Medications Reconciled at Discharge Versus Admission Among Inpatients at a Children's Hospital.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discharge prescription practices may contribute to medication overuse and polypharmacy. We aimed to estimate changes in the number and types of medications reported at inpatient discharge (versus admission) at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. METHODS: Electronic medication reconciliation data were extracted for inpatient admissions at The Hospital for Sick Children from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017 (n = 22 058). Relative changes in the number of medications and relative risks (RRs) of specific types and subclasses of medications at discharge (versus admission) were estimated overall and stratified by the following: sex, age group, diagnosis of a complex chronic condition, surgery, or ICU (PICU) admission. Micronutrient supplements, nonopioid analgesics, cathartics, laxatives, and antibiotics were excluded in primary analyses. RESULTS: Medication counts at discharge were 1.27-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.29) greater than admission. The change in medications at discharge (versus admission) was increased by younger age, absence of a complex chronic condition, surgery, PICU admission, and discharge from a surgical service. The most common drug subclasses at discharge were opioids (22% of discharges), proton pump inhibitors (18%), bronchodilators (10%), antiemetics (9%), and corticosteroids (9%). Postsurgical patients had higher RRs of opioid prescriptions at discharge (versus admission; RR: 13.3 [95% CI: 11.5-15.3]) compared with nonsurgical patients (RR: 2.38 [95% CI: 2.22-2.56]). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric inpatients were discharged from the hospital with more medications than admission, frequently with drugs that may be discretionary rather than essential. The high frequency of opioid prescriptions in postsurgical patients is a priority target for educational and clinical decision support interventions.

Testing for non-inferior mortality: a systematic review of non-inferiority margin sizes and trial characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the size and variability of non-inferiority margins used in non-inferiority trials of medications with primary outcomes involving mortality, and to examine the association between trial characteristics and non-inferiority margin size. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Medline In Process, Medline Epub Ahead of Print and Embase Classic+Embase databases from January 1989 to December 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Prospective non-inferiority randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological therapies, with primary analyses for non-inferiority and primary outcomes involving mortality alone or as part of a composite outcome. Trials had to prespecify non-inferiority margins as absolute risk differences or relative to risks of outcome and provide a baseline risk of primary outcome in the control intervention. RESULTS: 3992 records were screened, 195 articles were selected for full text review and 111 articles were included for analyses. 82% of trials were conducted in thrombosis, infectious diseases or oncology. Mortality was the sole primary outcome in 23 (21%) trials, and part of a composite primary outcome in 88 (79%) trials. The overall median non-inferiority margin was an absolute risk difference of 9% (IQR 4.2%-10%). When non-inferiority margins were expressed relative to the baseline risk of primary outcome in control groups, the median relative non-inferiority margin was 1.5 (IQR 1.3-1.7). In multivariable regression analyses examining the association between trial characteristics (medical specialty, inclusion of paediatric patients, mortality as a sole or part of a composite primary outcome, presence of industry funding) and non-inferiority margin size, only medical specialty was significantly associated with non-inferiority margin size. CONCLUSION: Absolute and relative non-inferiority margins used in published trials comparing medications are large, allowing conclusions of non-inferiority in the context of large differences in mortality. Accepting the potential for large increases in outcomes involving mortality while declaring non-inferiority is a challenging methodological issue in the conduct of non-inferiority trials.

Choosing medications wisely: Is it time to address paediatric polypharmacy?

There is a growing focus in the medical community on de-escalating medical treatments where appropriate; however, specific efforts to reduce medication burden in patients with polypharmacy has largely been targeted toward adult populations. Polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug reactions in children, and that risk may be further increased by the use of off-label drugs. The paediatric prescribing community should explore pharmacovigilance strategies and deprescription initiatives that prioritize patients with polypharmacy. Currently, best practices may be extrapolated from the adult literature, including medication review algorithms and patient education tools. Enhancing access to nonpharmacological modalities to address child and youth mental health may mitigate psychotropic polypharmacy. The aim of these initiatives should be to improve patient outcomes and experiences by avoiding adverse drug events and drug-drug interactions.

Relationship between cyclosporine area-under-the curve and acute graft versus host disease in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A prospective, multicenter study.

Traditionally in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), cyclosporine doses are individualized using cyclosporine trough concentrations (C0) while area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC) is used in solid organ transplant. AUC potentially has an important relationship with the development of acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD). We conducted a prospective study to describe the relationship between severe (grade III-IV) aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC in pediatric HSCT recipients. Pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic myeloablative HSCT and scheduled to receive cyclosporine for aGVHD prophylaxis participated in this multicenter study. Cyclosporine doses were adjusted based on C0 according to each center's standard of care. Cyclosporine AUC was determined weekly until neutrophil engraftment or Day +42, whichever was later. Associations between severe aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC and other patient and treatment-related factors were evaluated. Of the 110 children enrolled, 97 were evaluable. Thirty-seven (38%) children developed aGVHD; 13 (13.4%) had severe aGVHD. On univariate analysis, there was no association between severe aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC at any time point before engraftment. Future research should focus on refinement of C0 targets for cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in HSCT.

Nevirapine Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Neonates Receiving Combination Antiretroviral Therapy for Prevention of Vertical HIV Transmission.

BACKGROUND: Nevirapine (NVP)-based combination antiretroviral therapy is routinely prescribed to infants deemed at high risk of vertical HIV infection in our centers. We evaluated NVP pharmacokinetics and safety of this regimen. METHODS: Neonates were recruited prospectively between September 2012 and April 2015 or enrolled retrospectively if treated similarly before prospective study initiation. NVP was dosed at 150 mg/m daily for 14 days, then twice daily for 14 days. NVP levels were drawn at weeks 1, 2, and 4 [target trough (NVP-T): 3-8 mg/L]. RESULTS: Thirty-three neonates were included (23 prospectively). Median gestational age (GA) and birth weight were 38 weeks (32-41 weeks) and 2.9 kg (1.5-4.2 kg), respectively. Median NVP-Ts were 8.2 mg/L (1.6-25.1 mg/L), 3.5 mg/L (1.6-6.8 mg/L), and 4.3 mg/L (0.1-19.9 mg/L) at weeks 1, 2, and 4, respectively. The proportions with therapeutic NVP-T were 42%, 61%, and 73% at these same timepoints. Median apparent oral clearance (CL/F) increased from 0.05 L·kg·h (0.01-0.50 L·kg·h) at week 2 to 0.18 L·kg·h (0.01-0.78 L·kg·h) at week 4. Increased drug exposure [area under the curve (AUCτ)] correlated with younger GA (r = 0.459, P = 0.032) and lower birth weight (r = 0.542, P = 0.009). The most common adverse events potentially attributable to combination antiretroviral therapy were transient asymptomatic hyperlactatemia (26%), anemia (24.7%), and neutropenia (22.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment dose NVP was generally well-tolerated and associated with normalization of trough levels over time in most cases without dose adjustment. Lower empiric dosing is recommended for infants <34 weeks of GA. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring may not be required for infants ≥34 weeks of GA.

Prediction of area under the cyclosporine concentration versus time curve in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

This prospective study aimed to validate a previously developed first-dose limited sampling strategy (LSS) to predict the area under the cyclosporine concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) and to develop and then validate an LSS to predict cyclosporine AUC at steady state. This two-center Canadian study included children (ages .4 to 17.2 years) undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation receiving cyclosporine for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. There were three cohorts, each incorporating 24 AUC determinations: first-dose LSS validation, steady-state LSS development, and steady-state LSS validation. Patients contributing data to either of the development cohorts were excluded from the corresponding validation group. Cyclosporine was given every 12 hours as a 2-hour infusion. Cyclosporine AUC was determined after administration of the first cyclosporine dose (8 samples) and then once weekly (9 samples) until engraftment. Steady-state LSSs were developed using stepwise multiple linear regression. An LSS was considered to provide an acceptable estimate of AUC if the lower limit of the 95% confidence limit (CL) of the intraclass coefficient was .8 or higher and both bias and precision were 15% or less. Fifty-three children age .4 to 18 years participated. Cyclosporine concentrations drawn up to 4 hours from the start of the infusion correlated most strongly with AUC. The previously developed first-dose LSSs and three steady-state LSSs met criteria for acceptability. The intraclass coefficients of the three-point first-dose LSS validation cohort, three-point steady-state LSS development cohort, and three-point steady-state LSS validation cohort were .974 (95% CL: .941 to .988), .984 (95% CL: .965 to .993), and .993 (95% CL: .984 to .997), respectively. The three-point first-dose (2, 6, and 8 hours) and steady-state (2, 2.5, and 8 hours) LSSs are valid measures of cyclosporine AUC after intravenous administration over 2 hours. Their use in a prospective evaluation of the relationship between cyclosporine AUC and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation clinical outcomes in children is suggested.

