Quantitative analysis of the effects of iododeoxyuridine and ionising radiation treatment on the cell cycle dynamics of DNA mismatch repair deficient human colorectal cancer cells.

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is involved in processing DNA damage following treatment with ionising radiation (IR) and various classes of chemotherapy drugs including iododeoxyuridine (IUdR), a known radiosensitiser. In this study, the authors have developed asynchronous probabilistic cell cycle models to assess the isolated effects of IUdR and IR and the combined effects of IUdR + IR treatments on MMR damage processing. The authors used both synchronous and asynchronous MMR-proficient/MMR-deficient cell populations and followed treated cells for up to two cell cycle times. They have observed and quantified differential cell cycle responses to MMR damage processing following IR and IUdR + IR treatments, principally in the duration of both G1 and G2/M cell cycle phases. The models presented in this work form the foundation for the development of an approach to maximise the therapeutic index for IR and IUdR + IR treatments in MMR-deficient (damage tolerant) cancers.

Analysis of cell cycle dynamics using probabilistic cell cycle models.

In this study, we develop asynchronous probabilistic cell cycle models to quantitatively assess the effect of ionizing radiation on a human colon cancer cell line. We use both synchronous and asynchronous cell populations and follow treated cells for up to 2 cell cycle times. The model outputs quantify the changes in cell cycle dynamics following ionizing radiation treatment, principally in the duration of both Gi and G(2)/M phases.

Modulation of the activity of methyl binding domain protein 4 (MBD4/MED1) while processing iododeoxyuridine generated DNA mispairs.

DNA glycosylases function to remove endogenous and exogenous base damage and thus contribute to the maintenance of genomic integrity. This function gains clinical relevance when base mispairs introduced by chemotherapy or radiosensitizing drugs become their substrate. This report describes the action of DNA glycosylases on the mispairs generated by iododeoxyuridine (IUdR)-a radiosensitizer. A non-radioactive fluorescent dye-based in vitro glycosylase assay was employed to quantitatively measure the enzymatic activities of functionally related DNA glycosylases on IUdR generated mispairs including G:IU and A:IU. Thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) and methyl binding domain protein 4 (MBD4/MED1) are found to act on G:IU (but not A:IU) mispairs and are functionally complementary to each other. However, uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) does not show any activity on these mispairs. The methyl binding domain of MBD4/MED1 was found to specifically inhibit the activity of MBD4/MED1 as well as the glycosylase domain, when the G:IU mispairs were located in a methylated CpG context. However, inhibition of TDG activity on methylated G:IU mispairs by the methyl binding domain was not observed.

Probabilistic modeling of DNA mismatch repair effects on cell cycle dynamics and iododeoxyuridine-DNA incorporation.

Previous studies in our laboratory have described increased and preferential radiosensitization of mismatch repair-deficient (MMR(-)) HCT116 colon cancer cells with 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR). Indeed, our studies showed that MMR is involved in the repair (removal) of IUdR-DNA, principally the G:IU mispair. Consequently, we have shown that MMR(-) cells incorporate 25% to 42% more IUdR than MMR(+) cells, and that IUdR and ionizing radiation (IR) interact to produce up to 3-fold greater cytotoxicity in MMR(-) cells. The present study uses the integration of probabilistic mathematical models and experimental data on MMR(-) versus MMR(+) cells to describe the effects of IUdR incorporation upon the cell cycle for the purpose of increasing IUdR-mediated radiosensitivity in MMR(-) cells. Two computational models have been developed. The first is a stochastic model of the progression of cell cycle states, which is applied to experimental data for two synchronized isogenic MMR(+) and MMR(-) colon cancer cell lines treated with and without IUdR. The second model defines the relation between the percentage of cells in the different cell cycle states and the corresponding IUdR-DNA incorporation at a particular time point. These models can be combined to predict IUdR-DNA incorporation at any time in the cell cycle. These mathematical models will be modified and used to maximize therapeutic gain in MMR(-) tumors versus MMR(+) normal tissues by predicting the optimal dose of IUdR and optimal timing for IR treatment to increase the synergistic action using xenograft models and, later, in clinical trials.

BRCA1 activates a G2-M cell cycle checkpoint following 6-thioguanine-induced DNA mismatch damage.

Human DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is involved in the response to certain chemotherapy drugs, including 6-thioguanine (6-TG). Consistently, MMR-deficient human tumor cells show resistance to 6-TG damage as manifested by a reduced G(2)-M arrest and decreased apoptosis. In this study, we investigate the role of the BRCA1 protein in modulating a 6-TG-induced MMR damage response, using an isogenic human breast cancer cell line model, including a BRCA1 mutated cell line (HCC1937) and its transfectant with a wild-type BRCA1 cDNA. The MMR proteins MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 are similarly detected in both cell lines. BRCA1-mutant cells are more resistant to 6-TG than BRCA1-positive cells in a clonogenic survival assay and show reduced apoptosis. Additionally, the mutated BRCA1 results in an almost complete loss of a G(2)-M cell cycle checkpoint response induced by 6-TG. Transfection of single specific small interfering RNAs (siRNA) against MSH2, MLH1, ATR, and Chk1 in BRCA1-positive cells markedly reduces the BRCA1-dependent G(2)-M checkpoint response. Interestingly, ATR and Chk1 siRNA transfection in BRCA1-positive cells shows similar levels of 6-TG cytotoxicity as the control transfectant, whereas MSH2 and MLH1 siRNA transfectants show 6-TG resistance as expected. DNA MMR processing, as measured by the number of 6-TG-induced DNA strand breaks using an alkaline comet assay (+/-z-VAD-fmk cotreatment) and by levels of iododeoxyuridine-DNA incorporation, is independent of BRCA1, suggesting the involvement of BRCA1 in the G(2)-M checkpoint response to 6-TG but not in the subsequent excision processing of 6-TG mispairs by MMR.

DNA mismatch repair initiates 6-thioguanine--induced autophagy through p53 activation in human tumor cells.

PURPOSE: We investigate the roles of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and p53 in mediating the induction of autophagy in human tumor cells after exposure to 6-thioguanine (6-TG), a chemotherapy drug recognized by MMR. We also examine how activation of autophagy affects apoptosis (type I cell death) after MMR processing of 6-TG. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using isogenic pairs of MLH1(-)/MLH1(+) human colorectal cancer cells (HCT116) and MSH2(-)/MSH2(+) human endometrial cancer cells (HEC59), we initially measure activation of autophagy for up to 3 days after 6-TG treatment using LC3, a specific marker of autophagy. We then assess the role of p53 in autophagic signaling of 6-TG MMR processing using both pifithrin-alpha cotreatment to chemically inhibit p53 transcription and small hairpin RNA inhibition of p53 expression. Finally, we use Atg5 small hairpin RNA inhibition of autophagy to assess the effect on apoptosis after MMR processing of 6-TG. RESULTS: We find that MMR is required for mediating autophagy in response to 6-TG treatment in these human tumor cells. We also show that p53 plays an essential role in signaling from MMR to the autophagic pathway. Finally, our results indicate that 6-TG-induced autophagy inhibits apoptosis after MMR processing of 6-TG. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a novel function of MMR in mediating autophagy after a chemical (6-TG) DNA mismatch damage through p53 activation. The resulting autophagy inhibits apoptosis after MMR processing of 6-TG.

The DNA N-glycosylase MED1 exhibits preference for halogenated pyrimidines and is involved in the cytotoxicity of 5-iododeoxyuridine.

The base excision repair protein MED1 (also known as MBD4), an interactor with the mismatch repair protein MLH1, has a central role in the maintenance of genomic stability with dual functions in DNA damage response and repair. MED1 acts as a thymine and uracil DNA N-glycosylase on T:G and U:G mismatches that occur at cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) methylation sites due to spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine and cytosine, respectively. To elucidate the mechanisms that underlie sequence discrimination by MED1, we did single-turnover kinetics with the isolated, recombinant glycosylase domain of MED1. Quantification of MED1 substrate hierarchy confirmed MED1 preference for mismatches within a CpG context and showed preference for hemimethylated base mismatches. Furthermore, the k(st) values obtained with the uracil analogues 5-fluorouracil and 5-iodouracil were over 20- to 30-fold higher than those obtained with uracil, indicating substantially higher affinity for halogenated bases. A 5-iodouracil precursor is the halogenated nucleotide 5-iododeoxyuridine (5IdU), a cytotoxic and radiosensitizing agent. Cultures of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF) with different Med1 genotype derived from mice with targeted inactivation of the gene were evaluated for sensitivity to 5IdU. The results revealed that Med1-null MEFs are more sensitive to 5IdU than wild-type MEFs in both 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and colony formation assays. Furthermore, high-performance liquid chromatography analyses revealed that Med1-null cells exhibit increased levels of 5IdU in their DNA due to increased incorporation or reduced removal. These findings establish MED1 as a bona fide repair activity for the removal of halogenated bases and indicate that MED1 may play a significant role in 5IdU cytotoxicity.

Methoxyamine potentiates iododeoxyuridine-induced radiosensitization by altering cell cycle kinetics and enhancing senescence.

