Revascularization strategies for patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Patients with coronary artery disease who have prognostically significant lesions or symptoms despite optimum medical therapy require mechanical revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or both. In this review, we will evaluate the evidence-based use of the two revascularization approaches in treating patients with coronary artery disease. CABG has been the predominant mode of revascularization for more than half a century and is the preferred strategy for patients with multivessel disease, especially those with diabetes mellitus, left ventricular systolic dysfunction or complex lesions. There have been significant technical and technological advances in PCI over recent years, and this is now the preferred revascularization modality in patients with single-vessel or low-risk multivessel disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention can also be considered to treat complex multivessel disease in patients with increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes including frail patients and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Improvements in both CABG (including total arterial revascularization, off-pump CABG and 'no-touch' graft harvesting) and PCI (including newer-generation stents, adjunctive pharmacotherapy and intracoronary imaging) mean that they will continue to challenge each other in the future. A 'heart team' approach is strongly recommended to select an evidence-based, yet individualized, revascularization strategy for all patients with complex coronary artery disease. Finally, optimal medical therapy is important for all patients with coronary artery disease, regardless of the mode of revascularization.

Combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound radio frequency data analysis for plaque characterization. Classification accuracy of human coronary plaques in vitro.

This study was performed to characterize coronary plaque types by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) radiofrequency (RF) data analysis, and to investigate the possibility of error reduction by combining these techniques. Intracoronary imaging methods have greatly enhanced the diagnostic capabilities for the detection of high-risk atherosclerotic plaques. IVUS RF data analysis and OCT are two techniques focusing on plaque morphology and composition. Regions of interest were selected and imaged with OCT and IVUS in 50 sections, from 14 human coronary arteries, sectioned post-mortem from 14 hearts of patients dying of non-cardiovascular causes. Plaques were classified based on IVUS RF data analysis (VH-IVUS(TM)), OCT and the combination of those. Histology was the benchmark. Imaging with both modalities and coregistered histology was successful in 36 sections. OCT correctly classified 24; VH-IVUS 25, and VH-IVUS/OCT combined, 27 out of 36 cross-sections. Systematic misclassifications in OCT were intimal thickening classified as fibroatheroma in 8 cross-sections. Misclassifications in VH-IVUS were mainly fibroatheroma as intimal thickening in 5 cross-sections. Typical image artifacts were found to affect the interpretation of OCT data, misclassifying intimal thickening as fibroatheroma or thin-cap fibroatheroma. Adding VH-IVUS to OCT reduced the error rate in this study.

Sirolimus-eluting stents, bare metal stents or coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with multivessel disease including involvement of the proximal left anterior descending artery: analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies study part 2 (ARTS-II).

OBJECTIVE: The The Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS)-II trial found no differences in survival or overall adverse events between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and the surgical arm of ARTS-I. Nevertheless, existing data suggest that patients with disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) may derive particular benefit from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We therefore analysed the clinical outcome of patients in ARTS-I and ARTS-II with proximal LAD involvement. DESIGN: Multicentre observational study. SETTING: Forty-five European academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in ARTS-II with proximal LAD disease treated with SES (289/607, 48%) were compared with 187/600 (31%) bare metal stent patients (ARTS-I BMS) and 206/605 (34%) surgical patients (ARTS-I CABG) with proximal LAD involvement from ARTS-I. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after 3 years. RESULTS: The Arterial Revascularization Therapies study part 2 (ARTS-II) subgroup had better survival than both ARTS-I groups (ARTS-II 98.6% vs ARTS-I BMS 95.7%, p = 0.05 and vs ARTS-I CABG 94.7%, p = 0.01) and lower rates of the hard clinical composite endpoint of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (ARTS-II 3.1% vs ARTS-I BMS 9.6%, p = 0.002 and vs ARTS-I CABG 9.7%, p = 0.002). Although the ARTS-I CABG patients had a lower need for repeat revascularisation than ARTS-II (5.3% vs 13.1%, p = 0.002), the overall composite adverse event rates (death, myocardial infarction, stroke or any repeat revascularisation) were not significantly different between the ARTS-I CABG and ARTS-II patients (15.0% vs 18.0%, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: SES are not inferior to CABG or bare metal stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary disease including involvement of the proximal LAD.

