RESUMO
The best nonoperative or operative anal fissure (AF) treatment is not yet established, and several options have been proposed. Aim is to report the surgeons' practice for the AF treatment. Thirty-four multiple-choice questions were developed. Seven questions were about to participants' demographics and, 27 questions about their clinical practice. Based on the specialty (general surgeon and colorectal surgeon), obtained data were divided and compared between two groups. Five-hundred surgeons were included (321 general and 179 colorectal surgeons). For both groups, duration of symptoms for at least 6 weeks is the most important factor for AF diagnosis (30.6%). Type of AF (acute vs chronic) is the most important factor which guide the therapeutic plan (44.4%). The first treatment of choice for acute AF is ointment application for both groups (59.6%). For the treatment of chronic AF, this data is confirmed by colorectal surgeons (57%), but not by the general surgeons who prefer the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) (31.8%) (p = 0.0001). Botulin toxin injection is most performed by colorectal surgeons (58.7%) in comparison to general surgeons (20.9%) (p = 0.0001). Anal flap is mostly performed by colorectal surgeons (37.4%) in comparison to general surgeons (28.3%) (p = 0.0001). Fissurectomy alone is statistically significantly most performed by general surgeons in comparison to colorectal surgeons (57.9% and 43.6%, respectively) (p = 0.0020). This analysis provides useful information about the clinical practice for the management of a debated topic such as AF treatment. Shared guidelines and consensus especially focused on operative management are required to standardize the treatment and to improve postoperative results.
Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Neoplasias Colorretais , Fissura Anal , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Fissura Anal/cirurgia , Fissura Anal/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Depression and coronary artery disease are leading causes of mortality in adults in high-income countries. Due to the paucity of data on the young, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and associated major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in young adults hospitalized with comorbid depression a decade apart. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database for the years 2007 and 2017. Young adults (18-44 years) hospitalized with comorbid depression were identified using ICD-9 CM/ICD-10 codes. Frequency and trends in demographics, comorbidities including CVD risk factors, and MACCE have been compared between the 2017 vs 2007 cohorts. A total of 1,274,118 admissions with a median age of 34 years and 68.7% of females were recorded with comorbid depression. When the 2007 cohort was compared with the 2017 cohort, a rising trend in depression was observed (5.5% vs 8.2%, P < 0.001). The 2017 cohort of young adults with depression more often consisted of male, non-white patients. The burden of CVD risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes with chronic complications, smoking, and obesity was also greater in the 2017 cohort. Although the all-cause mortality remained comparable (0.3%) in both cohorts, there was a significantly higher rate and risk of MACCE including acute myocardial infarction (aOR 1.18, 95%CI:1.10-1.26), atrial fibrillation or flutter (aOR 1.47, 95%CI:1.40-1.54) and stroke (aOR 1.33, 95%CI: 1.26-1.40) (P < 0.001) in the 2017 cohort. In conclusion, this nationwide study reveals an alarmingly increased prevalence of CVD risk factors and an increase in the rate and risk of MACCE in 2 cohorts of young adults with comorbid depression studied a decade apart. The burden of mental disorders in young adults has been rising in the last decade and warrants extra vigilance by clinicians to recognize and manage depression to curtail CVD risk and improve MACE-associated outcomes.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Depressão/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the neurodegenerative illnesses that impair individual life & increase the demand for caregivers with no available curative medication right now. Therefore, there is a growing concern about employing herbal medicine to limit AD progression & improve patients' life quality, thus potentiating its add-on therapy. In addition, herbs are cost-effective & accessible with nearly no side effects. In the same vein, our study aimed to investigate the potency of Echinacea purpurea (EP) flower extracts to ameliorate the neurodegenerative effect of Aluminum chloride (AlCl3) in a rat model. Moreover, mechanistic studies, including impact on the cholinesterase activity, redox status, inflammatory mediators, behavior performance, glucose level & histopathology, were carried on. Our results showed that 250 mg/kg of Aqueous (AQ) & Alcoholic (AL) extracts of EP inhibited cholinesterase, restored oxidative balance, down-regulated IL-6 & TNF-α cytokines & improved behavior performance in vivo that was reflected in the brain picture by decreasing neuronal degeneration & amyloid plaques in cerebral cortex & hippocampus. The potency of both extracts was compared to reference drugs & AlCl3 positive control group. The AQ extract showed greater potency against COX-1, COX-2 & α-amylase in vitro, while the AL extract was more potent against cholinesterase in vitro, inflammatory cytokines, behavior & pathological improvement in vivo. Conclusively EP overcame AlCl3-induced neurobehavioral toxicity in the rat model via different pathways, which support its regular administration to postpone progressive neural damage in AD patients.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Echinacea , Animais , Ratos , Cloreto de Alumínio , Doença de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Colinesterases , Citocinas/metabolismo , Echinacea/metabolismo , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologiaRESUMO
AIM: The choice of whether to perform protective ileostomy (PI) after anterior resection (AR) is mainly guided by risk factors (RFs) responsible for the development of anastomotic leakage (AL). However, clear guidelines about PI creation are still lacking in the literature and this is often decided according to the surgeon's preferences, experiences or feelings. This qualitative study aims to investigate, by an open-ended question survey, the individual surgeon's decision-making process regarding PI creation after elective AR. METHOD: Fifty four colorectal surgeons took part in an electronic survey to answer the questions and describe what usually led their decision to perform PI. A content analysis was used to code the answers. To classify answers, five dichotomous categories (In favour/Against PI, Listed/Unlisted RFs, Typical/Atypical, Emotions/Non-emotions, Personal experience/No personal experience) have been developed. RESULTS: Overall, 76% of surgeons were in favour of PI creation and 88% considered listed RFs in the question of whether to perform PI. Atypical answers were reported in 10% of cases. Emotions and personal experience influenced surgeons' decision-making process in 22% and 49% of cases, respectively. The most frequently considered RFs were the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (96%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (88%), a positive intraoperative leak test (65%), blood loss (37%) and immunosuppression therapy (35%). CONCLUSION: The indications to perform PI following rectal cancer surgery lack standardization and evidence-based guidelines are required to inform practice. Until then, expert opinion can be helpful to assist the decision-making process in patients who have undergone AR for adenocarcinoma.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais , Reto , Humanos , Reto/cirurgia , Reto/patologia , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer management may require an ostomy formation; however, a stoma may negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to compare generic and stoma-specific HRQoL in patients with a permanent colostomy after rectal cancer across different countries. METHOD: A cross-sectional cohorts of patients with a colostomy after rectal cancer in Denmark, Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands, China, Portugal, Australia, Lithuania, Egypt, and Israel were invited to complete questionnaires regarding demographic and socioeconomic factors along with the Colostomy Impact (CI) score, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and five anchor questions assessing colostomy impact on HRQoL. The background characteristics of the cohorts from each country were compared and generic HRQoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 presented for the total cohort. Results were compared with normative data of reference European populations. The predictors of reduced HRQoL were investigated by multivariable logistic regression, including demographic and socioeconomic factors and stoma-related problems. RESULTS: A total of 2557 patients were included. Response rates varied between 51-93 per cent. Mean time from stoma creation was 2.5-6.2 (range 1.1-39.2) years. A total of 25.8 per cent of patients reported that their colostomy impairs their HRQoL 'some'/'a lot'. This group had significantly unfavourable scores across all EORTC subscales compared with patients reporting 'no'/'a little' impaired HRQoL. Generic HRQoL differed significantly between countries, but resembled the HRQoL of reference populations. Multivariable logistic regression showed that stoma dysfunction, including high CI score (OR 3.32), financial burden from the stoma (OR 1.98), unemployment (OR 2.74), being single/widowed (OR 1.35) and young age (OR 1.01 per year) predicted reduced stoma-related HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Overall HRQoL is preserved in patients with a colostomy after rectal cancer, but a quarter of the patients interviewed reported impaired HRQoL. Differences among several countries were reported and socioeconomic factors correlated with reduced quality of life.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Colostomia/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Complex ventral hernias (VHs) represent a real challenge to both general and plastic surgeons. This study aims to compare Sublay Mesh-Only Repair to Posterior Component Separation "PCS" with Transversus Abdominis Release "TAR" in the treatment of complex ventral-wall hernias (VHs). METHODS: This a randomized, controlled, intervention, including two parallel groups: A; Sublay Mesh-Only Repair and Group B; "TAR". Consecutive patients of both genders aged between 18 and 65 years old with complex VHs presented at Mansoura University Hospitals including large-sized abdominal-wall hernia ≥ 10 cm in width, loss of domain ≥ 20%, multiple hernial defects, or recurrent hernias. Immuno-compromised patients, patients with liver impairment, or severe heart failure were considered an exclusion criterion. The primary outcome is the recurrence rate after 12-months following the procedure. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were recruited in this study. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding recurrence. However, there was significant differences between both groups regarding seroma favoring mesh-only repair. CONCLUSIONS: Although TAR may be associated with longer operative times and more blood losses, these were not found to be statistically significant. Postoperative complication, except for seroma, and recurrence rates were comparable in both groups. Trail registration The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04516031".
Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral , Músculos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seroma , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard treatment for rectal cancer. Although TME has managed to decrease the rates of local recurrence after rectal cancer resection, local recurrence is still recorded at varying rates. The present study aimed to validate the PREDICT score in the prediction of local recurrence of rectal cancer after TME with curative intent. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study on patients with nonmetastatic low or middle rectal cancer who underwent TME. The total PREDICT score was calculated for every patient and related to the onset of local recurrence. According to the final score, patients were allocated to one of three risk groups: low, moderate, and high, and the rates of local recurrence in each group were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The present study included 262 patients (50.4% males) with a mean age of 47.1 years. The overall local recurrence rate was 12.6%. 29.4% of patients were in the low-risk group, 63.7% in the moderate-risk group, and 6.9% in the high-risk group. The local recurrence rate was 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-10.9) in the low-risk group, 13.2% (95% CI: 8.4-19.3) in the moderate risk group, and 44.4% (95% CI: 21.5-69.2) in the high-risk group (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of the PREDICT score was 72.7%, the specificity was 88.1%, and the accuracy was 86.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The PREDICT score had good diagnostic accuracy in the prediction of local recurrence after TME and a good discriminatory ability in the differentiation between patients at different risks to develop local recurrence.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Retais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Reto/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective modality for the control of immediate postoperative pain. The present randomized trial aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (USTAP) and laparoscopic subcostal TAP (LSTAP) block as compared to standard care without TAP block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial on patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were equally randomized to one of three groups: USTAP, LSTAP, and control group (no TAP block). The main outcome measures were pain scores and analgesic consumption within the first 24 h postoperatively, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to ambulation, time to first flatus, and adverse effects of TAP block. RESULTS: The trial included 110 patients (90% females) with a mean age of 40.9 ± 11.7 years. Both USTAP and LSTAP block groups were associated with significantly lower pain scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, lower cumulative dose of paracetamol, less PONV, and shorter time to flatus than the control group. USTAP and LSTAP block were associated with similar pain scores at all time points, similar analgesic requirements, a similar incidence of PONV, and comparable time to first ambulation and time to first flatus. No adverse effects related to TAP block were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: TAP block is a safe and effective method for pain control and improving recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both USTAP and LSTAP blocks were equally effective in terms of pain relief, analgesic requirements, PONV, return of bowel function, and time to ambulation.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Laparoscopia , Músculos Abdominais , Adulto , Analgésicos , Analgésicos Opioides , Anestésicos Locais , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Flatulência/complicações , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/etiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-operative management (NOM) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA) has been introduced as an alternative to appendectomy. This umbrella review aimed to provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of NOM of uncomplicated AA in the published systematic reviews. METHODS: This umbrella review has been reported in line with the PRISMA guidelines and umbrella review approach. Systematic reviews with and without meta-analyses on the efficacy of NOM of AA were analyzed. The quality of the reviews was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool. The main outcomes measures were the treatment failure and complication rates of NOM and hospital stay as compared to appendectomy. RESULTS: Eighteen systematic reviews were included to this umbrella review. Eight reviews documented higher odds of failure with NOM, whereas two reviews revealed similar odds of failure. Six reviews reported lower odds of complications with NOM, six reported similar odds, and one reported lower odds of complications with surgery. Eight reviews reported similar hospital stay between NOM and appendectomy, one reported longer stay with NOM and another reported shorter stay with NOM. Pooled analyses showed that NOM was associated with higher treatment failure overall, in children-only, adults only, and RCTs-only meta-analyses. NOM was associated with lower complications overall, yet children-only and RCTs-only analyses revealed similar complications to surgery. NOM was associated with shorter stay in the overall and adult-only analysis, but not in the children-only analysis. CONCLUSIONS: NOM of AA is associated with higher treatment failure, marginally lower rate of complications and shorter stay than appendectomy.
