Developing the 'checking' discipline.

We explore how engagement with checklists and adoption of a strict 'checking' discipline help avoid unintentional individual, team and systemic errors. Paradoxically, this is equally important when performing repetitive mundane tasks as well as during times of high-stress workload. In this article, we aim to discuss the different types of checklists and explain how deviations from a 'checking' discipline can lead to never events such as wrong side or site surgery. Well-designed checklists function as mental notes and prompts in clinical situations where the combination of fatigue and stress can contribute to a decline in cognitive performance. Furthermore, the need for proactive discussion by all members of the team during the implementation of the surgical checklist also reinforces the concept of teamwork and contributes towards effective communication. Patient safety is often a product of good communication, teamwork and anticipation: a 'checking' mentality remains the lynchpin which links these factors.

Case of a chronic ectopic pregnancy misdiagnosed as pelvic inflammatory disease.

The definition of a chronic ectopic pregnancy (CEP) is poorly defined in the literature and making a timely diagnosis can be incredibly challenging. This is primarily due to its broad range of clinical presentations and conflicting biochemical and sonographic results. Often, CEPs are mistaken for ovarian malignancies, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), uterine fibroids or endometriosis, therefore, leading to a delayed diagnosis. We present a case report of a woman who was initially misdiagnosed with PID and then later preoperatively diagnosed with a CEP. This case particularly highlights the diagnostic dilemma posed by CEPs and raises awareness of the key clinical symptoms, biochemical and sonographic investigations which in combination can contribute towards making a timely preoperative diagnosis.

Should the laparoscopic approach be the norm for appendicectomy in the third trimester of pregnancy?

Our case describes a pregnant woman with acute appendicitis who presented in the third trimester and underwent a laparoscopic appendicectomy. She made a rapid postoperative recovery and the pregnancy was otherwise uncomplicated, ending with a spontaneous vaginal birth at 41 weeks. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis can be unclear in pregnancy. Difficulty in establishing diagnosis due to atypical presentation often leads to delay in surgery, resulting in significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Surgical intervention should be prompt in cases of suspected appendicitis and the laparoscopic approach is advocated in the first two trimesters. In the third trimester (after 28 weeks), laparotomy is often performed due to the size of the uterus and the theoretical risk of inadvertent perforation with trocar placement. More recently, several authors have described successful outcomes following laparoscopic appendicectomy after 28 weeks and with increasing reassuring data, we suggest that this minimally invasive approach should be considered in managing appendicitis in the third trimester.

The use of hormone therapy and its alternatives in women with a history of hormone dependent cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Treating the effects of menopause in women with history of oestrogen-dependent cancers presents a clinical dilemma. Endocrine adjuvant agents like tamoxifen and other cancer treatments, often induce premature menopause. Vasomotor, psychological and somatic symptoms may be more severe in these women. The risk of hormone therapy (HT) and its efficacy must be balanced. Currently, there are no consensus guidelines for the management of these patients. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study carried out between 10/01/2011 and 27/01/2012 in a tertiary referral menopausal clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data was collected about cancer type and treatment, symptoms, prior use of T, bone density analyses and menopause treatments. RESULTS: 590 patient records were scanned and 146 patients (24.7%) had a history of cancer. Of these, 45.9% were younger than 50 years old. 67.1% comprised breast cancer patients, of which 69.4% were on adjuvant endocrine agents. 24.7% consisted of gynaecological cancer patients who were predominantly treated with surgery in conjunction with adjuvant therapies. 90.4% of the women had at least one menopause-related symptom, vasomotor symptoms being most prevalent, followed by psychological and vaginal symptoms. Women used a variety of HT and non-HRT therapies for their symptoms. Of the 77 women who had a personal history of oestrogen receptor positive cancers, 19.5% chose to take HT in spite of it being contraindicated. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing HT to women with a history of hormone dependent cancer remains controversial. Patient 'Quality of Life' must be considered. More research is required in this area.