Incidence and Remission of Post-Surgical Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Intraocular Inflammation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, remission, and relapse of post-surgical cystoid macular edema (PCME) following cataract surgery in inflammatory eye disease. METHODS: A total of 1859 eyes that had no visually significant macular edema prior to cataract surgery while under tertiary uveitis management were included. Standardized retrospective chart review was used to gather clinical data. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for inter-eye correlations were performed. RESULTS: PCME causing VA 20/50 or worse was reported in 286 eyes (15%) within 6 months of surgery. Adults age 18-64 years as compared to children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.42, for ages 18 to 44 years and aOR = 1.93 for ages 45 to 64 years, overall P = .02); concurrent use of systemic immunosuppression (conventional aOR 1.53 and biologics aOR = 2.68, overall P = .0095); preoperative VA 20/50 or worse (overall P < .0001); cataract surgery performed before 2000 (overall P = .03) and PMCE in fellow eye (aOR = 3.04, P = .0004) were associated with development of PCME within 6 months of cataract surgery. PCME resolution was seen in 81% of eyes at 12 months and 91% of eyes at 24 months. CME relapse was seen in 12% eyes at 12 months and 19% eyes at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: PCME occurs frequently in uveitic eyes undergoing cataract surgery; however, most resolve within a year. CME recurrences likely are due to the underlying disease process and not relapses of PCME.

Posterior capsular opacification and YAG laser capsulotomy in uveitis patients following cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of visually significant posterior capsule opacification (PCO with visual acuity ≤20/50) and the incidence of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in the year following cataract surgery for uveitic eyes. METHOD: Patients were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases (SITE) Cohort Study using a standardized chart review process. RESULTS: Among 1,855 uveitic eyes of 1,370 patients who had undergone cataract surgery, visually significant PCO occurred in 297 eyes (16%), and YAG laser capsulotomy was done in 407 eyes (22%) within the first year following surgery. Higher odds of developing 20/50 visual acuity attributed to PCO were noted in children and young adults compared with adults older than 65 years of age (overall p = 0.03). Poorer preoperative visual acuity (overall p = 0.0069) and postoperative inflammation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.37-2.45; p < 0.0001) were associated with PCO incidence. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for YAG laser capsulotomy were younger age groups compared with those older than 65 years of age at the time of surgery (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.90-2.24; 95% CI, 1.90-2.24; overall p = 0.0007), female sex (aOR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82; p = 0.03), postoperative active inflammation (aOR = 165; 95% CI, 1.27-2.16; overall p < 0.0001), extracapsular cataract extraction compared with phacoemulsification (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.47; overall p < 0.0001), and insertion of an intraocular lens (aOR = 4.60; 95% CI, -2.29-9.25; p < 0.0001). Black race was associated with lower YAG laser capsulotomy incidence than Whites (aOR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52; overall p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vision-reducing (≤20/50) PCO is common, occurring in about one sixth of uveitic eyes within 1 year of cataract surgery; a higher number (22%) of eyes underwent YAG laser capsulotomy within the first year. Age and postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery are the variables most associated with the incidence of visually significant PCO and YAG laser capsulotomy.

Treatment Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Uveitic Macular Edema.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept for UME (uveitic macular). METHODS: A retrospective review of records of patients that received aflibercept for UME from January 2017 to August 2022 was conducted. The primary outcomes were mean change in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) 6 and 12 months from the start of aflibercept treatment. RESULTS: A total of 16 eyes of 12 patients were included. Indications for treatment included eyes that had previously demonstrated a history of elevated intraocular pressure secondary to a steroid response (n = 10) or a history of non-response or partial response to local corticosteroids (n = 6). Fifteen eyes (94%) demonstrated a reduction in CST after their initial injection. At 6-months, mean VA gain was 2.6 ± 7.7 letters (p = 0.24) from a mean VA of 67.8 ± 10.7 letters at baseline and mean CST improved by 97.6 ± 113.5 µm (p = 0.004) from 458.6 ± 123.1 µm at baseline. Fourteen eyes had 12-months of follow up and received a median of 4 injections over 12 visits. The mean VA at 12-months remained stable compared to baseline (mean change of -1.4 ± 12.5 letters (p = 0.87)) while the CST improved by a mean of 90.9 ± 114.6 µm (p = 0.053) compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal aflibercept injections resulted in reduced central subfield thickness at all time-points. It appears to be an effective treatment alternative for UME, particularly for patients who are not responsive to local corticosteroids or who have contraindications to corticosteroid treatment.

