A Clinical Comparison of Linear- and Surface Area-Based Methods of Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether linear-based measurement significantly overestimates glenoid bone loss in comparison with surface area-based measurement in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. HYPOTHESIS: Linear-based measurement will significantly overestimate glenoid bone loss in comparison with surface area-based measurement in patients with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Thirty patients with anterior shoulder instability underwent preoperative bilateral shoulder computed tomography (CT) scans. Three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) reconstruction with humeral head subtraction was performed to obtain an en face view of the 3D-CT glenoid. Glenoid bone loss was measured with the surface area and linear methods of measurement. Statistical analysis was performed with a paired 2-tailed t test. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (5 female and 23 male; mean age, 25.1 years; age range, 15-58 years) were included in the study; 17 patients underwent a glenoid augmentation procedure, and 11 underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. The mean percentage glenoid bone loss calculated with the surface area and linear methods was 12.8% ± 8.0% and 17.5% ± 9.7% ( P < .0001), respectively. For the 17 patients who underwent glenoid augmentation, mean percentage bone loss with the surface area and linear methods was 16.6% ± 7.9% and 23.0% ± 8.0% ( P < .0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Linear measurement of glenoid bone loss significantly overestimates bone loss compared with surface area measurement in patients with anterior glenoid bony defects. These results indicate that these different methods cannot be used interchangeably and cannot be used with the same critical thresholds for glenoid bone loss.

The Effect of Capsulectomy on Hip Joint Biomechanics.

BACKGROUND: Capsulectomy is performed during hip arthroscopic surgery in young adult patients with hip pain to improve intraoperative visualization. The stability of the hip joint after anterior capsulectomy is relatively unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate anterior hip stability in capsular sectioned states with a labral injury to test whether the load required for anterior translation would decrease with greater capsular injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Sixteen hips from 8 of 10 human cadaveric pelvises (mean age, 54.25 years) were prepared/mounted onto a custom-built fixture and tested in 5 states: intact capsule, intact labrum (all intact); sutured capsule, intact labrum (sutured intact); sutured capsule, 1-cm partial labrectomy (sutured labrectomy); partial capsulectomy, 1-cm partial labrectomy (partial capsulectomy); and total capsulectomy, 1-cm partial labrectomy (total capsulectomy). Each hip was tested in a neutral position with a 20-N compressive force. The load at 12 mm of anterior translation was recorded for each state after 2 preconditioning trials. RESULTS: A repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment showed no difference between the all-intact versus sutured-intact states and demonstrated no significant difference between the sutured-intact and sutured-labrectomy states. There were significant differences between the sutured-labrectomy and partial capsulectomy (P = .01), sutured-labrectomy and total capsulectomy (P < .001), and partial capsulectomy and total capsulectomy (P = .04) states. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that the capsule/labrum plays an important role in anterior hip stability and that the iliofemoral ligament is crucial for preventing anterior translation in labral-injured states. In addition, the ischiofemoral and pubofemoral ligaments provide resistance to anterior translation in iliofemoral- and labral-deficient states. Intraoperative capsulectomy should be avoided in patients with large, irreparable labral tears to prevent postoperative anterior hip instability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study quantifies the roles of the capsulolabral structures in anterior hip stability and demonstrates the importance of maintaining/repairing them during hip arthroscopic surgery.

The Influence of Surgical Stabilization on Glenohumeral Abduction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Patients With Shoulder Instability.

PURPOSE: This study compared the amount of glenohumeral abduction during arm abduction in the affected and unaffected shoulders of 3 groups of patients with shoulder instability: failed surgical stabilization, successful surgical stabilization, and unstable shoulder with no prior surgical intervention. METHODS: All patients underwent bilateral shoulder computed tomography scans in 3 positions: 0° of abduction and 0° of external rotation (0-0 position), 30° of abduction and 30° of external rotation (30-30 position), and arms maximally abducted (overhead position). Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction was performed for both shoulders in all 3 positions. A specialized coordinate system marked specific points and directions on the humerus and glenoid of each model. These coordinates were used to calculate the glenohumeral abduction for the normal and affected sides in the 0-0, 30-30, and overhead positions. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with shoulder instability were included, of whom 14 had failed surgical repairs, 10 had successful surgical repairs, and 15 had unstable shoulders with no prior surgical intervention. In the overhead position, patients with failed surgical intervention had significantly less glenohumeral abduction in the failed shoulder (95.6° ± 12.7°) compared with the normal shoulder (101.5° ± 12.4°, P = .02). Patients with successfully stabilized shoulders had significantly less glenohumeral abduction in the successfully stabilized shoulder (93.6° ± 10.8°) compared with the normal shoulder (102.1° ± 12.5°, P = .03). Unstable shoulders with no prior surgical intervention (102.1° ± 10.3°) did not differ when compared with the normal shoulders (101.9° ± 10.9°, P = .95). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention, regardless of its success, limits the amount of abduction at the glenohumeral joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Nonsurgical management and postoperative rehabilitation of medial instability of the knee.

