Impact of Ethno-racial Factors on Clinical Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Chronic Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare disparities adversely affect clinical outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities. Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a complex disorder, and pressures for time and cost-containment may amplify the disparity for minorities in this condition. This study aimed to assess ethno-racial differences in the clinical outcomes of CP patients cared for at our institution. METHODS: This is a study of CP patients with available ethno-racial information followed at our pancreas center. We reviewed their demographics, comorbidities, clinical outcomes, and resource utilization: pain, frequent flares (≥ 2/year), local complications, psychosocial variables, exocrine, and endocrine insufficiency, imaging, endoscopic procedures, and surgeries. The outcomes underwent logistic regression to ascertain association(s) with covariates and were expressed as odds ratio (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: Of the 445 CP patients, there were 23 Hispanics, 330 Non-Hispanic Whites, 47 Non-Hispanic Blacks, 16 Asian Americans, and 29 patients from Other/mixed races. Over a median follow-up of 7 years, no significant differences in the pain profile (p = 0.36), neuromodulator use (p = 0.94), and opioid use for intermittent (p = 0.34) and daily pain (p = 0.80) were observed. Frequent flares were associated with Hispanic ethnicity [2.98(1.20-7.36); p = 0.02], despite adjustment for smoking [2.21(1.11-4.41); p = 0.02)] and alcohol [1.88(1.06-3.35); p = 0.03]. Local complications (pseudocysts, mesenteric thrombosis, and biliary obstruction), exocrine and endocrine dysfunction, and healthcare resource utilization (cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic procedures, celiac blocks, or surgeries) were comparable across all ethno-racial groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although no significant differences in clinical outcomes, and health resource utilization were noted across ethno-racial groups, Hispanic ethnicity had significant association with CP flares. This study calls for further investigation of an understudied minority population with CP.

Long-Term Follow-up of Disabled Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: Evaluation of Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Predictors.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) often report a poor quality of life and may be disabled. Our study identifies clinical characteristics, predictors and outcomes in CP patients with disability. METHODS: A review of established CP patients followed in our Pancreas Center between January 1, 2016 and April 30, 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on disability. Univariate analysis was performed to identify differences in demographics, risk factors, comorbidities, complications, controlled medications, and resource utilization. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify predictors for disability. RESULTS: Out of 404 CP patients, 18% were disabled. These patients were younger (53.8 vs. 58.8, P =0.001), had alcoholic CP (54.1% vs. 30%; P <0.001), more recurrent pancreatitis (83.6% vs. 61.1%; P =0.001), chronic abdominal pain (96.7% vs. 78.2%; P =0.001), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (83.6% vs. 55.5%; P <0.001), concurrent alcohol (39.3% vs. 23.3%; P =0.001) and tobacco abuse (42.6% vs. 26%; P =0.02), anxiety (23% vs. 18.2%; P <0.001), and depression (57.5% vs. 28.5%; P <0.001). A higher proportion was on opiates (68.9% vs. 43.6%; P <0.001), nonopiate controlled medications (47.5% vs. 23.9%; P <0.001), neuromodulators (73.3% vs. 44%; P <0.001), and recreational drugs (27.9% vs. 15.8%; P =0.036). Predictors of disability were chronic pain (OR 8.71, CI 2.61 to 12.9, P < 0.001), celiac block (OR 4.66, 2.49 to 8.41; P <0.001), neuromodulator use (OR 3.78, CI 2.09 to 6.66; P <0.001), opioid use (OR3.57, CI 2.06 to 6.31; P < 0.001), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (OR3.56, CI 1.89 to 6.82; P <0.001), non-opioid controlled medications (OR 3.45, CI 2.01 to 5.99; P <0.001), history of recurrent acute pancreatitis (OR 2.49, CI 1.25 to 4.77; P <0.001), depression (OR 2.26, CI 1.79 to 3.01; P <0.001), and active smoking (OR1.8, CI 1.25 to 2.29; P <0.001). CONCLUSION: CP patients with disability have unique characteristics and predictors, which can be targeted to reduce disease burden and health care expenditure in this population.

Natural history, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and long-term follow-up of pain-free chronic pancreatitis.

