Expression Profiles of Circulating MicroRNAs in XELOX-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers and a leading cause of cancer deaths around the world. Chemotherapy is one of the most effective treatments for cancer patients, and has remarkably enhanced survival rates. However, it has many side effects. Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been intensively studied as potential biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring. However, definitive biomarkers in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) are still lacking. The aim of this study was to identify the factors significant for neurological adverse events in GC patients receiving XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) chemotherapy. The results show that XELOX chemotherapy induces changes in the expression of hsa-miR-200c-3p, hsa-miR-885-5p, and hsa-miR-378f. Validation by qRT-PCR demonstrated that hsa-miR-378f was significantly downregulated in CIPN. Hsa-miR-378f was identified as showing a statistically significant correlation in GC patients receiving XELOX chemotherapy according to the analysis of differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs. Furthermore, 34 potential target genes were predicted using a web-based database for miRNA target prognostication and functional annotations. The identified genes are related to the peptidyl-serine phosphorylation and regulation of alternative mRNA splicing with enrichment in the gastric cancer, neurotrophin, MAPK, and AMPK signaling pathways. Collectively, these results provide information useful for developing promising strategies for the treatment of XELOX-chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Prognostic value of metabolic activity of the psoas muscle evaluated by preoperative 18F-FDG PET-CT in breast cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of metabolic activity of the psoas muscle measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography to predict treatment outcomes in patients with resectable breast cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 288 patients who had undergone surgical resection for stages I-III invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast between January 2014 and December 2014 in Pusan National University Hospital were reviewed. The standardized uptake values (SUVs) of the bilateral psoas muscle were normalized using the mean SUV of the liver. SUVRmax was calculated as the ratio of the maximum SUV of the average bilateral psoas muscle to the mean SUV of the liver. SUVRmean was calculated as the ratio of the mean SUV of the bilateral psoas muscle to the mean SUV of the liver. RESULTS: Univariate analyses identified a higher T stage, higher N stage, estrogen receptor negativity, progesterone receptor negativity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity, triple-negative breast cancer, mastectomy (rather than breast-conserving surgery), SUVRmean > 0.464, and SUVRmax > 0.565 as significant adverse factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that N3 stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.347, P = 0.031) was an independent factor for recurrence. An SUVRmax > 0.565 (HR = 4.987, P = 0.050) seemed to have a correlation with shorter DFS. CONCLUSIONS: A higher SUVRmax of the psoas muscle, which could be a surrogate marker of insulin resistance, showed strong potential as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with resectable breast cancer.

Prognosis palliative care study, palliative prognostic index, palliative prognostic score and objective prognostic score in advanced cancer: a prospective comparison.

BACKGROUND: Predicting how long a patient with far advanced cancer has to live is a significant part of hospice and palliative care. Various prognostic models have been developed, but have not been fully compared in South Korea. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the accuracy of the Prognosis in Palliative Care Study (PiPS), Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP) and Objective Prognostic Score (OPS) for patients with far advanced cancer in a palliative care unit in South Korea. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with far advanced cancer who were admitted to a single palliative care unit at the National University Hospital. Variables for calculating the prognostic models were recorded by a palliative care physician. The survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each model were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients participated. There was a significant difference in survival rates across all groups, each categorised through the five prognostic models. The overall accuracy (OA) of the prognostic models ranged between 54.5% and 77.6%. The OA of clinicians' predictions of survival ranged between 61.9% and 81.3%. CONCLUSION: The PiPS, PPI, PaP and OPS were successfully validated in a palliative care unit of South Korea. There was no difference in accuracy between the prognostic models, and OA tended to be lower than in previous studies.

Heart Rate Variability as a Non-invasive Objective Parameter for Predicting the Occurrence of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common chemotoxicities. However, no effective clinical CIPN screening methods have been reported. This study aimed to investigate whether changes in heart rate variability (HRV) could predict the development of CIPN for early symptom control in chemotherapy-prescribed patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five GI cancer outpatients undergoing palliative chemotherapy including taxanes and/or platinum compounds were enrolled. CIPN was diagnosed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI-CTCAE). HRV measures were derived from electrocardiogram signals. RESULTS: Twelve weeks after starting chemotherapy, 39 (70.9%) patients who complained of NCI-CTCAE grade 1-3 sensory changes were diagnosed with CIPN. Standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN), high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), and LF/HF ratio changed significantly during 3 assessment periods. Percentage changes in SDNN and HF were related to the occurrence of CIPN symptoms. A decision tree model indicated that patients with a rapid percentage change decrease in SDNN and HF were CIPN-positive. CONCLUSION: Using SDNN and HF, our decision tree predicted CIPN occurrence. The changes in HRV may occur earlier than sensory CIPN symptoms.

Treatment with Ramucirumab-paclitaxel in a metastatic gastric cancer patient undergoing hemodialysis: A case report.

RATIONALE: Ramucirumab, a human Ig 1 monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, in combination with paclitaxel is a second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Several reports have suggested that dose adjustments of cetuximab, an anti- epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, are not required in patients with renal impairment. However, the combination chemotherapy of ramucirumab and cytotoxic drug for hemodialysis (HD) patients has not been reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old man on HD was diagnosed with gastric cancer and underwent a subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was examined after completion of 8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine combination oxaliplatin. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer at stage IIIb (pT3N2M0) 11 months ago. Unfortunately, 9 months after the start of adjuvant chemotherapy, multiple liver metastases from gastric cancer were found by abdominal CT. INTERVENTIONS: He began receiving weekly paclitaxel(80 mg/m2) and every 15-day ramucirumab (8 mg/kg). HD was performed next day after administration of chemotherapy and repeated 3 times a week. OUTCOMES: He was treated with ramucirumab without dose adjustment. The metastatic liver mass had a partial response, after 2 and 4 cycles of chemotherapy and had a stable disease up to 12 cycles of chemotherapy. No obvious adverse effect was observed during treatment. However, after 14 cycles chemotherapy, follow-up abdominal CT revealed progression disease of multiple liver metastasis and lymph nodes invasion. LESSONS: The paclitaxel chemotherapy with ramucirumab is effective and safe in HD patients with metastatic gastric cancer. As seen in patients with normal kidney function, ramucirumab can be safely administered without a dose reduction.

First-line chemotherapy in very elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine monotherapy vs combination chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX) is widely used as the standard first-line treatment for pancreatic cancer. Considering the severe toxicities of combination chemotherapy, gemcitabine monotherapy (G mono) could be used as a first-line treatment in very elderly patients or those with a low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status. However, reports on the efficacy of G mono in patients older than 75 years are limited. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of G mono and combination chemotherapy by comparing their clinical outcomes in very elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 104 older patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent chemotherapy with G mono (n = 45) or combination therapy (n = 59) as a first-line treatment between 2011 and 2019. All patients were histologically diagnosed with ductal adenocarcinoma. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival and overall survival. We also analyzed subgroups according to age [65-74 years (elderly) and ≥ 75 years (very elderly)]. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the outcomes between the two chemotherapy groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were significantly different between the two chemotherapy groups, especially regarding age, ratio of multiple metastases, tumor burden, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the chemotherapy groups in elderly and very elderly patients. In the elderly patients, the median progression-free survival (62 d vs 206 d, P = 0.000) and overall survival (102 d vs 302 d, P = 0.000) were longer in the combination chemotherapy group. However, in the very elderly patients, the median progression-free survival (147 d and 174 d, respectively, P = 0.796) and overall survival (227 d and 211 d, respectively, P = 0.739) were comparable between the G mono and combination chemotherapy groups. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the combination chemotherapy group than in the G mono group, especially thromboembolism (G mono vs nab-paclitaxel vs FOLFIRINOX; 8.9% vs 5.9% vs 28%, P = 0.041), neutropenia (40.0% vs 76.5% vs 84.0%, P = 0.000), and neuropathy (0% vs 61.8% vs 28.0%, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, combination therapy is more effective than G mono. However, G mono is superior for the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer in very elderly patients.

Comparison of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA) and modified FOLFIRINOX (FFX) have been widely used as standard first-line treatment in pancreatic cancer. However, it is unclear which regimen is more efficacious. AIM: To evaluate a retrospective analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of FFX and GA as first-line chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed and compared outcomes in 101 patients who presented with pancreatic cancer and were treated with either GA (n = 54) or FFX (n = 47). Moreover, we performed subgroup analysis based on the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline characteristics, except for the ECOG performance status. The median progression-free survival (PFS) (6.43 mo vs 4.90 mo, P = 0.058) was comparable between two groups; however, median overall survival (OS) (10.17 mo vs 6.93 mo, P = 0.008) was longer in patients who received GA regimen. In patients with ECOG 0 (PFS: 8.93 mo vs 5.43 mo, P = 0.002; OS: 16.10 mo vs 6.97 mo, P = 0.000) and those with NLR < 3 (PFS: 8.10 mo vs 6.57 mo, P = 0.008; OS: 12.87 mo vs 9.93 mo, P = 0.002), GA regimen showed higher efficacy. CONCLUSION: GA regimen may be recommended to the patients with NLR < 3 or ECOG 0 status although GA and FFX showed comparable efficacy outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Ramosetron versus Palonosetron in Combination with Aprepitant and Dexamethasone for the Control of Highly-Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare ramosetron (RAM), aprepitant (APR), and dexamethasone (DEX) [RAD] with palonosetron (PAL), APR, and DEX [PAD] in controlling highly-emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC)-induced nausea and vomiting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive RAD or PAD:RAM (0.3 mg intravenously) or PAL (0.25 mg intravenously) D1, combined with APR (125 mg orally, D1 and 80 mg orally, D2-3) and DEX (12 mg orally or intravenously, D1 and 8 mg orally, D2-4). Patients were stratified by sex, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and administration schedule. The primary endpoint was overall complete response (CR), defined as no emesis and no rescue regimen during 5 days of HEC. Secondary endpoints were overall complete protection (CP; CR+nausea score < 25 mm) and total control (TC; CR+nausea score < 5 mm). Quality of life was assessed by Functional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire on D0 and D6. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients receiving RAD (n=137) or PAD (n=142) were evaluated. Overall CR rates in RAD and PAD recipients were 81.8% and 79.6% (risk difference [RD], 2.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.1 to 11.4), respectively. Overall CP and TC rates for RAD and PAD were 56.2% and 58.5% (RD, -2.3%; 95% CI, -13.9 to 9.4) and 47.5% vs. 43.7% (RD, 3.8%; 95% CI, -7.9 to 15.5), respectively. FLIE total score ≥ 108 (no impact on daily life) was comparable between RAD and PAD (73.9% vs. 73.4%, respectively). Adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In all aspects of efficacy, safety and QOL, RAD is non-inferior to PAD for the control of CINV in cancer patients receiving HEC.

Retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A single-center study.

ABSTRCT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).We performed a retrospective chart review of cancer patients with a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or both. Our analysis included all patients who received rivaroxaban from March 2013 to June 2016 at the Hemato-Oncology Division at the Pusan National University Hospital in Korea.Preliminary results identified 123 patients with a history of cancer that were treated with rivaroxaban. The average duration of rivaroxaban therapy was 95.25 days. While 35 patients had resolved VTE after the initiation of rivaroxaban, only one patient had it recur on rivaroxaban treatment. Major bleeding was observed in 6 (4.9%) patients and minor bleeding in 12 (9.8%) patients. The majority of bleeding events occurred spontaneously and most incidences of bleeding could be treated conservatively. Recurrence and major bleeding events on rivaroxaban were relatively low despite the fact that many patients had metastatic disease. Among 52 patient deaths (42.3%), none were due to VTE or bleeding complications; the cause of death in the majority of cases was cancer progression.Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

HMG CoA reductase expression as a prognostic factor in Korean patients with breast cancer: A retrospective study.