The medial ligaments of the knee are the most frequently injured structures of the knee joint. The decisions regarding the treatment of medial knee injuries must take into account the severity of injury to the entire knee, the chronicity of the injury, and the patient goals and activity level. The treatment and rehabilitation of the medial structures of the knee is largely reliant on the healing potential of these structures. Studies have shown that these medial, extra-articular ligaments may possess the ability to heal by both intrinsic and extrinsic properties. The goals of nonoperative treatment should include healing of the injured medial structures while controlling edema, restoring full knee motion, and preserving muscle strength. In cases of continued medial instability after an isolated grade III injury or in cases of combined multiligamentous knee injuries, the medial structures of the knee may be treated operatively with repair or reconstruction. The goals of rehabilitation following surgical intervention are the same as for nonoperative treatment; however, the progression of activity is more gradual to allow for repaired or reconstructed tissue to heal. If the objectives of early edema control, restoration of knee motion, gradual resumption of weight bearing, and return of muscle strength are followed, patients should return to full activity following medial injuries to the knee.

Comparison of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss With Arthroscopic Defect Size Estimation in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare four 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) methods of measuring glenoid bone loss with the arthroscopic estimation of glenoid bone loss. METHODS: Twenty patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability underwent bilateral shoulder CT scans and were found to have glenoid bone loss. Arthroscopic estimation of glenoid bone loss was performed in all patients. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction was performed on the CT scans of each patient. The glenoid bone loss of each patient was measured using the surface area, Pico, ratio, and anteroposterior distance-from-bare area methods. The mean percent loss calculated with each method was compared with arthroscopy to determine the reliability of arthroscopy in the measurement of glenoid bone loss. RESULTS: The mean percent bone loss calculated with arthroscopic estimation, surface area, Pico, ratio, and anteroposterior distance-from-bare area methods was 18.13% ± 11.81%, 12.15% ± 8.50% (P = .005), 12.77% ± 8.17% (P = .002), 9.50% ± 8.74% (P < .001), and 12.44% ± 10.68% (P = .001), respectively. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that the 3D CT methods and arthroscopy were significantly different (F4,76 = 13.168, P = .02). The estimate using arthroscopy is 55% greater than the average of the 3D CT methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that arthroscopy significantly overestimates glenoid bone loss compared with CT and call into question its validity as a method of measurement. A more internally consistent and accurate method for the measurement of glenoid bone loss is necessary to appropriately diagnose and treat shoulder instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?

BACKGROUND: All-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle (DB) posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction avoids an open dissection and the "killer turn" while maintaining the advantage of an anatomic graft. However, clinical data on the viability of this surgical technique in multiligamentous knee injuries are lacking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: At greater than 2 years of followup, we evaluated (1) validated outcomes scores; (2) range of motion; and (3) side-to-side stability on PCL stress radiographs of a small group of patients who underwent all-arthroscopic tibial inlay DB PCL reconstruction in multiligamentous knee injuries, either shortly after injury or late. METHODS: All patients sustaining an operative multiligamentous knee injury between August 2007 and March 2009 underwent PCL reconstruction with the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay DB PCL reconstruction. Twelve patients sustained such injuries and were reconstructed during the study period and all 12 returned for followup with a minimum of 2 years (mean 3 ± 0.8 years). There were nine males and three females, with a mean age of 30 years; four patients had a subacute reconstruction (≥ 3 weeks, but < 3 months), and eight patients had chronic reconstructions (> 3 months). Mean time from injury to PCL reconstruction was 7 ± 12 months. Demographics, ROM, outcome scores (Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] scores), and PCL stress views were obtained. RESULTS: At final followup, mean Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores were 79 ± 16 and 72 ± 19, respectively. IKDC objective scores included eight nearly normal knees, three abnormal knees, and one severely abnormal knee. Mean flexion and extension losses compared with the contralateral were 10 ± 9 and 1 ± 2, respectively. Mean ± SD final side-to-side difference on PCL stress radiographs was 5 ± 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and radiographic results of the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay DB PCL reconstruction appear comparable to the same technique in isolated PCL injuries and, based on similar published case series, comparable to results of multiligamentous knee reconstructions using other PCL reconstruction techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of reconstructive procedures for glenoid bone loss associated with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

