FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibition modulates PRC2 and promotes differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Internal tandem duplication mutations in fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3-ITD) are recurrent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and increase the risk of relapse. Clinical responses to FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) include myeloid differentiation of the FLT3-ITD clone in nearly half of patients through an unknown mechanism. We identified enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a component of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), as a mediator of this effect using a proteomic-based screen. FLT3i downregulated EZH2 protein expression and PRC2 activity on H3K27me3. FLT3-ITD and loss-of-function mutations in EZH2 are mutually exclusive in human AML. We demonstrated that FLT3i increase myeloid maturation with reduced stem/progenitor cell populations in murine Flt3-ITD AML. Combining EZH1/2 inhibitors with FLT3i increased terminal maturation of leukemic cells and reduced leukemic burden. Our data suggest that reduced EZH2 activity following FLT3 inhibition promotes myeloid differentiation of FLT3-ITD leukemic cells, providing a mechanistic explanation for the clinical observations. These results demonstrate that in addition to its known cell survival and proliferation signaling, FLT3-ITD has a second, previously undefined function to maintain a myeloid stem/progenitor cell state through modulation of PRC2 activity. Our findings support exploring EZH1/2 inhibitors as therapy for FLT3-ITD AML.

microRNA-150 targets major epigenetic repressors and inhibits cell proliferation.

The Polycomb Repressive Complex (PRC) proteins, EZH2 and EZH1 regulate many biological processes by generating the repressive H3K27me3 modifications in the chromatin. However, the factors that regulate the EZH1/EZH2 functions are poorly studied. We identify that the 3'UTRs of EZH2 and EZH1 mRNAs contain the binding sites for the miRNA, miR-150. MicroRNA-150 (miR-150) controls numerous biological processes including cell proliferation, differentiation and pathogenesis of a variety of diseases including cancer. We find that miR-150 regulates the levels of EZH1 and EZH2 through various experimental investigations. Since EZH2 is known to form a repressive complex with other epigenetic repressors especially DNMT3A and DNMT3B, we investigated whether miR-150 also regulates the DNMT3A and DNMT3B levels. We report that miR-150 regulates DNMT3A and DNMT3B levels through direct and indirect mechanisms respectively. Since these epigenetic repressors promote cell proliferation, we investigated the effect of miR-150 perturbation on HEK293 cell proliferation. We found that miR-150 inhibits cell proliferation and induces S-phase arrest by increasing the levels of tumor suppressors and decreasing the cell cycle regulators. Collectively, our study shows that miR-150 act as a tumor suppressor by down-regulating the oncogenic major epigenetic repressors and controls cell proliferation.

CREB acts as a common transcription factor for major epigenetic repressors; DNMT3B, EZH2, CUL4B and E2F6.

CREB signaling is known for several decades, but how it regulates both positive and negative regulators of cell proliferation is not well understood. On the other hand functions of major epigenetic repressors such as DNMT3B, EZH2 and CUL4B for their repressive epigenetic modifications on chromatin have also been well studied. However, there is very limited information available on how these repressors are regulated at their transcriptional level. Here, using computational tools and molecular techniques including site directed mutagenesis, promoter reporter assay, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), we identified that CREB acts as a common transcription factor for DNMT3B, EZH2, CUL4B and E2F6. ChIP assay revealed that pCREB binds to promoters of these repressors at CREs and induce their transcription. As expected, the expression of these repressors and their associated repressive marks particularly H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub are increased and decreased upon CREB overexpression and knock-down conditions respectively in the cancer cells indicating that CREB regulates the functions of these repressors by activating their transcription. Since CREB and these epigenetic repressors are overexpressed in various cancer types, our findings showed the molecular relationship between them and indicate that CREB is an important therapeutic target for cancer therapy.

De novo methyltransferases: Potential players in diseases and new directions for targeted therapy.

Epigenetic modifications govern gene expression by guiding the human genome on 'what to express and what not to'. DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) establish methylation patterns on DNA, particularly in CpG islands, and such patterns play a major role in gene silencing. DNMTs are a family of proteins/enzymes (DNMT1, 2, 3A, 3B, and 3L), among which, DNMT1 (maintenance methyltransferase) and DNMT3 (de novo methyltransferases) that direct mammalian development and genome imprinting are highly investigated. In recent decades, many studies revealed a strong association of DNA methylation patterns with gene expression in various clinical conditions. Differential expression of DNMT3 family proteins and their splice variants result in changes in methylation patterns and such alterations have been associated with the initiation and progression of various diseases, especially cancer. This review will discuss the aberrant modifications generated by DNMT3 proteins under various clinical conditions, suggesting a potential signature for de novo methyltransferases in targeted disease therapy. Further, this review discusses the possibility of using 'CpG island methylation signatures' as promising biomarkers and emphasizes 'targeted hypomethylation' by disrupting the interaction of specific DNMT-protein complexes as the future of cancer therapeutics.

A feedback regulation of CREB activation through the CUL4A and ERK signaling.

