Diagnostic accuracy, clinical characteristics, and prognostic differences of patients with acute myocarditis according to inclusion criteria.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of acute myocarditis (AM) is complex due to its heterogeneity and typically is defined by either Electronic Healthcare Records (EHRs) or advanced imaging and endomyocardial biopsy, but there is no consensus. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of these approaches for AM. METHODS: Data on ICD 10th Revision(ICD-10) codes corresponding to AM were collected from two hospitals and compared to CMR-confirmed or clinically suspected(CS) AM cases with respect to diagnostic accuracy, clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality. Next, we performed a review of published AM studies according to inclusion criteria. RESULTS: We identified 291 unique admissions with ICD-10 codes corresponding to AM in the first three diagnostic positions. The positive predictive value(PPV) of ICD-10 codes for CMR-confirmed or CS-AM was 36%, and patients with CMR-confirmed or CS AM had a lower all-cause mortality than those with a refuted diagnosis (P = 0.019). Using an unstructured approach, patients with CMR-confirmed and CS AM had similar demographics, comorbidity profiles and survival over a median follow-up of 52 months (P = 0.72). Our review of the literature confirmed our findings. Outcomes for patients included in studies using CMR-confirmed criteria were favourable compared to studies with EMB-confirmed AM cases. CONCLUSION: ICD-10 codes have poor accuracy in identification of AM cases and should be used with caution in clinical research. There are important differences in management and outcomes of patients according to the selection criteria used to diagnose AM. Potential selection biases must be considered when interpreting AM cohorts and requires standardisation of inclusion criteria for AM studies.

Impact of the introduction of a standardised ICD programming protocol: real-world data from a single centre.

PURPOSE: Randomised trials have shown that empiric ICD programming, using long detection times and high detection zones, reduces device therapy in ICD recipients. However, there is less data on its effectiveness in a "real-world" setting, especially secondary prevention patients. Our aim was to evaluate the introduction of a standardised programming protocol in a real-world setting of unselected ICD recipients. METHODS: We analysed 270 consecutive ICD recipients implanted in a single centre-135 implanted prior to protocol implementation (physician-led group) and 135 after (standardised group). The protocol included long arrhythmia detection times (30/40 or equivalent) and high rate detection zones (primary prevention lower treatment zone 200 bpm). Programming in the physician-led group was at the discretion of the implanter. The primary endpoint was time-to-any therapy (ATP or shocks). Secondary endpoints were time-to-inappropriate therapy and time-to-appropriate therapy. The safety endpoints were syncopal episodes, hospital admissions and death. RESULTS: At 12 months follow-up, 47 patients had received any ICD therapy (physician-led group, n = 31 vs. standardised group, n = 16). There was a 47 % risk reduction in any device therapy (p = 0.04) and an 86 % risk reduction in inappropriate therapy (p = 0.009) in the standardised compared to the physician-led group. There was a non-significant 30 % risk reduction in appropriate therapy (p = 0.32). Results were consistent across primary and secondary prevention patients. There were no significant differences in the rates of syncope, hospitalisation, and death. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients in a real-world setting, introduction of a standardised programming protocol, using long detection times and high detection zones, significantly reduces the burden of ICD therapy without an increase in adverse outcomes.

The impact of adjunctive complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation and linear lesions on outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: In persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF), success rates for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone are limited and additional substrate modification is often performed. The two most widely used substrate-based strategies are the ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) and left atrial linear ablation (LALA) at the roof and mitral isthmus. However, it is unclear whether adjunctive CFAE ablation or LALA add significant benefit to PVI alone. We performed a meta-analysis to better gauge the benefit of adjunctive CFAE ablation and LALA in PsAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were systematically searched. We included studies that examined the impact of CFAE ablation or LALA in addition to a PVI-based strategy on clinical outcomes in PsAF. We included both randomized and non-randomized studies. Totally 10 studies (n = 1821) were included: 6 evaluating CFAE ablation, 3 LALA, and 1 both approaches. In comparison with PVI alone, the addition of CFAE ablation [RR 0.86; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.64, 1.16; P = 0.32] or LALA (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.37, 1.09; P = 0.10) offered no significant improvement in arrhythmia-free survival. However, adjunctive CFAE ablation was associated with significant increases (P < 0.05) and LALA non-significant increases in procedure and fluoroscopy times. CONCLUSION: In PsAF, the addition of CFAE ablation or LALA, in comparison with PVI alone, offers no significant improvement in arrhythmia-free survival. Furthermore, they are associated with increases in both procedural and fluoroscopy times. The optimal ablation strategy for PsAF is currently unclear and needs further refinement.

Use of external defibrillator jacket to facilitate safe delivery of radiotherapy for lung cancer - a report of two cases.

