Metabolic activation of irinotecan during intra-arterial chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Biotransformation of irinotecan (CPT-11) into its pharmacologic active metabolite SN-38 was investigated in patients treated for advanced colorectal cancer. A dose of 180 mg/m(2) CPT-11 was administered to 6 patients by 60 min hepatic intra-arterial infusion (HAI) via a surgically implanted Port-a-Cath® system. Blood samples were collected from 0 to 360 min after start of HAI, and CPT-11 plus metabolites were analysed by a selective reversed phase HPLC method. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent to which SN-38 is generated after HAI of irinotecan given at a low dose of 180 mg/m(2). In a second investigation, CPT-11 was administered via conventional intravenous infusion (dose 180 mg/m(2), 60 min infusion time, 11 patients) and CPT-11 plus metabolites were quantified using identical analytical procedure. Compared to i.v. infusion, the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and SN-38 were altered by HAI. The mean c(max) of CPT-11 after HAI was reduced by 37%, whereas the mean c(max) of SN-38 increased by 60%. HAI resulted in a desired, increased metabolic conversion of CPT-11 into SN-38 and might improve the regional availability of the pharmacologic active metabolite SN-38 at the site of tumor. Plasma concentrations of the metabolites SN-38 glucuronide and APC remained unaffected by the route of administration.

Plasma disposition of capecitabine and its metabolites 5'DFCR and 5'DFUR in a standard and dose-intensified monotherapy regimen.

PURPOSE: In view of a potential gain in anticancer activity in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC), there has been considerable interest in using a higher than the approved standard dose of capecitabine (CCB) combined with oxaliplatin. This pharmacokinetic study was designed to evaluate whether CCB is metabolized at the same extent when administered as a monotherapy in two different dose regimens, comparing standard dose (CCB 1) and intensified dose (CCB 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients suffering from ACRC received subsequently two CCB schedules: In the standard schedule, 1,250 mg/m² CCB p.o. twice daily for 2 weeks was administered, after a pause of 1 week, a dose-intensified CCB 2 schedule was given: 1,750 mg/m² CCB p.o. twice daily for 1 week to be followed by 1 week rest. Due to this paired cross over design a direct comparison for each single patient was feasible. RESULTS: In both schedules, mean peak plasma concentrations of CCB occurred at about 50 min, those of metabolites shortly later (range 54-80 min). Peak plasma concentrations were about 10% (CCB, DFCR) and 40% (DFUR) higher in the CCB 2 regimen. According to the higher dose of CCB in the dose-intensified regimen (+40%), the AUC(last) values increased by 34% (CCB), 20% (DFCR) and 58% (DFUR), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that higher doses of CCB are metabolized approximately dose-dependent compared to the standard dose. No indices for a saturation of metabolizing processes or any significant delay of elimination rate was observed. The immediate 5FU precursor DFUR was formed at a 50% higher extent (expressed as AUC(last) values) than in the standard CCB 1 schedule. From the pharmacokinetic point of view, this increased formation rate suggests clinical importance in regard to metabolic activation of CCB.

Systemic bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for exudative neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The BEAT-AMD-Study.

BACKGROUND: Double-blinded, randomised, prospective, pilot-study to determine the effect of systemic bevacizumab therapy. METHODS: Subjects with fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment, subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation extending under the geometric centre of the foveal avascular zone and/or macular thickness of at least 300 microm in both eyes were included. Sixteen eyes were included and randomised equally to receive either three infusions of 5 mg/kg Avastin or 100 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride every 2 weeks. The main outcome measure was the lesion size. The follow-up time was 24 weeks. RESULTS: Throughout the 24-week follow-up, the lesion size and macular thickness decreased in the Avastin group by 0.5 (SD 0.08) mm and 103.6 (14.9) microl respectively. In both groups, visual acuity remained stable in seven eyes and decreased in one eye. At the end of follow-up, 50% of the eyes in the Avastin group became fibrotic, 37.5% remained unchanged, and 12.5% developed a subretinal bleeding. There was a treatable rise in blood pressure after Avastin treatment. CONCLUSION: Systemic Avastin could be offered to patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration in both eyes and/or patients who refuse intravitreal injections if blood pressure is normal and there is no history of thrombosis.

Disposition of paclitaxel (Taxol) and its metabolites in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) when combined with trastuzumab (Hercpetin).

Monoclonal antibodies are capable of modulating drug metabolising enzymes resulting in unexpected plasma concentrations of a drug when given concomitantly. Therefore plasma concentration of paclitaxel (PTX) and its metabolites has been monitored in 10 patients with advanced breast cancer during treatment with PTX alone or combined with trastuzumab (TMAB, paired cross over design). Compared to the MONO regimen PTX peak plasma concentrations were about 25% lower in the TMAB schedule: cmax = 3294 +/- 1174 ng/ml (MONO: 4368 +/- 1887 ng/ml). TMAB also caused lower peak plasma concentration of the main metabolite 6-hydroxy PTX (248 +/- 89 ng/ml) compared to the MONO schedule (194 +/- 82 ng/ml). Cmax of the minor metabolites was distinctly below 100 ng/ml and consequently differed negligible in both schedules. The similar apparent formation rate of the metabolites in both schedules (range from 30 to 50 min) as well as identical tmax values (range 170-190 min) suggested that TMAB had no influence on PTX metabolism. In accordance to plasma concentrations, AUClast of PTX was lower in the MONO schedule (733 +/- 197 microg/ml*min, AUClast = 669 +/- 248 microg/ml*min for TMAB) but without significance. In summary no indices for an altered plasma disposition of PTX and its metabolites could be found when TMAB was given concomitantly.

A double-blind, randomised, parallel study comparing intravenous dolasetron plus dexamethasone and intravenous dolasetron alone for the management of fractionated cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting.

Fractionated cisplatin-containing regimens are routinely used for chemotherapy in certain types of cancer. Dolasetron has been shown to be effective in preventing acute emesis related to high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy over 24 h; its effectiveness has not been evaluated in fractionated cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. This trial was designed to assess the efficacy of dolasetron alone or dolasetron plus dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vomiting related to fractionated cisplatin chemotherapy. The patients were 210 cancer in-patients, who were randomised to receive 100 mg dolasetron i.v. or 100 mg dolasetron i.v. plus 20 mg dexamethasone before chemotherapy primarily with cisplatin (15-50 mg/m2) infused over < or =4 h for at least 2 but not more than 5 consecutive days. Dolasetron was administered to all patients 30 min before cisplatin. Dexamethasone was administered in double-blind fashion 5 min before cisplatin. Efficacy was measured at hour 24 of each study day using complete response (no vomiting and no rescue medication) and maximum severity of nausea, self-assessed by patients using a 100mm visual analogue scale. Most (198) of the patients completed the study and were evaluable. Overall complete response rates were significantly higher in the dolasetron plus dexamethasone group than in the dolasetron only group (72.9% vs. 40.8%, respectively; P<0.0001). Complete response rates on each study day were also significantly higher with dolasetron plus dexamethasone than with dolasetron alone (P<0.029), with an attenuated efficacy in the delayed phase in both groups. Chi-square test and logistic regression applied to daily response rates indicated a significant influence of treatment (day 1: P = 0.0002, day 2: P<0.0001, day 3: P = 0.0007, day 4: P = 0.0007, day 5: P = 0.029). Treatment and duration of chemotherapy exerted the only statistically significant subgroup effects on complete response (P<0.0001). Both treatments were administered safely. As seen with other 5-HT3 receptor antagonist antiemetics, the addition of dexamethasone to dolasetron significantly increases effectiveness in preventing nausea and vomiting related to fractionated cisplatin chemotherapy. Both dolasetron and dolasetron plus dexamethasone were well tolerated.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of paclitaxel after polychemotherapy with the cytoprotective agent amifostine.

BACKGROUND: Cytoprotection of healthy cells represents a new approach in cancer chemotherapy, but a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between the cytostatic and the cytoprotectant is undesired. METHODS: The purpose was to evaluate the clinical pharmacokinetics (PHK) of paclitaxel (PACLI) and its metabolites under cytoprotection in patients suffering from breast cancer. PACLI was administered alone and in a second cycle in combination with amifostine (AMI) as a paired cross over. RESULTS: In both treatment schedules the steady state of PACLI occurred after 3 hours, the tmax of metabolites between 3 and 4 hours. The mean steady-state concentration was cmax = 5432 +/- 1238 ng/ml in the control group and cmax = 5140 +/- 2407 ng/ml in the AMI group. For the serum metabolites, the findings were very similar: 6-OH-PACLI: cmax 413 +/- 153 ng/ml versus 432 +/- 304 ng/ml, 3"-OH-PACLI: cmax 99 +/- 103 ng/ml versus 123 +/- 98 ng/ml, 3",6-DiOH-PACLI: cmax 43 +/- 55 ng/ml versus 75 +/- 85 ng/ml. AUC values of metabolites were slightly higher in the AMI group, but PHK seemed equal. CONCLUSION: The results gave evidence, that cytoprotection with AMI has no clinical consequences on PACLI pharmacokinetics and biotransformation.

Clinical significance of pharmacokinetic drug interactions between interferon-alpha and antineoplastic drugs.

The major problems in chemotherapy are occasional low response rates in patients despite favourable in vitro action, the development of drug resistance and long or short term adverse effects. Therefore, in the past decade efforts have been made to circumvent these problems by combining antineoplastic drugs with biomodulating or cytoprotective agents. Most of the clinically useful drug regimens consist of a cocktail of drugs with different mechanisms of action, and hence different toxicity profiles. Dose-limiting factors in regard to toxicity and therapeutic efficacy predominate, and it is therefore clinically essential to know whether or not a pharmacokinetic drug interaction occurs. The introduction of interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) in chemotherapy is an alternative investigational approach to amplify the cytotoxicity of an antineoplastic drug in order to increase tumour response. Most of the clinical studies reported with IFNalpha provide useful information and identify major pharmacodynamic interactions, but only a few focus on and report potential pharmacokinetic interactions between antineoplastic drugs and IFNalpha in patients. The broad spectrum of antineoplastic drugs whose activity can be enhanced by IFNalpha argues for multiple levels of drug-drug interactions: protein binding (cisplatin), alteration in cellular uptake, modulation of drug target enzymes (dihydropyrimidine hydrogenase) and changes in biotransformation (tretinoin) or excretion. Pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions may be beneficial (fluorouracil) or sometimes detrimental and coincidental (doxorubicin). This article focuses on observed pharmacokinetic drug interactions between IFNalpha and antineoplastic drugs and discusses possible mechanisms of action.

Phase II trial of dexverapamil and epirubicin in patients with non-responsive metastatic breast cancer.

Agents capable of reversing P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance have usually failed to enhance chemotherapy activity in patients with solid tumours. Based on its toxicity profile and experimental potency, dexverapamil, the R-enantiomer of verapamil, is considered to be promising for clinical use as a chemosensitizer. The purpose of this early phase II trial was to evaluate the effects of dexverapamil on epirubicin toxicity, activity and pharmacokinetics in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A two-stage design was applied. Patients first received epirubicin alone at 120 mg m(-2) i.v. over 15 min, repeated every 21 days. Patients with refractory disease continued to receive epirubicin at the same dose and schedule but supplemented with oral dexverapamil 300 mg every 6 h x 13 doses. The Gehan design was applied to the dexverapamil/epirubicin cohort of patients. Thirty-nine patients were entered on study, 25 proceeded to receive epirubicin plus dexverapamil. Dexverapamil did not increase epirubicin toxicity. The dose intensity of epirubicin was similar when used alone or with dexverapamil. In nine intrapatient comparisons, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of epirubicin was significantly reduced by dexverapamil (mean 2968 vs 1901 microg ml[-1] h[-1], P= 0.02). The mean trough plasma levels of dexverapamil and its major metabolite nor-dexverapamil were 1.2 and 1.5 microM respectively. The addition of dexverapamil to epirubicin induced partial responses in 4 of 23 patients evaluable for tumour response (17%, CI 5-39%, s.e.P 0.079). The remissions lasted 3, 8, 11 and 11+ months. These data suggest that the concept of enhancing chemotherapy activity by adding chemosensitizers may function not only in haematological malignancies but also in selected solid tumours. An increase in the AUC and toxicity of cytotoxic agents does not seem to be a prerequisite for chemosensitizers to enhance anti-tumour activity.