Background: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is characterized by chronic abdominal pain and functional insufficiency. However, a small subset of patients with prior acute pancreatitis (AP) and/or underlying risk factors for developing CP may be pain-free at diagnosis and may have a different clinical course. We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and healthcare utilization between CP patients with and without pain. Methods: Reviewed patients with established CP were followed in our Pancreas Center between January 2016 and April 2021. Patients without risk factors for developing CP and/or without AP prior to their diagnosis and only with incidental radiologic features of CP were excluded, so as to minimize confounding factors of pancreatopathy unrelated to CP. Patients were divided into painful and pain-free groups to analyze differences in demographics, outcomes, and healthcare utilization. Results: Of 368 CP patients, 49 (13.3%) were pain-free at diagnosis and had remained so for >9 years. There were no significant differences in body mass index, race, sex, or co-morbidities between the two groups. Pain-free patients were older at diagnosis (53.9 vs 45.7, P = 0.004) and had less recurrent AP (RAP) (43.8% vs 72.5%, P < 0.001) and less exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) (34.7% vs 65.7%, P < 0.001). Pain-free patients had less disability (2.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.003), mental illness (20.4% vs 61.0%, P < 0.001), surgery (0.0% vs 15.0%, P = 0.059), and therapeutic interventions (0.0% vs 16.4%, P = 0.005) for pain. Conclusions: We described a unique subset of patients with underlying risk factors for CP and/or prior AP who were pain-free at diagnosis. They were older at diagnosis, had less EPI and RAP, and overall favorable outcomes with minimal resource utilization.

Pancreatic Cancer Screening for At-Risk Individuals (Pancreas Scan Study): Yield, Harms, and Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines endorse pancreatic cancer screening in genetically susceptible individuals. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study to determine yield, harms, and outcomes of pancreatic cancer screening. METHODS: All high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer screening at 5 centers from 2020 to 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Pancreas findings were designated as low-risk (fatty or chronic pancreatitis-like changes), intermediate-risk (neuroendocrine tumor [NET] <2 cm or branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm [IPMN]), or high-risk lesions (high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia/dysplasia, main-duct IPMN, NET >2 cm, or pancreatic cancer). Harms from screening included adverse events during screening or undergoing low-yield pancreatic surgery. Annual screening was performed using endoscopic ultrasound and or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Annual screening for new-onset diabetes using fasting blood sugar was also performed ( ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT05006131). RESULTS: During the study period, 252 patients underwent pancreatic cancer screening. Mean age was 59.9 years, 69% were female, and 79.4% were White. Common indications were BRCA 1/2 (36.9%), familial pancreatic cancer syndrome kindred (31.7%), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (3.5%), Lynch syndrome (6.7%), Peutz-Jeghers (4.3%), and familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (3.5%). Low-risk lesions were noted in 23.4% and intermediate-risk lesions in 31.7%, almost all of which were branch-duct IPMN without worrisome features. High-risk lesions were noted in 2 patients (0.8%), who were diagnosed with pancreas cancer at stages T2N1M0 and T2N1M1. Prediabetes was noted in 18.2% and new-onset diabetes in 1.7%. Abnormal fasting blood sugar was not associated with pancreatic lesions. There were no adverse events from screening tests, and no patient underwent low-yield pancreatic surgery. DISCUSSION: Pancreatic cancer screening detected high-risk lesions with lower frequency than previously reported. No harms from screening were noted.

Smoking Is Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is a known risk factor for progression of chronic pancreatitis (CP). AIM: We compare clinical outcomes of CP patients with current or former smoking with those who have never smoked. METHODS: We reviewed all patients with followed at our Pancreas Center from 2016 to 2021, comparing the demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, outcomes, and resource utilization between smokers and non-smokers. RESULTS: Of 439 CP patients, 283 were smokers (125 current, 158 former). Significantly more smokers were men (58.3% vs 40.4%), with alcoholic CP (45.5% vs 12.1%), chronic abdominal pain (77.7% vs 65.4%), anxiety and depression (22.6% vs 14.1% and 38.9% vs 23.1%), and with more local pancreatic complications [splanchnic vein thrombosis (15.7% vs 5.13%), pseudocyst (42.7% vs 23.7%), biliary obstruction (20.5% vs 5.88%)], exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (65.8% vs 46.2%), hospitalizations (2.59 vs 1.75 visits), and emergency department visits (8.96% vs 3.25%). Opioid and neuromodulator use were significantly higher (59.2% vs 30.3% and 58.4% vs 31.2%). Current smokers had worse outcomes than former smokers. Multivariate analysis controlling for multiple factors identified smoking as an independent predictor of chronic abdominal pain (OR 2.49, CI 1.23-5.04, p = 0.011), opioid (OR 2.36, CI 1.35-4.12, p = 0.002), neuromodulators (OR 2.55, CI 1.46-4.46, p = 0.001), and non-opioid-controlled medications (OR 2.28, CI 1.22-4.30, p = 0.01) use, as well as splanchnic vein thromboses (OR 2.65, CI 1.02-6.91, p = 0.045) and biliary obstruction (OR 4.12, CI 1.60-10.61, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: CP patients who smoke or formerly smoked have greater morbidity and worse outcomes than non-smokers.

