Bedtime digital media use, sleep and fatigue among survivors of childhood cancer, their siblings and healthy control sibling pairs.

Bedtime digital media use (BDM) is linked to poor sleep and fatigue in many populations. Pediatric cancer patients have been observed to engage in BDM in clinical settings, but it is unknown whether BDM rates are higher in this population or how this impacts their sleep and fatigue during treatment and into survivorship. The goal of this study was to evaluate patterns of BDM and its relationship with sleep and fatigue in a sample of pediatric cancer survivors and to compare these patterns with children from their own family (i.e. siblings) and children from unaffected families (i.e. healthy matched controls and siblings of controls). Ninety-nine children (4 groups: 24 acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors, 13 survivor siblings, 33 controls, 29 control siblings) ages 8-18 were recruited from a long-term survivor clinic at a large children's hospital and via community advertisements. Survivors were 2-7 years post-treatment (M = 4.80 years). Children's BDM was parent-reported. Children completed 7 consecutive days of sleep actigraphy and the PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale. Most survivors (66.67%) engaged in BDM; smartphones were the most common medium. BDM patterns were equivalent across survivors, their siblings, controls, and control siblings. Statistical trends suggested that BDM was associated with fewer minutes of sleep and greater fatigue for all children; these relationships were equivalent across groups. BDM was common among survivors, but usage was not different from their own siblings or compared to healthy control children and sibling pairs. This study underscores the importance of assessing bedtime digital media use in childhood cancer survivors, although other factors impacting sleep should be explored. Clinicians should emphasize established recommendations for healthy media use and sleep habits in pediatric oncology settings.

School immunization coverage in adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on immunization coverage for adolescents, and little is known about how coverage has changed throughout the pandemic. We aimed to: (1) assess the change in coverage for school-based vaccines in Alberta, Canada resulting from the pandemic; (2) determine whether coverage differed by geographic health zone and school type; and (3) ascertain whether coverage has returned to pre-pandemic levels. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we used administrative health data to compare coverage for human papillomavirus (HPV) and meningococcal conjugate A, C, Y, W-135 (MenC-ACYW) vaccines between pre-pandemic (2017-2018 school year) and pandemic (2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years) cohorts (N = 289,420). Coverage was also compared by health zone and authority type. The 2019-2020 cohort was followed over one year to assess catch-up. RESULTS: Compared to 2017-2018, immunization coverage for HPV was significantly lower in the 2019-2020 (absolute difference: 60.8%; 95% CI: 60.4-61.3%) and 2020-2021 cohorts (absolute difference: 59.9%; 95% CI: 59.4-60.3%). There was a smaller, significant decline in MenC-ACYW coverage comparing 2017-2018 to 2019-2020 (absolute difference: 6.1%; 95% CI: 5.6-6.5%) and 2020-2021 (absolute difference: 32.2%; 95% CI: 31.6-32.7%). Private schools had low coverage overall, while coverage fluctuated by zone. During follow-up of the 2019-2020 cohort, coverage for HPV and MenC-ACYW increased from 5.6% to 50.2%, and 80.7% to 83.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a substantial decrease in school-based immunization coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic, and coverage has not returned to pre-pandemic levels, suggesting further catch-up is needed.