Clinical procedures for in vitro maturation treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate clinical techniques for in vitro maturation (IVM) treatment, including stimulation recommendations, small follicle pick-up procedures, and compact cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) search practice. DESIGN: This video utilizes live-action footage from surgery and embryology practice for a representative IVM treatment cycle, with step-by-step instructions and recommendations for practice procedures. SETTING: In vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IVM treatment. The patient(s) included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online, including on social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites, and other applicable sites. INTERVENTION(S): Identification of treatment cohorts, IVM definitions, and recommendations for stimulation treatments. A visual demonstration of COC extraction techniques from small antral follicles includes tubing, needle types, considerations when using double lumen or sheath needles, needle pressure, ultrasound, needle flushing, and aspiration technique. Visual demonstration of oocyte search and IVM preparation, including filtering follicular aspirate, prevention of COC cooling, identification of compact COCs, and general parameters of different IVM approaches. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical techniques for small follicle ovum pick up and compact COC identification for IVM treatment. RESULTS: Successful IVM treatment of patients can be achieved using minimal ovarian stimulation, effective small follicle retrieval, and efficient compact COC identification with flexibility in approach depending on clinical constraints and preference. CONCLUSION(S): In vitro maturation treatment is an efficacious and safe treatment for high ovarian reserve and hyper-responding patients undergoing IVF treatment, in which the retrieval of multiple immature COCs and their ex vivo maturation can be achieved with little to no in vivo stimulation. Practice procedures vary between treatment centers and IVM techniques. This video provides practice recommendations paired with a visual demonstration of techniques to assist in standardizing the approach and expanding the practice to more centers.

Electronic witnessing in the medically assisted reproduction laboratory: insights and considerations after 10 years of use.