Long-term visual acuity outcomes following cataract surgery in eyes with ocular inflammatory disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term visual acuity (VA) outcome of cataract surgery in inflammatory eye disease. SETTING: Tertiary care academic centres. DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A total of 1741 patients with non-infectious inflammatory eye disease (2382 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery while under tertiary uveitis management were included. Standardised chart review was used to gather clinical data. Multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for intereye correlations were performed to evaluate the prognostic factors for VA outcomes. Main outcome measure was VA after cataract surgery. RESULTS: Uveitic eyes independent of anatomical location showed improved VA from baseline (mean 20/200) to within 3 months (mean 20/63) of cataract surgery and maintained through at least 5 years of follow-up (mean 20/63). Eyes that achieved 20/40 or better VA at 1 year were more likely to have scleritis (OR=1.34, p<0.0001) or anterior uveitis (OR=2.2, p<0.0001), VA 20/50 to 20/80 (OR 4.76 as compared with worse than 20/200, p<0.0001) preoperatively, inactive uveitis (OR=1.49, p=0.03), have undergone phacoemulsification (OR=1.45 as compared with extracapsular cataract extraction, p=0.04) or have had intraocular lens placement (OR=2.13, p=0.01). Adults had better VA immediately after surgery, with only 39% (57/146) paediatric eyes at 20/40 or better at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adult and paediatric eyes with uveitis typically have improved VA following cataract surgery and remain stable thereafter for at least 5 years.

Treatment of Intermediate Uveitis-associated Retinal Vasoproliferative Tumors: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: To report the use of combination intravitreal pharmacotherapy using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and short and long-term corticosteroid implants for the treatment of retinal vasoproliferative tumors (VPT) associated with intermediate uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with VPT secondary to idiopathic intermediate uveitis that underwent combination intravitreal pharmacotherapy at a single center was performed. Multimodal imaging including ultrawide field color fundus photography, ultrawide field fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography obtained before and after treatment were reviewed. RESULTS: Four eyes of 4 patients were treated with multiple injections of a combination of aflibercept, dexamethasone, and fluocinolone acetonide implants for VPT associated with intermediate uveitis. All 4 patients had improvement in visual acuity, intraocular inflammation, central macular thickness, and retinal vascular leakage, as well as regression of the VPT and reduction in lesion leakage on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Combination intravitreal anti-VEGF and corticosteroid implants may be a useful approach for the treatment of intermediate uveitis-associated VPTs and can lead to both functional and structural improvement.