Revascularization in the high-risk patient: multivessel disease.

The aim of this article is to review the treatment of patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been challenging coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the gold standard of care for patients with multi-vessel disease; however, the application of PCI to these patients has been mainly limited by restenosis. Up to the late 1990s, numerous large-scale, randomized trials addressed this issue comparing CABG to PCI with balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stents. These studies demonstrated similar rates of death and myocardial infarction in both groups, while the need for revascularization remained significantly lower in the CABG group. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have dramatically reduced restenosis and repeat revascularization rates. CABG has also progressed with improvements in perioperative management, a higher use of arterial grafting, and advanced techniques with the implementation of minimally invasive and off-pump surgery as options. Therefore, the results of previous trials in the pre-DES era can no longer be extrapolated into the ''real world''. As intermediate steps preceding a fully-fledged, randomized trial, several trials have compared PCI with DES and the historical control of CABG, but the results are still inconclusive. Several dedicated randomized trials are currently ongoing to compare PCI with DES and CABG using contemporary techniques. Until the results of these randomized trials are presented, the choice for each strategy should be based on the patients' individual risk and anatomy.

Biodegradable-polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting Infinnium stent: 9-Month clinical and angiographic follow-up results from the SIMPLE II prospective multi-centre registry study.

BACKGROUND: SIMPLE II was a multi-centre, prospective registry study aimed at investigating the safety and efficacy of the Infinnium (Sahajanand Medical Technologies Pvt. Ltd, India) paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of single de novo lesions in the native coronary arteries. METHODS: One hundred and three patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease were treated for single de novo native coronary artery lesions using the Infinnium stent (paclitaxel concentration 1.4 mcg/mm2 released over 48 days) in a multi-centre, prospective study performed on 3 continents (Asia, Europe and South America). The primary safety endpoint was major adverse cardiac events at 30 days (MACE 30d) and efficacy was assessed by in-stent binary restenosis as measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at six-month follow-up. A clinical follow-up was scheduled at nine months. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 58.5 years; 70.9% were males; 43.7% had unstable angina and 38.8% previous myocardial infarction. Risk factors included hypertension in 62.1%, hypercholesterolemia in 52.4%, current smoking in 32.0% and diabetes in 28.2%. Stent implantation was successful in all patients, with more than one stent being implanted in 9 patients (8.7%). Hierarchical MACE 30d was 2.9%. At nine months, 101 patients had clinical follow-up (1 patient had died and 1 refused). There was one death (1.0%), one Q-wave myocardial infarction (Q MI) (1.0%), three non-Q MIs (2.9%), one clinically-driven target lesion Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) (1.0%), and one clinically-driven target lesion repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (re-PCI) (1.0%). The overall event-free rate at nine months was 93.2%. QCA revealed in-stent and in-segment late loss of 0.38+/-0.49 mm and 0.18+/-0.46 mm, resulting in binary restenosis rates of 7.3% and 8.3%, respectively. There was one case of late stent thrombosis in the patient experiencing the Q MI and subsequent re-PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The Infinnium paclitaxel-eluting stent appears to be safe and efficacious for the treatment of single de novo lesions in coronary arteries in a patient population with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD).

Long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy (IRT). SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. METHODS: The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was retrospectively determined in 301 consecutive patients who were treated with IRT. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or any reintervention. Long term clinical outcome was obtained from an electronic database of hospital records and from questionnaires to the patients and referring physicians. Long term survival status was assessed by written inquiries to the municipal civil registries. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow up was 3.6 (1.2) years. The cumulative incidence of MACE at six months was 19.1%, at one year 36.4%, and at four years 58.3%. The target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate at six months was 12.9%, at one year 28.3%, and at four years 50.4%. From multivariate analysis, dose < 18 Gy was the most significant predictor of TLR. At four years the cumulative incidence of death was 3.8%, of myocardial infarction 13.4%, and of coronary artery bypass surgery 11.3%. Total vessel occlusion was documented in 12.3% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the long term follow up of patients after IRT, there are increased adverse cardiac events beyond the first six months.

