Surgically implanted endovascular, microaxial left ventricular assist device: A single institution study.

Objective: The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Inc), a surgically implanted endovascular microaxial left ventricular assist device, is increasingly used worldwide and there have been more than 10,000 implants. The purpose of this study is to describe a large-volume, single-center experience with the use of the Impella 5.5. Methods: Data were obtained retrospectively from patients supported with the Impella 5.5 implanted at our institution from May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes for each group are described. Results are reported in median (interquartile range) or n (%). The entire cohort was divided into 5 main groups based on the intention to treat at the time of the Impella 5.5 implantation: (1) patients who had a planned Impella 5.5 implanted at the time of high-risk cardiac surgery; (2) patients with cardiogenic shock; (3) patients bridged to a durable left ventricular assist device; (4) patients bridged to transplant; and (5) patients with postcardiotomy shock who received an unplanned Impella 5.5 implant. Results: A total of 126 patients were supported with the Impella 5.5. Overall survival to device explant was 76.2%, with 67.5% surviving to discharge. Midterm survival was assessed with a median follow-up time of 318 days and demonstrated an overall survival of 60.3% and a median of 650 days (549-752). Conclusions: Outcomes after using the Impella 5.5 are variable depending on the indication of use. Patient selection may be of utmost importance and requires further experience with this device to determine who will benefit from insertion.

Management of severe tricuspid valve regurgitation due to ruptured papillary muscle in a patient with mediastinitis early after heart transplant.

Objective: Even though severe tricuspid regurgitation is not uncommon after cardiac transplantation, primary severe tricuspid regurgitation is rare. We present such a case with additional complexities. Methods: The patient was 44-year-old man with a HeartWare durable left ventricular assist device (Heartware Inc) who received a temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) with a ProtekDuo cannula (LivaNova Inc USA) for refractory ventricular fibrillation and underwent a heart transplant as United Network for Organ Sharing Status 1, in the presence of partially compensated cardiogenic shock, renal failure. Given complex re-operative surgery in a volume-overloaded patient with unknown pulmonary vascular resistance, an RVAD cannula was preserved and re- inserted during cardiac transplant. Postoperatively he required hemodialysis, had severe primary tricuspid regurgitation discovered after RVAD removal and developed Enterobacter mediastinitis. He underwent complex tricuspid valve repair for flail tricuspid leaflet due to ruptured papillary muscle likely due to RVAD cannula injury, after multiple mediastinal washouts and was followed by delayed chest reconstruction. Results: The patient is doing well, 6 months after discharge to home, asymptomatic, without re-admissions, on renal recovery path, with no tricuspid regurgitation and good biventricular function. Conclusions: Replacing the tricuspid valve in presence of hemodialysis catheter, immunosuppression and mediastinitis could be high risk for endocarditis. Even though we have short-term follow-up, tricuspid valve repair can be an effective way of managing primary severe regurgitation especially when there is a desire or need to avoid valve replacement.

Lung transplantation long-term survival is worse in patients who have undergone previous cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10% of lung transplant recipients have had previous cardiothoracic surgery. We sought to determine if previous surgery affects outcomes after lung transplant at a national level. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was analysed from 2005 to 2019 to include adult patients who underwent lung transplant who had previous cardiac surgery and previous thoracic surgery. T-test and chi-squared analysis were used to compare perioperative outcomes. Long-term survival comparison was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method in an unadjusted and propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS: Out of 24 784 lung transplants, 691 (2.7%) had previous cardiac surgery and 1321 (6.5%) had previous thoracic surgery. Operative mortality was worse in previous cardiac surgery [42 (6.1%)] versus no previous cardiac surgery [740 (3.1%), P < 0.001] and in previous thoracic surgery [65 (4.9%)] versus no previous thoracic surgery [717 (3.1%), P < 0.001]. The previous thoracic surgery group had more primary graft failure and treated rejection during the first-year post-transplant. There was no difference in stroke, dialysis, intubation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 h. Long-term survival was significantly worse for lung transplant patients who had undergone previous cardiac surgery (median 3.8 vs 6.3 years, P < 0.001) due to an increase in cardiovascular deaths (P = 0.008) and malignancy (P = 0.043). However, there was no difference in previous thoracic surgery (median 6.6 vs 6.1 years, P = 0.337). CONCLUSIONS: Previous cardiac surgery prior to lung transplant results in worse survival related to cardiovascular death and malignancies. Previous thoracic surgery worsens perioperative outcomes but does not affect long-term survival.

