Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic carinal resections: technical aspects and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Important benefits in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer have recently been achieved. However, the use of this technique for complex sleeve procedures is limited. We describe the technical aspects of and patient outcomes following carinal resections using uniportal VATS. METHODS: Since 2015, 16 sleeve carinal resections, including 11 right pneumonectomies, 4 right upper lobectomies and 1 lung-sparing carinal resection, have been performed at the Regional Clinic Hospital, Tyumen, Russia. RESULTS: The mean surgical time was 215.9 ± 67.2 min (range 125-340 min). The mean blood loss volume was 256.3 ± 284.5 ml (range 50-1200 ml). There was 1 case of conversion to thoracotomy. The morbidity rate was 25%, and the mortality rate was 0%. The median overall survival was 38.6 ± 3.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The use of uniportal VATS for carinal resections in certain patients allows for radical resections with low rates of morbidity and mortality.

Technical aspects of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic double sleeve bronchovascular resections.

Double sleeve, bronchial and vascular reconstructions are challenging procedures indicated for centrally located tumours to avoid pneumonectomy. Traditionally, these resections have been performed by thoracotomy, but thanks to advances in imaging systems, better surgical instruments and the gained experience in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the scenario now is different. During the last decade, we have seen a rapid evolution of the uniportal VATS technique from simple lobectomies to advanced double sleeve bronchovascular procedures and carinal resections. The advantages of VATS over open surgery for major lung resections in terms of postoperative pain and morbidity, length of hospital stay and quality of life have prompted experienced surgeons to adopt uniportal VATS for cases requiring a sleeve resection. However, when a double bronchial and vascular sleeve resection is required, the adoption rate of minimally invasive surgery is still very low even for very experienced VATS surgeons. The difficulty of tumour mobilization, complexity of the suturing technique and the concern about possible uncontrolled massive bleeding during VATS are the main reasons for this low rate of adoption. In this article, we describe the technical aspects and tricks of this procedure when it is done by the uniportal VATS approach.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: a consensus report from the Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG) of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to report the results of the first consensus paper among international experts in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) lobectomy obtained through a Delphi process, the objective of which was to define and standardize the main procedural steps, optimize its indications and perioperative management and identify elements to assist in future training. METHODS: The 40 members of the working group were convened and organized on a voluntary basis by the Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG) of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). An e-consensus finding exercise using the Delphi method was applied to require 75% agreement for reaching consensus on each question. Repeated iterations of anonymous voting continued for 3 rounds. RESULTS: Overall, 31 international experts from 18 countries completed all 3 rounds of questionnaires. Although a technical quorum was not achieved, most of the responders agreed that the maximum size of a UniVATS incision should be ≤4 cm. Agreement was reached on many points outlining the currently accepted definition of a UniVATS lobectomy, its indications and contraindications, perioperative clinical management and recommendations for training and future research directions. CONCLUSIONS: The UVIG Consensus Report stated that UniVATS offers a valid alternative to standard VATS techniques. Only longer follow-up and randomized controlled studies will predict whether UniVATS represents a valid alternative approach to multiport VATS for major lung resections or whether it should be performed only in selected cases and by selected centres. The next step for the ESTS UVIG is the establishment of a UniVATS section inside the ESTS databases.

Uniportal sleeve lobectomy for lung cancer.

Over the last years video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become more popular as it has a number of advantages comparing to the classical thoracotomy (less postoperative pain, reduced blood loss, cosmetic effect, etc.) A short time ago it was generally thought that it was impossible to make certain surgeries (including bronchoplasty) through single port approach. However, improvement of manual skills, more advanced stapling devices, tools and surgical needles have made it possible to perform surgeries practically of any extent observing the oncological principles of operational intervention.