HYPOTHESIS: A tibial plafond allograft, iliac crest allograft, and coracoid autograft in a congruent arc Latarjet reconstruction better restore radius of curvature, depth, and surface area for glenoid bone loss in recurrent instability compared with the coracoid autograft in a standard Latarjet reconstruction for anteroinferior glenoid bone loss of the shoulder. METHODS: Three-dimensional shoulder models were generated from bilateral computed tomography scans in 15 patients, who were a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 23 (7.7) years, with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and known glenoid bone loss. The surface areas of the glenoid in the involved and contralateral normal shoulder were measured. Virtual surgery was then performed using standard and congruent arc Latarjet reconstruction, tibial plafond, and iliac crest allografts. Grafts were optimally positioned to restore articular congruity and defect fill. Radius of curvature and restoration of glenoid depth were compared with the contralateral glenoid. RESULTS: Glenoid surface area (11.04% [6.95% SD]) and depth (0.75 [0.57 SD] vs 1.44 [0.65 SD] mm) were significantly reduced (P < .012) in the injured glenoid. The mean (SD) coronal plane radius of curvature of the congruent arc Latarjet reconstruction (60.3 [39.0 SD] mm) more closely matched the radius of curvature of the injured glenoid (67.5 [33.2 SD] mm) compared with the other grafts. Restored glenoid depth was greater in the tibial plafond (1.8 [1.1 SD] mm) and iliac crest (2.0 [0.6 SD] mm) allografts compared with other grafts (P < .002). CONCLUSION: Congruent arc Latarjet reconstruction more closely restores native glenoid coronal radius of curvature, whereas tibial plafond and iliac crest allografts more adequately restore depth compared with standard Latarjet reconstruction.

Rotator cuff tear and glenohumeral instability : a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The rotator cuff plays a significant role in the static and dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint. Rotator cuff tears may occur after shoulder dislocations, whether in younger athletes or older patients with age-related tendon degeneration. Untreated tears may cause persistent pain, dysfunction, instability, and degenerative changes. A thorough understanding of when to look for rotator cuff tears after shoulder dislocations and how best to manage them may decrease patients' pain and improve function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We systematically reviewed the available literature to better understand (1) when a rotator cuff tear should be suspected after a dislocation, (2) whether surgical or nonsurgical approaches result in better scores for pain and satisfaction in patients with rotator cuff tears resulting from shoulder dislocations, and (3) whether intraarticular lesions, rotator cuff tears, or both should be addressed when surgery is performed. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE(®), CINAHL, and EMBASE for studies published from 1950 to 2012. We included studies reporting outcomes after treatment in patients with rotator cuff tears and shoulder dislocations. We excluded case reports, studies without any treatment, and studies about patients treated with arthroplasty. Five Level III and six Level IV studies were ultimately selected for review. RESULTS: Patients with persistent pain or dysfunction after a shoulder dislocation often had a concomitant rotator cuff tear. Surgical repair resulted in improved pain relief and patient satisfaction compared to nonoperative management. Repair of the rotator cuff, along with concomitant capsulolabral lesions, helped restore shoulder stability. While these findings are based on Level III and IV evidence, better long-term studies with larger cohorts are needed to strengthen evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent pain and dysfunction after a shoulder dislocation should prompt evaluation of the rotator cuff, especially in contact or overhead athletes, patients older than 40 years, or those with nerve injury. Surgery should be considered in the appropriately active patient with a rotator cuff tear after dislocation. While the current literature suggests improved stability and function after surgical repair of the rotator cuff, higher-quality prospective studies are necessary to make definitive conclusions.

A biomechanical analysis of the soft tissue and osseous constraints of the hip joint.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the role of soft tissue and osseous constraints in hip biomechanics using a unique robotic testing apparatus. METHODS: Four fresh-frozen human cadaveric hemi-pelvises without degenerative changes or dysplasia were stripped of all soft tissue except the ligamentous capsule and the intra-articular structures. All hips were tested using a robotic manipulator/universal force-moment sensor testing system to measure and compare end-range of motion (ROM) and kinematic translations in "capsule vented" (a small hole in the capsule) and "capsule separated" (capsular ligaments separated from each other) states. Then, the "capsule vented" state was compared to the condition in which the capsule and labrum were removed to calculate bone and soft tissue forces with 40 N of load applied in six different directions along three axes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in end-ROM or kinematic translations between the "capsule vented" and "capsule separated" states. Bone forces significantly increased with loads applied in the anterior, posterior and superior directions. Soft tissue forces increased significantly with loads applied in the medial, lateral and inferior directions. CONCLUSION: The individual hip capsular ligaments act independently of each other to resist end-ROM. Both osseous and soft tissue constraints are important to hip biomechanics depending upon the direction of applied force. The clinical relevance is that surgical management for hip disorders should preserve the soft tissue constraints in the hip when possible to maintain normal hip biomechanics.