Use of Immunosuppression and the Risk of Subsequent Overall or Cancer Mortality.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of all-cause and cancer mortality (CM) in association with immunosuppression. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study at ocular inflammatory disease (OID) subspecialty centers. We harvested exposure and covariate data retrospectively from clinic inception (earliest in 1979) through 2010 inclusive. Then we ascertained overall and cancer-specific mortalities by National Death Index linkage. We constructed separate Cox models to evaluate overall and CM for each class of immunosuppressant and for each individual immunosuppressant compared with person-time unexposed to any immunosuppression. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with noninfectious OID, excluding those with human immunodeficiency infection or preexisting cancer. METHODS: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (mostly infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept); antimetabolites (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine); calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine); and alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide) were given when clinically indicated in this noninterventional cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall mortality and CM. RESULTS: Over 187 151 person-years (median follow-up 10.0 years), during which 15 938 patients were at risk for mortality, we observed 1970 deaths, 435 due to cancer. Both patients unexposed to immunosuppressants (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.01) and those exposed to immunosuppressants but free of systemic inflammatory diseases (SIDs) (SMR = 1.04, 95% CI, 0.95-1.14) had similar mortality risk to the US population. Comparing patients exposed to TNF inhibitors, antimetabolites, calcineurin inhibitors, and alkylating agents with patients not exposed to any of these, we found that overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.88, 0.89, 0.90, 1.11) and CM (aHR = 1.25, 0.89, 0.86, 1.23) were not significantly increased. These results were stable in sensitivity analyses whether excluding or including patients with SID, across 0-, 3-, or 5-year lags and across quartiles of immunosuppressant dose and duration. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, in a cohort where the indication for treatment was proven unassociated with mortality risk, found that commonly used immunosuppressants-especially the antimetabolites methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine; the TNF inhibitors adalimumab and infliximab, and cyclosporine-were not associated with increased overall and CM over a median cohort follow-up of 10.0 years. These results suggest the safety of these agents with respect to overall and CM for patients treated with immunosuppression for a wide range of inflammatory diseases. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Cataract in Anterior Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To estimate the incidence/risk factors for cataract in noninfectious anterior uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort study (6 US tertiary uveitis sites, 1978-2010). METHODS: Data were harvested by trained expert reviewers, using protocol-driven review of experts' charts. We studied cataract incidence-newly reduced visual acuity worse than 20/40 attributed to cataract; or incident cataract surgery-in 3923 eyes of 2567 patients with anterior uveitis. RESULTS: Cataract developed in 507 eyes (54/1000 eye-years, 95% CI 49-59). Time-updated risk factors associated with cataract included older age (≥65 vs <18 years: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 5.04, 95% CI 3.04-8.33), higher anterior chamber cell grade (P(trend)=0.001), prior incisional glaucoma surgery (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.14), band keratopathy (aHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.47-3.37), posterior synechiae (aHR 3.71, 95% CI 2.83-4.87), and elevated intraocular pressure ≥30 vs 6-20 mm Hg (aHR 2.57, 95% CI 1.38-4.77). Primary acute (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.15) and recurrent acute (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.98) had lower cataract risk than chronic anterior uveitis. Higher-dose prednisolone acetate 1%-equivalent use (≥2 drops/day) was associated with >2-fold higher cataract risk in eyes with anterior chamber cell grades 0.5+ or lower but was not associated with higher cataract risk in the presence of anterior chamber cells of grade 1+ or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract complicates anterior uveitis in ∼5.4/100 eye-years. Several fixed and modifiable risk factors were identified, yielding a point system to guide cataract risk minimization. Topical corticosteroids only were associated with increased cataract risk when anterior chamber cells were absent or minimally present, suggesting their use to treat active inflammation (which itself is cataractogenic) does not cause a net increase in cataract incidence.

Antidrug Antibodies to Tumor Necrosis Factor α Inhibitors in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis.