Assuntos
Apendicectomia , Apendicite , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Purpose. The primary aim of the study was to review the existing literature about patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in colorectal cancer and IBD. The secondary aim was to present a road map to develop a core outcome set via opinion gathering using social media. Method. This study is the first step of a three-step project aimed at constructing simple, applicable PROMs in colorectal surgery. This article was written in a collaborative manner with authors invited both through Twitter via the #OpenSourceResearch hashtag. The 5 most used PROMs were presented and discussed as slides/images on Twitter. Inputs from a wide spectrum of participants including researchers, surgeons, physicians, nurses, patients, and patients' organizations were collected and analyzed. The final draft was emailed to all contributors and 6 patients' representatives for proofreading and approval. Results. Five PROM sets were identified and discussed: EORTC QLQ-CR29, IBDQ short health questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, ED-Q5-5L, and Short Form-36. There were 315 tweets posted by 50 tweeters with 1458 retweets. Awareness about PROMs was generally limited. The general psycho-physical well-being score (GPP) was suggested and discussed, and then a survey was conducted in which more than 2/3 of voters agreed that GPP covers the most important aspects in PROMs. Conclusion. Despite the limitations of this exploratory study, it offered a new method to conduct clinical research with opportunity to engage patients. The general psycho-physical well-being score suggested as simple, applicable PROMs to be eventually combined procedure-specific, disease-specific, or symptom-specific PROMs if needed.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Humanos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Abstract Introduction: There are scarce data comparing different mechanical valves in the aortic position. The objective of this study was to compare the early hemodynamic changes after aortic valve replacement between ATS, Bicarbon, and On-X mechanical valves. Methods: We included 99 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves between 2017 and 2019. Three types of mechanical valves were used, On-X valve (n=45), ATS AP360 (n=32), and Bicarbon (n=22). The mean prosthetic valve gradient was measured postoperatively and after six months. Results: Preoperative data were comparable between groups, and there were no differences in preoperative echocardiographic data. Pre-discharge echocardiography showed no difference between groups in the ejection fraction (P=0.748), end-systolic (P=0.764) and end-diastolic (P=0.723) diameters, left ventricular mass index (P=0.348), aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient (P=0.454), and indexed aortic prosthetic orifice area (P=0.576). There was no difference in the postoperative aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient between groups when stratified by valve size. The changes in the aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient of the intraoperative period, at pre-discharge, and at six months were comparable between the three prostheses (P=0.08). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that female gender (beta coefficient -0.242, P=0.027), body surface area (beta coefficient 0.334, P<0.001), and aortic prosthetic size (beta coefficient -0.547, P<0.001), but not the prosthesis type, were independent predictors of postoperative aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient. Conclusion: The three bileaflet mechanical aortic prostheses (On-X, Bicarbon, and ATS) provide satisfactory early hemodynamics, which are comparable between the three valve types and among different valve sizes.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Desenho de Prótese , Ecocardiografia , Ecocardiografia Doppler , HemodinâmicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Parks classification has been used for the classification of anal fistula for several years, but it does not allow for risk factors for failure after surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe a modification of the Parks classification of anal fistula and examine its predictive validity in the assessment of the outcome of anal fistula in terms of failure of healing and fecal incontinence. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of a prospective database. SETTING: This study was conducted in the Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients with anal fistula who underwent surgery were included. INTERVENTIONS: Five risk factors for failure after fistula surgery were identified from the literature and were examined by multivariate analysis of our patients. Four risk factors proved to be significant independent predictors of failure: secondary extensions, horseshoe fistula, previous fistula surgery, and anterior anal fistula in women. We modified the Parks classification by dividing the transsphincteric type into high and low and by grouping supra- and extrasphincteric anal fistulas into 1 group. The first 3 stages were subdivided according to the absence or presence of predictors of failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the validity of the modified Parks classification with regard to the rates of failure and fecal incontinence after surgical treatment of each stage of anal fistula. RESULTS: A total of 665 patients with cryptoglandular anal fistula were included. Failure rates increased from 2.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-4.7%), to 17.4% (95% CI, 10.8%-25.9%), 19.5% (95% CI, 15%-24.6%), and 30.7% (95% CI, 9.1%-61.4%) across the 4 stages. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94) indicating the strong discriminative ability of the final multivariable predictive model. The increase in failure and incontinence rates across the fistula stages was significant. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective, single-center study. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of predictors of poor outcome into the modified classification helped differentiate simple and complex fistulas within each stage and between the different stages, which can help in assessment and decision making for anal fistula. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B441. MODIFICACIN DE LA CLASIFICACIN DE PARKS DE LA FSTULA ANAL CRIPTOGLANDULAR: ANTECEDENTES:La clasificación de Parks se ha utilizado para la clasificación de la fístula anal durante varios años, sin embargo, no tuvo en cuenta los factores de riesgo de fracaso después de la cirugía.OBJETIVO:Describir una modificación de la clasificación de Parks de fístula anal y examinar su validez predictiva en la evaluación de los resultados de la fístula anal en términos de fracaso de la cicatrización e incontinencia fecal.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva de la base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Unidad de Cirugía Colorrectal, Hospital Universitario de Mansoura.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos con fístula anal intervenidos quirúgicamente.INTERVENCIONES:Se identificaron cinco factores de riesgo de fracaso después de la cirugía de fístula de la literatura y se examinaron mediante análisis multivariante de nuestros pacientes. Cuatro factores de riesgo demostraron ser importantes predictores independientes de fracaso: extensiones secundarias, fístula en herradura, cirugía de fístula previa y fístula anal anterior en mujeres. Modificamos la clasificación de Parks dividiendo el tipo transesfinteriano en alto y bajo y agrupando la fístula anal supraesfinteriana y extraesfinteriana en un grupo. Las tres primeras etapas se subdividieron según la ausencia o presencia de predictores de fracaso.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Validez de la clasificación de Parks modificada con respecto a las tasas de fracaso e incontinencia fecal después del tratamiento quirúrgico de cada etapa de la fístula anal.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 665 pacientes con fístula anal criptoglandular. Las tasas de fracaso aumentaron del 2,3% (IC del 95%: 0,9-4,7%), al 17,4% (IC del 95%: 10,8 al 25,9%), 19,5% (IC del 95%: 15-24,6%) y 30,7% (95% IC: 9,1- 61,4%) en las cuatro etapas. El área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor fue 0,90 (IC del 95%: 0,85-0,94), lo que indica una fuerte capacidad discriminativa del modelo predictivo multivariable final. El aumento en las tasas de fracaso e incontinencia en las etapas de la fístula fue significativo.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo, unicéntrico.CONCLUSIÓN:La inclusión de predictores de mal resultado en la clasificación modificada ayudó a diferenciar las fístulas simples y complejas dentro de cada etapa y entre las diferentes etapas, lo que puede ayudar en la evaluación y toma de decisiones para la fístula anal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B441.