Posterior shoulder instability in the contact athlete.

Historically, posterior shoulder instability has been a challenging problem for contact athletes and orthopedic surgeons alike. A complete understanding of the normal shoulder anatomy and biomechanics and the pathoanatomy responsible for the instability is necessary for a successful clinical outcome. In addition, the surgeon must be familiar with the diagnostic imaging and physical examination maneuvers required for the correct diagnosis without missing any other concurrent abnormalities. This understanding will allow orthopedists to plan and execute the appropriate management, whether this may involve conservative or surgical intervention. The goal should always be to correct the abnormality and have the patient return to play with full strength and no recurrent instability.

Capsular laxity of the hip: findings at magnetic resonance arthrography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography imaging findings associated with capsular laxity of the hip joint found at surgery. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 27 patients who had arthroscopy reports that described the presence or absence of capsular laxity of the hip joint were identified over a 2-year period. Preoperative MR images were retrospectively reviewed by 2 blinded radiologists. The following observations were recorded: (1) thickness, signal intensity, and defects of the anterior joint capsule; (2) thickness and signal intensity of the zona orbicularis; (3) width of the anterior and posterior joint recesses at the level of the femoral head; (4) presence of synovitis in the anterior joint recess; and (5) volume of intra-articular contrast and degree of hip rotation. Intrarater and inter-rater agreement was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients, 17 were positive and 10 were negative for hip joint laxity at arthroscopy. The mean thickness of the anterior hip capsule was significantly different (P = .0043), measuring 2.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 2.8 mm) in those with hip laxity and 3.3 mm (95% CI, 2.8 to 3.8 mm) in those without laxity. The mean width of the anterior joint recess was 5.8 mm (95% CI, 5.4 to 6.3 mm) in those with laxity and 3.6 mm (95% CI, 3.3 to 3.9 mm) in those without laxity and was significantly different (P < .0001). No other variables were considered useful because of a lack of significant differences between the 2 patient groups or low inter-rater agreement. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of 95% CIs, hip joint laxity at MR arthrography is associated with widening of the anterior hip joint recess (>5 mm) and thinning of the adjacent joint capsule (<3 mm) lateral to the zona orbicularis.

Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: global assessment of the femoral head-neck junction on a single reformatted MR image.

PURPOSE: To characterize the imaging appearance of femoral head-neck contour abnormalities on a short-axis magnetic resonance (MR) image compared with the usual anterior alpha angle measurements and multiple alpha angle measurements on radial reformatted MR images, with surgery as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval of this HIPAA-compliant study, 21 patients who underwent arthroscopy and 24 patients who did not, all of whom were evaluated with three-dimensional MR imaging, during 1 year were identified. Short-axis MR images of the femoral head-neck junction were reformatted with multiple radial images along the axis of the femoral neck. The following measurements were made at each hour of a clock face: (a) presence and size of bone contour abnormality visible beyond a best-fit circle and (b) femoral head-neck offset angles. Mann-Whitney, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank tests were performed. Intra- and interreader agreement were calculated as the Cohen κ. RESULTS: Of the 21 subjects who underwent surgery, 16 were confirmed to have cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) at surgery. Comparing findings from short-axis images with those at surgery, average accuracy was 81%. Comparing findings from head-neck offset angles with those at surgery, average accuracy was 80%. On short-axis images, average bone elevation was 3.2 mm in patients with cam-type FAI and 1.4 mm in those without it. In eight of 24 subjects who did not undergo surgery, the alpha angle was normal but the short-axis MR image showed abnormal bone contour. CONCLUSION: An abnormal bone contour identified on a short-axis MR image at the femoral head-neck junction correlates with surgical findings and may allow for a global characterization of the bone abnormality with regard to location, extent, and amount of elevation compared with the alpha angle and multiple head-neck offset angles.