Importance: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) can induce antidrug antibody (ADA) formation and loss of therapeutic response. However, the utility of ADA testing and the association between ADAs and treatment response in patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is not well understood. Objective: To assess the frequency of ADAs and their association with drug levels and clinical response in patients with NIU treated with adalimumab or infliximab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with NIU who received adalimumab or infliximab and underwent testing for serum drug level and ADAs at the National Eye Institute from September 2017 to July 2021. Exposures: Serum drug level testing with reflex testing for ADA levels was performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the association between drug levels and ADAs, clinical response, and concurrent antimetabolite use in patients treated with TNFis for NIU. Results: Of 54 patients included in the study, 42 received adalimumab (mean [SD] age, 43.6 [19.6] years; 25 [59.5%] female) and 12 received infliximab (mean [SD] age, 42.7 [20.4] years; 7 [58.3%] male). In the adalimumab group, mean (SD) drug level was 9.72 (6.82) µg/mL, mean (SD) ADA level was 84.2 (172.9) arbitrary units/mL, and ADA frequency was 35.7% (15 of 42 patients). Mean drug level was lower in those with ADAs compared with those without ADAs (mean [SD], 2.8 [2.6] µg/mL vs 13.6 [5.2] µg/mL; difference: 10.8 µg/mL; 95% CI, 8.3-13.2 µg/mL; P < .001). There was a higher mean drug level with concurrent antimetabolite use compared with monotherapy (mean [SD], 11.0 [7.3] µg/mL vs 6.8 [4.5] µg/mL; difference: -4.2 µg/mL; 95% CI, -8.7 to 0.2 µg/mL; P = .06). Multivariable modeling showed that a 1-arbitrary unit increase in ADAs was associated with a -0.02 µg/mL (95% CI, -0.01 to -0.34 µg/mL) difference in mean drug level (P < .001). Favorable clinical response was associated with a threshold drug level above 2.7 µg/mL or an antibody level below 15.2 µg/mL. The mean (SD) drug level in the infliximab group was 27.02 (18.15) µg/mL, and no ADAs were detected. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, 35.7% of adalimumab-treated patients with NIU had ADAs. The presence of ADAs was associated with lower drug levels, and higher ADA levels were associated with increased risk of TNFi treatment failure. Although limited by the retrospective design, our results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered among patients experiencing therapy failure to help exclude ADAs as a potential cause of treatment failure.

Ophthalmic Manifestations of ROSAH (Retinal Dystrophy, Optic Nerve Edema, Splenomegaly, Anhidrosis, and Headache) Syndrome, an Inherited NF κB-Mediated Autoinflammatory Disease with Retinal Dystrophy.

PURPOSE: We aimed to characterize the ocular phenotype of patients with ROSAH (retinal dystrophy, optic nerve edema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis, and headache) syndrome and their response to therapy. DESIGN: Single-center observational case study. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven patients with a diagnosis of ROSAH syndrome and mutation in ALPK1 were included. METHODS: Patients with molecularly confirmed ROSAH syndrome underwent ophthalmic evaluation, including visual acuity testing, slit-lamp and dilated examinations, color fundus and autofluorescence imaging, fluorescein angiography, OCT, and electrophysiologic testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, electrophysiology, fluorescein angiography, and OCT findings. RESULTS: Eleven individuals (6 female and 5 male patients) from 7 families ranging in age from 7.3 to 60.2 years at the time of the initial evaluation were included in this study. Seven patients were followed up for a mean of 2.6 years (range, 0.33-5.0 years). Best-corrected visual acuity at baseline ranged from 20/16 to no light perception. Variable signs or sequelae of intraocular inflammation were observed in 9 patients, including keratic precipitates, band keratopathy, trace to 2+ anterior chamber cells, cystoid macular edema, and retinal vasculitis on fluorescein angiography. Ten patients were observed to show optic disc elevation and demonstrated peripapillary thickening on OCT. Seven patients showed retinal degeneration consistent with a cone-rod dystrophy, with atrophy tending to involve the posterior pole and extending peripherally. One patient with normal electroretinography findings and visual evoked potential was found to have decreased Arden ratio on electro-oculography. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging insights from the largest single-center ROSAH cohort described to date, this study identified 3 main factors as contributing to changes in visual function of patients with ROSAH syndrome: optic nerve involvement; intraocular inflammation, including cystoid macular edema; and retinal degeneration. More work is needed to determine how to arrest the progressive vision loss associated with ROSAH syndrome. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

The International Vitreoretinal B-Cell Lymphoma Registry: a protocol paper.