Double-sleeve and carinal resections using the uniportal VATS technique: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) double-sleeve lobectomy and carinal resections are two of the most complex procedures in thoracic surgery. The uniportal approach provides an advantage for performing these procedures successfully; however, knowledge of the important technical details is required. This study describes the experience of implementing these procedures by Russian specialists. METHODS: Six patients (one woman; mean age, 57.3±3.6 years) who underwent a uniportal VATS double sleeve and carinal resections were consecutively included in this study. A 5- to 6-cm incision was made at the fifth intercostal space on the middle axillary line. RESULTS: Double sleeve left upper lobectomy was completed in four cases. One case of the right sleeve carinal pneumonectomy and one case of the right sleeve carinal upper lobectomy were completed. The mean operation time was 280±13 minutes. There was no conversion to thoracotomy. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10.8±0.8 days. There was no postoperative mortality. In one case of double-sleeve lobectomy, postoperative pneumonia developed. The postoperative diagnoses of the four uniportal double-sleeve cases were as follows: T2aN2M0 in one case, T3N1M0 in two cases, and T2aN0M0 in one case. The postoperative diagnoses of the two uniportal totally carinal resections were as follows: T4N0M0 and T3N0M0. CONCLUSIONS: This study results suggest that a uniportal VATS approach might be a feasible option for complex sleeve resections with acceptable postoperative outcomes in the advanced stages of lung cancer. To further evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this technique, more experience would be required.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bronchoplastic and carinal sleeve procedures.

Despite of the recent advanced with the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), the most common approach for bronchial and carinal resection is still the open surgery. The technical difficulties, the steep learning curve and the concerns about performing an oncologic and safe reconstruction in advanced cases, are the main reasons for the low adoption of VATS for sleeve resections. Most of the authors use 3-4 incisions for thoracoscopic sleeve procedures. However these surgical techniques can be performed by a single incision approach by skilled uniportal VATS surgeons. The improvements of the surgical instruments, high definition cameras and recent 3D systems have greatly contributed to facilitate the adoption of uniportal VATS techniques for sleeve procedures. In this article we describe the technique of thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve, bronchovascular and carinal resections through a single incision approach.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bronchovascular, tracheal and carinal sleeve resections†.

Locally advanced lung tumours often require complex surgical techniques to achieve an oncological and safe procedure. Sleeve resections when operating on endobronchial lesions or hilar tumours should be attempted whenever possible rather than performing a pneumonectomy. These procedures result in improved survival, better quality of life, a reduced loss of lung function and an improved operative mortality compared with pneumonectomy. Although the most common approach is an open thoracotomy, these complex surgical techniques can be performed in a thoracoscopic way with the skills and the experience gained from major video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures (VATS). However, despite the multiple advantages of VATS compared with thoracotomy, such as decreased postoperative pain and better recovery, this minimally invasive approach is still not widely adopted for advanced stages of lung cancer and complex resections. Concerns about performing an adequate oncological resection and safe reconstruction VATS are the main reasons for the low adoption of these minimally invasive approaches. Like other thoracoscopic techniques, VATS sleeve procedures also have a steep learning curve, and should therefore be performed either by or with skilled and experienced VATS surgeons to ensure safety and avoid complications. In this article, we describe the technique of thoracoscopic sleeve procedures through a single-incision (uniportal) approach for bronchial, bronchovascular, tracheal and carinal reconstruction, and review the literature reporting sleeve resections by VATS.

Thoracoscopic double sleeve lobectomy in 13 patients: a series report from multi-centers.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to explore the feasibility and safety of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) double sleeve lobectomy in patients with non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Between June 2012 and August 2014, 13 NSCLC patients underwent thoracoscopic double sleeve lobectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy at three institutions. A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, operative data, postoperative events and follow-up was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen NSCLC patients (median age, 60 years; range, 43-67 years) underwent thoracoscopic double sleeve lobectomy. There were no conversions to thoracotomy. Left upper lobectomy was most frequently performed (eleven patients). Median operative time was 263 minutes (range, 218-330 minutes), and median blood loss was 224 mL (range, 60-400 mL). The learning curve revealed reductions in both operative times and blood loss of ten cases from one center. Median data were duration of blocking pulmonary artery (PA) 72 minutes (range, 44-143 minutes), resected lymph nodes 24 (range, 10-46), stations of retrieved lymph nodes 6 (range, 5-9), thoracic drainage 1,042 mL (range, 500-1,700 mL), duration of thoracic drainage 5 days (range, 3-8 days), postoperative hospital stay 10 days (range, 7-20 days), and ICU stay 1 day (range, 1-2 days). One patient (1/13, 7.70%) suffered from pneumonia after surgery. There were no deaths at 30 days. Median duration of follow-up was 6 months (range, 1-26 months). And no local recurrences or distant metastasis were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic double sleeve lobectomy is a technically challenging, but feasible procedure for NSCLC patients and it should be restricted to skilled VATS surgeons.