STUDY QUESTION: What have we learnt after 10 years of electronic witnessing? SUMMARY ANSWER: When applied correctly, an electronic witnessing system can replace manual witnessing in the medically assisted reproduction lab to prevent sample mix-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Electronic witnessing systems have been implemented to improve the correct identification, processing, and traceability of biological materials. When non-matching samples are simultaneously present in a single workstation, a mismatch event is generated to prevent sample mix-up. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This evaluation investigates the mismatch and administrator assign rate over a 10-year period (March 2011-December 2021) with the use of an electronic witnessing system. Radiofrequency identification tags and barcodes were used for patient and sample identification. Since 2011, IVF and ICSI cycles and frozen embryo transfer cycles (FET) were included; IUIs cycles were included since 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The total number of tags and witnessing points were recorded. Witnessing points in a particular electronic witnessing system represent all the actions that have been performed from gamete collection through embryo production, to cryopreservation and transfer. Mismatches and administrator assigns were collected and stratified per procedure (sperm preparation, oocyte retrieval, IVF/ICSI, cleavage stage embryo or blastocyst embryo biopsy, vitrification and warming, embryo transfer, medium changeover, and IUI). Critical mismatches (such as mislabelling or non-matching samples within one work area) and critical administrator assigns (such as samples not identified by the electronic witnessing system and unconfirmed witnessing points) were selected. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 109 655 cycles were included: 53 023 IVF/ICSI, 36 347 FET, and 20 285 IUI cycles. The 724 096 used tags, led to a total of 849 650 witnessing points. The overall mismatch rate was 0.251% (2132/849 650) per witnessing point and 1.944% per cycle. In total, 144 critical mismatches occurred over the different procedures. The yearly mean critical mismatch rate was 0.017 ± 0.007% per witnessing point and 0.129 ± 0.052% per cycle. The overall administrator assign rate was 0.111% (940/849 650) per witnessing point and 0.857% per cycle, including 320 critical administrator assigns. The yearly mean critical administrator assign rate was 0.039 ± 0.010% per witnessing point and 0.301 ± 0.069% per cycle. Overall mismatch and administrator assign rates remained fairly stable during the evaluated time period. Sperm preparation and IVF/ICSI were the procedures most prone to critical mismatch and administrator assigns. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The procedures and methods of integration of an electronic witnessing system may vary from one laboratory to another and result in differences in the potential risks related to sample identification. Individual embryos cannot (yet) be identified by such a system; this makes extra manual witnessing indispensable at certain critical steps where potential errors are not recorded. The electronic witnessing system still needs to be used in combination with manual labelling of both the bottom and lid of dishes and tubes to guarantee correct assignment in case of malfunction or incorrect use of radiofrequency identification tags. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Electronic witnessing is considered to be the ultimate tool to safeguard correct identification of gametes and embryos. But this is only possible when used correctly, and proper training and attention of the staff is required. It may also induce new risks, i.e. blind witnessing of samples by the operator. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was either sought or obtained for this study. J.S. presents webinars on RIW for CooperSurgical. The remaining authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Cumulative live birth rate after ovarian stimulation with freeze-all in women with polycystic ovaries: does the polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype have an impact?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) differ between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes when a freeze-all strategy is used to prevent OHSS after ovarian stimulation? DESIGN: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of 422 women with PCOS or polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM), in whom a freeze-all strategy was applied after GnRH agonist triggering because of hyper-response in their first or second IVF/ICSI. Primary outcome was CLBR; multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: Phenotype A (hyperandrogenism + ovulation disorder + PCOM [HOP]) (n = 91/422 [21.6%]); phenotype C (hyperandrogenism + PCOM [HP]) (33/422 [7.8%]; phenotype D (ovulation disorder + PCOM [OP]) (n = 161/422 [38.2%]); and PCOM (n = 137/422 [32.5%]. Unadjusted CLBR was similar among the groups (69.2%, 69.7%, 79.5% and 67.9%, respectively; P = 0.11). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, the phenotype did not affect CLBR (OR 0.72, CI 0.24 to 2.14 [phenotype C]; OR 1.55, CI 0.71 to 3.36 [phenotype D]; OR 0.84, CI 0.39 to 1.83 [PCOM]; P = 0.2, with phenotype A as reference). CONCLUSIONS: In women with PCOS, hyper-response after ovarian stimulation confers CLBR of around 70%, irrespective of phenotype, when a freeze-all strategy is used. This contrasts with unfavourable clinical outcomes in women with hyperandrogenism and women with PCOS who underwent mild ovarian stimulation targeting normal ovarian response and fresh embryo transfer. The results should be interpreted with caution because the study is retrospective and cannot be generalized to all cycles as they pertain to those in which hyper-response is observed.

Outcome of in-vitro oocyte maturation in patients with PCOS: does phenotype have an impact?

STUDY QUESTION: Does the phenotype of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affect clinical outcomes of ART following in-vitro oocyte maturation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) after IVM were significantly different between distinct PCOS phenotypes, with the highest CLBR observed in patients with phenotype A/HOP (= hyperandrogenism + ovulatory disorder + polycystic ovaries), while IVM in patients with phenotype C/HP (hyperandrogenism + polycystic ovaries) or D/OP (ovulatory disorder + polycystic ovaries) resulted in lower CLBRs (OR 0.26 (CI 0.06-1.05) and OR 0.47 (CI 0.25-0.88), respectively, P = 0.03). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: CLBRs in women with hyperandrogenic PCOS phenotypes (A/HOP and C/HP) have been reported to be lower after ovarian stimulation (OS) and ART when compared to CLBR in women with a normo-androgenic PCOS phenotype (D/OP) and non-PCOS patients with a PCO-like ovarian morphology (PCOM). Whether there is an influence of the different PCOS phenotypes on success rates of IVM has been unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study including 320 unique PCOS patients performing their first IVM cycle between April 2014 and January 2018 in a tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Baseline patient characteristics and IVM treatment cycle data were collected. The clinical outcomes following the first IVM embryo transfer were retrieved, including the CLBR defined as the number of deliveries with at least one live birth resulting from one IVM cycle and all appended cycles in which fresh or frozen embryos were transferred until a live birth occurred or until all embryos were used. The latter was considered as the primary outcome. A multivariate regression model was developed to identify prognostic factors for CLBR and test the impact of the patient's PCOS phenotype. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Half of the patients presented with a hyperandrogenic PCOS phenotype (n = 140 A/HOP and n = 20 C/HP vs. n = 160 D/OP). BMI was significantly different between phenotype groups (27.4 ± 5.4 kg/m2 for A/HOP, 27.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2 for C/HP and 23.3 ± 4.4 kg/m2 for D/OP, P < 0.001). Metformin was used in 33.6% of patients with PCOS phenotype A/HOP, in 15.0% of C/HP patients and in 11.2% of D/OP patients (P < 0.001). Anti-müllerian hormone levels differed significantly between groups: 12.4 ± 8.3 µg/l in A/HOP, 7.7 ± 3.1 µg/l in C/HP and 10.4 ± 5.9 µg/l in D/OP patients (P = 0.01). The number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) was significantly different between phenotype groups: 25.9 ± 19.1 COC in patients with phenotype A/HOP, 18.3 ± 9.0 COC in C/HP and 19.8 ± 13.5 COC in D/OP (P = 0.004). After IVM, patients with different phenotypes also had a significantly different number of mature oocytes (12.4 ± 9.3 for A/HOP vs. 6.5 ± 4.2 for C/HP vs. 9.1 ± 6.9 for D/OP, P < 0.001). The fertilisation rate, the number of usable embryos and the number of cycles with no embryo available for transfer were comparable between the three groups. Following the first embryo transfer, the positive hCG rate and LBR were comparable between the patient groups (44.7% (55/123) for A/HOP, 40.0% (6/15) for C/HP, 36.7% (47/128) for D/OP, P = 0.56 and 25.2% (31/123) for A/HOP, 6.2% (1/15) for C/HP, 26.6% (34/128) for D/OP, respectively, P = 0.22). However, the incidence of early pregnancy loss was significantly different across phenotype groups (19.5% (24/123) for A/HOP, 26.7% (4/15) for C/HP and 10.2% (13/128) for D/OP, P = 0.04). The CLBR was not significantly different following univariate analysis (40.0% (56/140) for A/HOP, 15% (3/20) for C/HP and 33.1% (53/160) for D/OP (P = 0.07)). When a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to account for confounding factors, the PCOS phenotype appeared to be significantly correlated with CLBR, with a more favourable CLBR in the A/HOP subgroup (OR 0.26 for phenotype C/HP (CI 0.06-1.05) and OR 0.47 for phenotype D/OP (CI 0.25-0.88), P = 0.03)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: These data should be interpreted with caution as the retrospective nature of the study holds the possibility of unmeasured confounding factors and misassignment of the PCOS phenotype. Moreover, the sample size for phenotype C/HP was too small to draw conclusions for this subgroup of patients. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Caucasian infertile patients with a PCOS phenotype A/HOP who undergo IVM achieved a higher CLBR than their counterparts with C/HP and D/OP. This is in strong contrast with previously reported outcomes following OS where women with PCOS and hyperandrogenism (A/HOP and C/HP) performed significantly worse. For PCOS patients who require ART, the strategy of OS followed by an elective freeze-all strategy remains to be compared with IVM in a prospective fashion; however, the current data provide support for IVM as a valid treatment option, especially in the most severe PCOS phenotypes (A/HOP). Our data suggest that proper patient selection is of utmost importance in an IVM programme. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The clinical IVM research has been supported by research grants from Cook Medical and Besins Healthcare. All authors declared no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Fertility preservation does not delay the initiation of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether fertility preservation (FP) in adult women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) may impact the time interval between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy in an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant setting. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of breast cancer patients diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2017 undergoing FP at a tertiary-care academic fertility centre before neo-adjuvant (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and matched control breast cancer patients who had no FP. FP interventions included oocyte vitrification following ovarian stimulation or after in-vitro maturation (IVM) of immature oocytes, and/or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Controls from the patient database of the affiliated Breast Cancer Clinic were matched for tumour characteristics and type of treatment. Time intervals between cancer diagnosis and the start of chemotherapy were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine BC patients underwent FP: 29 received NAC and 30 received AC. The average interval between diagnosis and chemotherapy in BC patients with NAC was 28.5 days (27.3 (range: 14.0-44.0) days in cases and 29.6 (range: 14.0-62.0) days in controls (NS)); this interval was 58.9 days in BC patients with AC (57.2 (range: 36.0-106.0) days in cases and 60.7 (range: 31.0-105.0) days in controls (NS)). CONCLUSION: Fertility preservation does not delay the start of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Live births following fertility preservation using in-vitro maturation of ovarian tissue oocytes.