CUL4A; an E3 ubiquitin ligase is involved in the degradation of negative regulators of cell cycle such as p21, p27, p53, etc., through polyubiquitination-mediated protein degradation. The functional role(s) of CUL4A proteins on their targets are well characterized; however, the transcriptional regulation of CUL4A, particularly at its promoter level is not yet studied. Therefore, in this study, using computational tools, we found cAMP responsive elements (CRE) at the locations of - 926 and - 764 with respect to transcription state site + 1 of CUL4A promoter. Hence, we investigated the role of CREB on the regulation of CUL4A transcription. Our chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) data clearly showed increased levels of promoter occupancy of both CREB and pCREB on both CREs of CUL4A promoter. As expected, the expression of CUL4A increases and decreases upon the overexpression of and knocking down of CREB, respectively. Moreover, the inhibition of ERK pathway by U0126 not only reduces the CREB activation but also the CUL4A levels suggesting that CREB is the upstream activator of CUL4A transcription. The reduction of CUL4A levels upon the knocking down of CREB or by U0126 treatment increases the protein levels of CUL4A substrates such as p21 and p27. It is reported that CUL4A activates the ERK1/2 transcription and ERK1/2 pathway activates the CREB by phosphorylation. Based on our data and earlier findings, we report that CREB regulates the CUL4A levels positively which in turn activates the CREB through ERK1/2 pathway in the form of auto-regulatory looped mechanism.This suggests that CUL4A might be involved in proliferation of cancer cells by regulating the ERK1/2 and CREB signaling.

N-terminal truncations of human bHLH transcription factor Twist1 leads to the formation of aggresomes.

In the cell, misfolded proteins are processed by molecular chaperone-mediated refolding or through ubiquitin-mediated proteosome system. Dysregulation of these mechanisms facilitates the aggregation of misfolded proteins and forms aggresomes in the juxta nuclear position of the cell which are removed by lysosome-mediated autophagy pathway in the subsequent cell division. Accumulation of misfolded proteins in the cell is hallmark of several neurological disorders and other diseases including cancer. However, the exact mechanism of aggresome formation and clearance is not thoroughly understood. Reports have shown that several proteins including p300, p53, TAU, α-synuclein, SOD, etc. contain intrinsically disordered region (IDR) which has the tendency to form aggresome. To study the nature of aggresome formation and stability of the aggresome, we have chosen Twist1 as a model protein since it has IDR regions. Twist1 is a bHLH transcription factor which plays a major role in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and shown to interact with HAT domain of p300 and p53. In the present study, we generated several deletion mutants of human Twist1 with different fluorescent tags and delineated the regions responsible for aggresome formation. The Twist1 protein contains two NLS motifs at the N-terminal region. We showed that the deletions of regions spanning the amino acids 30-46 (Twist1Δ30-46) which lacks the first NLS motif form larger and intense aggregates while the deletion of residues from 47 to 100 (Twist1Δ47-100) which lacks the second NLS motif generates smaller and less intense aggregates in the juxta nuclear position. This suggests that both the NLS motifs are needed for the proper nuclear localization of Twist1. The aggresome formation of the Twist1 deletion mutants was confirmed by counterstaining with known aggresome markers: Vimentin, HDAC6, and gamma tubulin and further validated by MG-132 treatment. In addition, it was found that the aggresomes generated by the Twist1Δ30-46 construct are more stable than the aggresome produced by the Twist1Δ47-100 construct as well as the wild-type Twist1 protein. Taken together, our data provide an important understanding on the role of IDR regions on the formation and stability of aggresomes.

Effect of administration of allopurinol on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing intracardiac repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

OBJECTIVE: To determine effects of allopurinol administration on outcomes following intracardiac repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing TOF repair were randomized to 2 groups of 25 each: the allopurinol group (n = 25) and the placebo group (n = 25). Postoperatively, inotropic score, rhythm, duration of mechanical ventilation, cardiac output, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay were assessed. Plasma troponin-I, superoxide dismutase (SOD), interleukin (IL) 1-ß, IL-6, and malondialdehyde were measured serially. RESULTS: Inotropic score was lower in the allopurinol compared with placebo group (11.04 ± 5.70 vs 17.50 ± 7.83; P = .02). Duration of ICU and hospital stay was lower in the allopurinol group. Plasma levels of SOD preoperative were (2.87 ± 1.21 U/mL vs 4.5 ± 2.08 U/mL; P = .012), immediately following release of crossclamp (2.32 ± 0.98 U/mL vs 5.32 ± 2.81 U/mL; P < .001), and after termination of CPB (2.18 ± 1.0.78 U/mL vs 3.44 ± 1.99 U/mL; P = .003) between the placebo versus allopurinol group, respectively. Postoperative levels of IL1-ß and IL-6 were lower in the allopurinol group. Malondialdehyde levels following CPB were lower in the allopurinol group (11.80 ± 2.94 pg/mL in the placebo vs 9.16 ± 3.02 g/mL in the allopurinol group; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Allopurinol administration in patients undergoing intracardiac repair of TOF is associated with reduced inotropic scores, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay and favorable biochemical markers of inflammation. Further studies in multiple setups are needed before recommending it as a routine practice.