Incidence and Prevalence of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms in Individuals With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of branch-duct intraductal papillary neoplasm (BD-IPMN) in BRCA1/2 patients is unknown. Our goal was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of BD-IPMN and other pancreatic lesions in BRCA1/2 patients and compare it to that for average-risk individuals. METHODS: We identified a cohort of BRCA1/2 patients followed at our institution between 1995 and 2020. Medical records and imaging results were reviewed to determine prevalence of pancreatic lesions. We then identified those who had undergone follow-up imaging and determined the incidence of new pancreatic lesions. We categorized pancreatic lesions as low, intermediate, or high-risk based on their malignant potential. RESULTS: During the study period, 359 eligible BRCA1/2 patients were identified. Average patient age was 56.8 years, 88.3% were women, and 51.5% had BRCA1 . The prevalence of low-risk pancreatic lesions was 14.4%, intermediate-risk 13.9%, and high-risk 3.3%. The prevalence of BD-IPMN was 13.6% with mean cyst size 7.7 mm (range: 2 to 34 mm). The prevalence of pancreatic cancer was 3.1%. Subsequent imaging was performed in 169 patents with mean follow-up interval of 5.3 years (range: 0 to 19.7 y). The incidence of BD-IPMN was 20.1%, with median cyst size 5.5 mm (range: 2 to 30 mm). The incidence of pancreatic cancer was 2.9%. BRCA2 patients were almost 4-times more likely to develop pancreatic cancer than BRCA1 patients, however, there was no difference in incidence or prevalence of BD-IPMN. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence and prevalence of BD-IPMNs in BRCA1/2 patients was similar to that reported for average-risk individuals. BRCA2 patients were more likely than BRCA1 patients to develop pancreatic cancer but had similar rates of BD-IPMN.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Ulnar Growth in Radial Dysplasia Treated by a Combination of Distraction and Radialization.

PURPOSE: To study the long-term results of radial club hand, regarding ulna growth, radial angulation, and volar subluxation using a 2-stage treatment protocol. METHODS: From 1998 to 2009, 39 radial club hands (32 patients) were treated with distraction, radialization, and a bilobed flap. Long-term follow-up was available in 13 patients (17 hands; average 12.6 years, range 9-16 years). All 17 hands were classified as Bayne and Klug grade 3 or 4. RESULTS: The average age at distraction was 12 months (SD 5.3). The average age at radialization was 14 months (SD 5.8). At final follow-up, the average ulna length on the involved side was 69.3% of the uninvolved contralateral side in the unilateral cases. In the 4 bilateral cases, the average ulna length was 62% of the ulna length of a cohort of normal children. The transverse diameter of the ulna in the posteroanterior view was 79%, and in the lateral view 99%, of the radius on the contralateral side in the unilateral cases. The average radial deviation improved from 82° to 8° and the average volar subluxation improved from 20° to 12°. However, in 4 hands recurrent volar subluxation and required revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This approach to treatment was associated with consistent results in the correction of the radial angulation, volar subluxation, and ulna growth in long-term follow-up. Volar subluxation may result in a requirement for revision. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Comparison of Opioid-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Physician-Directed Analgesia in Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is commonly used for acute postoperative pain management. Clinicians may also use PCA in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP); however, there is limited data on its impact on patient outcomes. We aimed to characterize a cohort of patients receiving PCA therapy for pain management in AP compared to those patients receiving standard physician-directed delivery of analgesia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted with AP at a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2018. Exclusion criteria included patients with chronic opioid use, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Primary outcomes include length of stay (LOS) and time to enteral nutrition. Secondary outcomes include proportion of patients discharged with opioid and complications. Multivariate regression analysis and t-test were used for analysis. RESULTS: Among 656 AP patients who met the criteria, patients receiving PCA (n = 62) and standard delivery (n = 594) were similar in admission pain score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and pancreatitis severity. There were significantly greater proportion of women, Caucasians and nonalcoholics who received PCA therapy (p < 0.01) than standard delivery. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that patients in the PCA group have a longer LOS (7.17 vs. 5.43 days, p < 0.007, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.07), longer time to enteral nutrition (3.84 days vs. 2.56 days, p = 0.012, OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02-1.20), and higher likelihood of being discharged with opioids (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.07-3.63, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The use of PCA in AP may be associated with poorer outcomes including longer LOS, time to enteral intake and a higher likelihood of being discharged with opioids.