STUDY QUESTION: Can oocytes extracted from excised ovarian tissue and matured in vitro be a useful adjunct for urgent fertility preservation (FP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian tissue oocyte in-vitro maturation (OTO-IVM) in combination with ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is a valuable adjunct technique for FP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite the impressive progress in the field, options for FP for cancer patients are still limited and, depending on the technique, clinical outcome data are still scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital-affiliated fertility clinic between January 2012 and May 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included 77 patients who underwent unilateral oophorectomy for OTC. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained during ovarian tissue processing were matured in vitro for 28-42 h. Oocytes reaching metaphase II stage were vitrified or inseminated for embryo vitrification. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, 1220 COCs were collected. The mean oocyte maturation rate was 39% ± 23% (SD). There were 64 patients who had vitrification of oocytes (6.7 ± 6.3 oocytes per patient). There were 13 patients who had ICSI of mature oocytes after IVM, with 2.0 ± 2.0 embryos vitrified per patient. Twelve patients have returned to the clinic with a desire for pregnancy. For seven of these, OTO-IVM material was thawed. Two patients had OTO-IVM oocytes warmed, with survival rates of 86% and 60%. After ICSI, six oocytes were fertilised in total, generating three good quality embryos for transfer, leading to a healthy live birth for one patient. In five patients, for whom a mean of 2.0 ± 0.8 (SD) embryos had been vitrified, seven embryos were warmed in total: one embryo did not survive the warming process; two tested genetically unsuitable for transfer; and four were transferred in separate cycles to three different patients, resulting in two healthy babies. In this small series, the live birth rate per patient after OTO-IVM, ICSI and embryo transfer was 43%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective study design and the limited sample size should be considered when interpreting results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of the study illustrate the added value of OTO-IVM in combination with OTC. We report the first live birth following the use of this appended technique combined with oocyte vitrification. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. M.D.V. reports honoraria for lectures in the last 2 years from MSD and Ferring, outside the submitted work, as well as grant support from MSD. The other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Gene expression differences induced by equimolar low doses of LH or hCG in combination with FSH in cultured mouse antral follicles.

In a natural cycle, follicle growth is coordinated by FSH and LH. Follicle growth stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) requires antral follicles to be exposed to both FSH and LH bioactivity, especially after GNRH analog pretreatment. The main aim was to detect possible differences in gene expression in granulosa cells after exposing the follicle during antral growth to LH or hCG, as LH and hCG are different molecules acting on the same receptor. Effects of five gonadotropin treatments were investigated for 16 genes using a mouse follicle culture model. Early (day 6) antral follicles were exposed to high recombinant FSH combined or not with equimolar concentrations of recombinant LH (rLH) or recombinant hCG (rhCG) and to highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) for 6 h, 12 h, or 3 days. Expression differences were tested for genes involved in steroidogenesis: Mvk, Lss, Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, Cyp19a1, Nr4a1, and Timp1; final granulosa differentiation: Lhcgr, Oxtr, Pgr, Egfr, Hif1a, and Vegfa; and cytokines: Cxcl12, Cxcr4, and Sdc4. Lhcgr was present and upregulated by gonadotropins. Nr4a1, Cxcl12, and Cxcr4 showed a different expression pattern if LH bioactivity was added to high FSH in the first hours after exposure. However, no signs of premature luteinization were present even after a 3-day treatment as shown by Cyp19a1, Oxtr, Pgr, and Egfr and by estrogen and progesterone measurements. The downstream signaling by rhCG or rLH through the LHCGR was not different for this gene selection. Granulosa cells from follicles exposed to HP-hMG showed an enhanced expression level for several genes compared with recombinant gonadotropin exposure, possibly pointing to enhanced cellular activity.

Differences in collagen expression in cumulus cells after exposure to highly purified menotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a mouse follicle culture model.

Extracellular matrix (ECM) formation by cumulus cells is an important process that determines fertilization and embryo quality. Several collagen types are present in the ovarian follicular ECM and are related to proliferation, steroidogenesis, and luteinization. In vitro mouse follicles can optimally grow and provide developmentally competent oocytes with 10 IU/L recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH). As a model for superovulation, experiments with 100 IU/L rFSH or 100 IU/L highly purified menotropin (HP-hMG) exposure during antral growth were undertaken. Col4a1, Col4a2, and Col6a2 expression levels were analyzed at three time points during antral growth and at a 4-h interval up to 16 h after ovulation induction using quantitative PCR. The presence and induction of the collagen mRNA and protein were confirmed in cumulus from in vivo- and in vitro-grown follicles, and TGFBs 1 and 2 were assayed as potential regulators. The study revealed that exposure to 100 IU/L FSH, as in both superovulation conditions, significantly influenced the follicle morphology and slowed down nuclear maturation and mucification (P < 0.05). This coincided with an increased expression of the three collagens in the cumulus-oocyte complex at the end of antral growth and in the first hours following the ovulatory dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (P < 0.05). The increased expression might reflect a differentiation but is most likely due to a precocious luteinization of the cumulus. Growth in HP-hMG resulted in higher Tgfb1 mRNA and protein levels, fewer COCs with an increased collagen expression and with a more synchronous nuclear maturation. This suggests that the presence of luteinizing hormone activity tempered the effect of the elevated FSH dose.

Timing of nuclear maturation and postovulatory aging in oocytes of in vitro-grown mouse follicles with or without oil overlay.

Meiotic maturation of the oocyte is a timed sequence of events induced by the ovulatory LH surge. In vitro maturation of oocytes is known to alter the meiotic time course. This study documented the timing of meiosis in oocytes grown in vitro for 12 days, from the preantral follicle stage onward, and the influence of an oil overlay. In the oil-free culture, the stability of the metaphase II spindle was further explored to determine the postovulatory aging events. After the maturation stimulus, in vitro-grown oocytes were collected at 2-h intervals spanning the period of meiosis (0-18 h) and at 3-h intervals during early postovulatory aging (18-27 h). Stage of maturation was assessed both morphologically and by detailed spindle analysis and chromosome alignment. Results revealed that oil overlay did not impair the competence of cultured oocytes to proceed to meiosis II, but delayed meiosis I progression. Oil overlay during culture causes a different hormonal exposure of the follicles by a differential segregation into the oil overlay. The use of a progesterone receptor antagonist, however, did not induce a delay in meiotic progression. Aging effects in oil-free cultured follicles were detected 5 h after the establishment of the metaphase II spindle, comparable to their in vivo grown counterparts. The predominant effect of aging was an interphase-like appearance of the cytoskeleton. So an optimal time window for fertilization after in vitro follicular growth was determined to be 16-21 h after maturation induction.