There are many preclinical and epidemiological reports suggesting a correlation between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoAR) or HMG-CoAR inhibitor (statin) treatment and prognosis in breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the expression of HMG-CoAR in Korean patients with breast cancer.The expression of HMG-CoAR on tissue microarrays from 191 patients who underwent resection from 2005 to 2006 in the Pusan National University Hospital was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The IHC assessment by a board-certified pathologist included areas of both carcinoma and peritumoral tissue of the breast. The scores of cancer-specific staining were adjusted by the scores of peritumoral staining.The patients were followed for a median 9.1 years. Disease-free survival (DFS) was shorter in patients with a positive adjusted HMG-CoAR score by log-rank test (not reached vs 11.6 years, P = .011). After adjusting for age, T stage, N stage, pathological grade, perioperational chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, estrogen receptor positivity, progesterone receptor positivity, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positivity, and high Ki-67 (>10%), a positive adjusted HMG-CoAR IHC score was also associated with shorter DFS (hazard ratio = 2.638, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.112-6.262, P = .028).The expression of HMG-CoAR might be an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. There are established drugs targeting HMG-CoAR, and further studies on its potential as a predictive marker are needed.

A Pilot Prospective Study of Refractory Solid Tumor Patients for NGS-Based Targeted Anticancer Therapy.

With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), targeted sequencing is now contributing to decision making for which chemotherapeutics to administer to cancer patients, especially in refractory and metastatic cancer. Given that most patients with refractory cancer develop resistance to chemotherapy and have few treatment options, we performed NGS test to evaluate the efficacy and clinical feasibility of NGS-based targeted anticancer therapy. We used a gene panel for capturing target regions covering 83 cancer-related genes. A total of 25 refractory metastatic solid tumor patients were enrolled in this study. Among the 25 patients, 7 had FDA-approved drug-responsive or -resistant alterations. However, the effectiveness of targeted therapy was assessed by follow-up in three patients (12%). These included crizotinib for ALK-EML4 fusion in a malignancy of undefined origin patient and everolimus for AKT3 amplification in a uterine sarcoma patient. In addition, we identified a KRAS codon 146 mutation (A146V), which is associated with resistance to anti-EGFR, in a cetuximab-resistant colon cancer patient with wild-type KRAS exons 2 and 12, and EGFR amplification. He received bevacizumab therapy. All three patients showed partial response after targeted therapy. Furthermore, we characterized KRAS A146V biologically using colon cancer cells. In conclusion, this study suggests that targeted therapy based on NGS test may be a good choice for improving the care of patients with refractory solid tumors.

Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of prostate in a young adult: A case report.

RATIONALE: Prostate sarcoma has been reported to represent 0.7% of primary prostate malignancies. Leiomyosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma are the most common sarcomas of the prostate. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) of the prostate is very rare. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 22-year-old man presented with gross hematuria and voiding difficulty for 2 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 6-cm mass in the left lobe of the prostate. DIAGNOSES: Core needle biopsy results revealed high-grade sarcoma, suggestive of poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma. The final diagnosis of laparoscopic prostatectomy was MPNST, because it did not show the presence of SYT-SSX fusion transcripts on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Adjuvant radiotherapy was planned because preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) did not show any metastatic lesion and the resection margin was microscopically involved. However, chest CT showed multiple lung metastases a month after prostatectomy. A chemotherapeutic regimen of doxorubicin and ifosfamide was administered. OUTCOMES: The best response to chemotherapy was partial response. After several courses of chemotherapy, he died 9 months after the surgery. LESSONS: Primary prostate sarcoma and even MPNST are extremely rare. MPNST of the prostate has seldom been reported. This report may help diagnose and manage the disease.

Efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in non-extremity soft tissue sarcoma with moderate chemosensitivity.

PURPOSE: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare and heterogeneous cancer with over 50 known subtypes. It is difficult to understand the role of adjuvant treatment in STS. We aimed to determine the benefits of adjuvant treatment for a rare STS subset: non- extremity STS with moderate chemosensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records from Pusan National University Hospital and Kosin University Gospel Hospital, which had detailed pathological reports on patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2016. The most important inclusion criterion was resection with curative intent. We grouped STS by chemosensitivity based on reported data and analyzed non- extremity STS with moderate chemosensitivity. RESULTS: We investigated 142 patients with 20 pathological subtypes of STS. Eighty-six patients had extremity STS and 56 had non- extremity STS. Thirty-eight of 56 patients were categorized as having moderate chemosensitivity. Seventeen of 38 patients (44.7%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and 14 (36.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. A log-rank test showed longer disease-free survival (DFS) in the adjuvant radiotherapy group than in the group treated without adjuvant radiotherapy (not reached vs. 1.468 years, p = 0.037). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, with covariates including age, stage, resection margin, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy, revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with longer DFS (odds ratio = 0.369, p = 0.045). Overall survival was not correlated with adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiotherapy may be associated with longer DFS in patients with non-extremity STS with moderate chemosensitivity.

