Prevalence and risk factors of neck pain in spine surgeons - Are we our own patients?

Aim: This survey of spine surgeons aimed to determine the prevalence of neck pain and identify the associated risk factors. The prevalence of neck pain has been reported in various medical sub-specialities including laparoscopy surgeons, dentists, plastic surgeons, ophthalmologist, urologist and orthopaedic surgeons. However, the literature is lacking on prevalence and risk factors for neck pain in spine surgeons. Methods: A survey questionnaire containing demographic, Neck pain and work practice details was administered to 300 spine surgeons (members of an online group) via text message and e-mail. Results: One hundred and eighty surgeons responded to the survey (response rate, 60%). Three spine surgeons had previous cervical spine surgeries. The 1-month prevalence rate of neck pain was 74.4% (134/180 surgeons). One hundred and eighteen surgeons (88%) reported only neck pain, 16 surgeons (11.9%) had neck pain with radicular arm pain. Only 20.5% of surgeons used a loupe, 18% of surgeons used a microscope, and 24% of surgeons used operating table height at umbilicus during surgery. There was no significant difference between the mean age (p = 0.65), work experience (p = 0.8), time spent in surgery (p = 0.7), and operating table height preference (p = 0.4) when symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were compared. However, a significantly greater percentage of surgeons had a sedentary lifestyle (p = 0.002) & used loupes as compared to microscopes (p = 0.04) in the symptomatic group. There was significant correlation between the surgeon's lifestyle & use of loupe and the incidence of neck pain. Conclusion: Spine surgeons have a higher prevalence of neck pain than general populations and surgeons from other specialties. Considering the high prevalence of neck pain, general health, work, and ergonomic guidelines and recommendations must be formulated to help prevent and decrease the burden of neck pain among spine surgeons.

Does Three-Dimensional Printed Patient-Specific Templates Add Benefit in Revision Surgeries for Complex Pediatric Kyphoscoliosis Deformity with Sublaminar Wires in Situ? A Clinical Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific templates (PSTs) for placement of pedicle screws (PAs) in patients undergoing revision surgeries for complex kyphoscoliosis deformity with sublaminar wires in situ. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Revision kyphoscoliosis correction surgery in pediatric patients is a challenging task for the treating surgeon. In patients with sublaminar wires in situ, the native anatomical landmarks are obscured, thus making the freehand screw placement technique a highly specialized task. Hence, the concept of using PSTs for insertion of PAs in such surgeries is always intriguing and attractive. METHODS: Five consecutive patients undergoing revision deformity correction with sublaminar wires in situ were included in this study. Patients were divided in two groups based on the technique of PA insertion. A total of 91 PAs were inserted using either a freehand technique (group A) or 3D printed templates (group B) (34 vs. 57). The placement of PAs was classified according to a postoperative computed tomography scan using Neo's classification. Perforation beyond class 2 (>2 mm) was termed as a misplaced screw. The average time required for the insertion of screws was also noted. RESULTS: Mean age, surgical time, and blood loss were recorded. The change in mean Cobb's angle in both groups was also recorded. The difference in rates of misplaced screws was noted in group A and group B (36.21% vs. 2.56%); however, the mean number of misplaced PAs per patient in group A and group B was statistically insignificant (6.5±3.54 vs. 4.67±1.53, p =0.4641). The mean time required to insert a single PA was also statistically insignificant (120±28.28 vs. 90±30 seconds, p =0.3456). CONCLUSIONS: Although 3D printed PSTs help to avoid the misplacement of PAs in revision deformity correction surgeries with sublaminar wires in situ, the mean number of misplaced screws per patient using this technique was found to be statistically insignificant when compared with the freehand technique in this study.

Management of Metastatic Spine and Hip Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare soft tissue tumor. Primary or metastatic involvement of the spine is unusual in ASPS. In most case, it is refractory to chemotherapy and radiation. Surgical resection is the most effective intervention. We report the case of a 38-year-old female having ASPS along with metastatic spine and hip involvement treated surgically as a single-stage operation, which is the first of its kind approach to our knowledge. We present the case of a 38-year-old female with simultaneous L4 pathological fracture with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis without focal neurology and pathological fracture of neck of femur of left hip, secondary to metastatic ASPS. Since both conditions were contributing equally to her disability and demanded early intervention, they were treated simultaneously with intralesional excision of the tumor and posterior stabilization of the spine and left hip proximal femur resection and replaced it with proximal femur endoprosthesis as a single-stage operation. Postoperatively, she had significant relief of radiculopathy and left hip pain. She was mobilized out of bed on the postoperative day 1 and was discharged from hospital on the postoperative day 6. She was given chemotherapy drug sunitib postoperative. At her last follow-up, 20 months' postoperative, she was asymptomatic and was independent in terms of activities of daily living. Metastatic ASPS of the spine and hip is a rare clinical entity. Simultaneous surgical treatment of the spine and hip pathology is technically demanding. If the conditions demands, as in our case, both of them can be managed safely in a single-stage with good midterm outcome.

Management of Proximal Thoracic Kyphoscoliosis with Early Myelopathy in a Young Adult with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis (NF) 1 is associated with skeletal deformities. Scoliosis is seen in about 10-64% of NF-1 patients. NF-1 may be associated with dystrophic or non-dystrophic type of curve. There are technical difficulties in treating large dystrophic curve with proximal thoracic kyphoscoliosis in NF-1. This case report and subsequent review of literature attempts to provide a line of management for such difficult lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a case of 22-year-old male with NF-1 who came to us with gradually progressive upper back deformity and signs of early myelopathy for 2-3 months. The patient had a 100° proximal thoracic kyphosis and 100° scoliosis with no neurological deficit and brisk reflexes. A single stage posterior fixation with three column osteotomy at the apex of the curve was performed. RESULTS: The kyphosis was corrected to 65° from 100, the scoliosis was corrected to 60° from 100. Clinically, the hump in the upper back was visibly reduced. At 1-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic with no loss of correction and implant breakage on X-ray. CONCLUSION: Large dystrophic proximal thoracic kyphoscoliosis is a difficult lesion to treat and can be managed with an all posterior approach, achieving good cosmetic and neurological outcomes, as demonstrated by this case.

Locally aggressive aneurysmal bone cyst of C4 vertebra treated by total en bloc excision and anterior plus posterior cervical instrumentation.

We are presenting a case of cervical (C4) aneurysmal bone cyst in a 13-year-old girl, came to the outpatient department with neck pain and stiffness since 6 months and normal neurology. We did an en bloc excision of locally aggressive tumor through anterior plus posterior approach and stabilization by lateral mass screw fixation and anterior cervical instrumentation. Involvement of several adjacent cervical vertebrae by an aneurysmal bone cyst is rare, and conventional treatment with curettage and bone grafting is most likely to carry a high rate of recurrence and spinal instability. We recommend complete excision of the tumor and instrumentation in a single stage to avoid instability.