Pre-existing, Concurrent/Early-Onset, and Late-Onset Diabetes in Chronic Pancreatitis: Do Outcomes Differ?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diabetes secondary to endocrine insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis (CP) may develop at any time during the disease course. We sought to evaluate the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in CP patients with pre-existing, early-onset, and late-onset diabetes. METHODS: We reviewed CP patients seen at our Pancreas Center during 2016-2021. We divided them into four groups: those without diabetes, with pre-existing diabetes, with early-onset diabetes, and with late-onset diabetes. We then compared clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 450 patients with CP: 271 without diabetes, 99 with pre-existing diabetes, 51 with early-onset diabetes, and 29 with late-onset diabetes. Early-onset diabetics were younger (54.1 vs 57.3 vs 62.5 vs 61.9 years), had more alcohol-related CP (45.1% vs 31.7% vs 32.3% vs 31%), had higher HbA1C levels (8.02% vs 5.11% vs 7.71% vs 7.66%), were more likely to be on insulin (78.4% vs 0% vs 48.4% vs 65.5%), and used more opioids (64.7% vs 43.9% vs 55.1% vs 44.8%) and gabapentinoids (66.7% vs 43.5% vs 48% vs 60.7%) compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Patients who developed diabetes after CP diagnosis had more exocrine insufficiency (72.4% vs 70.6% vs 65.7% vs 53.1%), anatomical complications, and interventions for pain control (p < 0.05). There was no difference in pancreatic cancer in the four groups. CONCLUSION: CP patients who are younger and use alcohol are at higher risk of having early-onset diabetes and have poorer glucose control compared other CP patients. Patients who develop diabetes after CP diagnosis have worse outcomes and use more resources.

Association Between Family History and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants.

OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines limit pancreatic cancer screening to those BRCA1/2 patients who have a family history of pancreatic cancer. We aimed to assess the association between family history and risk of pancreatic neoplasms in BRCA1/2 patients. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of BRCA1/2 patients followed at our institution between 1995 and 2020. Family history was defined as those with a first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer. We compared the incidence and prevalence of pancreatic neoplasms between patients with and without family history of pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: We identified 56 BRCA1/2 patients with family history and 238 without family history of pancreatic cancer. No difference between these groups was noted in age, race, or sex. Mean follow-up interval for BRCA1/2 patients was 4.6 years (range, 0-19.7 years). There was no significant difference in prevalence (19.6% vs 12.6; P = 0.3) or incidence (29% vs 14.1%; P = 0.08) of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm between the 2 groups. No association between family history and pancreatic cancer risk was noted. Only 1 of 10 BRCA1/2 patients with pancreatic cancer had a family history. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support using family history to determine eligibility for pancreatic cancer screening.

Impact of recurrent acute pancreatitis on the natural history and progression to chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is believed that acute pancreatitis (AP), recurrent AP (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) represent stages of the same disease spectrum. We aimed to identify risk factors, clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with prior RAP who develop CP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with CP who were seen at our Pancreas Center during 2016-2021. We divided them into two groups: with and without RAP (≥2 episodes of AP). We compared demographics, clinical presentation and resource utilization between the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 440 patients with CP, of which 283 (64%) patients had preceding RAP. These patients were younger (55.6 vs 63.1 years), active smokers (36% vs 20%) and had alcohol-related CP (49% vs 25%) compared to those without RAP and CP (p < 0.05). More patients with RAP had chronic abdominal pain (89% vs 67.9%), nausea (43.3% vs 27.1%) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (65.8% vs 46.5%) (p < 0.05). More patients with RAP used opioids (58.4% vs 32.3%) and gabapentinoids (56.6% vs 34.8%) (p < 0.05). They also had more ED visits resulting in an opioid prescription (9.68% vs 2%) and more CP flares requiring hospitalization (3.09 vs 0.87) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Young age, smoking and alcohol use are seen in patients with RAP who progress to CP. These patients are highly symptomatic and use more healthcare resources, suggestive of an overall a more course compared to those patients who develop CP without preceding RAP. Early identification and counselling of these patients may slow down progression to CP.