First Report of Proton Beam Therapy in a Patient With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

A 77 year old man previously implanted with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator presented with a left upper lobe squamous cell lung cancer. Oncology determined that proton beam therapy was indicated for treatment, and a multidisciplinary team of radiation physicists, radiation oncologists, and LVAD providers developed a protocol to proceed safely. He was successfully treated with combined proton beam radiation therapy and reduced dose chemotherapy. This case demonstrates feasibility and considerations of proton beam therapy for malignancy relevant to patients with implantable cardiac devices including LVADs.

A report of transcatheter aortic valve insertion in a patient with chronic type B aortic dissection.

A 72-year-old man presented with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis and a chronic descending thoracic aorta dissection with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. After careful consideration, a transcatheter aortic valve was inserted through a transfemoral approach. This case demonstrates feasibility, and consideration should be given to this approach in patients requiring intervention for aortic stenosis.

Does Donor Age and Double Versus Single Lung Transplant Affect Survival of Young Recipients?

BACKGROUND: In an effort to expand the donor pool for lung transplants, numerous studies have examined the use of advanced age donors with mixed results, including decreased survival among younger recipients. We evaluated the impact of the use of advanced age donors and single versus double lung transplantation on posttransplant survival. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was retrospectively queried between January 2005 and June 2014 to identify lung transplant patients aged at least 18 years. Patients were stratified by recipient age 50 years or less, donor age 60 years or more, and single versus double lung transplantation. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable survival analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In all, 14,222 lung transplants were performed during the study period. With univariate analysis, donor lungs aged 60 years or more were associated with slightly worse 5-year survival (44% versus 52%; p < 0.001). Among recipients aged more than 50 years, this trend was not present in the multivariate model (hazard ratio 1.23, p = 0.055). Among recipients aged 50 years or more, receiving older donor lungs showed worse survival with the use of single lung transplant (5-year survival 15% versus 50%, p = 0.01). No significant difference in survival between young and old donors was seen when double lung transplant was performed (p = 0.491). Cox proportional hazards model showed a trend toward interaction between single lung transplantation and older donors (hazard ratio 2.36, p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: Reasonable posttransplant outcomes can be achieved with use of advanced age donors in all recipient groups. Double lung transplantation should be performed when older donors (age more than 60) are used in young recipients (age 50 or less).

Predictors of Donor Heart Utilization for Transplantation in United States.

BACKGROUND: Optimum use of donor organs can increase the reach of the transplantation therapy to more patients on waiting list. The heart transplantation (HTx) has remained stagnant in United States over the past decade at approximately 2,500 HTx annually. With the use of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) deceased donor database (DCD) we aimed to evaluate donor factors predicting donor heart utilization. METHODS: UNOS DCD was queried from 2005 to 2014 to identify total number of donors who had at least one of their organs donated. We then generated a multivariate logistic regression model using various demographic and clinical donor factors to predict donor heart use for HTx. Donor hearts not recovered due to consent or family issues or recovered for nontransplantation reasons were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: During the study period there were 80,782 donors of which 23,606 (29%) were used for HTx, and 38,877 transplants (48%) were not used after obtaining consent because of poor organ function (37%), donor medical history (13%), and organ refused by all programs (5%). Of all, 22,791 donors with complete data were used for logistic regression (13,389 HTx, 9,402 no-HTx) which showed significant predictors of donor heart use for HTx. From this model we assigned probability of donor heart use and identified 3,070 donors with HTx-eligible unused hearts for reasons of poor organ function (28%), organ refused by all programs (15%), and recipient not located (9%). CONCLUSIONS: An objective system based on donor factors can predict donor heart use for HTx and may help increase availability of hearts for transplantation from existing donor pool.

Single Versus Double Lung Retransplantation Does Not Affect Survival Based on Previous Transplant Type.

BACKGROUND: Survival following retransplantation with a single lung is worse than after double lung transplant. We sought to characterize survival of patients who underwent lung retransplantation based on the type of their initial transplant, single or double. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult patients who underwent lung retransplantation from 2005 onward. Patients were excluded if they underwent more than one retransplantation. The patient population was divided into 4 groups based on first followed by second transplant type, respectively: single then single, double then single, double then double, and single then double. Descriptive analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients underwent retransplantation in the study time period. Overall mean survival for all patients who underwent retransplantation was 1,213 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated no difference in graft survival between the 4 study groups (p = 0.146). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in graft survival between recipients of retransplant with single or double lungs when stratified by previous transplant type. These results suggest that when retransplantation is performed, single lung retransplantation should be considered, regardless of previous transplant type, in an effort to maximize organ resources.

Sunshine Heart C-Pulse: device for NYHA Class III and ambulatory Class IV heart failure.

Advanced heart failure (HF) patients not meeting criteria for ventricular assist device or heart transplant with life-limiting symptoms are limited to medical and resynchronization therapy. The Sunshine Heart C-Pulse, based on intra-aortic balloon pump physiology, provides implantable, on-demand, extra-aortic counterpulsation, which reduces afterload and improves cardiac perfusion in New York Heart Association Class III and ambulatory Class IV HF. The C-Pulse reduces New York Heart Association Class, improves 6-min walk distances, inotrope requirements and HF symptom questionnaires. Advantages include shorter operative times without cardiopulmonary bypass, no reported strokes or thrombosis and no need for anticoagulation. Driveline exit site infections, inability to provide full circulatory support and poor function with intractable arrhythmias remain concerns. Current randomized controlled studies will evaluate long-term efficacy and safety compared with medical and resynchronization therapy.

Normalization of Exhaled Carbonyl Compounds After Lung Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative analysis of specific exhaled carbonyl compounds (ECCs) has shown promise for the detection of lung cancer. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the normalization of ECCs in patients after lung cancer resection. METHODS: Patients from a single center gave consent and were enrolled in the study from 2011 onward. Breath analysis was performed on lung cancer patients before and after surgical resection of their tumors. One liter of breath from a single exhalation was collected and evacuated over a silicon microchip. Carbonyls were captured by oximation reaction and analyzed by mass spectrometry. Concentrations of four cancer-specific ECCs were measured and compared by using the Wilcoxon test. A given cancer marker was considered elevated at 1.5 or more standard deviations greater than the mean of the control population. RESULTS: There were 34 cancer patients with paired samples and 187 control subjects. The median values after resection were significantly lower for all four ECCs and were equivalent to the control patient values for three of the four ECCs. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of ECCs demonstrates reduction to the level of control patients after surgical resection for lung cancer. This technology has the potential to be a useful tool to detect disease after lung cancer resection. Continued follow-up will determine whether subsequent elevation of ECCs is indicative of recurrent disease.

Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Indications and Outcomes from 2003 through 2013.

Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with increased in-hospital mortality rates and adverse events. This study retrospectively evaluated indications and outcomes in patients who underwent emergency CABG. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database for a single center (Jewish Hospital) was queried to identify patients undergoing isolated CABG. Univariate analysis was performed. From January 2003 through December 2013, 5,940 patients underwent CABG; 212 presented with emergency status. A high proportion of female patients (28.2%) underwent emergency surgery. Emergency CABG patients experienced high rates of intra-aortic balloon pump support, bleeding, dialysis, in-hospital death, and prolonged length of stay. The proportion of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting declined during years 2008-2013 compared with 2003-2007 (2.2% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001), but the incidence of angiographic accident (5.3% vs. 29.2%) increased as an indication. Ongoing ischemia remains the most frequent indication for emergency CABG, yet the incidence of angiographic accident has greatly increased. In-hospital mortality rates and adverse events remain high. If we look specifically at emergency CABG cases arising from angiographic accident, we find that 14 (15%) of all 93 emergency CABG deaths occurred in that subset of patients. Efforts to improve outcomes should therefore be focused on this high-risk group.

