Orthopedic postoperative infection profile and antibiotic sensitivity of 2038 patients across 24 countries - Call for region and institution specific surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Purpose: Improper utilization of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis frequently leads to increased risks of morbidity and mortality.This study aims to understand the common causative organism of postoperative orthopedic infection and document the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol across various institutions in to order to strengthen surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice and provide higher-quality surgical care. Methods: This multicentric multinational retrospective study, includes 24 countries from five different regions (Asia Pacific, South Eastern Africa, Western Africa, Latin America, and Middle East). Patients who developed orthopedic surgical site infection between January 2021 and December 2022 were included. Demographic details, bacterial profile of surgical site infection, and antibiotic sensitivity pattern were documented. Results: 2038 patients from 24 countries were included. Among them 69.7 % were male patients and 64.1 % were between 20 and 60 years. 70.3 % patients underwent trauma surgery and instrumentation was used in 93.5 %. Ceftriaxone was the most common preferred in 53.4 %. Early SSI was seen in 55.2 % and deep SSI in 59.7 %. Western Africa (76 %) and Asia-Pacific (52.8 %) reported a higher number of gram-negative infections whereas gram-positive organisms were predominant in other regions. Most common gram positive organism was Staphylococcus aureus (35 %) and gram-negative was Klebsiella (17.2 %). Majority of the organisms showed variable sensitivity to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Conclusion: Our study strongly proves that every institution has to analyse their surgical site infection microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity of the organisms and plan their surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis accordingly. This will help to decrease the rate of surgical site infection, prevent the emergence of multidrug resistance and reduce the economic burden of treatment.

Squat and smile assessment in predicting healing of lower limb fractures fixed with a SIGN nail.

BACKGROUND: Irrespective of the treatment method, union is the ultimate goal of any fracture treatment. However, nowadays, rather than the physician-based clinico-radiological methods, the patient-reported outcome measurements assessing their quality of life and function are gaining much popularity. This is specifically true in the part of the world where the patient needs almost complete degree of hip/knee flexion - for social, cultural, religious or occupational reason(s). The ability to squat can assess the mobility and stability of joints and thus the quality of squatting is a proxy reflection of the functional outcome after fixation of lower limb fracture. Thus, we studied to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) and Squat and Smile (S & S) test in clinical photograph. We further calculated the sensitivity and specificity of S & S test in predicting healing of lower limb fracture fixed by intramedullary interlocking nail considering RUST as the gold standard. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of solid Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) intramedullary interlocking nailing from a single, university-based, high volume tertiary center where 56 consecutive adults with either tibial or femoral shaft fractures fixed with a SIGN nail within one year and not requiring any surgery till minimum of eighteen-month follow-up were included. Cases without either Anterior-Posterior (AP) view and/or Lateral (Lat.) view follow-up x-ray(s) or proper S & S clinical photograph (at least 1.5-year post fixation) were excluded. The x-rays (RUST criteria) and clinical photograph (S & S grading) were scored by two independent and blinded observers each and repeated after 1 month. RESULTS: The overall intra-observer reliability was from 0.773 to 0.825 and inter-observer reliability from 0.635 to 0.757 for RUST scoring which was from 0.687 to 0.785 and from 0.301 to 0.650 respectively for S & S scoring. The sensitivity and specificity of S & S in predicting fracture healing were up to 82.22% and 63.64% respectively. CONCLUSION: The S & S test is reliable to predict the healing of lower limb fracture fixed with an intramedullary nail. The test is more useful to determine healed fractures than to determine non-healed ones. (sensitivity being higher than specificity).

Functional outcome of patients of tibial fracture treated with solid nail (SIGN nail) versus conventional hollow nail - A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Trauma related disabilities disproportionately affects low and middle income countries due to lack of resources, skills and optimal implants. Despite adequate animal studies, biomechanical studies, cohort studies and comparison studies we are not aware of any randomized trial to compare the functional outcome of SIGN (Surgical Implant Generation Network, US) solid nailing with a hollow nailing for tibial shaft fracture. METHODS: Sixty patients (≥16 years) of closed and Gustilo grade I traumatic fractures of the leg were randomized into SIGN solid nailing or hollow nailing group. Cases with compromised soft tissue and grossly deformed medullary canal were excluded. Functional outcome and need for resurgery were the primary outcomes while the secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, overall pain (VAS), radiological union (RUST), surgery related complications (infection, malalignment, shortening, nonunion) and pain/range of motion (ROM) of knee/ankle. All SIGN surgery related data were entered and retrieved online from www.signsurgery.org. RESULT: The demographical parameters were symmetrically distributed between the groups (p > 0.05). 2 cases in SIGN nailing and 4 cases in hollow nailing needed open reduction. The functional outcome, as assessed by blinded physiotherapist using Johner and Wruh criteria, was excellent in 18 (62.06%), good in 6 (20.68%), fair in 3 (10.34%) and poor in 2 (6.89%) for SIGN nail whereas it was 16 (57.14%), 8 (28.57%), 3 (10.71%) and 1 (3.57%) respectively for hollow nail. There was 1 case of implant failure and 1 case of infection. Intraoperative blood loss (397 ± 94.47 ml versus 350 ± 75.43 ml, p = 0.037) and duration of surgery (94.8 ± 14.57 min versus 82.0 ± 12.36 min, p = 0.001) were significantly more in hollow nailing group. At final follow up, overall pain on weight bearing (VAS score) and radiological union (RUST score) were 2.1 and 11.7 for SIGN nailing while they were 2.7 and 11.3 respectively for hollow nailing.(p = 0.41 and 0.45 respectively) The malrotation (p = 1.000), shortening (p = 1.000), varus-valgus angulation (p = 0.511), AP angulation (p = 0.706), ROM ankle (p = 0.239) and ROM knee (p = 0.086) were similar. CONCLUSION: Solid SIGN nailing gives comparable functional outcome as conventional hollow nailing for tibia shaft fracture. For developing world with limited resources, SIGN nail is useful which is supplied freely and is designed to be used without image intensifier and fracture table.