Induction and maintenance immunosuppression in lung transplantation.

Immunosuppression for lung transplant recipients is a critical part of post-transplant care, to prevent acute and chronic rejection. Treatment protocols consist of induction and maintenance immunotherapy. Induction agents provide an immediate state of immunosuppression following transplantation and over time, and their use has become more commonplace. Several agents are available for clinical use, including anti-thymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab, the latter being most commonly employed. Each induction agent has unique side effects and caveats to their use, of which we must be aware. Maintenance immunosuppression is initiated following transplant but requires multiple doses prior to reaching therapeutic levels. A calcineurin inhibitor, an anti-metabolite, and a corticosteroid are traditionally used, most commonly tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Dosing regimens and goal trough levels vary and are tailored to a patient's clinical status and duration post-transplant. Future clinical studies may be able to assist in determining the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppression regimens. In the interim, we use cohort and registry data to guide our therapies.

Evaluating the accuracy of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis with choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP) is the most common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) in the United States. Patients with AGP may also present with choledocholithiasis. In 2010, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) suggested a management algorithm based on probability for choledocholithiasis, recommending additional imaging for patients at intermediate risk and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients at high risk of choledocholithiasis. In 2019, the ASGE guidelines were updated using more specific criteria to categorize individuals at high risk for choledocholithiasis. Neither ASGE guideline has been studied in AGP to determine the probability of having choledocholithiasis. AIM: To determine compliance with ASGE guidelines, assess outcomes, and compare 2019 vs 2010 ASGE criteria for suspected choledocholithiasis in AGP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 882 patients admitted with AP to a single tertiary care center from 2008-2018. AP was diagnosed using revised Atlanta criteria and AGP was defined as the presence of gallstones on imaging or with cholestatic pattern of liver injury in the absence of another cause. Patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic malignancy were excluded as were those who went directly to cholecystectomy prior to assessment for choledocholithiasis. Patients were assigned low, intermediate or high risk based on ASGE guidelines. Our primary outcomes of interest were the proportion of patients in the intermediate risk group undergoing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) first and the proportion of patients in the high risk group undergoing ERCP directly without preceding imaging. Secondary outcomes of interest included outcome differences based on if guidelines were not adhered to. We then evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 2019 in comparison to the 2010 ASGE criteria for patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. We performed the t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, as appropriate, to analyze if there were outcome differences based on if guidelines were not adhered to. Kappa coefficients were calculated to measure the degree of agreement between pairs of variables. RESULTS: In this cohort, we identified 235 patients with AGP of which 79 patients were excluded as they went directly to surgery for cholecystectomy without prior MRCP or ERCP. Of the remaining 156 patients, 79 patients were categorized as intermediate risk and 77 patients were high risk for choledocholithiasis according to the 2010 ASGE guidelines. Among 79 intermediate risk patients, 54 (68%) underwent MRCP first whereas 25 patients (32%) went directly to ERCP. For the 54 patients with intermediate risk who had MRCP first, 36 patients had no choledocholithiasis while 18 patients had evidence of choledocholithiasis prompting ERCP. Of these patients, ERCP confirmed stone disease in 11 patients. Of the 25 intermediate risk patients who directly underwent ERCP, 18 patients had stone disease. One patient with a normal ERCP developed post ERCP pancreatitis. Patients undergoing MRCP in this group had a significantly longer length of stay (5.0 vs 4.0 d, P = 0.02). In the high risk group, 64 patients (83%) had ERCP without preceding imaging, of which, 53 patients had findings consistent with choledocholithiasis, of which 13 patients (17%) underwent MRCP before ERCP, all of which showed evidence of stone disease. Furthermore, all of these patients ultimately had an ERCP, of which 8 patients had evidence of stones and 5 had normal examination.Our cohort also demonstrated that 58% of all 156 patients with AGP had confirmed choledocholithiasis (79% of the high risk group and 37% of the intermediate group when risk was assigned based on the 2010 ASGE guidelines). When the updated 2019 ASGE guidelines were applied instead of the original 2010 guidelines, there was moderate agreement between the 2010 and 2019 guidelines (kappa = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.34-0.58). Forty-two of 77 patients were still deemed to be high risk and 35 patients were downgraded to intermediate risk. Thirty-five patients who were originally assigned high risk were reclassified as intermediate risk. For these 35 patients, 26 patients had ERCP findings consistent with choledocholithiasis and 9 patients had a normal examination. Based on the 2019 criteria, 9/35 patients who were downgraded to intermediate risk had an unnecessary ERCP with normal findings (without a preceding MRCP). CONCLUSION: Two-thirds in intermediate risk and 83% in high risk group followed ASGE guidelines for choledocholithiasis. One intermediate-group patient with normal ERCP had post-ERCP AP, highlighting the risk of unnecessary procedures.

Evaluating Outcomes and Misuse in Opioid-Dependent Chronic Pancreatitis Using a State-Mandated Monitoring System.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) often require opioids for pain control. The goal of our study was to characterize opioid use in patients with CP in a real-life practice using a state-mandated online monitoring program and to assess outcomes compared to CP patients without opioid dependency. METHODS: CP patients seen in our Pancreas Center from 2016 to 2021 were divided into two groups-with and without chronic opioid use. Details of opioids and other controlled prescriptions were obtained by review of the Massachusetts Prescription Awareness Tool (MassPat). RESULTS: Of the 442 CP outpatients, 216 used chronic opioids. Patients with opioid use had significantly more recurrent acute pancreatitis (76.6% vs. 52.7%), concurrent alcohol use (11.2% vs. 5.8%), tobacco use (37.8% vs. 19.7%), anxiety (22.4% vs. 16.6%), depression (43.5% vs. 23.5%) and daily pain (59.8% vs. 24.8%) (p < 0.001). They also concurrently used more benzodiazepines (43.7% vs. 12.4%), gabapentinoids (66.4% vs. 31.1%) and medical marijuana (14.9% vs. 4.19%) (p < 0.001). They had more celiac plexus blocks (22.0% vs. 6.67%), surgery (18.3% vs. 8.89%) and more hospitalizations for CP flares (3.6 vs. 1.0 visits) (p < 0.001). Less than 13% patients received opioids by means of ED visits; 81.7% patients received their prescriptions from one facility and 75% received them at regular intervals. CONCLUSION: Opioid-dependent CP patients exhibit polypharmacy and have worse outcomes with higher resource utilization. The state-monitoring program ensures that the majority of patients receive opioids from a single facility, thereby minimizing misuse.

Racial Variations in Pain Management and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common cause of hospitalization. Black AP patients have higher risk for alcoholic etiology and hospitalization than White patients. We evaluated outcomes and treatment disparities by race in hospitalized AP patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed Black and White AP patients admitted 2008-2018. Primary outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit admission, 30-day readmissions, and mortality. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid dosing, and complications. RESULTS: We identified 630 White and 186 Black AP patients. Alcoholic AP (P < 0.001), tobacco use (P = 0.013), and alcohol withdrawal (P < 0.001) were more common among Blacks. There were no differences in length of stay (P = 0.113), intensive care unit stay (P = 0.316), 30-day readmissions (P = 0.797), inpatient (P = 0.718) or 1-year (P = 0.071) mortality, complications (P = 0.080), or initial (P = 0.851) and discharge pain scores (P = 0.116). Discharge opioids were prescribed more frequently for Whites (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized Black and White AP patients had similar treatment and outcomes. Standardized protocols used to manage care may eliminate racial biases. Disparities in discharge opioid prescriptions may be explained by higher alcohol and tobacco use by Black patients.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Prescriptions in Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Disease in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Racial-ethnic disparities in pain management are common but not known among pancreatic disease patients. We sought to evaluate racial-ethnic disparities in opioid prescriptions for pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were used to examine racial-ethnic and sex differences in opioid prescriptions for ambulatory visits by adult pancreatic disease patients. RESULTS: We identified 207 pancreatitis and 196 pancreatic cancer patient visits, representing 9.8 million visits, but weights were repealed for analysis. No sex differences in opioid prescriptions were found among pancreatitis (P = 0.78) or pancreatic cancer patient visits (P = 0.57). Opioids were prescribed at 58% of Black, 37% of White, and 19% of Hispanic pancreatitis patient visits (P = 0.05). Opioid prescriptions were less common in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic pancreatitis patients (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.91; P = 0.03). We found no racial-ethnic differences in opioid prescriptions among pancreatic cancer patient visits. CONCLUSIONS: Racial-ethnic disparities in opioid prescriptions were observed in pancreatitis, but not pancreatic cancer patient visits, suggesting possible racial-ethnic bias in opioid prescription practices for patients with benign pancreatic disease. However, there is a lower threshold for opioid provision in the treatment of malignant, terminal disease.