Differences in Status 1A Heart Transplantation Survival in the Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Era.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy for end-stage heart failure patients; however, volumes are limited because of donor organ shortage. With the increasing availability of more durable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CFLVADs), the matrix of the heart transplantation waiting list and that of donor allocation have seen substantial changes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the stated reasons for status 1A at time of transplantation on post-transplantation survival in CFVAD patients. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) thoracic organ transplantation database was queried between 2006 and 2013 to identify patients aged 18 years or older who underwent heart transplantation as UNOS status 1A. We further assessed the data to identify reasons for status 1A at time of transplantation in CFVAD patients. We also computed post-transplantation survival of patients supported with CFLVAD who were status 1A at the time of transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 15,779 patients underwent heart transplantation during the study time period, of whom 8,429 were Status 1A, and 3,913 had CFLVAD at time of transplantation. Of all status 1A patients, 2,737 had CFLVAD at time of transplantation, of which 52% (1,413) had device complications (thrombosis, infection, malfunction, and other) and 48% (1,314) were on 30-day grace status 1A. Post-transplantation survival (at 3 years) of CFLVAD patients who received a transplant on 30-day grace status 1A was similar to patients who underwent transplantation on status 1B (84% versus 85%, p = 0.5), both of which were significantly better than status 1A patients because of device complications (84% and 85% versus 78%, p = 0.01) (Fig 1). CONCLUSIONS: CFLVAD patients who underwent transplantation as Status 1B or on the 30-day grace Status 1A have similar post-transplantation survival. These data suggest that there needs to be an objective organ allocation system for recipients of heart transplant that prioritize patients with CFVAD complications and patients not eligible for CFVAD for transplantation over 30-day grace period patients.

Does Donor Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Time Affect Heart Transplantation Outcomes and Survival?

BACKGROUND: Donor heart availability has limited the number of heart transplants performed in the United States, while the number of patients waiting for a transplant continues to increase. Optimizing the use of all available donor hearts is important to reduce waiting list deaths and to increase the number of patients who can ultimately undergo a successful heart transplant. Donor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) time has been proposed to be a selection criterion to consider in donor selection. This study examined whether the duration of donor CPR time affects recipient posttransplantation outcomes and survival. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively queried from January 2005 to December 2013 to identify adult patients who underwent heart transplantation. This population was divided into four groups: donors with no CPR, CPR of less than 20 minutes, CPR of 20 to 30 minutes, and CPR exceeding 30 minutes. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the recipient posttransplant survival between groups, and posttransplant outcomes were examined. Propensity matching was performed for comparison of posttransplant survival of recipients of donors who did and did not undergo CPR. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine individual independent variables for death after transplant. RESULTS: During this period, 17,022 patients underwent heart transplantation. Of those, 16,042 patients received hearts from a donor with no CPR, 639 patients with donor CPR of less than 20 minutes, 154 patients with donor CPR 20 to 30 minutes, and 187 patients with donor CPR exceeding 30 minutes. The posttransplant survival at 1 year for each group was 89% vs 90% vs 88% vs 89% and at 5 years was 75% vs 74% vs 74% vs 72%, respectively, which was not significantly different among the groups. Recipient primary graft failure and rejection rates were similar among the groups. The multivariable regression model showed CPR duration was not an independent risk factor for posttransplant death. CONCLUSIONS: Donor CPR does not significantly affect outcomes and survival after transplant. In an effort to optimize donor heart use, donor CPR time alone should not be used to rule out the acceptance of a potential donor heart.