INTRODUCTION: Vitreoretinal lymphoma is a rare ocular cancer with high morbidity and mortality despite treatment. Diagnosis by cytopathology is often delayed, and various molecular and image-based investigations have been developed. Diverse treatments are used, but there is a limited medical evidence to differentiate their effectiveness. We designed an international registry that would collect diagnostic, treatment and outcomes data, to establish new evidence for the management of this cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The International Vitreoretinal B-Cell Lymphoma Registry will accrue data retrospectively for individuals aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with new or recurrent vitreoretinal B-cell lymphoma on or after 1 January 2020. A steering committee of subspecialised ophthalmologists identified 20 key clinical data items that describe patient demographics, tissue involvements, diagnostic testing, ocular and systemic treatments and treatment complications, and visual acuity and survival outcomes. Customised software was designed to permit collection of these data across a single baseline and multiple follow-up forms. The platform collects data without identifiers and at 3 month reporting intervals. Outcomes of the project will include: (1) descriptions of clinical presentations, and diagnostic and therapeutic preferences; (2) associations between clinical presentations, and diagnostics and treatments, and between diagnostics and treatments (assessed by ORs with 95% CIs); and (3) estimations of rates of vision loss, and progression-free and overall survival (assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The registry has received Australia-wide approval by a national human research ethics committee. Sites located outside Australia are required to seek local human research ethics review. Results generated through the registry will be disseminated primarily by peer-reviewed publications that are expected to inform clinical practice, as well as educational materials.

Risk of Elevated Intraocular Pressure With Difluprednate in Patients With Non-Infectious Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk factors associated with clinically important intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation with topical difluprednate treatment in patients with non-infectious uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Fifty-four eyes of 54 patients with non-infectious uveitis treated with topical difluprednate at the current institution were included. Demographics and clinical characteristics of uveitis patients were collected. The main outcome measure was development of clinically important IOP elevation defined as IOP ≥21 mmHg and an increase of ≥10 mmHg from baseline. RESULTS: A clinically important IOP elevation was observed in 17 patients (31.5%). The mean time to clinically important IOP elevation was 7.4±4.8 weeks (range 3-19). Statistically significant risk factors for incident clinically important IOP elevation were being a child (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 7.85 [95% CI 1.48-41.56], P = .02) and concurrent use of systemic steroids (aHR 5.31 [95% CI 1.18-24.00], P = .03). Patients with concurrent systemic corticosteroids developed clinically important IOP elevation earlier than those without systemic corticosteroid (mean 5.7±3.4 [range 3-14] vs 10.4±5.7 [range 4-19] weeks, P = .05). Incident IOP ≥30 mmHg occurred in 7 patients (13.0%). All patients responded well to the cessation of difluprednate and/or use of topical antiglaucomatous agents and no eyes required glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that clinically important IOP elevation is common in uveitis patients with topical difluprednate treatment. Children and patients with concurrent systemic corticosteroids are at substantial risk of developing clinically important IOP elevation.

Secondary vitreoretinal lymphoma with spontaneous regression.

PURPOSE: To report a patient with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) secondary to systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who had two episodes of spontaneous regression. OBSERVATIONS: An 80-year-old Nicaraguan male with a history of treated systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presented with decreased vision in his right eye over one year. The patient was found to have subretinal lesions and moderate vitreous opacities in his right eye. Cytological analysis of vitreous confirmed B-cell lymphoma. Following his systemic work-up, spontaneous clinical improvement was noted. There were no vitreoretinal or systemic lymphoma recurrences during one year of follow-up until the patient had new onset decreased vision in the left eye. He was presumed to have a recurrence of VRL supported by optical coherence tomography findings. Repeat systemic workup was negative for reoccurrence and the ocular lesions resolved spontaneously over 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous regression of intraocular lymphoma can rarely occur. Multimodal imaging has an essential role in diagnosing and monitoring recurrence of this disease.

Corneal Endothelial Transplantation in Uveitis: Incidence and Risk Factors.