We previously reported that methoxyamine (an inhibitor of base excision repair) potentiates iododeoxyuridine (IUdR)-induced radiosensitization in human tumor cells. In this study, we investigated the potential mechanisms of this enhanced cell death. Human colorectal carcinoma RKO cells were exposed to IUdR (3 micromol/L) and/or methoxyamine (3 mmol/L) for 48 hours before ionizing radiation (5 Gy). We found that IUdR/methoxyamine altered cell cycle kinetics and led to an increased G1 population but a decreased S population before ionizing radiation. Immediately following ionizing radiation (up to 6 hours), IUdR/methoxyamine-pretreated cells showed a stringent G1-S checkpoint but an insufficient G2-M checkpoint, whereas a prolonged G1 arrest, containing 2CG1 and 4CG1 cells, was found at later times up to 72 hours. Levels of cell cycle-specific markers [p21, p27, cyclin A, cyclin B1, and pcdc2(Y15)] and DNA damage signaling proteins [gammaH2AX, pChk1(S317), and pChk2(T68)] supported these altered cell cycle kinetics. Interestingly, we found that IUdR/methoxyamine pretreatment reduced ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis. Additionally, the extent of cell death through necrosis or autophagy seemed similar in all (IUdR +/- methoxyamine + ionizing radiation) treatment groups. However, a larger population of senescence-activated beta-galactosidase-positive cells was seen in IUdR/methoxyamine/ionizing radiation-treated cells, which was correlated with the increased activation of the senescence factors p53 and pRb. These data indicate that IUdR/methoxyamine pretreatment enhanced the effects of ionizing radiation by causing a prolonged G1 cell cycle arrest and by promoting stress-induced premature senescence. Thus, senescence, a novel ionizing radiation-induced tumor suppression pathway, may be effectively targeted by IUdR/methoxyamine pretreatment, resulting in an improved therapeutic gain for ionizing radiation.

The interaction between two radiosensitizers: 5-iododeoxyuridine and caffeine.

5-Iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) and caffeine are recognized as potential radiosensitizers with different mechanisms of interaction with ionizing radiation (IR). To assess the interaction of these two types of radiosensitizers, we compared treatment responses to these drugs alone and in combination with IR in two p53-proficient and p53-deficient pairs of human colon cancer cell lines (HCT116 versus HCT116 p53-/- and RKO versus RKO E6). Based on clonogenic survival, the three single agents (IR, IUdR, and caffeine) as well as IUdR or caffeine combined with IR are less or equally effective in p53-deficient human tumor cells compared with p53-proficient tumor cells. However, using both radiosensitizers, a significantly greater radiosensitization was found in p53-deficient human tumor cells. To better understand the interaction of these two radiosensitizers, additional studies on DNA repair and cell cycle regulation were done. We found that caffeine enhanced IUdR-DNA incorporation and IUdR-mediated radiosensitization by partially inhibiting repair (removal) of IUdR in DNA. The repair of IR-induced DNA double-strand breaks was also inhibited by caffeine. However, these effects of caffeine on IUdR-mediated radiosensitization were not found in p53-proficient cells. Cell cycle analyses also showed a greater abrogation of IR-induced S- and G2-phase arrests by caffeine in p53-deficient cells, particularly when combined with IUdR. Collectively, these data provide the mechanistic bases for combining these two radiosensitizers to enhance tumor cytotoxicity. This differential dual mode of radiosensitization by combining IUdR and caffeine-like drugs (e.g., UCN-01) in p53-deficient human tumors may lead to a greater therapeutic gain.

Schedule-dependent drug effects of oral 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose as an in vivo radiosensitizer in U251 human glioblastoma xenografts.

PURPOSE: 5-Iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose (IPdR) is an oral prodrug of 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IUdR), an in vitro/in vivo radiosensitizer. IPdR can be rapidly converted to IUdR by a hepatic aldehyde oxidase. Previously, we found that the enzymatic conversion of IPdR to IUdR could be transiently reduced using a once daily (q.d.) treatment schedule and this may affect IPdR-mediated tumor radiosensitization. The purpose of this study is to measure the effect of different drug dosing schedules on tumor radiosensitization and therapeutic index in human glioblastoma xenografts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three different IPdR treatment schedules (thrice a day, t.i.d.; every other day, q.o.d.; every 3rd day, q.3.d.), compared with a q.d. schedule, were analyzed using athymic nude mice with human glioblastoma (U251) s.c. xenografts. Plasma pharmacokinetics, IUdR-DNA incorporation in tumor and normal proliferating tissues, tumor growth delay following irradiation, and body weight loss were used as end points. RESULTS: The t.i.d. schedule with the same total daily doses as the q.d. schedule (250, 500, or 1,000 mg/kg/d) improved the efficiency of IPdR conversion to IUdR. As a result, the percentage of IUdR-DNA incorporation was higher using the t.i.d. schedule in the tumor xenografts as well as in normal small intestine and bone marrow. Using a fixed dose (500 mg/kg) per administration, the q.o.d. and q.3.d. schedules also showed greater IPdR conversion than the q.d. schedule, related to a greater recovery of hepatic aldehyde oxidase activity prior to the next drug dosing. In the tumor regrowth assay, all IPdR treatment schedules showed significant increases of regrowth delays compared with the control without IPdR (q.o.d., 29.4 days; q.d., 29.7 days; t.i.d., 34.7 days; radiotherapy alone, 15.7 days). The t.i.d. schedule also showed a significantly enhanced tumor growth delay compared with the q.d. schedule. Additionally, the q.o.d. schedule resulted in a significant reduction in systemic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The t.i.d. and q.o.d. dosing schedules improved the efficiency of enzymatic activation of IPdR to IUdR during treatment and changed the extent of tumor radiosensitization and/or systemic toxicity compared with a q.d. dosing schedule. These dosing schedules will be considered for future clinical trials of IPdR-mediated human tumor radiosensitization.