Drug-eluting stents: from randomized trials to the real world.

Drug-eluting stents have been developed to prevent in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary revascularization. In a number of randomized trials, polymer-coated sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents have been proven to markedly reduce the incidence of angiographic restenosis and repeat revascularization when compared to bare metal stents. Effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents in the prevention of restenosis has been confirmed in many subsets of patients and lesions not included in randomized trials, such as in-stent restenosis, chronic total occlusion, acute myocardial infarction, and others. Very promising data in the real world are emerging for utilization of paclitaxel-eluting stents as well. Other drug-eluting stents gave less brilliant results or even true failures, whilst a number of new drugs and stent platforms are under clinical or preclinical evaluation. In this review we describe the main clinical trials on drug-eluting stents, and the most recent informations derived from observational studies and registries. Moreover, preliminary results on new drug-eluting stents are summarized.

A European multi-center trial investigating the anti-restenotic effect of intravascular sonotherapy after stenting of de novo lesions (EUROSPAH: EUROpean Sonotherapy Prevention of Arterial Hyperplasia).

BACKGROUND: Intravascular sonotherapy (IST) reduces neointimal hyperplasia post-stenting in animal studies. Euro-SPAH is a multi-center, double blind, randomized trial investigating the efficacy of IST to reduce in-stent late loss. METHODS: Patients with angina or silent ischaemia with stented de novo lesions were randomised to sham or IST. The sample size had a 90% power to detect a late loss difference of 0.21 mm at 6 months. The secondary endpoints were MACE at 1, 6, 12 months and neo-intimal hyperplasia on IVUS at 6 months. RESULTS: At 23 sites in Europe, 403 patients were randomized, with successful treatment with sham or IST in 95.6%. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of baseline demographics or lesion characteristics. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 89%. In-stent late loss was not significantly different. The restenosis rate at 6 months was 23% in the IST group versus 25% in the sham group. The IVUS measurements confirm the absence of effect of IST on neointimal hyperplasia. At one year, the event-free survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of sonotherapy following stent implantation in de novo lesions does not reduce intra-stent neointimal hyperplasia, or effect the angiographic restenosis rate compared to sham treatment.

A multicentre European registry of intraluminal coronary beta brachytherapy.

AIMS: To assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of intravascular brachytherapy (VBT) in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 1999 and September 2000, 1098 consecutive patients treated in 46 European centres by intraluminal irradiation using a Sr/Y(90)source train (BetaCath, Novoste, GA) were included in a registry, and follow-up data were obtained for 98.8% of them after 6.3+/-2.4 months. Eight hundred and forty (76.5%) patients were males, and mean age was 62.0+/-10.2 years. Two hundred and seventy-one (26.9%) had unstable angina, and 256 (23.5%) were diabetics. Nine hundred and thirteen lesions (77.7%) were the result of in-stent restenosis, 208 (17.7%) were de novo lesions and 48 (4.1%) non-stented restenotic lesions. Mean estimated reference diameter was 3.2+/-0.5mm and mean estimated lesion length was 19.0+/-11.8mm. The prescribed radiation dose was 18.8+/-3.2Gy. Multivessel irradiation was done in 6.2% of cases, and a new stent was implanted in 29.6% of cases. Most patients received 6 or 12 months of combined aspirin and thienopyridin treatment after the procedure. Technical success was obtained in 95.9% of treated lesions, and the in-hospital major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 1.8%. At follow-up, the MACE rate was 18.7% (1.9% deaths from any cause, 2.6% AMI, 13.3% TVR by PCI and 3.3% TVR by CABG). CONCLUSION: The major current application of VBT is the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The good results of VBT observed in recent randomized controlled trials can be reproduced in clinical practice.

Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: six month results of a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term angiographic, clinical and economic outcome of direct stenting vs stenting after balloon predilatation. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS: Four hundred patients with coronary stenoses in a single native vessel were randomized to direct stenting vs stenting after predilatation. A major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) was defined as death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target restenosis, repeat target- and non-target vessel-related percutaneous coronary intervention, target lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass surgery and stroke. RESULTS: Stents were successfully implanted in 98.3% of patients randomized to direct stenting vs 97.8% randomized to stenting preceded by predilatation. The primary success rate of direct stenting was 88.3%, vs 97.8% for stenting preceded by balloon dilatation (P=0.01). The angiographic follow-up at 6 months included 333 of the 400 patients (83%). The binary in-stent restenosis rate was 23.1% of 163 patients randomized to direct stenting vs 18.8% of 166 patients randomized to balloon predilatation (P=0.32). By 185+/-25 days, MACCE had occurred in 31 of 200 (15.5%) patients randomized to direct stenting, vs 33 of 200 (16.5%) randomized to predilatation (P=0.89). At 6 months, costs associated with the direct stenting strategy (Euros 3222/patient) were similar to those associated with predilatation (Euros 3428/patient, P=0.43). However, procedural costs were significantly lower. It is noteworthy that, on multivariate analysis, a baseline C-reactive protein level >10 mg l(-1)was a predictor of restenosis (odds ratio: 2.10, P=0.025) as well as of MACCE (odds ratio: 1.94, P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to stenting preceded by balloon predilatation, direct stenting was associated with similar 6-month restenosis and MACCE rates. Procedural, but not overall 6-month costs, were reduced by direct stenting. An increased baseline CRP level was an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome after coronary stent implantation.

Reno, a European postmarket surveillance registry, confirms effectiveness of coronary brachytherapy in routine clinical practice.

PURPOSE: To assess, by a European registry trial, the clinical event rate in patients with discrete stenotic lesions of coronary arteries (de novo or restenotic) in single or multiple vessels (native or bypass grafts) treated with beta-radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1999 and September 2000, 1098 consecutive patients treated in 46 centers in Europe and the Middle East with the Novoste Beta-Cath System were included in Registry Novoste (RENO). RESULTS: Six-month follow-up data were obtained for 1085 patients. Of 1174 target lesions, 94.1% were located in native vessels and 5.9% in a bypass graft; 17.7% were de novo lesions, 4.1% were restenotic, and 77.7% were in-stent restenotic lesions. Intravascular brachytherapy was technically successful in 95.9% of lesions. Multisegmental irradiation, using a manual pullback stepping maneuver to treat longer lesions, was used in 16.3% of the procedures. The in-hospital rate of major adverse cardiac events was 1.8%. At 6 months, the rate was 18.7%. Angiographic follow-up was available for 70.4% of the patients. Nonocclusive restenosis was seen in 18.8% and total occlusion in 5.7% of patients. A combined end point for late (30-180 days) definitive or suspected target vessel closure was reached in 5.4%, but with only 2% of clinical events. Multivariate analysis was performed for major adverse cardiac events and late thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained from the multicenter RENO registry study, derived from a large cohort of unselected consecutive patients, suggest that the good results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials can be replicated in routine clinical practice.

Rapamycin in cardiovascular medicine.

The cellular action of rapamycin (sirolimus), a natural fermentation product produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus, is mediated by binding to the FK506 binding protein. By inhibiting a kinase known as the target of rapamycin, it restricts the proliferation of smooth-muscle cells by blocking cell-cycle progression at the G1/S transition. The finding that rapamycin possesses both anti-proliferative and antimigratory activity suggests that it could contribute to the control of arterial re-narrowing after percutaneous intervention and control the vascular manifestations of chronic rejection in transplanted hearts. The first clinical trials of implantation of rapamycin- coated stents in obstructive coronary artery lesions have been reported and, in selected patient groups, it appears that the restenosis process has been abolished. Studies are underway to establish the benefits of rapamycin-coated stents in day-to-day interventional practice, including small vessels, long lesions and patients with multivessel disease. With the addition of novel antiplatelet agents and delivery systems, it is possible that the two major limitations of percutaneous coronary intervention - restenosis and stent thrombosis - will be overcome. Cardiac graft loss due to intimal hyperplasia and accelerated atherosclerosis remains the major limitation to long-term survival following cardiac transplantation. Animal studies of rapamycin have suggested that this process can be reduced or abolished. Human studies of the efficacy of rapamycin in preventing both acute rejection and allograft arterial disease are in progress. Concerns regarding toxicity, carcinogenicity, delayed healing and endothelialization remain. As with any new agent or technology, we must remain vigilant to late adverse side-effects.

[Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1980-85 and 1995-96: more frequent multivessel disease, fewer reoperations and no change in mortality 1 and 5 years postoperatively]. / Percutane transluminale coronairangioplastiek in 1980/'85 en in 1995/'96: vaker meervatslijden, minder heringrepen en ongewijzigde sterfte I en 5 jaar na de ingreep.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty (PTCA) over the past 20 years and the outcome after 1 and 5 years. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. METHODS: All patients who underwent a first PTCA in the Thorax centre of the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam during the period from 1 September 1980 through 30 November 1985 (group I) were compared with all patients who likewise underwent such a first PTCA during the period between 1 September 1995 and 31 December 1996 (group II). Data on the patients, the operations, any reoperations and the mortality were obtained from patient records, general practitioners and municipal archives. Cumulative percentages of survival and of not having rePTCA or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) were analysed by using the Kaplan-Meier-method. RESULTS: Group I consisted of 856 patients and group II of 840 patients. The percentage of males decreased over the years from 80% to 69%. The average age increased from 56 to 60 years; the oldest patient in group I was 75 years and the oldest in group II was 87 years. The percentage of patients with multivessel disease increased from 36% to 44%. Stent implantation occurred in 55% of the patients in group II (0% in group I). The necessity for urgent CABG due to unsuccessful PTCA decreased from 9.4% to 1%. After 1 year, the percentage of coronary revascularisations was 28.8% in group I and 22.6% in group II (p = 0.01). The perioperative mortality and the 5-year survival were not significantly different in the two groups (group I: 1.3% and 90%; group II: 2.4% and 88%, respectively). For both groups, higher age, a smaller ejection fraction, more extensive vascular disease and no treatment with statins were independent predictors of a higher mortality after 5 years. In group II, renal function disorders were the most important predictor of higher mortality.

Platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction, alone or as adjunct to other rescue therapies; single centre retrospective analysis of 548 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction.

In order to study the safety of 'rescue' strategies in the treatment of patients with failed thrombolysis, all 548 patients admitted with evolving myocardial infarction to the Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, from January 1997 until April 1999 were reviewed. Of these patients, 49% had received thrombolysis. Of patients treated with thrombolysis and not referred from other hospitals (n = 154) 36% received rescue therapy for failed thrombolysis. Three rescue therapies were used after failed thrombolysis: percutaneous coronary intervention (74%), retreatment with thrombolysis (39%) and platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockers (53%), often in combination. Platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers were administered in 64% of patients treated with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. Major bleeding occurred in 14% of all thrombolysis treated patients, and in 30% of patients who received multiple rescue therapies. Bleeding was related to heparin usage and platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers, as was the insertion of catheters for percutaneous coronary intervention or intra-aortic balloon pumps. Major bleeding resulted in one death due to a ruptured ventricle, one haemorrhagic stroke, and three cases of tamponade for which surgery was needed. Four of these patients had received combination rescue therapy. Rescue therapy is a widely used strategy for failed thrombolysis, but is associated with a high bleeding rate. Alternative reperfusion strategies to avoid failed thrombolysis should be considered in high risk patients.

Intracoronary beta-radiation to reduce restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting; the Beta Radiation In Europe (BRIE) study.

