RESUMO
Ganglioside-monosialic acid (GM1) gangliosidosis (ICD-10: E75.1; OMIM: 230500, 230600, 230650) is a rare autosomal recessive hereditary disease, lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the GLB1 gene that lead to the absence or insufficiency of ß-galactosidase. In this study, we report a case of a Russian family with a history of GM1 gangliosidosis. The family had a child who, from the age of 6 months, experienced a gradual loss of developmental skills, marked by muscle flaccidity, psychomotor retardation, hepatosplenomegaly, and the onset of tonic seizures by the age of 8 months. Funduscopic examination revealed a «cherry red spot¼ in the macula, which is crucial for the diagnosis of lipid storage disorders. To find the pathogenic variants responsible for these clinical symptoms, the next-generation sequencing approach was used. The analysis revealed two variants in the heterozygous state: a frameshift variant c.699delG (rs1452318343, ClinVar ID 928700) in exon 6 and a missense variant c.809A>C (rs371546950, ClinVar ID 198727) in exon 8 of the GLB1 gene. The spouses were advised to plan the pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology (ART), followed by preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorder (PGT-M) on the embryos. Trophectoderm biopsy was performed on 8 out of 10 resulting embryos at the blastocyst stage. To perform PGT-M, we developed a novel testing system, allowing for direct analysis of disease-causing mutations, as well as haplotype analysis based on the study of polymorphic markers-short tandem repeats (STR), located upstream and downstream of the GLB1 gene. The results showed that four embryos were heterozygous carriers of pathogenic variants in the GLB1 gene (#1, 2, 5, 8). Two embryos had a compound heterozygous genotype (#3, 4), while the embryos #7 and 9 did not carry disease-causing alleles of the GLB1 gene. The embryo #7 without pathogenic variants was transferred after consideration of its morphology and growth rate. Prenatal diagnosis in the first trimester showed the absence of the variants analyzed in the GLB1 gene in the fetus. The pregnancy resulted in the delivery of a female infant who did not inherit the disease-causing variants in the GLB1 gene.
RESUMO
We report on the case of prenatal detection of trisomy 2 in placental biopsy and further algorithm of genetic counseling and testing. A 29-year-old woman with first-trimester biochemical markers refused chorionic villus sampling and preferred targeted non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which showed low risk for aneuploidies 13, 18, 21, and X. A series of ultrasound examinations revealed increased chorion thickness at 13/14 weeks of gestation and fetal growth retardation, a hyperechoic bowel, challenging visualization of the kidneys, dolichocephaly, ventriculomegaly, increase in placental thickness, and pronounced oligohydramnios at 16/17 weeks of gestation. The patient was referred to our center for an invasive prenatal diagnosis. The patient's blood and placenta were sampled for whole-genome sequencing-based NIPT and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), respectively. Both investigations revealed trisomy 2. Further prenatal genetic testing in order to confirm trisomy 2 in amniocytes and/or fetal blood was highly questionable because oligohydramnios and fetal growth retardation made amniocentesis and cordocentesis technically unfeasible. The patient opted to terminate the pregnancy. Pathological examination of the fetus revealed internal hydrocephalus, atrophy of brain structure, and craniofacial dysmorphism. Conventional cytogenetic analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed chromosome 2 mosaicism with a prevalence of trisomic clone in the placenta (83.2% vs. 16.8%) and a low frequency of trisomy 2, which did not exceed 0.6% in fetal tissues, advocating for low-level true fetal mosaicism. To conclude, in pregnancies at risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities that refuse invasive prenatal diagnosis, whole-genome sequencing-based NIPT, but not targeted NIPT, should be considered. In prenatal cases of trisomy 2, true mosaicism should be distinguished from placental-confined mosaicism using cytogenetic analysis of amniotic fluid cells or fetal blood cells. However, if material sampling is impossible due to oligohydramnios and/or fetal growth retardation, further decisions should be based on a series of high-resolution fetal ultrasound examinations. Genetic counseling for the risk of uniparental disomy in a fetus is also required.