Intra-abdominal fluid extravasation during hip arthroscopy: a survey of the MAHORN group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to survey experts in the field of hip arthroscopy from the Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network (MAHORN) group to determine the frequency of symptomatic intra-abdominal fluid extravasation (IAFE) after arthroscopic hip procedures, identify potential risk factors, and develop preventative measures and treatment strategies in the event of symptomatic IAFE. METHODS: A survey was sent to all members of the MAHORN group. Surveys collected data on general hip arthroscopy settings, including pump pressure and frequency of different hip arthroscopies performed, as well as details on cases of symptomatic IAFE. Responses to the survey were documented and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifteen hip arthroscopists from the MAHORN group were surveyed. A total of 25,648 hip arthroscopies between 1984 and 2010 were reviewed. Arthroscopic procedures included capsulotomies, labral reattachment after acetabuloplasty, peripheral compartment arthroscopy, and osteoplasty of the femoral head-neck junction. Of the arthroscopists, 7 (47%) had 1 or more cases of IAFE (40 cases reported). The prevalence of IAFE in this study was 0.16% (40 of 25,650). Significant risk factors associated with IAFE were higher arthroscopic fluid pump pressure (P = .004) and concomitant iliopsoas tenotomy (P < .001). In all 40 cases, the condition was successfully treated without long-term sequelae. Treatment options included observation, intravenous furosemide, and Foley catheter placement, as well as 1 case of laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic IAFE after hip arthroscopy is a rare occurrence, with an approximate prevalence of 0.16%. Prevention of IAFE should include close intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of abdominal distention, core body temperature, and hemodynamic stability. Concomitant iliopsoas tenotomy and high pump pressures may be risk factors leading to symptomatic IAFE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a self-administered evaluative tool to measure health-related quality of life in young, active patients with hip disorders. METHODS: This outcome measure was developed for active patients (aged 18 to 60 years, Tegner activity level ≥ 4) presenting with a variety of symptomatic hip conditions. This multicenter study recruited patients from international hip arthroscopy and arthroplasty surgeon practices. The outcome was created using a process of item generation (51 patients), item reduction (150 patients), and pretesting (31 patients). The questionnaire was tested for test-retest reliability (123 patients); face, content, and construct validity (51 patients); and responsiveness over a 6-month period in post-arthroscopy patients (27 patients). RESULTS: Initially, 146 items were identified. This number was reduced to 60 through item reduction, and the items were categorized into 4 domains: (1) symptoms and functional limitations; (2) sports and recreational physical activities; (3) job-related concerns; and (4) social, emotional, and lifestyle concerns. The items were then formatted using a visual analog scale. Test-retest reliability showed Pearson correlations greater than 0.80 for 33 of the 60 questions. The intraclass correlation statistic was 0.78, and the Cronbach α was .99. Face validity and content validity were ensured during development, and construct validity was shown with a correlation of 0.81 to the Non-Arthritic Hip Score. Responsiveness was shown with a paired t test (P ≤ .01), effect size of 2.0, standardized response mean of 1.7, responsiveness ratio of 6.7, and minimal clinically important difference of 6 points. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a new quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measure, the 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). This questionnaire uses a visual analog scale response format designed for computer self-administration by young, active patients with hip pathology. Its development has followed the most rigorous methodology involving a very large number of patients. The iHOT-33 has been shown to be reliable; shows face, content, and construct validity; and is highly responsive to clinical change. In our opinion the iHOT-33 can be used as a primary outcome measure for prospective patient evaluation and randomized clinical trials.

Association between previous meniscal surgery and the incidence of chondral lesions at revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Knees undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically have more intra-articular injuries than do knees undergoing primary reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Previous partial meniscectomy (PM) is associated with a higher rate of chondral lesions at revision ACL reconstruction, whereas previous meniscal repair (MR) is not associated with a higher rate of chondral lesions at revision ACL reconstruction, compared with knees undergoing revision ACL with no previous meniscal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Prevalence); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Data from a multicenter cohort was reviewed to determine the history of prior meniscal surgery (PM/MR) and the presence of grade II/III/IV chondral lesions at revision ACL reconstruction. The association between previous meniscal surgery and the incidence of chondral lesions was examined. Patient age was included as a covariate to determine if surgery type contributes predictive information independent of patient age. RESULTS: The cohort included 725 ACL revision surgeries. Chondrosis was associated with patient age (P < .0001) and previous meniscal surgery (P < .0001). After adjusting for patient age, knees with previous PM were more likely to have chondrosis than knees with previous MR (P = .003) or no previous meniscal surgery (P < .0001). There was no difference between knees without previous meniscal surgery and knees with previous MR (P = .7). Previous partial meniscectomy was associated with a higher rate of chondrosis in the same compartment compared with knees without previous meniscal surgery (P < .0001) and knees with previous MR (P ≤ .03). CONCLUSION: The status of articular cartilage at the time of revision ACL reconstruction relates to previous meniscal surgery independent of the effect of patient age. Previous partial meniscectomy is associated with a higher incidence of articular cartilage lesions, whereas previous meniscal repair is not. Although this association may reflect underlying differences in the knee at the time of prior surgery, it does suggest that meniscal repair is preferable when possible at the time of ACL reconstruction.