Evaluation of a U.S. National Cohort to Determine Utilization in Colectomy Rates for Ulcerative Colitis Among Ethnicities.

BACKGROUND: Colectomy is the curative management for ulcerative colitis (UC). Multiple studies have reported racial disparities for colectomy before the advent of anti-TNF alpha agents. The aim of this study was to describe racial and geographic differences in colectomy rates among hospitalized patients with UC after anti-TNF therapy was introduced. METHODS: We examined all patients discharged from the hospital between 2010 and 2014 with a primary diagnosis of UC or of complications of UC. The data were evaluated for race and colectomy rates among the hospitalized patients with UC. RESULTS: The unadjusted national colectomy rate among hospitalized patients with UC between 2010 and 2014 was 3.90 per 1000 hospitalization days (95% confidence interval, 3.72-4.08). The undajusted colectomy rates in African American (2.33 vs 4.35; P < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (3.99 vs 4.35; P ≤ 0.009) were considerably lower than those for White patients. After adjustment for confounders, the incidence rate ratio for African American as compared to White patients was 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.58; P < 0.001). Geographic region of the United States also showed significant variation in colectomy rates, with western regions having the highest rate (4.76 vs 3.20; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Racial and geographical disparities persist for the rate of colectomy among hospitalized patients with UC. The national database analysis reveals that colectomy rates for hospitalized African American and Hispanic patients were lower than those for White patients. Further studies are important to determine the social and biologic foundations of these disparities.

The Impact of an Inpatient Pancreatitis Service and Educational Intervention Program on the Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: We introduced an inpatient pancreatitis consultative service aimed to 1) provide guideline-based recommendations to acute pancreatitis inpatients and 2) educate inpatient teams on best practices for acute pancreatitis management. We assessed the impact of pancreatitis service on acute pancreatitis outcomes. METHODS: Inpatients with acute pancreatitis (2008-2018) were included in this cohort study. Primary outcomes included length of stay and refeeding time. The educational intervention was a guideline-based decision support tool, reinforced at hospital-wide educational forums. In Part A (n = 965), we compared outcomes pre-service (2008-2010) to post-service (2012-2018), excluding 2011, when the pancreatitis service was introduced. In Part B (n = 720, 2012-2018), we divided patients into 2 groups based on if co-managed with the pancreatitis service, and compared outcomes, including subgroup analysis based on severity, focusing on mild acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: In Part A, for mild acute pancreatitis, length of stay (111 vs 88.4 h, P = .001), refeeding time (61.8 vs 47.4 h, P = .002), and infections (10.0% vs 1.87%, P < .001) were significantly improved after the pancreatitis service was introduced, with multivariable analysis showing reduced length of stay (odds ratio 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.84; P < .001) and refeeding time (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.77; P < .001). In Part B, for mild acute pancreatitis, refeeding time (44.2 vs 50.3 h, P = .123) and infections (5.58% vs 4.70%, P = .80) were similar in patients cared for without and with the service. Length of stay was higher in the pancreatitis service group (93.3 vs 81.2 h, P = .05), as they saw more gallstone acute pancreatitis patients who had greater length of stay and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. In the post-service period, a majority of patients with moderate/severe acute pancreatitis and nearly all intensive care unit admits received care from the pancreatitis service. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an inpatient pancreatitis service was associated with improved outcomes in mild acute pancreatitis. Guideline-based educational interventions have a beneficial impact on management of mild acute pancreatitis by admitting teams even without pancreatitis consultation.