Should All Patients with Barrett's Esophagus Receive Ablation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this paper is to review and assess the appropriateness of eradication of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus is a known predictor for the development of esophageal cancer, and is currently the best marker in aiding the decision making regarding treatment options. Current data supports endoscopic eradication therapy for most patients with dysplastic Barrett's. The controversy, however, lies in the management of nondysplastic Barrett's and when to recommend ablation versus ongoing surveillance. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been increasing efforts to identify factors that can help predict which patients with nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus are at increased risk for cancer progression, and to quantify that risk. While there is currently varying data and literature supporting this, a more objective risk score is likely to soon become available and accepted, in an effort to differentiate between low and high risk nondysplastic Barrett's, and better aid in decision making regarding surveillance versus endoscopic eradication. This article reviews the current data on Barrett's esophagus and its risk for cancer progression, and it outlines several factors which impact progression that should be considered in the management approach to nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: With growing application of endoscopic therapy for early-stage esophageal cancer, we sought to review our experience of endoscopic mucosal resections (EMRs). The aim of our study was to understand the natural course of these patients, especially with positive margins. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing endoscopic therapies at Georgetown University Hospital for esophageal cancer was used for the analysis between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: Of 80 patients in the EMR database, 35 were performed as index cases for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Majority (74.3%) had a pre-treatment ultrasound confirming absence of regional adenopathy. There were no post-EMR bleeding or perforation events requiring re-intervention. Complete R0 resection was achieved in 22/35 (62.9%) after initial EMR. Thirteen patients had positive margins. Of these 13 patients, only 7 patients underwent repeat endoscopic resection, 2 underwent subsequent esophagectomy, 2 received definitive radiation given poor surgical candidacy, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Overall and 5-year survival of all patients undergoing EMR was 67.9 months and 85%, respectively. Subset analysis of the 13 patients with R1 resection demonstrated an overall survival of 49.2 months and 60% 5-year survival vs overall survival of 78.9 months and 93% 5-year survival for R0 resection. At a median follow-up of 60.5 months, cancer recurrence occurred in 3 patients. All of them were successfully managed with repeat EMR. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resections represent a safe and effective treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer. Patients with high-risk features should be counseled to undergo an esophagectomy if they are operable candidates.

Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Gastrointestinal Tract With Unusual Endoscopic and Histologic Presentations.

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an infrequent site of breast cancer metastasis, but it often poses a diagnostic challenge when it occurs. The symptoms of GI metastases are often nonspecific, and the endoscopic manifestations are variable, requiring tissue biopsies for histologic examination. We report 2 cases of breast cancer metastasizing to the GI tract: a case of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma that metastasized to the stomach, a rare location for this histologic subtype, and another case of invasive lobular cell carcinoma that metastasized to the colon with unusual findings of mucosal pallor and edema on colonoscopy.

Role of Multimodality Imaging in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Its Complications, with Clinical and Pathologic Correlation.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition and impairs the quality of life for millions of patients, accounts for considerable health care spending, and is a primary risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There have been substantial advances in understanding the pathogenesis of GERD and its complications and much progress in diagnosis and management of GERD; however, these have not been comprehensively discussed in the recent radiology literature. Understanding the role of imaging in GERD and its complications is important to aid in multidisciplinary treatment of GERD. GERD results from prolonged or recurrent reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. Common symptoms include heartburn or regurgitation. Prolonged reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus can cause erosive esophagitis. Over time, the inflammatory response related to esophagitis can lead to deposition of fibrous tissue and development of strictures. Alternatively, the esophageal mucosa can undergo metaplasia (Barrett esophagus), a precursor to dysplasia (which can lead to adenocarcinoma). Conventional barium esophagography has long been considered the primary imaging modality for the esophagus, and the fluoroscopic findings for diagnosis of GERD have been well established. Multimodality imaging has a clear role in detection and assessment of the complications of GERD, specifically reflux esophagitis and Barrett esophagus; differentiation of benign and malignant strictures; and detection, staging, and posttreatment surveillance of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the dramatic changes in utilization of abdominal imaging during the past 2 decades, with significantly declining volume of fluoroscopic procedures and concomitant increase in CT and MRI studies, it is crucial that modern radiologists appreciate the value of barium esophagography in the workup of GERD and recognize the key imaging features of GERD and its complications at CT and MRI.

Pseudoachalasia secondary to metastatic bladder cancer.

Pseudoachalasia, or secondary achalasia, is a clinical condition that must be distinguished from primary achalasia. Both diagnoses may present similarly, but the aetiology and management for each are drastically different. Most significantly, pseudoachalasia carries a high association with malignancy, most often with primary adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or cardia. Our case involves a patient with signs and symptoms consistent with pseudoachalasia due to metastatic bladder cancer.

Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Dysplasia and Early Carcinoma Detected After Remote Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma.

We present a case of squamous dysplasia and early squamous carcinoma of the esophagus after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. We briefly discuss mucosectomy and ablative therapy as potential treatment options.

Gastric Duplication Cyst With Elevated Amylase: An Unusual Presentation Mimicking Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasm.

Enteric duplication cysts (EDCs) are benign congenital anomalies that are found incidentally in adults. Gastric duplication cysts (GDCs) are the least common subtype of EDC, but when located near the pancreas, may resemble other neoplastic conditions. We report a case of GDC adjacent to the pancreas with high cystic fluid amylase and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and 3 different epithelia (respiratory, gastric, and intestinal), all diagnosed via endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration.