Comparing resident operative volumes for routine general surgery cases at academic, urban community, and rural training sites.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training traditionally took place at academic centres, but changed to incorporate community and rural hospitals. As little data exist comparing resident case volumes between these locations, the objective of this study was to determine variations in these volumes for routine general surgery procedures. METHODS: We analyzed senior resident case logs from 2009 to 2019 from a general surgery residency program. We classified training centres as academic, community, and rural. Cases included appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hernia repair, bowel resection, adhesiolysis, and stoma formation or reversal. We matched procedures to blocks based on date of case and compared groups using a Poisson mixed-methods model and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 85 residents and 28 532 cases. Postgraduate year (PGY) 3 residents at academic sites performed 10.9 (95% CI 10.1-11.6) cases per block, which was fewer than 14.7 (95% CI 13.6-15.9) at community and 15.3 (95% CI 14.2-16.5) at rural sites. Fourth-year residents (PGY4) showed a greater difference, with academic residents performing 8.7 (95% CI 8.0-9.3) cases per block compared with 23.7 (95% CI 22.1-25.4) in the community and 25.6 (95% CI 23.6-27.9) at rural sites. This difference continued in PGY5, with academic residents performing 8.3 (95% CI 7.3-9.3) cases per block, compared with 18.9 (95% CI 16.8-21.0) in the community and 14.5 (95% CI 7.0-21.9) at rural sites. CONCLUSION: Senior residents performed fewer routine cases at academic sites than in community and rural centres. Programs can use these data to optimize scheduling for struggling residents who require exposure to routine cases, and help residents complete the requirements of a Competence by Design curriculum.

Evaluating the scope of rural general surgery in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Rural general surgeons perform many procedures outside the conventional scope of the specialty. Unique to British Columbia, the Rural Practice Subsidiary Agreement (RSA) formally defines rurality in the province. Our goal is to understand the scope of practice for BC's rural general surgeons and whether it has been affected over time by changing privileging guidelines. METHODS: Medical Services Plan (MSP) data were collected from 2011 to 2021 for procedures billed by general surgeons in communities defined by the RSA as rural. We categorized codes from the MSP based on surgical specialty. For each community, we calculated the totals for these categories considering what other surgical specialties were present as well as changes over time. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2021, 222 905 procedures were performed in 23 rural communities in BC. Colonoscopies were the most frequently performed procedure (n = 80 114, 35.9%), followed by colorectal (n = 23 891, 10.7%) and hernia procedures (n = 20 911, 9.4%). The most common unconventional procedures were plastic surgeries (n = 8077, 3.6%). Classification within the RSA did not significantly influence the percentage of unconventional general surgery procedures performed (p = 0.4). When another surgical specialty was present, there was often a decrease in the number of that specialty's procedures performed by general surgeons. Over the past decade, rural general surgeons performed fewer unconventional general surgery procedures (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: General surgeons working in rural communities perform a variety of procedures based on resources, community need, and access to other specialists. Over the last decade, this appears to have been influenced by new privileging guidelines. Understanding the scope of rural general surgery can inform training opportunities and, as there is a migration away from rural surgeons performing as many unconventional procedures, can elucidate the implications on patients and communities.

The impact of targeted fee increases on the pay disparity between female and male general surgeons in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: High-level payment data provided by Doctors of BC showed a 19.7% pay disparity in annual payments between female and male general surgeons in fiscal year 2019/20, and this was previously as high as 30% in 2012/13. This study aimed to examine the impact of targeted fee increases on pay disparity by sex over time. METHODS: The top 35 fees billed by female general surgeons, representing 76.3% of total payments, were retrospectively analyzed. The pay disparity by sex was calculated for each individual fee from 2000/01 to 2019/20. RESULTS: There were notable billing differences between female and male general surgeons. Female surgeons billed breast oncology procedures, malignancy consultations and visits, and peritoneal malignancy surgical procedures in greater proportions than did their male counterparts. Male surgeons billed hemorrhoid banding and rigid proctosigmoidoscopy in greater proportions than their female counterparts. With targeted fee increases, pay disparity by sex worsened for 17 of the top 35 fees but improved for the other 18 from 2010/11 to 2019/20, to varying degrees, resulting in an overall reduction in pay disparity by sex from 23% to 15%. If across-the-board fee increases had been implemented instead of targeted fee increases, the disparity in 2019/20 would have been 19% instead of 15%. CONCLUSION: Targeted fee increases reduced pay disparity between male and female general surgeons compared with theoretical across-the-board fee increases in British Columbia from 2010/11 to 2019/20, but not uniformly; some fee increases resulted in increased disparity. Other physician groups should conduct a similar analysis and allocate future fee changes with the aim of improving rather than worsening disparity.

Germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene analyses from English NHS regional molecular genomics laboratories 1996-2020: development of a national resource of patient-level genomics laboratory records.

OBJECTIVE: To describe national patterns of National Health Service (NHS) analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) genes in England using individual-level data submitted to the National Disease Registration Service (NDRS) by the NHS regional molecular genetics laboratories. DESIGN: Laboratories submitted individual-level patient data to NDRS against a prescribed data model, including (1) patient identifiers, (2) test episode data, (3) per-gene results and (4) detected sequence variants. Individualised per-laboratory algorithms were designed and applied in NDRS to extract and map the data to the common data model. Laboratory-level MMR activity audit data from the Clinical Molecular Genetics Society/Association of Clinical Genomic Science were used to assess early years' missing data. RESULTS: Individual-level data from patients undergoing NHS MMR germline genetic testing were submitted from all 13 English laboratories performing MMR analyses, comprising in total 16 722 patients (9649 full-gene, 7073 targeted), with the earliest submission from 2000. The NDRS dataset is estimated to comprise >60% of NHS MMR analyses performed since inception of NHS MMR analysis, with complete national data for full-gene analyses for 2016 onwards. Out of 9649 full-gene tests, 2724 had an abnormal result, approximately 70% of which were (likely) pathogenic. Data linkage to the National Cancer Registry demonstrated colorectal cancer was the most frequent cancer type in which full-gene analysis was performed. CONCLUSION: The NDRS MMR dataset is a unique national pan-laboratory amalgamation of individual-level clinical and genomic patient data with pseudonymised identifiers enabling linkage to other national datasets. This growing resource will enable longitudinal research and can form the basis of a live national genomic disease registry.

Adaptations to general surgery resident education in response to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to many new provincial public health measures to reallocate resources in response to an impending surge of cases. These necessary decisions had several downstream effects on general surgery training. We surveyed the actions taken by Canadian general surgery training programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: A mixed-methods survey was sent to all general surgery program directors to assess various domains in surgical education and modifications made because of the pandemic. Responses were quantified as proportions or qualitative narratives describing those changes. RESULTS: Most programs (13/15) recalled residents from planned rotations and redistributed them to rotations considered as core required services, including acute care surgery, trauma surgery and intensive care. Many programs also restructured their acute care surgery models to allow for a group of "reserve" residents to replace trainees who became infected with SARS-CoV-2. In terms of clinical experience, there was a reduction in both clinical and operative exposure among trainees. The reduction in clinical exposure disproportionately affected junior residents, whose involvement in COVID-19 cases was restricted. Formal educational sessions were maintained, but delivered virtually. Many programs instituted a program of increased frequency of communication with trainees. CONCLUSION: Many programs embraced using virtual platforms for teaching. The demonstrated utility of virtual teaching may lead to rethinking how training programs deliver didactic teaching and expand teaching opportunities. However, many programs also perceived a decrease in clinical and procedural exposure, primarily affecting junior residents. More information is needed to quantify the deficit in learning incurred as a result of the pandemic as well as its long-term effects on resident competency.

Comparing the Quality of Narrative Comments by Rotation Setting.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of rotation setting on trainee-directed narrative comments within a Canadian General Surgery Residency Program. The primary outcome was to use the McMaster Narrative Comment Rating Scale (MNCRS) to evaluate the quality of narrative comments across five domains: valence of language, degree of correction versus reinforcement, specificity, actionability and overall usefulness. As distributed medical education in the postgraduate training context becomes more prevalent, delineating differences in feedback between various sites will be imperative, as it may affect how narrative comments are interpreted by clinical competency committee (CCC) members. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis of 2,469 assessments obtained between July 1, 2014 and May 5, 2019 from the General Surgery Residency Program at the University of British Columbia (UBC) was conducted. Narrative comments were rated using the McMaster Narrative Comment Rating Scale (MNCRS), a validated instrument for evaluating the quality of narrative comments. A repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted to explore the impact of rotation setting, academic, urban tertiary, distributed urban, and distributed rural on the quality of narrative feedback. RESULTS: Overall, the quality of the narrative comments varied substantially between and within rotation settings. Academic sites tended to provide more actionable comments (p = 0.01) and more corrective versus reinforcing comments, compared with other sites (p's < 0.01). Comments produced by the urban tertiary rotation setting were consistently lower in quality across all scale categories compared with other settings (p's < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The type of rotation setting has a significant effect on the quality of faculty feedback for trainees. Faculty development on the provision of feedback is necessary, regardless of rotation setting, and should appropriately combine rotation-specific needs and overarching program goals to ensure trainees and clinical competence committees receive high quality narrative.