Diagnostic knee arthroscopy: a pilot study to evaluate surgical skills.

PURPOSE: To develop a scoring system to evaluate individual proficiency at diagnostic knee arthroscopy. METHODS: This was a prospective blinded study. Subjects included residents in postgraduate year (PGY) 1 through PGY 5 (n = 20) and staff surgeons (n = 10). All subjects performed a diagnostic arthroscopy on a cadaveric knee. Subjects were evaluated on both completeness and time required to complete the arthroscopy. The examiner viewed the arthroscopy from a remote location and was blinded to the level of training of the subjects. During the arthroscopy, 15 areas required assessment to achieve a score of 75 points. An additional 25 points were awarded depending on the time it took to complete the arthroscopy. A maximum of 100 points were available (Total score = Arthroscopy score + Time score). RESULTS: Thirty subjects were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (PGY 1 or 2) (n = 12), group 2 (PGY 3, 4, or 5) (n = 8), and group 3 (staff) (n = 10). In group 1 the mean total score was 28.25 points, the mean time to complete arthroscopy was 11.9 minutes, and the mean number of structures not examined was 8.67. In group 2 the mean total score was 76 points, the mean time to complete arthroscopy was 8.2 minutes, and the mean number of structures not examined was 1.75. In group 3 the mean total score was 100 points, the mean time to complete arthroscopy was 4.6 minutes, and the mean number of structures not examined was 0. Statistically significant differences by use of an analysis of variance test were noted for the total score, total time, and number of missed structures (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Using our skills assessment tool, we were able to evaluate subjects and determine their relative technical skill level in performing a diagnostic arthroscopy. This tool was able to distinguish among the novice, experienced, and expert levels in performing diagnostic arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, development of diagnostic criteria on the basis of consecutive subjects.

Open tibial inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

PURPOSE: The optimal method of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is not known. The purpose was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical literature comparing open tibial inlay and arthroscopic transtibial PCL reconstructions and determine which method of reconstruction is superior. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed. Biomechanical and clinical studies comparing the outcomes of open tibial inlay and arthroscopic transtibial PCL reconstructions were selected and reviewed. RESULTS: Biomechanical studies evaluating posterior stability found no difference or increased stability with open inlay reconstruction. Graft degradation at the killer turn after arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction was described in some of the biomechanical studies. Biomechanical studies found no significant difference in graft forces after cyclic loading between the 2 groups. Biomechanical studies were influenced by methodologic limitations of graft fixation, power analysis, graft tensioning protocol, and magnitude of load applied for cyclic loading. Clinical studies with some methodologic limitations found no significant difference in maintaining posterior stability between the 2 reconstruction groups at short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of open inlay or arthroscopic transtibial PCL reconstruction techniques remains uncertain in the setting of conflicting biomechanical studies, with notable limitations in clinical studies. The arthroscopic tibial inlay technique may provide benefits of both open inlay and transtibial reconstruction techniques and comparable stability to the conventional PCL reconstruction methods according to several biomechanical studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review.

Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment.

In sports medicine, diagnosis and treatment of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) continue to be difficult. Partial tears of the ACL are common, representing 10% to 28% of all ACL tears. As our understanding of the anatomy of the native ACL improves, our accuracy in diagnosing these injuries increases. The advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and recognition of injury patterns have more clearly delineated the pathoanatomy in a majority of these cases. Natural history studies following patients with these injuries have demonstrated that fewer than 50% of patients return to their preinjury activity level. Several studies have also documented that progression to complete rupture is a common outcome for patients who want to return to an active lifestyle. Treatment options include conservative modalities (eg, activity modification, functional rehabilitation, functional bracing) and surgery (eg, thermal shrinkage of remaining ACL, complete reconstruction, newer techniques to augment or reconstruct the damaged portion of the native ligament). Studies comparing conservative treatments with more aggressive operative interventions are required to fully evaluate the efficacy of these treatments.