Determination of area under the whole blood concentration versus time curve after first intravenous cyclosporine dose in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant: limited sampling strategies.

Achievement of target trough cyclosporine whole blood concentrations after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) reduces the risk of acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD). In solid organ transplant, prevention of acute graft rejection correlates with achievement of target area under the whole blood concentration versus time curve during the 12-hour dosing interval (AUC-12) after oral administration. This study describes a limited sampling strategy for determination of cyclosporine AUC-12 after administration of the first intravenous (IV) dose in children undergoing HSCT and explores the relationships between individual whole blood concentrations during the dosing interval and the AUC. Children undergoing HSCT and receiving cyclosporine prophylaxis were eligible to participate. The first cyclosporine dose was given as a 2 hour infusion, and eight cyclosporine concentrations were determined at 2 (end of the infusion), 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after the start of the IV infusion. The relationship between AUC-12 and whole blood cyclosporine concentrations at individual time points after IV administration was assessed by the Spearman rho correlation coefficient. Limited sampling strategies were developed using three to six time points by way of multiple linear regression analysis. The agreement between the AUC-12 calculated using all eight data points and the limited sampling strategies was assessed by intraclass coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Twenty-four children (0.5-16.9 yr) participated. The mean AUC-12 calculated using all eight concentration versus time points was 2793 +/- 1165.6 microg/L.hr. Whole blood cyclosporine concentrations obtained within the first 4 hours from the start of the infusion correlated strongly with AUC-12 (Spearman rho coefficient, 0.717-0.868). Limited sampling strategies were developed to estimate AUC-12 with adjusted r2 of 0.955 to 0.998, mean bias of 0% to 0.93%, and precision of 1.6% to 8.1%. The actual AUC-12 and predicted AUC-12 values agreed strongly (intraclass coefficient, 0.981-0.999). Limited sampling strategies using three to six data points have been developed that will estimate cyclosporine AUC-12 after administration of the first IV dose given over 2 hours. Information regarding the possible association between aGvHD and cyclosporine AUC-12 is not available. The limited sampling strategies described here will facilitate the prospective evaluation of the clinical importance of cyclosporine AUC-12 in the prevention of aGvHD.

Pharmacokinetic modelling of a once-daily dosing regimen for intravenous tobramycin in paediatric cystic fibrosis patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine an optimal dose range for the once-daily dosing (ODD) of tobramycin in the treatment of an acute pulmonary exacerbation in paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In addition, we aimed to assess whether certain patient characteristics affect tobramycin pharmacokinetics and, therefore, dosing. METHODS: Patient characteristics and pharmacokinetic parameters of patients receiving tobramycin three times daily from 1 January 1992 to 31 October 2005 were analysed using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression to determine statistically significant relationships and to derive dosing models. The binary partitioning method was used to derive critical values to determine stratification within the chosen dosing model. RESULTS: Using multiple linear regression, age and sex were significantly associated with the volume of distribution divided by the body weight (V/kg). By the binary partitioning method, the critical value for age was 13.75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Age and sex were used to derive an ODD regimen for tobramycin in paediatric CF. Using a target peak concentration range of 25-35 mg/L, the initial dose for female CF patients at least 14 years of age was calculated to be 7 mg/kg/day given intravenously as a single daily dose. All other CF patients would receive an initial dose of 9 mg/kg/day given intravenously as a single daily dose. These dosing guidelines will require prospective evaluation for safety and efficacy.