use of preoperative nutrition screens, development and use of a prophylactic antibiotic dosing chart, use of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening, maintenance of normal patient temperature, and use of nasal swabs in the operating room. The SSI rate dropped from a baseline figure of 4% in 2013 (n = 154) and 3.2% in 2014 (n = 189) to 0.0% (n = 198) in 2015 after the bundles were implemented. Both compliance with the bundle and SSI rates must be monitored monthly. Staff and providers should be offered monthly feedback on SSI rates and care bundle compliance. If an SSI does occur, a root-cause analysis is performed with the multidisciplinary care team using a standardized review form.