Differential radiosensitization in DNA mismatch repair-proficient and -deficient human colon cancer xenografts with 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose.

PURPOSE: 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose (IPdR) is a pyrimidinone nucleoside prodrug of 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) under investigation as an orally administered radiosensitizer. We previously reported that the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (both hMSH2 and hMLH1) impact on the extent (percentage) of IUdR-DNA incorporation and subsequent in vitro IUdR-mediated radiosensitization in human tumor cell lines. In this study, we used oral IPdR to assess in vivo radiosensitization in MMR-proficient (MMR+) and -deficient (MMR-) human colon cancer xenografts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We tested whether oral IPdR treatment (1 g/kg/d for 14 days) can result in differential IUdR incorporation in tumor cell DNA and subsequent radiosensitization after a short course (every day for 4 days) of fractionated radiation therapy, by using athymic nude mice with an isogenic pair of human colon cancer xenografts, HCT116 (MMR-, hMLH1-) and HCT116/3-6 (MMR+, hMLH1+). A tumor regrowth assay was used to assess radiosensitization. Systemic toxicity was assessed by daily body weights and by percentage of IUdR-DNA incorporation in normal bone marrow and intestine. RESULTS: After a 14-day once-daily IPdR treatment by gastric gavage, significantly higher IUdR-DNA incorporation was found in HCT116 (MMR-) tumor xenografts compared with HCT116/3-6 (MMR+) tumor xenografts. Using a tumor regrowth assay after the 14-day drug treatment and a 4-day radiation therapy course (days 11-14 of IPdR), we found substantial radiosensitization in both HCT116 and HCT116/3-6 tumor xenografts. However, the sensitizer enhancement ratio (SER) was substantially higher in HCT116 (MMR-) tumor xenografts (1.48 at 2 Gy per fraction, 1.41 at 4 Gy per fraction), compared with HCT116/3-6 (MMR+) tumor xenografts (1.21 at 2 Gy per fraction, 1.20 at 4 Gy per fraction). No substantial systemic toxicity was found in the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IPdR-mediated radiosensitization can be an effective in vivo approach to treat "drug-resistant" MMR-deficient tumors as well as MMR-proficient tumors.

Inhibition of base excision repair potentiates iododeoxyuridine-induced cytotoxicity and radiosensitization.

5-Iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IdUrd) is a halogenated thymidine analogue recognized as an effective in vitro and in vivo radiosensitizer in human cancers. IdUrd-related cytotoxicity and/or radiosensitization are correlated with the extent of IdUrd-DNA incorporation replacing thymidine. IdUrd cytotoxicity and radiosensitization result, in part, from induction of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) with subsequent enhanced DNA double-strand breaks leading to cell death. Because base excision repair (BER) is a major DNA repair pathway for SSB induced by chemical agents and ionizing radiation, we initially assessed the role of BER in modulating IdUrd cytotoxicity and radiosensitization using genetically matched Chinese hamster ovary cells, with (AA8 cells) and without (EM9 cells) XRCC1 expression. XRCC1 plays a central role in processing and repairing SSBs and double-strand breaks. We found that EM9 cells were significantly more sensitive than parental AA8 cells to IdUrd alone and to IdUrd + ionizing radiation. The EM9 cells also demonstrate increased DNA damage after IdUrd treatment as evaluated by pulse field gel electrophoresis and single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet Assay). BER-competent EM9 cells, which were stably transfected with a cosmid vector carrying the human XRCC1 gene, showed responses to IdUrd similar to AA8 cells. We also assessed the role of methoxyamine, a small molecule inhibitor of BER, in the response of human colon cancer cells (HCT116) to IdUrd cytotoxicity and radiosensitization. Methoxyamine not only was able to increase IdUrd cytotoxicity but also increased the incorporation of IdUrd into DNA of HCT116 human colon cancer cells leading to greater radiosensitization. Thus, a genetic or biochemical impairment of BER results in increased IdUrd-induced cytotoxicity and radiosensitization in mammalian cells.