Clonal landscape and clinical outcomes of telomere biology disorders: somatic rescuing and cancer mutations.

Telomere biology disorders (TBD), caused by pathogenic germline variants in telomere-related genes, present with multi-organ disease and a predisposition to cancer. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) as a marker of cancer development and survival in TBD is poorly understood. Here, we characterized the clonal landscape of a large cohort of 207 TBD patients with a broad range of age and phenotype. CH occurred predominantly in symptomatic patients and in signature genes typically associated with cancers: PPM1D, POT1, TERT promoter (TERTp), U2AF1S34, and/or TP53. Chromosome 1q gain (Chr1q+) was the commonest karyotypic abnormality. Clinically, multiorgan involvement and CH in TERTp, TP53, and splicing factor genes associated with poorer overall survival. Chr1q+, and splicing factor or TP53 mutations significantly increased the risk of hematologic malignancies, regardless of the clonal burden. Chr1q+ and U2AF1S34 mutated clones were pre-malignant events associated with the secondary acquisition of mutations in genes related to hematologic malignancies. Like known effects of Chr1q+ and TP53-CH, functional studies demonstrated that U2AF1S34 mutations primarily compensated for aberrant upregulation of TP53 and interferon pathways in telomere-dysfunctional hematopoietic stem cells, highlighting the TP53 pathway as a canonical route of malignancy in TBD. In contrast, somatic POT1/PPM1D/TERTp-CH had distinct trajectories unrelated to cancer development. With implications beyond TBD, our data show that telomere dysfunction is a strong selective pressure for CH. In TBD, CH is a poor prognostic marker associated with worse overall survival. The identification of key regulatory pathways that drive clonal transformation in TBD allows the identification of patients at a higher risk of cancer development.

Eltrombopag for patients with moderate aplastic anemia or uni-lineage cytopenias.

There is no standard or widely effective treatment of patients with moderate aplastic anemia (MAA) or hypo-productive uni-lineage cytopenias (UC). Eltrombopag (EPAG), a small molecule thrombopoietin mimetic, has previously been shown to result in durable multi-lineage hematologic responses with low toxicity in patients with refractory severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Its safety and efficacy in MAA are unknown. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled previously untreated and treated MAA and UC patients with clinically relevant cytopenias. EPAG was administered at doses escalating from 50 to 300 mg/d. Hematologic responses were assessed at 16 to 20 weeks. Responding patients were continued on EPAG until reaching defined robust or stable blood counts. EPAG was reinstituted for relapse. Thirty-four patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2017, including 31 with MAA and 3 with UC. Seventeen patients responded in at least 1 eligible lineage by the primary end point. A striking improvement in anemia was observed in a patient with Diamond-Blackfan anemia. EPAG was well tolerated, and it was discontinued for robust or stable blood counts in 12 of 17 patients after a median of 8 months. A majority required re-initiation of EPAG for declining counts, and all regained response. Two of 34 patients developed non-chromosome 7 bone marrow cytogenetic abnormalities while taking EPAG, without dysplasia or increased blasts. Somatic mutation allele frequencies in cancer genes did not increase overall on EPAG. EPAG is a well-tolerated oral treatment of cytopenias in patients with MAA/UC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01328587.

Treatment optimization and genomic outcomes in refractory severe aplastic anemia treated with eltrombopag.

Eltrombopag (EPAG) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of refractory severe aplastic anemia (rSAA) based on treatment of 43 patients with doses escalating from 50 to 150 mg daily for 12 weeks. Response kinetics suggested that more prolonged administration of EPAG at a dose of 150 mg could speed and improve response rates. We enrolled 40 patients with rSAA in a study of EPAG 150 mg daily, with a primary end point of response at 24 weeks. Twenty (50%) of 40 patients responded at 24 weeks; 5 (25%) of 20 would have been deemed nonresponders at 12 weeks, the end point of the previous study. Fifteen of the 19 responding patients continuing on EPAG had drug discontinued for robust response; 5 of the 15 required EPAG re-initiation for relapse, with all recovering response. To analyze risk of clonal progression, we combined long-term data from the 83 patients with rSAA enrolled in both studies. Evolution to an abnormal karyotype occurred in 16 (19%), most within 6 months of EPAG initiation. Targeted deep sequencing/whole-exome sequencing was performed pre-EPAG and at primary response end point and/or time of clonal evolution or longest follow-up. Cytogenetic evolution did not correlate with mutational status, and overall mutated allele fractions of myeloid cancer genes did not increase on EPAG. In summary, extended administration of EPAG at a dose of 150 mg for 24 weeks rescued responses in some patients with rSAA not responding at 12 weeks. The temporal relationship between clonal evolution and drug exposure suggests that EPAG may promote expansion of dormant preexisting clones with an aberrant karyotype. The studies were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00922883 and #NCT01891994.