Third-party CMV- and EBV-specific T-cells for first viral reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Virus-specific T-cells (VSTs) from third-party donors mediate short- and long-term antiviral effects in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with relapsed or refractory viral infections. We investigated early administration of third-party VSTs, together with antiviral therapy in patients requiring treatment for first cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Thirty HSCT patients were treated with 1 to 4 VST infusions (2 × 107 cells/m2; CMV n=27, EBV n=3) at a median of 4 days after initiation of antiviral treatment. The overall viral response rate was 100%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 94%. Of the 28 patients who achieved a CR, 23 remained virus PCR negative (n=9) or below quantitation limit (n=14) for the duration of follow-up. Four patients had brief episodes of quantifiable reactivation not requiring additional therapy, and one required a second infusion after initial CR, remaining PCR negative thereafter. All 3 patients treated for EBV post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder achieved sustained CR. Rates of aGVHD and cGVHD after infusion were 13% and 23%, respectively. There were no serious infusion-related adverse events. VST infusion was associated with rapid recovery of CD8+CD45RA-CD62L- and a slower recovery of CD4+CD45RA-CD62L- effector memory T-cells; CMV-specific T-cells comprised up to 13% of CD8+ cells. At 1 year post-transplant, non-relapse mortality was 10%, cumulative incidence of relapse was 7%, overall survival was 88% and 25 of 27 patients had ECOG status of 0 or 1. Early administration of third-party VSTs in conjunction with antiviral treatment appears safe and leads to excellent viral control and clinical outcomes. Registered on Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry as #ACTRN12618000343202.

CAR-T cell therapy: practical guide to routine laboratory monitoring.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a genetically-modified cellular immunotherapy that has a current established role in the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with emerging utility in a spectrum of other haematological and solid organ malignancies. It is associated with a number of characteristic toxicities, most notably cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, for which laboratory testing can aid in the prediction of severity and in monitoring. Other toxicities, such as cytopenias/marrow hypoplasia, hypogammagloblinaemia and delayed immune reconstitution are recognised and require monitoring due to the implications for infection risk and prophylaxis. The detection or quantitation of circulating CAR-T can be clinically useful, and is achieved through both direct methods, if available, or indirect/surrogate methods. It is important that the laboratory is informed of the CAR-T therapy and target antigen whenever tissue is collected, both for response assessment and investigation of possible relapse, so that the expression of the relevant antigen can be assessed, in order to distinguish antigen-positive and -negative relapses. Finally, the measurement of circulating tumour DNA has an evolving role in the surveillance of malignancy, with evidence of its utility in the post-CAR-T setting, including predicting patients who will inevitably experience frank relapse, potentially allowing for pre-emptive therapy.

Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Challenges and Future Directions.

The ability to sensitively monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) has played a key role in improving the management and outcomes for a number of leukemias, particularly acute promyelocytic leukemia and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. By contrast, MRD monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been limited by variable assay methodologies and a relative paucity of patient-specific MRD markers. Inter- and intratumor genetic heterogeneity poses significant challenges for the identification of molecular markers suitable for MRD monitoring in AML, particularly for those cases without structural chromosomal rearrangements associated with fusion genes. Furthermore, the need to discriminate which mutations may be suitable for MRD monitoring creates additional complexity. The mainstay of current molecular MRD monitoring is real-time quantitative PCR, targeting fusion genes, mutations, and gene overexpression. New technologies, particularly next-generation sequencing approaches, offer new ways to overcome these limitations. Here, the authors review the techniques available for molecular MRD monitoring in AML and discuss their utility in clinical practice.