Left ventricular assist device in cardiac amyloidosis: friend or foe?

The prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis has progressively increased over the last years, being recognized as a significant cause of heart failure. In fact, the management of advanced heart failure is a cornerstone treatment of amyloid cardiomyopathy due to the frequent delay in its diagnosis. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been gaining importance in the scenario of end-stage heart failure, representing an alternative to heart transplant. However, only few studies have investigated the role of LVAD in restrictive cardiomyopathies such as cardiac amyloidosis, since there are several problems to consider. In fact, both anatomical factors and the restrictive physiology of this condition make LVAD implant a relevant challenge in this subset of patients. Furthermore, due to the systemic involvement of amyloidosis, several factors have to be considered after LVAD implant, such as an increased risk of bleeding and right ventricular failure. This review attempts to summarize the current evidence of LVAD in cardiac amyloidosis, especially focusing on the challenges that this cardiomyopathy imposes both to the implant and to its management thereafter.

Multi-chamber speckle tracking imaging and diagnostic value of left atrial strain in cardiac amyloidosis.

AIMS: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) affects the four heart chambers, which can all be evaluated through speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 423 consecutive patients screened for CA over 5 years at two referral centres. CA was diagnosed in 261 patients (62%) with either amyloid transthyretin (ATTR; n = 144, 34%) or amyloid light-chain (AL; n = 117, 28%) CA. Strain parameters of all chambers were altered in CA patients, particularly those with ATTR-CA. Nonetheless, only peak left atrial longitudinal strain (LA-PALS) displayed an independent association with the diagnosis of CA or ATTR-CA beyond standard echocardiographic variables and cardiac biomarkers (Model 1), or with the diagnosis of ATTR-CA beyond the validated IWT score in patients with unexplained left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. Patients with the most severe impairment of LA strain were those most likely to have CA or ATTR-CA. Specifically, LA-PALS and/or LA-peak atrial contraction strain (PACS) in the first quartile (i.e. LA-PALS <6.65% and/or LA-PACS <3.62%) had a 3.60-fold higher risk of CA, and a 3.68-fold higher risk of ATTR-CA beyond Model 1. Among patients with unexplained LV hypertrophy, those with LA-PALS or LA-PACS in the first quartile had an 8.76-fold higher risk for CA beyond Model 1, and a 2.04-fold higher risk of ATTR-CA beyond the IWT score. CONCLUSIONS: Among STE measures of the four chambers, PALS and PACS are the most informative ones to diagnose CA and ATTR-CA. Patients screened for CA and having LA-PALS and/or LA-PACS in the first quartile have a high likelihood of CA and ATTR-CA.

COVID-19 and the burning issue of drug interaction: never forget the ECG.

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2), has been rapidly escalating, becoming a relevant threat to global health. Being a recent virus outbreak, there are still no available therapeutic regimens that have been approved in large randomised trials and so patients are currently being treated with multiple drugs. This raises concerns regarding drug interaction and their implication in arrhythmic burden. In fact, two of the actually used drugs against SARS-CoV2, such as chloroquine and the combination lopinavir/ritonavir, might determine a QT (the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave) interval prolongation and they show several interactions with antiarrhythmic drugs and antipsychotic medications, making them prone to an increased risk of developing arrhythmias. This brief review focuses the attention on the most relevant drug interactions involving the currently used COVID-19 medications and their possible association with cardiac rhythm disorders, taking into account also pre-existing condition and precipitating factors that might additionally increase this risk. Furthermore, based on the available evidence and based on the knowledge of drug interaction, we propose a quick and simple algorithm that might help both cardiologists and non-cardiologists in the management of the arrhythmic risk before and during the treatment with the specific drugs used against SARS-CoV2.

The role of the left atrial function in the surgical management of aortic and mitral valve disease.

The right management of both mitral and aortic disease can be challenging, especially in asymptomatic patients. The current guidelines recommend valve repair or replacement when symptoms arise or when there is an evident left ventricular dysfunction. However, deciding the optimal surgical timing can be very difficult, since the line between the absence of symptoms and being minimally symptomatic, especially in the elderly, is blurred. Another relevant issue regards the second surgical criterion: operating on a patient with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction or with a dilated left ventricle might jeopardize the possibility of a fully reverse remodeling of the heart after surgery. In this scenario, the left atrium might play an important role. In particular, left atrial deformation might be a very useful tool to detect early ultrastructural alterations, and help or support guiding a patient-tailored treatment at an early stage, optimizing the outcome in the long term.

Reference values of left atrial size and function according to age: should we redefine the normal upper limits?

Different cut-offs have been proposed for left atrial (LA) size. Furthermore, conflicting results have been reported about the influence of age on LA size and data on the impact of age on LA myocardial function are scanty. The aim of this study was to derive references values for LA size and function in healthy subjects and to evaluate the impact of age. We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE database. We included only studies evaluating healthy subjects, with age ranged between 18 and 80 years. Parameters were compared among four age groups, < 30, 30-45, > 45-60, > 60 years. Three hundred twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and the final population consisted of 62,821 subjects. LA volume index (LAVi) did not differ among different age groups (p = 0.21). The normal upper limit of LAVi was 24 mL/m2. LA reservoir function, measured by strain, did not differ among age groups (38 ± 3%, 32-43%; p = 0.74). Left ventricular (LV) size and function were not different among groups, except LV mass index. A decrease in E/A ratio and an increase in E/e' ratio were found with advancing age (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively). In healthy subjects the normal upper limit of LAVi was lower than that recommended and is not influenced by advancing age. Furthermore, also LA function measured by strain was not affected by age. The current reference values of LAVi should be used with caution when applied to healthy subjects.