Optimizing Resident Wellness During a Pandemic: University of British Columbia's General Surgery Program's COVID-19 Experience.

OBJECTIVE: The University of British Columbia's General Surgery Program delineates a unique and systematic approach to wellness for surgical residents during a pandemic. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers are suffering from increased rates of mental health disturbances. Residents' duty obligations put them at increased physical and mental health risk. It is only by prioritizing their well-being that we can better serve the patients and prepare for a surge. Therefore, it is imperative that measures are put in place to protect them. METHODS: Resident wellness was optimized by targeting 3 domains: efficiency of practice, culture of wellness and personal resilience. RESULTS: Efficiency in delivering information and patient care minimizes additional stress to residents that is caused by the pandemic. By having a reserve team, prioritizing the safety of residents and taking burnout seriously, the culture of wellness and sense of community in our program are emphasized. All of the residents' personal resilience was further optimized by the regular and mandatory measures put in place by the program. CONCLUSIONS: The new challenges brought on by a pandemic puts increased pressure on residents. Measures must be put in place to protect resident from the increased physical and mental health stress in order to best serve patients during this difficult time.

Surgical training in the midst of a pandemic: a distributed general surgery residency program's response to COVID-19.

Summary: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a substantial impact on surgical training. We describe some of the challenges brought on by the pandemic and our program's province-wide response to them. We focus specifically on residents' provision of service, education and wellness.

Single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a novel antibiotic-impregnated biologic porcine submucosa tissue matrix.

BACKGROUND: Single-stage repair of incisional hernias in contaminated fields has a high rate of surgical site infection (30-42%) when biologic grafts are used for repair. In an attempt to decrease this risk, a novel graft incorporating gentamicin into a biologic extracellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa was developed. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational study was designed to determine the incidence of surgical site infection following implantation of the device into surgical fields characterized as CDC Class II, III, or IV. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled, with 42% contaminated and 25% dirty surgical fields. After 12 months, 5 patients experienced 6 surgical site infections (21%) with infection involving the graft in 2 patients (8%). No grafts were explanted. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of gentamicin into a porcine-derived biologic graft can be achieved with no noted gentamicin toxicity and a low rate of device infection for patients undergoing single-stage repair of ventral hernia in contaminated settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered March 27, 2015 at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02401334.

Incisional hernia repair surgery improves patient reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias are a frequent complication after abdominal surgeries. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of incisional hernia repair on health related quality of life. METHODS: We prospectively recruited a sample of patients waiting for incisional hernia repairs in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Canada. Study participants self-report their pain, depression and overall quality of life using patient reported outcome measures EQ-5D, PHQ-9 and PEG as they were placed on the waitlist and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: There were 87 patients who responded to both the pre and post-operative survey. The average wait for surgery was 20.3 weeks. Patients with poor baseline health pre-operatively had significant improvement in pain, depression and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with poorer baseline health who underwent surgery for incisional hernias, there was a significant benefit in depression, pain and overall quality of life.

Laparoscopic Mesh Repair of Bilateral Obturator Hernias Post-Peritoneal Dialysis.

Abdominal wall hernias are prevalent in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Obturator hernias, first described by Arnaud de Ronsil in 1724, are an uncommon type of hernia where intra-abdominal contents protrude through the obturator foramen. The following case highlights a rare presentation of bilateral obturator hernias with right femoral and inguinal hernia in an 82-year-old woman post-PD. This patient presented with 5 months of bilateral thigh pain and swelling and was found to only have a right-sided obturator hernia on computer tomography (CT) scan. Intraoperatively, bilateral obturator hernias were found along with right inguinal and femoral hernias, which were all repaired laparoscopically with polypropylene mesh. Postoperatively, the patient developed a self-limiting port site hematoma and resumed PD 1 month post-surgery. Due to the high morbidity and mortality from obturator hernias, prompt diagnosis and treatment are imperative. Compared with open hernia repair, laparoscopic hernia repairs are associated with quicker return to usual activities and less persisting pain and numbness. This case portrays that laparoscopic approach to bilateral obturator hernias can be considered in patients post-PD.