PURPOSE: To estimate the incidence of corneal endothelial transplantation (CET) and identify risk factors among patients with noninfectious ocular inflammation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients attending United States tertiary uveitis care facilities diagnosed with noninfectious ocular inflammation were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases Cohort Study. Time-to-event analysis was used to estimate the incidence of CET, including penetrating keratoplasty, Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty, or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty procedures. The incidence of CET was calculated. Potential risk factors for CET were also evaluated using Cox regression, accounting for correlation between eyes of the same patient. RESULTS: Overall, 14,264 eyes met eligibility criteria for this analysis, with a median follow-up of 1.8 eye-years. The Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of CET within 10 years was 1.10% (95% CI, 0.68%-1.53%). Risk factors for CET included age >60 years vs <40 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 16.5; 95% CI, 4.70-57.9), anterior uveitis and scleritis vs other types (aHR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.46-6.05; and aHR, 4.14; 95% CI,1.28-13.4, respectively), topical corticosteroid treatment (aHR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.32-6.13), cataract surgery (aHR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.73-11.4), tube shunt surgery (aHR, 11.9; 95% CI, 5.30-26.8), band keratopathy (aHR, 5.12; 95% CI, 2.34-11.2), and hypotony (aHR, 7.38; 95% CI, 3.14-17.4). Duration of uveitis, trabeculectomy, peripheral anterior synechia, and ocular hypertension had no significant association after multivariate adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ocular inflammation, CET occurred infrequently. Tube shunt surgery, hypotony, band keratopathy, cataract surgery, and anterior segment inflammation were associated with increased risk of undergoing CET; these factors likely are associated with endothelial cell damage.

Ocular adverse events in PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors can cause unique immune-related adverse effects due to non-specific immunological activation. However, less is known about adverse effects of these drugs in the eye. METHODS: Two adverse event databases were retrospectively reviewed. The two databases consisted of a routine adverse event database and a serious adverse event database of expeditiously submitted reports. Patients with any malignancy who had ocular adverse events while on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment were included. Patients received nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab alone or in combination with other anticancer agents per each trial's protocol. Databases were queried up to May 19, 2020. RESULTS: In the routine adverse event database, 272 adverse events from 213 patients were reported and in the serious adverse event reporting database, 59 ocular adverse events from 47 patients were reported. A lower estimate of the prevalance from the routine adverse event database showed 259/7727 patients on study treatment arms reporting ocular adverse events (3.3% prevalence). Excluding trials that do not report lower grade adverse events to the routine adverse event database results in a higher end estimate of 242/3255 patients on study treatment arms reporting ocular adverse events (7.4% prevalence). Ocular events occurred early after drug initiation (routine database: median 6 weeks, IQR 0-16, serious adverse events database: median 11 weeks, IQR 6-21). The median Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade was grade 1 (mild) (IQR 1-2) and grade 2 (moderate) (IQR 2-3) for the routine database and the serious adverse events database, respectively. In-depth analysis of the serious adverse event reports revealed varying degrees of clinical workup, with 30/47 patients (64%) receiving ophthalmological evaluation and 16/47 (34%) of patients having to delay or discontinue treatment. However, 16/47 (34%) patients experienced resolution and 14/47 (30%) patients experienced at least some improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest analyses of ocular adverse events in patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the USA. We found ocular adverse events are rare complications of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy, can be severe enough to cause treatment discontinuation/delay, and may not always be appropriately evaluated by eye specialists. Standardized plans for ophthalmology evaluation and management of ocular toxicities are needed in studies of patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Daratumumab-Based Treatment for Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils of light chains produced by clonal CD38+ plasma cells. Daratumumab, a human CD38-targeting antibody, may improve outcomes for this disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis to receive six cycles of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or with subcutaneous daratumumab followed by single-agent daratumumab every 4 weeks for up to 24 cycles (daratumumab group). The primary end point was a hematologic complete response. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 11.4 months. The percentage of patients who had a hematologic complete response was significantly higher in the daratumumab group than in the control group (53.3% vs. 18.1%) (relative risk ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.1; P<0.001). Survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression favored the daratumumab group (hazard ratio for major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.02). At 6 months, more cardiac and renal responses occurred in the daratumumab group than in the control group (41.5% vs. 22.2% and 53.0% vs. 23.9%, respectively). The four most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (13.0% in the daratumumab group and 10.1% in the control group), pneumonia (7.8% and 4.3%, respectively), cardiac failure (6.2% and 4.8%), and diarrhea (5.7% and 3.7%). Systemic administration-related reactions to daratumumab occurred in 7.3% of the patients. A total of 56 patients died (27 in the daratumumab group and 29 in the control group), most due to amyloidosis-related cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone was associated with higher frequencies of hematologic complete response and survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ANDROMEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03201965.).

Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis of Vitreoretinal Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To provide recommendations for diagnosis of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL). METHODS: Literature was reviewed for reports supporting the diagnosis of VRL. A questionnaire (Delphi 1 round) was distributed to 28 participants. In the second round (Delphi 2), items of the questionnaire not reaching consensus (75% agreement) were discussed to finalize the recommendations. RESULTS: Presenting symptoms include floaters and painless loss of vision, vitreous cells organized into sheets or clumps. Retinal lesions are usually multifocal creamy/white in the outer retina. Other findings include retinal lesions with "leopard-skin" appearance and retinal pigment epithelium atrophy. Severe vitreous infiltration without macular edema is the most likely presentation. Diagnostic vitrectomy should be performed. Systemic corticosteroid should be discontinued at least 2 weeks before surgery. An interleukin (IL)-10:IL-6 ratio > 1, positive mutation for the myeloid differentiation primary response 88 gene and monoclonality are indicators of VRL. Multi-modal imaging (optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence) are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus meeting allowed the establishment of recommendations important for the diagnosis of VRL.

The Association between QuantiFERON-TB Gold Test and Clinical Manifestations of Uveitis in the United States.

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence of QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) positivity among uveitis patients compared to general population and to evaluate the differences in clinical features of uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: SETTING: Institutional. PATIENT POPULATION: 418 consecutive new uveitis patients, regardless of clinical suspicion, were tested for QFT-G. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Demographics, TB risk factors, clinical characteristics of uveitis were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The frequency of QFT-G positivity among uveitis patients and characteristic clinical features among QFT-G positive patients. RESULTS: QFT-G positivity was found in 60/418 patients with uveitis (14.4%, 95% CI: 11.18 - 18.14) higher than the general US population (5%, 95% CI: 4.2 - 5.8, p<.001). Age, gender and residence were similar between QFT-G positive and negative groups. Uveitis patients with positive QFT-G were more likely to be foreign born or have a recent travel history (OR:5.84; 95% CI: 2.83 - 12.05; p<.001). QFT-G positive patients were more likely to present with granulomatous uveitis (OR 2.90; 95%CI 1.36 - 6.21; p=.006). No significant association was found with specific clinical features such as choroiditis, retinal vasculitis, occlusive vasculitis, and serpiginoid choroiditis (p>.05 for each). Prevalence of TB-uveitis based on treatment response was 1.19%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates significantly higher prevalence of QFT-G positivity among uveitis patients compared to average US population. Characteristic signs of TB uveitis reported in endemic countries were not seen in this cohort. Implications of higher prevalence of QFT-G positivity among uveitis patients require further investigation.

Clinical Utility of Antiretinal Antibody Testing.

