Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumor Protruding from the Liver Surface and Directly Penetrating the Colon.

A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with a liver abscess and received antibiotics at a local hospital. He was referred to our hospital due to a persistent fever. He had hepatic masses protruding from the liver surface toward the transverse colon. We reached a diagnosis of inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) by a percutaneous liver biopsy. Colonoscopy showed direct invasion of IPT to the colon. His condition improved by the intravenous administration of antibiotics. Hepatic IPT is often misdiagnosed as a malignant tumor. We should consider IPT when we encounter hepatic tumors, and a percutaneous liver biopsy is useful for avoiding unnecessary excessive treatments.

Secondary sclerosing cholangitis with hemobilia induced by pembrolizumab: Case report and review of published work.

A 66-year-old man was admitted to our department due to cholestatic liver injury. He had received five cycles of pembrolizumab for small-cell lung cancer. Imaging showed the possibility of sclerosing cholangitis (SC) with hemobilia. Histologically, CD8+ T cells had infiltrated the biliary epithelium of the extrahepatic bile duct. We reached the diagnosis of secondary SC induced by pembrolizumab. Although we treated him with high-dose corticosteroids, laboratory data showed only a moderate response. Clinicians should recognize that immune checkpoint inhibitors can sometimes cause severe and irreversible SC.

Multi-center clinical evaluation of streptozocin-based chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japan: focus on weekly regimens and monotherapy.

PURPOSE: Streptozocin (STZ) is a key agent for treating advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET). Most STZ regimens for pNET are daily and also include 5-fluorouracil (5FU), whereas STZ monotherapy and weekly regimens have also been applied in daily practice in Japan. The present study aimed to evaluate responses to weekly regimens and to STZ monotherapy, and to identify a predictive marker of a response to STZ. METHODS: Clinical data regarding STZ-based chemotherapy for pNET were collected between 2015 and 2017 at 25 facilities. We analyzed the effects, safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and factors that correlate with responses to STZ. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate (ORR) of 110 patients who underwent STZ-based chemotherapy (monotherapy, 81.8%; weekly regimen 46.4%) was 21.8%, and PFS was 9.8 months. The ORR of weekly vs. daily regimens was 21.6 vs. 22.0% (P = 1.000), and that of monotherapy vs. combination therapy was 21.1 vs. 25.0% (P = 0.766). A Ki67 proliferation index (Ki67) of > 5% was a predictive marker of a response to STZ (P = 0.017), whereas regimen type, mono- or combination therapy, treatment line and liver tumor burden were not associated with responses. The frequencies of Grade ≥ 3 nausea and hematological adverse events were significantly lower for monotherapy than combination therapy (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of weekly STZ monotherapy on pNET are comparable to those previously reported and the toxicity profile was acceptable. Ki67 > 5% was the sole predictive marker of an objective response.

Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir Combination Therapy-induced Hepatitis and Cholecystitis with Coagulation Disorder due to Hypersensitivity Reactions.

A 70-year-old woman with chronic hepatitis C was admitted to our hospital due to liver injury, cholecystitis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation with a fever and skin rash. She had been on a combination regimen of daclatasvir and asunaprevir for 2 weeks of a 24-week regimen. Because of the symptoms, laboratory findings, results of a drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test, and pathological findings of liver biopsy, we diagnosed her with drug-induced liver injury. Although daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy is generally well-tolerated, some serious adverse effects have been reported. Our findings indicate that immunoallergic mechanisms were associated with daclatasvir and asunaprevir-induced liver injury.

Recognition of infection, status of outpatient treatment, and treatment history before carcinogenesis in patients with viral hepatitis-associated liver cancer.

We conducted a survey on the recognition of infection, status of outpatient treatment, and treatment history in hepatitis virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma patients admitted to our department between 2005 and 2014. We compared these parameters in 75 patients with primary hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) and 307 patients with hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCV-HCC). Based on the presence or absence of outpatient treatment in medical institutions at the time of HCC diagnosis, the patients were divided into an outpatient treatment-free group or an outpatient treated group. In addition, the latter group was divided into three subgroups depending on the department consulted:the Department of Internal Medicine group, the Department of Gastroenterology group, and a hepatologist-treated group. Patients in the outpatient treatment-free group accounted for 40.0% of patients with HBV-HCC. In the outpatient treated group (60.0%), 21.3% were treated in the Department of Internal Medicine, 22.7% in the Department of Gastroenterology, and 16.0% were treated by a hepatologist. The percentage of HBV-HCC patients in the outpatient treatment-free group was 1.9 times higher than that in the HCV-HCC group and 0.6-fold higher in the hepatologist-treated group. Of the HBV-HCC patients, non-recognizers who were not diagnosed with a viral infection accounted for 21.3%, and non-outpatients who had not consulted a hospital despite the recognition of infection accounted for 33.3%. These percentages were approximately 2 times higher than in HCV-HCC patients. Of the HBV-HCC patients, 66.7% in the hepatologist-treated group had received nucleic acid analogue preparations. On the other hand, one patient in each of the Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Gastroenterology groups (approximately 6.0%) had received a nucleic acid analogue, lamivudine, despite the appearance of a resistant strain. In the HBV-HCC patients, the proportions of "non-recognizers" and "non-outpatients" were higher than in the HCV-HCC patients, suggesting a lack of appropriate treatment.

Hepatic peribiliary cysts with rapidly progressive refractory obstructive jaundice and esophageal varices.

A 54-year-old man with decompensated alcoholic liver cirrhosis presented with acute cholangitis. Although no localized lesions were detected in the liver on contrast-enhanced computed tomography and no risky varices were noted on endoscopy, hepatic peribiliary cysts (HPBCs) developed along the intrahepatic portal vein in the course of only 40 days. Moreover, esophageal varices with the red color sign grew rapidly during the same period, and the patient ultimately died due to rupture. HPBC formation is a rare complication of liver disease, including cirrhosis. Although HPBCs are generally harmless, on rare occasions they may induce the rapid progression of esophageal varices.