Characterization and optimization of a positively charged poly (ethylene glycol)diacrylate hydrogel as an actuating muscle tissue engineering scaffold.

Hydrogels have been used for many applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine due to their versatile material properties and similarities to the native extracellular matrix. Poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) is an ionic electroactive polymer (EAP), a material that responds to an electric field with a change in size or shape while in an ionic solution, that may be used in the development of hydrogels. In this study, we have investigated a positively charged EAP that can bend without the need of external ions. PEGDA was modified with the positively charged molecule 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl-trimethylammonium chloride (MAETAC) to provide its own positive ions. This hydrogel was then characterized and optimized for bending and cellular biocompatibility with C2C12 mouse myoblast cells. Studies show that the polymer responds to an electric field and supports C2C12 viability.

Characterization and optimization of actuating poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/acrylic acid hydrogels as artificial muscles.

Large volume deficiencies in skeletal muscle tissue fail to heal with conservative treatments, and improved treatment methods are needed. Tissue engineered scaffolds for skeletal muscle need to mimic the optimal environment for muscle development by providing the proper electric, mechanical, and chemical cues. Electroactive polymers, polymers that change in size or shape in response to an electric field, may be able to provide the optimal environment for muscle growth. In this study, an electroactive polymer made from poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and acrylic acid (AA) is characterized and optimized for movement and biocompatibility. Hydrogel sample thickness, overall polymer concentration, and the ratio of PEGDA to AA were found to significantly impact the actuation response. C2C12 mouse myoblast cells attached and proliferated on hydrogel samples with various ratios of PEGDA to AA. Future experiments will produce hydrogel samples combined with aligned guidance cues in the form of electrospun fibers to provide a favorable environment for muscle development.

Cycles of silence: First Nations women overcoming social and historical barriers in supportive cancer care.

BACKGROUND: First Nations people with cancer in Canada confront several critical inequities in physical and psychosocial domains. First Nations women are at a particular disadvantage as they are disproportionately affected by social determinants of health, but how they navigate these challenges within their communities is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: Our study explores survivorship experiences of First Nations women with cancer and their caregivers. Drawing from a larger data set on survivorship, we identify several major barriers to cancer communication and support in First Nations communities. METHODS: Our team conducted a participatory, arts-based study using several data collection methods (interviews, sharing sessions, photovoice, and other creative activities) with 43 participants (24 cancer survivors and 19 caregivers) from four First Nations communities in Canada. RESULTS: Two major themes have emerged out of our data analyses: (1) suffering without support leads to cycles of silence and (2) community-based supports can disrupt these cycles. We identified several social, historical, and institutional barriers to speaking about cancer and finding/providing support; however, communities met the challenge of silence through voluntary and unsolicited provision of support. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread silence around cancer reflects both the limited access First Nations people have to formal, supportive programs and services, as well as the creative ways they provide emotional, social, and financial support within their informal networks. Beyond the support of their communities, they also required institutional provision of care that is culturally safe, addressing the colonial impacts on cancer communication and the disproportionate burdens of disease in First Nations communities.

Implant repositioning by segmental osteotomy: a case series and review.

Although every effort is made to place dental implants in a proper position, the restorative dentist does not always succeed. Historically, treatment options for poorly placed implants included removing the implant or leaving it "sleeping." Recent modifications of an existing technique, the segmental osteotomy, may offer hope in these situations by rendering many of these "hopeless" implants salvageable. This paper presents lessons learned from a series of cases in which segmental osteotomies were performed to improve the esthetic outcome of implant malpositioning. Two clinical cases (one successful, one failed) utilizing segmental osteotomy to surgically correct malposed implants are presented with a review of the literature associated with the technique. With adherence to proper case selection and detailed surgical protocol, segmental osteotomy is a viable treatment option to correct misaligned dental implants.