IMPORTANCE: The clinical utility of most antiretinal antibodies (retina antibodies) currently available for testing remains unclear and unproven. Despite this, the presence of retinal antibodies is included in current diagnostic autoimmune retinopathy criteria. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of comprehensive retinal antibody evaluations currently offered in North America. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, 14 patients without autoimmune retinopathy were recruited into the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Biorepository for this study between January 1, 2019, and October 1, 2019. These serum samples without autoimmune retinopathy were sent in masked fashion to a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory. Using similar methods, the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Research Laboratory independently assessed the same sample to ascertain reproducibility of the findings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Results of the autoimmune retinopathy and cancer-associated retinopathy panels. RESULTS: Thirteen of 14 (93%; 95% CI, 66%-100%) serum samples tested positive for retinal antibodies, with a median of 5 retinal antibodies (range, 0-8) per patient at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory, which provides a specificity of 7% (95% CI, 0%-34%). Confirmatory immunohistochemistry staining in human retina was present in 12 of 14 samples (86%). α-Enolase was found in 9 (64%). The only retinal antibody not present was recoverin. These nonspecific retinal antibody results were replicated at the Mayo Clinic Laboratory on Western blot using pig retina proteins as substrate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The presence of retinal antibodies in 93% of the patients without autoimmune retinopathy indicates a lack of specificity and that most detectable retinal antibodies have limited clinical relevance in the evaluation of patients for suspected autoimmune retinopathy. Current retinal antibody testing, other than recoverin, should be interpreted with caution, especially for cases of low clinical suspicion. The poor specificity is important to recognize to prevent the potentially unnecessary commencement of systemic immunosuppressants that may result in significant extraocular adverse effects. Identification of biomarkers that have a high predictive value for inflammatory or autoimmune retinal diseases is needed to move the field forward.

Risk of Cataract in Intermediate Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of and predictive factors for cataract in intermediate uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases Cohort Study, in which medical records were reviewed to determine demographic and clinical data of every eye/patient at every visit at 5 participating US tertiary care uveitis centers. The primary outcome was development of vision-compromising cataract as defined by a decrease in visual acuity to 20/40 or less, or requiring cataract surgery. Survival analysis assessed visually defined cataract to avoid bias due to timing of surgery vis-à-vis inflammatory status. RESULTS: Among 2,190 eyes of 1,302 patients with intermediate uveitis, the cumulative incidence of cataract formation was 7.6% by 1 year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.2%-9.1%), increasing to 36.6% by 10 years (95% CI = 31.2%-41.6%). Increased cataract risk was observed in eyes with concurrent anterior uveitis causing posterior synechiae (hazard ratio = 2.68, 95% CI = 2.00-3.59, P < .001), and in eyes with epiretinal membrane formation (hazard ratio = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.15-2.07, P = .004). Higher dose corticosteroid therapy was associated with significantly higher incidence of cataract, especially time-updated use of topical corticosteroids ≥2 times/d or ≥4 periocular corticosteroid injections. Low-dose corticosteroid medications (oral prednisone 7.5 mg daily or less, or topical corticosteroid drops <2 times/d) were not associated with increased cataract risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the incidence of clinically important cataract in intermediate uveitis is moderate. The risk is higher with markers of severity and with higher doses of corticosteroid medications, the latter being potentially modifiable.

Contemporaneous Risk Factors for Visual Acuity in Non-Infectious Uveitis.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the associations of clinical and demographic characteristics with visual acuity (VA) with over 5 years in a subspecialty noninfectious uveitis population. METHODS: Retrospective data from 5,530 noninfectious uveitis patients were abstracted by expert reviewers, and contemporaneous associations of VA with demographic and clinical factors were modeled. RESULTS: Patients were a median of 41 years old, 65% female, and 73% white. Eyes diagnosed ≥5 years prior to cohort entry had worse VA (-1.2 lines) than those diagnosed <6 months prior, and eyes with cataract surgery performed prior to entry had worse VA (-5.9 lines) than those performed during follow-up. Vitreous haze (-4.2 lines for 3+ vs quiet), hypotony (-2.5 lines for ≤5 mm Hg vs 6-23 mm Hg), and CNV (-1.8 lines) all were strongly associated with reduced VA. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with reduced VA included well-known structural complications, and lack of subspecialty care during cataract surgery.