Correlation of in-vivo imaging with histopathology: A review.

Despite tremendous advancements in in vivo imaging modalities, there remains substantial uncertainty with respect to tumor delineation on in these images. Histopathology remains the gold standard for determining the extent of malignancy, with in vivo imaging to histopathologic correlation enabling spatial comparisons. In this review, the steps necessary for successful imaging to histopathologic correlation are described, including in vivo imaging, resection, fixation, specimen sectioning (sectioning technique, securing technique, orientation matching, slice matching), microtome sectioning and staining, correlation (including image registration) and performance evaluation. The techniques used for each of these steps are also discussed. Hundreds of publications from the past 20 years were surveyed, and 62 selected for detailed analysis. For these 62 publications, each stage of the correlative pathology process (and the sub-steps of specimen sectioning) are listed. A statistical analysis was conducted based on 19 studies that reported target registration error as their performance metric. While some methods promise greater accuracy, they may be expensive. Due to the complexity of the processes involved, correlative pathology studies generally include a small number of subjects, which hinders advanced developments in this field.

Viscoelastic biomechanical models to predict inward brain-shift using public benchmark data.

Brain-shift during neurosurgery compromises the accuracy of tracking the boundaries of the tumor to be resected. Although several studies have used various finite element models (FEMs) to predict inward brain-shift, evaluation of their accuracy and efficiency based on public benchmark data has been limited. This study evaluates several FEMs proposed in the literature (various boundary conditions, mesh sizes, and material properties) by using intraoperative imaging data (the public REtroSpective Evaluation of Cerebral Tumors [RESECT] database). Four patients with low-grade gliomas were identified as having inward brain-shifts. We computed the accuracy (using target registration error) of several FEM-based brain-shift predictions and compared our findings. Since information on head orientation during craniotomy is not included in this database, we tested various plausible angles of head rotation. We analyzed the effects of brain tissue viscoelastic properties, mesh size, craniotomy position, CSF drainage level, and rigidity of meninges and then quantitatively evaluated the trade-off between accuracy and central processing unit time in predicting inward brain-shift across all models with second-order tetrahedral FEMs. The mean initial target registration error (TRE) was 5.78 ± 3.78 mm with rigid registration. FEM prediction (edge-length, 5 mm) with non-rigid meninges led to a mean TRE correction of 1.84 ± 0.83 mm assuming heterogeneous material. Results show that, for the low-grade glioma patients in the study, including non-rigid modeling of the meninges was significant statistically. In contrast including heterogeneity was not significant. To estimate the optimal head orientation and CSF drainage, an angle step of 5° and an CSF height step of 5 mm were enough leading to <0.26 mm TRE fluctuation.

Accuracy of deformable image registration techniques for alignment of longitudinal cholangiocarcinoma CT images.

PURPOSE: Response assessment of radiotherapy for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) across longitudinal images is challenging due to anatomical changes. Advanced deformable image registration (DIR) techniques are required to correlate corresponding tissues across time. In this study, the accuracy of five commercially available DIR algorithms in four treatment planning systems (TPS) was investigated for the registration of planning images with posttreatment follow-up images for response assessment or re-treatment purposes. METHODS: Twenty-nine IHCC patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy and with pretreatment and posttreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed. Liver segmentations were semiautomatically generated on all CTs and the posttreatment CT was then registered to the pretreatment CT using five commercially available algorithms (Demons, B-splines, salient feature-based, anatomically constrained and finite element-based) in four TPSs. This was followed by an in-depth analysis of 10 DIR strategies (plus global and liver-focused rigid registration) in one of the TPSs. Eight of the strategies were variants of the anatomically constrained DIR while the two were based on a finite element-based biomechanical registration. The anatomically constrained techniques were combinations of: (a) initializations with the two rigid registrations; (b) two similarity metrics - correlation coefficient (CC) and mutual information (MI); and (c) with and without a controlling region of interest (ROI) - the liver. The finite element-based techniques were initialized by the two rigid registrations. The accuracy of each registration was evaluated using target registration error (TRE) based on identified vessel bifurcations. The results were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison tests. Stratified analysis was conducted on the inter-TPS data (plus the liver-focused rigid registration) using treatment volume changes, slice thickness, time between scans, and abnormal lab values as stratifying factors. RESULTS: The complex deformation observed following treatment resulted in average TRE exceeding the image voxel size for all techniques. For the inter-TPS comparison, the Demons algorithm had the lowest TRE, which was significantly superior to all the other algorithms. The respective mean (standard deviation) TRE (in mm) for the Demons, B-splines, salient feature-based, anatomically constrained, and finite element-based algorithms were 4.6 (2.0), 7.4 (2.7), 7.2 (2.6), 6.3 (2.3), and 7.5 (4.0). In the follow-up comparison of the anatomically constrained DIR, the strategy with liver-focused rigid registration initialization, CC as similarity metric and liver as a controlling ROI had the lowest mean TRE - 6.0 (2.0). The maximum TRE for all techniques exceeded 10 mm. Selection of DIR strategy was found to be a statistically significant factor for registration accuracy. Tumor volume change had a significant effect on TRE for finite element-based registration and B-splines DIR. Time between scans had a substantial effect on TRE for all registrations but was only significant for liver-focused rigid, finite element-based and salient feature-based DIRs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the limitations of commercially available DIR techniques in TPSs for alignment of longitudinal images of liver cancer presenting complex anatomical changes including local hypertrophy and fibrosis/necrosis. DIR in this setting should be used with caution and careful evaluation.

How Have Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria Evolved Over Time?

Knowledge reuse of cancer trial designs may benefit from a temporal understanding of the evolution of the target populations of cancer studies over time. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the trends of cancer trial eligibility criteria between 1999 and 2014. The yearly distributions of eligibility concepts for chemicals and drugs, procedures, observations, and medical conditions extracted from free-text eligibility criteria of 32,000 clinical trials for 89 cancer types were analyzed. We identified the concepts that trend upwards or downwards in all or selected cancer types, and the concepts that show anomalous trends for some cancers. Later, concept trends were studied in a disease-specific manner and illustrated for breast cancer. Criteria trends observed in this study are also validated and interpreted using evidence from the existing medical literature. This study contributes a method for concept trend analysis and original knowledge of the trends in cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria.