Specificity of electrocardiographic myocardial infarction screening criteria in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies.

BACKGROUND: The 32-point, 54-criteria Selvester QRS scoring system has been successfully used to estimate the size of nonacute myocardial infarction (MI). Three criteria of the system have been shown to be sensitive for the identification of nonacute MI and specific in normal control subjects. The validity of the system has not been tested in patients with cardiomyopathy of nonischemic origin. The purpose of this study was to examine the electrocardiographs (ECGs) of patients with abnormal left ventricular function but no presence of coronary disease to determine the diagnostic specificity of the MI screening criteria subset of the Selvester QRS scoring system. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six hundred ninety patients were considered. Exclusion criteria included age <10 years, cardiac transplantation, thrombolytic therapy, any angiographic evidence of coronary disease, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >60%, or history of myocardial revascularization. ECG exclusion criteria included left ventricular hypertrophy, right ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, ventricular pacing, left anterior fascicular block, left posterior fascicular block, ventricular preexcitation, and low voltage, because these confounding factors could mimic an infarct on the ECG. The 261 remaining patients were then examined for the presence of the MI screening criteria subset: (1) inferior location: Q > or =30 msec in aVF, (2) anterior location: either any Q or R< or =0.1 mV and < or =10 msec in V2, and (3) posterior location: R> or =40 msec in V1. Thirty-two of the 261 patients falsely met at least 1 of the 3 MI screening criteria, resulting in an overall specificity of 88% (vs 95% in normal control subjects, P=.0006). A specificity of 98% (n = 256) was achieved for the inferior MI screening criterion alone, whereas the anterior and posterior MI screening criteria alone achieved significantly lower specificities: 94% (n = 245) and 95% (n = 249), respectively. When the patient population was divided into LVEF <30% and LVEF > or =30%, no significant association was found between MI screening criteria and LVEF with specificities of 87% and 88%, respectively, for the 2 groups (P= .34). CONCLUSIONS: The MI screening criteria subset is relatively specific in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, falsely identifying only 12% with nonacute MI. However, this specificity is lower than the 95% achieved in normal subjects. Regional accumulation of scarring caused by cardiomyopathy could result in false-positive indication of MI in the present population. Another possibility could be that some patients could have hypertrophy of the myocardium insufficient to produce positive ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy or right ventricular hypertrophy but sufficient to mimic infarction.

Asymptomatic coronary artery disease detection: update 1996. A screening protocol using 16-lead high-resolution ECG, ultrafast CT, exercise testing, and radionuclear imaging.

The authors have proposed a new four-step screening algorithm to detect asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in flight school candidates, cadets, and rated flyers of the Unites States Air Force (USAF). In step 1, the USAF Armstrong Laboratory (USAF/AL) risk profile and improved 16-lead high-resolution electrocardiogram/vectorcardiogram will be recorded at baseline. On routine follow-up evaluations, quantitative serial comparisons will be performed by the method of Kornreich. In step 2, beginning with flight school candidates and cadets, all three groups will be studied by the ultrafast computed tomograph (CT) protocol. Those candidates positive for coronary calcium will be studied by coronary angiography and ventriculography, and their eligibility for continued rated flight status will be determined by present criteria. In step 3, those candidates negative for coronary calcium by ultrafast CT will then be screened by the newly defined and improved high-sensitivity treadmill exercise test criteria. In step 4, candidates with a positive treadmill exercise test result, or who are also found in the upper quintile of the USAF/AL risk profile, wild also have exercise nuclear wall motion studies and perfusion scans. If these are abnormal and suggestive of myocardial ischemia, this subset will also be studied by heart catheterization and coronary angiography, and their eligibility for continued rated flight status will be determined by present criteria. The incidence of coronary calcium/no calcium for each degree of stenosis in the 6,000 flyers in each quintile was used to develop the following projections: (1) that more than 3 of 4 rated flyers with unsuspected CAD, and (2) more than 9 of 10 with severe flow-limiting CAD can be identified by these upgraded screening procedures. Evidence is herein presented that these enhancements will result in a major (5-8-fold) increase in case finding of this disease. Based on the estimate of four lost high-performance aircrafts per year from sudden incapacitation of the pilot due to CAD, when this four-step screen is fully operational, it can be expected to reduce the $80 million annual losses to the United States government from CAD by 85%, a savings of $68 million per year.

Psychological correlates of progression of atherosclerosis in men.

Patients who underwent repetitive repetitive coronary angiograms at an average interval of 17 months completed the Jenkins Activity Survey (n = 66) and were given the Rosenman diagnostic interview to measure Type A behavior (n = 45). Significant progression of coronary artery disease was judged to be an increase in occlusion of 25% or more, or progression to total occlusion in any vessel. At subsequent study, 30% of the patients showed evidence of progression. Progression was much more likely in patients with initially more severe disease and was marginally related to cigarette smoking when initial level of disease was controlled. Interview assessment of Type A did not discriminate reliably between the groups in the smaller sample of patients given this measure. There was significant positive association between magnitude of Activity Survey Type A scores and progression of disease, although mean scores on the Type A scale were not reliably different between the Progression and No Progression groups. The pattern of results suggested that extreme Type B subjects (classified by Activity Survey) were unlikely to show progression over this time period.