Assuntos
Incontinência Fecal/epidemiologia , Glândulas Perianais/patologia , Fístula Retal/classificação , Fístula Retal/cirurgia , Adulto , Animais , Gerenciamento de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard treatment of mid- and low-lying rectal cancer. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection has been suggested as an approach to decrease recurrence and improve survival. Our meta-analysis presented here aimed to review the current outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection and total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. METHODS: A systematic literature search querying electronic databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed articles that reported the outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection combined with total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. The main outcome measures were local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall and disease free-survival, and complications. RESULTS: This systematic review included 29 studies of 10,646 patients. Of those patients, 39.4% underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The median operation time for the lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was significantly longer than total mesorectal excision alone (360 minutes versus 294.7 minutes, P = .02). Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was associated with higher odds of overall complications (odds ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.87, P < .001) and urinary dysfunction (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-3.67, P = .008) than total mesorectal excision alone. Both groups had similar rates of male sexual dysfunction (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-2.79, P = .08), anastomotic leakage (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.93, P = .59), local recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.25, P = .79), distant metastasis (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.2, P = .72), overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.056, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.13, P = .13), and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.07, P = .37). CONCLUSION: Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was not associated with a significant reduction of recurrence rates or improvement in survival as compared with total mesorectal excision alone; however, LPLND was associated with longer operation time and increased complication rate.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There are scarce data comparing different mechanical valves in the aortic position. The objective of this study was to compare the early hemodynamic changes after aortic valve replacement between ATS, Bicarbon, and On-X mechanical valves. METHODS: We included 99 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves between 2017 and 2019. Three types of mechanical valves were used, On-X valve (n=45), ATS AP360 (n=32), and Bicarbon (n=22). The mean prosthetic valve gradient was measured postoperatively and after six months. RESULTS: Preoperative data were comparable between groups, and there were no differences in preoperative echocardiographic data. Pre-discharge echocardiography showed no difference between groups in the ejection fraction (P=0.748), end-systolic (P=0.764) and end-diastolic (P=0.723) diameters, left ventricular mass index (P=0.348), aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient (P=0.454), and indexed aortic prosthetic orifice area (P=0.576). There was no difference in the postoperative aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient between groups when stratified by valve size. The changes in the aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient of the intraoperative period, at pre-discharge, and at six months were comparable between the three prostheses (P=0.08). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that female gender (beta coefficient -0.242, P=0.027), body surface area (beta coefficient 0.334, P<0.001), and aortic prosthetic size (beta coefficient -0.547, P<0.001), but not the prosthesis type, were independent predictors of postoperative aortic prosthetic mean pressure gradient. CONCLUSION: The three bileaflet mechanical aortic prostheses (On-X, Bicarbon, and ATS) provide satisfactory early hemodynamics, which are comparable between the three valve types and among different valve sizes.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Ecocardiografia , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Desenho de PróteseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early-onset colon and rectal cancer has increased in alarming rates. The present study reviewed the characteristics and outcome of early-onset rectal cancer in patients aged ≤40 years. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on rectal cancer patients who were treated in a tertiary center in the Middle East. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients ≤40 years were compared with patients >40 years. Main outcome measures were patients' and tumor characteristics, local recurrence, distance metastasis, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Among 244 patients with rectal cancer, 81 (33.2%) aged 40 years or less. 56.8% of patients ≤40 years and 49.7% of patients >40 years presented with stage III/IV disease (p = 0.36). Local recurrence and distant metastasis were detected in 10.3% and 13.2% of patients ≤40 years and in 16.9% and 13.9% of patients >40 years (p = 0.29 and 0.88). The 3-year OS and DFS rates of patients ≤40 years were 75% and 80.9% versus 74.2% and 76.5% in patients >40 years (p = 0.9 and 0.59). Patients ≤40 years presented with ulcerative carcinoma (38.3% vs 21.5%, p = 0.01) and signet-ring carcinoma (12.3% vs 2.5%, p = 0.008) more than patients > 40 years. CONCLUSION: Early-onset rectal cancer accounted for one-third of all patients presenting with rectal cancer. Patients younger than 40 years had higher incidence of mucinous and signet-ring rectal carcinoma, and presented more with advanced stage. The age of patients did not have a significant impact on the oncologic outcome of rectal cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Retais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Proctology is one of the surgical specialties that suffered the most during COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from a cross-sectional worldwide web survey, we aimed to snapshot the current status of proctologic practice in Italy with differences between three macro areas (North, Centre, South). Specialists affiliated to renowned scientific societies with an interest in coloproctology were invited to join a 27-item survey. Predictive power of respondents' and hospitals' demographics on the change of status of surgical activities was calculated. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04392245). Of 299 respondents from Italy, 94 (40%) practiced in the North, 60 (25%) in the Centrer and 82 (35%) in the South and Islands. The majority were men (79%), at consultant level (70%), with a mean age of 46.5 years, practicing in academic hospitals (39%), where a dedicated proctologist was readily available (68%). Southern respondents were more at risk of infection compared to those from the Center (OR, 3.30; 95%CI 1.46; 7.47, P = 0.004), as were males (OR, 2.64; 95%CI 1.09; 6.37, P = 0.031) and those who routinely tested patients prior to surgery (OR, 3.02; 95%CI 1.39; 6.53, P = 0.005). The likelihood of ongoing surgical practice was higher in the South (OR 1.36, 95%CI 0.75; 2.46, P = 0.304) and in centers that were not fully dedicated to COVID-19 care (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.88; 8.50, P < 0.001). The results of this survey highlight important factors contributing to the deadlock of proctologic practice in Italy and may inform the development of future management strategies.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cirurgia Colorretal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Administração Hospitalar , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PandemiasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is a common painful anal condition. Medical treatment of CAF involves the use of agents that induce chemical sphincterotomy. The present trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical minoxidil and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) preparations in treatment of CAF. METHODS: Adult patients with CAF were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups; group I received topical 5% minoxidil gel and group II received topical 0.2% GTN cream. The main outcome measures were healing of anal fissure, duration to healing, relief of symptoms, and adverse effects. RESULTS: 62 patients (36 female and 26 male) were included to the study. Group I comprised 30 patients and group II comprised 32 patients. Healing of anal fissure was achieved in 23 (76.7%) patients in group I and 15 (46.9%) patients in group II (p = 0.03). The average duration to healing in group I was significantly shorter than group II (4.1 ± 1.9 vs 5.3 ± 2.7 weeks, p = 0.048). Adverse effects were recorded in 2 (6.6%) patients in group I and 13 (40.6%) patients in group II. The post-treatment pain score in the GTN group was significantly lower than the Minoxidil group. CONCLUSION: Topical 5% minoxidil gel achieved greater and quicker healing of CAF and fewer adverse effects than topical 0.2% GTN cream. Post-treatment pain scores after GTN were significantly lower than minoxidil. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03528772.
Assuntos
Fissura Anal/tratamento farmacológico , Minoxidil/administração & dosagem , Nitroglicerina/administração & dosagem , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pomadas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
This study explored the camel milk (CM) efficacy to ameliorate the fenpropathrin (FNP) induced neurotoxic impacts in rats. Six groups were orally administered physiological saline, corn oil, CM (2ml/rat/day), FNP (15 mg/kg bw daily for 60 days), CM/FNP (protective) or FNP + CM (therapeutic). Sensorimotor functions, memory, exploratory, and locomotor activities were assessed. The levels of dopamine (DOPA) neurotransmitter, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme, oxidative stress, and inflammatory markers were determined. Brain histopathology and apoptotic markers immunohistochemical detection were performed. The results revealed that FNP exposure resulted in deficit sensorimotor functions, impaired memory, and less exploration. DOPA and AChE Levels were significantly reduced. FNP exposure increased nitric oxide, malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase, Caspase-3, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels but interleukin 10, total antioxidant capacity, and Bcl-2 levels were declined. Also, FNP exposure induced obvious encephalopathy. Additionally, neurodegenerative changes were seen in the hippocampi of FNP-treated rats. FNP Exposure induced a significant decrease of Bcl-2 immunolabelling but Caspase-3 immunoexpression was increased in cerebral cortices and hippocampus tissues. CM significantly counteracted the FNP injurious impacts, especially when used as a prophylactic routine than a therapeutic one. Conclusively, these findings confirmed that CM could be a biologically effective protective agent against FNP induced neurobehavioral aberrations and neurotoxic impacts.
Assuntos
Apoptose , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Leite , Estresse Oxidativo , Piretrinas/toxicidade , Animais , Comportamento Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Encéfalo/patologia , Camelus , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Inflamação/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Memória/efeitos dos fármacos , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Piretrinas/administração & dosagem , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-DawleyRESUMO
Background: Morbid obesity is associated with variable degrees of pulmonary dysfunction that may predispose to postoperative complications. This study aimed to identify high risk patients to have pulmonary dysfunction before bariatric surgery in terms of age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) and the impact of pulmonary dysfunction on postoperative pulmonary complications. Methods: Prospective database of patients with morbid obesity who underwent bariatric surgery was reviewed. Data on patients' demographics, parameters of pulmonary function tests, and postoperative pulmonary complications were collected. The correlation between patients' age, sex and BMI, and pulmonary function was investigated using Pearson's correlation coefficient test. Results: Ninety-seven patients (82 female) with morbid obesity were included in the study. Twenty-eight (28.9%) patients had pulmonary dysfunction. Patients >40 years had higher odds of pulmonary dysfunction than patients ≤40 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54, P = .05). Male patients had significantly higher odds of pulmonary dysfunction than female patients (OR: 2.5, P = .03). Patients with BMI >50 had significantly higher odds of pulmonary dysfunction than patients with BMI <50 (OR: 4.9, P = .002). Patients with pulmonary dysfunction had significantly higher odds of developing pulmonary complications than patients with normal spirometry (OR: 9.13, P = .009). Conclusion: Around 30% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery had pulmonary dysfunction. Pulmonary dysfunction in preoperative spirometry was able to predict postoperative pulmonary complications. Men, patients older than 40 years, and superobese individuals had higher odds of having pulmonary dysfunction and are at higher risk to develop pulmonary complications after bariatric surgery.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Testes de Função Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Complex anal fistula is one of the challenging anorectal conditions. Several treatments have been proposed for complex anal fistula, yet none proved to be ideal. OBJECTIVE: This randomized trial aimed to assess the efficacy of external anal sphincter-sparing seton in comparison with the conventional drainage seton in the treatment of complex anal fistula. DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the Colorectal Surgery Unit of Mansoura University Hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients of both sexes with complex anal fistula were recruited and evaluated with MRI before surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups; group 1 was treated with conventional drainage seton and group 2 was treated with external anal sphincter-sparing seton using a rerouting technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The duration of healing, incidence of recurrence or persistence, postoperative pain, and complications including fecal incontinence were measured. RESULTS: Sixty patients (56 men) with a mean age of 43 years were included. Mean operation time in group 1 was significantly shorter than group 2 (29.8 ± 4.3 vs 43.8 ± 4.5 min; p < 0.0001). The mean pain score at 24 hours in group 1 was 8.1 ± 1.6 versus 5.3 ± 1.3 in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Five patients (17%) in group 1 experienced complications versus 2 (7%) in group 2. All of the patients in group 1 required a second-stage fistulotomy versus 2 patients (7%) in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Time to complete healing in group 1 was significantly (p < 0.0001) longer than group 2 (103 ± 47 vs 46 ± 18 d). Four patients (13%) in group 1 and 1 patient (3%) in group 2 experienced persistence or recurrence of anal fistula (p = 0.35). LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study with relatively small numbers in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with external anal sphincter-sparing seton after rerouting of the fistula tract achieved quicker healing and less postoperative pain than those with conventional drainage seton. Postoperative complication and recurrence rates were comparable in both groups. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A963. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03636997 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03636997).