AIMS: The BRIE trial is a registry evaluating the safety and performance of (90)Sr delivered locally (Beta-Cath TM system of Novoste) to de-novo and restenotic lesions in patients with up to two discrete lesions in different vessels. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 149 patients (175 lesions) were enrolled; 62 treated with balloons and 113 with stents. The restenosis rate, the minimal luminal diameter and the late loss were determined in three regions of interest: (a) in a subsegment of 5mm containing the original minimal luminal diameter pre-intervention termed target segment; (b) the irradiated segment, 28 mm in length, and (c) the entire analysed segment, 42 mm in length, termed the vessel segment. Binary restenosis was 9.9% for the target segment, 28.9% for the irradiated segment, and 33.6% for the vessel segment. These angiographic results include 5.3% total occlusions. Excluding total occlusions binary restenosis was 4.9%, 25% and 29.9%, respectively. At 1 year the incidence of major adverse cardiac events placed in a hierarchical ranking were: death 2%, myocardial infarction 10.1%, CABG 2%, and target vessel revascularization 20.1%. The event-free survival rate was 65.8%. Non-appropriate coverage of the injured segment by the radioactive source termed geographical miss affected 67.9% of the vessels, and increased edge restenosis significantly (16.3% vs 4.3%, P=0.004). It accounted for 40% of the treatment failures. CONCLUSION: The results of this registry reflect the learning process of the practitioner. The full therapeutic potential of this new technology is reflected by the restenosis rate at the site of the target segment. It can only be unravelled once the incidence of late vessel occlusion and geographical miss has been eliminated by the prolonged use of thienopyridine, the appropriate training of the operator applying this new treatment for restenosis prevention, and the use of longer sources.

Routine intracoronary beta-irradiation. Acute and one year outcome in patients at high risk for recurrence of stenosis.

AIMS: Intracoronary radiation is a promising therapy potentially reducing restenosis following catheter-based interventions. Currently, only limited data on this treatment are available. The feasibility and outcome in daily routine practice, however, is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 100 consecutive patients, intracoronary beta-radiation was performed with a (90)Strontium system (Novoste Beta-Cathtrade mark) following angioplasty. Predominantly complex (73% type B2 and C) and long lesions (length 24.3+/-15.3 mm) were included (37% de novo, 19% restenotic and 44% in-stent restenotic lesions). Radiation success was 100%. Mean prescribed dose was 19.8+/-2.5 Gy. A pullback procedure was performed in 19% lesions. Geographic miss occurred in 8% lesions. Periprocedural thrombus formation occurred in four lesions, dissection in nine lesions. During hospital stay, no death, acute myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization was observed. Major adverse cardiac events occurred predominantly between 6 and 12 months after the index procedure with major adverse cardiac event-free survival of 66% at 12 months (one death, 10 Q-wave myocardial infarctions, 23 target vessel revascularizations; ranked for worst event). CONCLUSION: Routine catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation therapy after angioplasty is safe and feasible with a high acute procedural success. The clinical 1-year follow-up showed delayed occurrence of major adverse cardiac events between 6 and 12 months after the index procedure.

Bypass surgery versus stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease in patients with unstable angina compared with stable angina.

BACKGROUND: Earlier reports have shown that the outcome of balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery in unstable angina is less favorable than in stable angina. Recent improvements in percutaneous treatment (stent implantation) and bypass surgery (arterial grafts) warrant reevaluation of the relative merits of either technique in treatment of unstable angina. Methods and Results- Seven hundred fifty-five patients with stable angina were randomly assigned to coronary stenting (374) or bypass surgery (381), and 450 patients with unstable angina were randomly assigned to coronary stenting (226) or bypass surgery (224). All patients had multivessel disease considered to be equally treatable by either technique. Freedom from major adverse events, including death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events, at 1 year was not different in unstable patients (91.2% versus 88.9%) and stable patients (90.4% versus 92.6%) treated, respectively, with coronary stenting or bypass surgery. Freedom from repeat revascularization at 1 year was similar in unstable and stable angina treated with stenting (79.2% versus 78.9%) or bypass surgery (96.3% versus 96%) but was significantly higher in both unstable and stable patients treated with stenting (16.8% versus 16.9%) compared with bypass surgery (3.6% versus 3.5%). Neither the difference in costs between stented or bypassed stable or unstable angina ($2594 versus $3627) nor the cost-effectiveness was significantly different at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in rates of death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular event at 1 year in patients with unstable angina and multivessel disease treated with either stented angioplasty or bypass surgery compared with patients with stable angina. The rate of repeat revascularization of both unstable and stable angina was significantly higher in patients with stents.