Effectiveness of a patient and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: the CHOICE trial.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality but is underused. Effective interventions to increase screening that can be implemented broadly are needed. METHODS: A controlled trial was conducted to evaluate a patient-level and practice-level intervention to increase the use of recommended CRC screening tests among health plan members. The patient-level intervention was a patient decision aid and included stage-targeted brochures that were mailed to health plan members. Intervention practices received academic detailing to prepare practices to facilitate CRC testing once patients were activated by the decision aid. We used patient surveys and claims data to assess CRC test completion. RESULTS: Among 443 active participants, 75.8% were ages 52 to 59 years, 80.9% were white, 62.1% were women, and 46.4% had college degrees or greater education. Among 380 active participants with known screening status at 12 months based on survey results, 39% in the intervention group reported receiving CRC screening compared with 32.2% in the usual care group (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval; [CI], 0.88-2.05; P = .17). After adjusting for baseline differences and accounting for clustering, the effect was somewhat larger (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98-2.73; P = .06). Claims analysis produced similar effects for active participants. The intervention was more effective in those who had incomes >$50,000 (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.07-4.35) than in those who had lower incomes (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.53-2.94; P = .03 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions combining a patient-directed decision aid and practice-directed academic detailing had a modest but statistically nonsignificant effect on CRC screening rates among active participants.

Effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: design and baseline findings of the CHOICE trial.

BACKGROUND: : Evidence-based interventions have been found effective in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Translating these successful interventions into real world settings, such as health plans, can be challenging. METHODS: : CHOICE (Communicating Health Options through Information and Cancer Education) is a controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level intervention to increase use of recommended CRC screening tests. The patient-level intervention was a patient decision aid and stage-targeted brochures, mailed to eligible health plan members, to provide information about CRC, available screening tests, and how to obtain CRC screening at their physicians' practices. The practice-level intervention was academic detailing to prepare practices to facilitate CRC testing once the patient was activated by the decision aid. Surveys and claims data will be used to assess CRC screening test completion. RESULTS: : Thirty-two primary care practices in Florida and Georgia participated. The authors recruited 443 participating health plan members for the trial; 211 were patients in intervention practices, and 232 were in usual care practices. Study participants reflected an insured population; the majority were white and aged <60 years. The authors also mailed the intervention to 343 people from intervention practices who did not respond to the eligibility or baseline survey. Receipt of screening in that group will be compared with screening among 319 people from usual care practices who did not respond to these surveys using claims data. CONCLUSIONS: : The CHOICE study will demonstrate the effect of 2 combined evidence-based interventions on CRC screening test completion among health plan members. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

Yield of claims data and surveys for determining colon cancer screening among health plan members.

Screening can reduce incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer but has been underutilized. Efforts to increase screening depend on accurate data about screening status. We sought to evaluate the independent and combined yield of claims and direct survey for identifying colorectal cancer screening among average-risk health plan beneficiaries. Participants were Aetna members ages between 52 and 80 years from 32 primary care practices in Florida and Georgia participating in the Communicating Health Options through Information and Cancer Education study. Main outcomes were the proportion of average-risk patients who were up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening based on claims data and the estimated additional yield of survey data for patients with no evidence of screening in their claims history. Of 4,020 average-risk members identified, claims data indicated that 1,066 (27%) had recent colorectal cancer screening. Among the 1,269 average-risk members with no evidence of screening by claims data who returned surveys, 498 (39%) reported being up-to-date with screening. Combining claims data and survey data and accounting for survey nonresponse, we estimate that 47% to 59% of member patients were actually up-to-date with screening, an additional yield of 20 to 32 percentage points. We conclude that, among health plan members, the combination of claims data and survey information had substantially higher yield than claims data alone for identifying colorectal cancer screening.

Objective assessment of surgical decision making in trauma after a laboratory-based course: durability of cognitive skills.

BACKGROUND: Because surgical trainees have less exposure to surgical trauma, there is a greater potential of having gaps in decision-making skills. We previously validated a novel assessment tool for decision making in surgical trauma and have documented improvement in resident decision-making skills after a hands-on course. However, brief intensive courses have been criticized for not imparting long-term changes in practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the durability of cognitive skills learned after a 2-day course. METHODS: Twenty-two residents participated in a 2-day interactive didactic lecture series as well as an animal laboratory focused on practical strategies in dealing with surgical trauma. All participants underwent precourse and immediate postcourse assessment of surgical decision making through a validated short-answer examination. Six months after the course, 12 of these 22 residents completed a third similar examination-the retention test. RESULTS: The retention test showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha, .81) and construct validity as evidenced by a positive correlation between test scores and postgraduate year level (r = .9, P < .001). There was no significant difference between retention test scores and posttest scores. However, both were significantly higher than pretest scores (P < .05). This did not change after adjusting for differing degrees of difficulty between the examinations. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of residency trauma education, there is a measurable positive impact of an intensive, hands-on course on surgical decision making. This impact is durable and cognitive skills persist after the immediate postcourse period. These data support the continued supplementation of traditional residency experiential learning with appropriate laboratory-based skills training.