Retrospective analysis of palliative chemotherapy for the patients with bladder adenocarcinoma: Korean Cancer Study Group Genitourinary and Gynecology Cancer Committee.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Because of rarity, role of chemotherapy of bladder adenocarcinoma are still unidentified. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical features and chemotherapy outcomes of bladder adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Eligible patients for this retrospective analysis were initially diagnosed with bladder adenocarcinoma and presented with a clinically no other primary site of origin. The collected data included age, gender, performance status, stage, hemoglobin, albumin, initial date of diagnosis, treatment modality utilized, response to treatment, presence of relapse, last status of patient, and last date of follow-up. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients, who were treated with chemotherapy for bladder adenocarcinoma at 10 Korean medical institutions from 2004 to 2014. The median age of patients was 58 years (range, 17 to 78) and 51.7% of the patients were female. Urachal adenocarcinoma was identified in 15 patients. Of 27 symptomatic patients, 22 experienced gross hematuria. Twelve patients were treated with 5-f luorouracil based chemotherapy, five were gemcitabine based, three were taxane and others. Thirteen of them achieved complete response (10.3%) or partial response (34.5%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5 to 11.6) and 24.5 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 47.8), respectively. The cases of urachal adenocarcinoma exhibited worse tendency in PFS and OS (p = 0.024 and p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Even though bladder adenocarcinoma had been observed moderate effectiveness to chemotherapy, bladder adenocarcinoma is a highly aggressive form of bladder cancer. PFS and OS were short especially in urachal carcinoma.

Primary rhabdomyosarcoma of the breast in a 17-year-old girl: Case report.

RATIONALE: Primary rhabdomyosarcoma of the breast is very rare disease with poor prognosis and no definitive treatment has yet been established. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 17-year-old girl presented with right breast mass without distant metastasis in image study. DIAGNOSIS: The result of core needle biopsy was intraductal carcinoma; however, histopathologic finding after mastectomy was primary rhabdomyosarcoma of breast. INTERVENTIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended because resection margin was involved by tumor cells, but she did not visit the clinic anymore. Five months later, tumor recurred with local invasion and chemotherapy of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VAC/IE) was done. OUTCOMES: In the course of chemotherapy and sequential follow-up, there was no tumor growth until now. LESSONS: Primary breast rhabdomyosarcoma is an uncommon disease, as a result diagnosis is often delayed. For the same reason, there is little information about treatment. This report may be helpful for managing the disease.

Differential Prognostic Value of Metabolic Heterogeneity of Primary Tumor and Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Pharyngeal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to explore the prognostic value of metabolic heterogeneity of 18F-FDG uptake in chemoradiotherapy-treated pharyngeal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 52 consecutive patients with pharyngeal cancer who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before definitive chemoradiotherapy. The heterogeneity factor (HF) was defined as the derivative (dV/dT) of a volume-threshold function for primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. The relationships between clinical parameters and HFs of primary tumors (pHF) and metastatic lymph nodes (nHF) were analyzed. RESULTS: The pHF (range=∓1.367 - -0.027; median=-0.152) was significantly correlated with the maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. Induction chemotherapy response was not correlated with HF, whereas response to radiotherapy was significantly better in patients with high pHF (low heterogeneity). Consistently, the 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival was significantly better in patients with high pHF (82.9% for pHF>-0.152 vs. 30.5% for pHF<-0.152, log-rank p=0.009). The nHF (range=-1.067 - -0.039; median=-0.160) was not correlated with response to radiotherapy and locoregional recurrences. CONCLUSION: pHF, but not nHF, was a significant predictor of response to radiotherapy and locoregional recurrence in pharyngeal cancer. Thus, HF use can prevent unnecessary treatment and surgical delays.