The increasing rate of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation coupled with shared risk factors between lung cancer and ischemic cardiac disease means that the need for radiotherapy in cardiac device patients is set to become commonplace. We describe two cases referred to our electrophysiology service over a 6-month period. Both had been diagnosed with lung cancer in tissue directly posterior to a previously implanted ICD device. The cases highlight the risks to device function caused by ionizing radiation, the practical difficulties and ethical dilemmas of delivering radiotherapy to cardiac device patients safely and a novel setting for the use of a wearable defibrillator system.

Defining potential to benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: the role of biomarkers.

AIMS: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy improves survival in patients at high sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. However, some patient groups fulfilling indications for ICD therapy may not gain significant benefit: patients whose absolute risk of SCD is low and patients whose risk of death even with an ICD is high. The value of biomarkers in identifying patients' potential for survival benefit from ICD therapy is unknown. We performed a pilot study to investigate this. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five established cardiovascular biomarkers were measured in patients with ICDs on the background of left ventricular dysfunction: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], soluble ST2 [sST2], growth differentiation factor-15, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. The endpoints were all-cause mortality and survival with appropriate ICD therapy. One hundred and fifty-six patients were enrolled (age 69 years [Q1-Q3 62-77], 85% male, 76% ischaemic aetiology). During a follow-up of 15 ± 3 months, 12 patients died and 43 survived with appropriate ICD therapy. In a Cox proportional hazards model, the strongest predictors of death were Log sST2 (P< 0.001), serum creatinine (P< 0.001), and Log NT-proBNP (P= 0.002). The strongest predictor of survival with appropriate ICD therapy was Log NT-proBNP (P= 0.01). CONCLUSION: The biomarkers NT-proBNP and sST2 are promising biomarkers for identifying patients with little potential to gain significant survival benefit from ICD therapy. However, their incremental benefit, in addition to currently available clinical risk prediction models, remains unclear. These results demand a confirmatory prospective cohort study, designed and powered to derive and validate prediction algorithms incorporating these markers.

Permanent transvenous left ventricular endocardial pacing in a patient with univentricular atrioventricular connection.

Chronotropic incompetence is associated with poorer effort tolerance and worse mortality outcomes, not only in the general cardiac population but also in patients with congenital heart disease. When present in complex patients, pacing options may be limited by difficult pacing access, and an open surgical approach for epicardial lead placement may not always be desirable. We describe a case of symptomatic chronotropic incompetence in a patient with tricuspid atresia, valvar and subpulmonary stenosis, normally related great vessels, and a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt, awaiting cardiac transplantation, whom we palliated with a transvenous endocardial pacing strategy. This technique may provide an alternative pacing strategy for highly selected patients, where few other treatment options are available.

Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: a single-centre study of electrosurgical and laser extraction.

AIMS: Both electrosurgical dissection (EDS) and laser tools are effective in the extraction of chronic implanted endovascular leads. It is unclear which is superior. We undertook a retrospective single-centre study to assess this. METHODS AND RESULTS: In our institution from 2000 to 2004, all extractions requiring an ablative sheath were performed using the EDS system. In 2004, an excimer laser system was acquired, which became the first choice. Consecutive patients undergoing extraction requiring an ablative sheath (EDS or laser) were studied. From 2000 to 2007, 140 leads were extracted from 74 patients (EDS 31 and laser 43). Procedural success was non-significantly higher in the laser vs. the EDS group (95 vs. 87%). In the EDS group, one patient suffered tamponade requiring surgery; in the laser group, one patient suffered a significant pericardial effusion treated conservatively. There were no deaths. Procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar between groups. More patients were referred for primary surgical extraction in the EDS vs. the laser era (7 vs. 0, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Lead extraction using an ablative sheath is safe and effective. In our small study, there were no significant differences between EDS and laser sheaths in terms of success, time, or safety.

Prostate cancer diagnosed in spinal cord-injured patients is more commonly advanced stage than in able-bodied patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and characteristics of prostate cancer in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Little is known about the characteristics of prostate cancer in men with SCI, because prostate cancer screening is not aggressively performed in this population. METHODS: In one fiscal year, 648 men with SCI older than age 50 years were actively enrolled with the SCI service, 20,949 able-bodied men older than age 50 years were actively enrolled in the outpatient clinic database, and 945 patients with prostate cancer were in the cancer registry at our facility. These three databases were cross-referenced for prostate cancer diagnosis and stage and compared with the presence of SCI. RESULTS: Of the 648 patients with SCI, 12 patients with a prostate cancer diagnosis that preceded their injury were excluded. Of the remaining 636 patients, 11 (1.7%) had been diagnosed with prostate cancer since their injury. In contrast, of the 20,949 able-bodied men older than age 50 years seen at our facility in fiscal year 1999, 919 (4.4%) had prostate cancer. Of the patients with SCI and prostate cancer, 7 (63.6%) had locally advanced (Stage T3) or metastatic prostate cancer compared with 267 (29.1%) in the able-bodied population (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Although the proportion of patients with a prostate cancer diagnosis was greater in the able-bodied patients, the prostate cancer detected in the patients with SCI tended to be of a more advanced stage and grade. The difference was likely a result of the decreased use of prostate cancer screening in this population.