Prognostic value of posttreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated by chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: An inflammatory-immunological marker, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), was evaluated as a predictive marker of advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: This study included 104 patients with treatment-naïve head and neck cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. An inflammatory marker was measured at baseline and after 1 month of treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A univariate analysis revealed that T,N-stage, the pre- and posttreatment NLRs were significant predictors of progression after the chemoradiotherapy. However, the posttreatment NLR remained an independent predictor of PFS in the multivariate analysis (HR=2.23, 95% CI 1.15-2.321; P=0.001). A high posttreatment NLR was significantly associated with an increased risk of death (HR=1.87, 95% CI 0.89-3.31; P=0.037). CONCLUSION: A high posttreatment NLR is associated with poor prognostic factor. An early reduction in the NLR after treatment may indicate survival improvement in the patients.

Evaluation of prognostic factors in patients with relapsed AML: Clonal evolution versus residual disease.

BACKGROUND: It is widely known that the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on chromosomal abnormalities. The majority of AML patients relapse and experience a dismal disease course despite initial remission. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and laboratory findings of 55 AML patients who had relapsed between 2004 and 2013 and who had been treated at the Division of Hematology of the Pusan National University Hospital. RESULTS: The event-free survival (EFS) was related to prognostic karyotype classification at the time of diagnosis and relapse (unfavorable vs. favorable or intermediate karyotypes at diagnosis, 8.2 vs. 11.9 mo, P=0.003; unfavorable vs. favorable or intermediate karyotypes at relapse, 8.2 vs. 11.9 mo, P=0.009). The overall survival (OS) was significantly correlated with karyotype classification only at diagnosis (unfavorable vs. favorable or intermediate vs. karyotypes at diagnosis, 8.5 vs. 21.8 mo, P=0.001; unfavorable vs. favorable or intermediate karyotypes at relapse, 8.5 vs. 21.2 mo, P=0.136). A change in karyotype between diagnosis and relapse, which is regarded as a factor of resistance against treatment, was not a significant prognostic factor for OS, EFS, and post-relapse survival (PRS). A Cox proportional hazards model showed that the combined use of fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG) as a salvage regimen, was a significant prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio=0.399, P=0.010) and the PRS (hazard ratio=0.447, P=0.031). CONCLUSION: The karyotype classification at diagnosis predicts survival including PRS in relapsed AML patients as well as in treatment-naïve patients. We suggest that presently, administration of salvage FLAG could be a better treatment option.

Transdermal granisetron versus palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, cross-over, active-controlled, and phase IV study.

BACKGROUND: Palonosetron is the second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA) that has shown better efficacy than the first-generation 5-HT3RA for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS), a novel transdermal formulation, was developed to deliver granisetron continuously over 7 days. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of the GTDS to palonosetron for the control of CINV following MEC. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 196 patients were randomized to GP or PG group. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, cross-over, active-controlled, Phase IV study, GP group was assigned to receive transdermal granisetron (one GTDS patch, 7 days) in the first chemotherapy cycle, palonosetron (iv 0.25 mg/day, 1 days) in the second chemotherapy cycle before receiving MEC, and PG group was assigned to receive palonosetron in the first cycle and GTDS in the second cycle. Primary endpoint was the percentage of chemotherapy cycles achieving complete response (CR; defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication use) during the acute phase (0-24 h in post-chemotherapy; non-inferiority comparison with palonosetron). RESULTS: Total 333 cycles (165 in GTDS and 168 in palonosetron) were included in the per protocol analysis. The GTDS cycles showed non-inferiority to palonosetron cycles during the acute phase: CR was achieved by 124 (75.2 %) patients in the GTDS cycles and 134 (79.8 %) patients in the palonosetron cycles (treatment difference, -4.6 %; 95 % confidence interval, -13.6-4.4). There was no significant difference in CR rate during acute phase after the end of the first and second chemotherapy cycle between GP and PG group (p = 0.405, p = 0.074). Patients' satisfaction, assessed using Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLI-E), GTDS cycle were higher than those of palonosetron cycle in GP group (FLI-E score; median 1549.5 in GTDS cycle, median 1670.0 in palonosetron cycle). Both treatments were well tolerated and safe. CONCLUSION: Transdermal granisetron is a good alternative therapeutic option to palonosetron for preventing CINV after MEC.