Weighted correlation network analysis revealed novel long non-coding RNAs for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, which after breast, lung and, prostate cancers, is the fourth prevalent cancer in the United States. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have an essential role in the pathogenesis of CRC. Therefore, bioinformatics studies on lncRNAs and their target genes have potential importance as novel biomarkers. In the current study, publicly available microarray gene expression data of colorectal cancer (GSE106582) was analyzed with the Limma, Geoquery, Biobase package. Afterward, identified differentially expressed lncRNAs and their target genes were inserted into Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to obtain modules and hub genes. A total of nine differentially expressed lncRNAs (LINC01018, ITCH-IT, ITPK1-AS1, FOXP1-IT1, FAM238B, PAXIP1-AS1, ATP2B1-AS1, MIR29B2CHG, and SNHG32) were identified using microarray data analysis. The WGCNA has identified several hub genes for black (LMOD3, CDKN2AIPNL, EXO5, ZNF69, BMS1P5, METTL21A, IL17RD, MIGA1, CEP19, FKBP14), blue (CLCA1, GUCA2A, UGT2B17, DSC2, CA1, AQP8, ITLN1, BEST4, KLF4, IQCF6) and turquoise (PAFAH1B1, LMNB1, CACYBP, GLO1, PUM3, POC1A, ASF1B, SDCCAG3, ASNS, PDCD2L) modules. The findings of the current study will help to improve our understanding of CRC. Moreover, the hub genes that we have identified could be considered as possible prognostic/diagnostic biomarkers. This study led to the determination of nine lncRNAs with no previous association with CRC development.

Differences and similarities between mesenchymal stem cell and endothelial progenitor cell immunoregulatory properties against T cells.

Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells have some interesting biological properties that make them unique for cell therapy of degenerative and cardiovascular disorders. Although both cell populations have been already studied and used for their regenerative potentials, recently their special immunoregulatory features have brought much more attention. Mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells have both proangiogenic functions and have been shown to suppress the immune response, particularly T cell proliferation, activation, and cytokine production. This makes them suitable choices for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Nevertheless, these two cells do not have equal immunoregulatory activities. Many elements including their extraction sources, age/passage, expression of different markers, secretion of bioactive mediators, and some others could change the efficiency of their immunosuppressive function. However, to our knowledge, no publication has yet compared mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells for their immunological interaction with T cells. This review aims to specifically compare the immunoregulatory effect of these two populations including their T cell suppression, deactivation, cytokine production, and regulatory T cells induction capacities. Moreover, it evaluates the implications of the tumor necrosis factor alpha-tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 axis as an emerging immune checkpoint signaling pathway controlling most of their immunological properties.

TNFα priming through its interaction with TNFR2 enhances endothelial progenitor cell immunosuppressive effect: new hope for their widespread clinical application.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are immature endothelial cells (ECs) involved in neo-angiogenesis and endothelial homeostasis and are considered as a circulating reservoir for endothelial repair. Many studies showed that EPCs from patients with cardiovascular pathologies are impaired and insufficient; hence, allogenic sources of EPCs from adult or cord blood are considered as good choices for cell therapy applications. However, allogenic condition increases the chance of immune rejection, especially by T cells, before exerting the desired regenerative functions. TNFα is one of the main mediators of EPC activation that recognizes two distinct receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2. We have recently reported that human EPCs are immunosuppressive and this effect was TNFα-TNFR2 dependent. Here, we aimed to investigate if an adequate TNFα pre-conditioning could increase TNFR2 expression and prime EPCs towards more immunoregulatory functions. METHODS: EPCs were pre-treated with several doses of TNFα to find the proper dose to up-regulate TNFR2 while keeping the TNFR1 expression stable. Then, co-cultures of human EPCs and human T cells were performed to assess whether TNFα priming would increase EPC immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effect. RESULTS: Treating EPCs with 1 ng/ml TNFα significantly up-regulated TNFR2 expression without unrestrained increase of TNFR1 and other endothelial injury markers. Moreover, TNFα priming through its interaction with TNFR2 remarkably enhanced EPC immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects. Conversely, blocking TNFR2 using anti-TNFR2 mAb followed by 1 ng/ml of TNFα treatment led to the TNFα-TNFR1 interaction and polarized EPCs towards pro-inflammatory and immunogenic functions. CONCLUSIONS: We report for the first time the crucial impact of inflammation notably the TNFα-TNFR signaling pathway on EPC immunological function. Our work unveils the pro-inflammatory role of the TNFα-TNFR1 axis and, inversely the anti-inflammatory implication of the TNFα-TNFR2 axis in EPC immunoregulatory functions. Priming EPCs with 1 ng/ml of TNFα prior to their administration could boost them toward a more immunosuppressive phenotype. This could potentially lead to EPCs' longer presence in vivo after their allogenic administration resulting in their better contribution to angiogenesis and vascular regeneration. Video Abstract.

Regulatory T cell induction by mesenchymal stem cells depends on the expression of TNFR2 by T cells.

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells can modulate the effector immune cells especially T lymphocytes. Due to this important feature, they can regulate the development of a variety of disorders including inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, cancers, and transplantation outcomes. One of the most important MSC immunoregulatory functions is their capacity to convert conventional T cells into regulatory T cells. Several mechanisms, mostly related to MSCs but not T cells, have been shown essential for this aspect. The inflammatory microenvironment majorly caused by pro-inflammatory cytokines has been demonstrated to govern the direction of the immune response. In this respect, we have recently revealed that the TNFα-TNFR2 signaling controls several aspects of MSC immunomodulatory properties including their ability to suppress T cells and their conversion towards Foxp3-expressing Tregs. Here in this work, we have looked from another angle by investigating the impact of TNFR2 expression by T cells on their ability to be converted to suppressive Tregs by MSCs. We showed that unlike WT-T cells, their TNFR2 KO counterparts are remarkably less able to convert into Foxp3+ and Foxp3- Tregs. Furthermore, TNFR2 blockade diminished the anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion by iTregs and consequently resulted in less T cell immunosuppression. This work is the first evidence of the crucial association of TNFR2 expression by T cells with their iTreg conversion capacity by MSCs. It strengthens once more the potential of anti-TNFR2 administration for a strong and effective interference with the immunosuppression exerted by TNFR2-expressing cells.

TNFα-TNFR2 signaling pathway in control of the neural stem/progenitor cell immunosuppressive effect: Different experimental approaches to assess this hypothetical mechanism behind their immunological function.

BACKGROUND: Stem cells have a vast range of functions from tissue regeneration to immunoregulation. They have the ability to modulate immune responses and change the progression of different inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Tumor cells share many characteristics of stem/progenitor cells too. Both can inhibit effector T cells and other immune cells, while inducing regulatory T cells (T regs), thus, reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increasing the production of anti-inflammatory ones. In this context, some cytokines like TNFα are able to control the direction of the immune response. TNF-TNFR signaling plays a dual role: while the interaction of TNFα with TNFR1 mediates pro-inflammatory effects and cell death, its interaction with TNFR2 mediates anti-inflammatory effects and cell survival. MAIN BODY: We think the expression of TNFR2 confers a level of immunomodulatory properties to its expressing cell and this could be crucially important, particularly, for stem/progenitor and tumor cells. This idea has been already proven in many TNFR2+ cells. Different immunosuppressive cells like T regs, regulatory B cells (B regs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) express TNFR2 and are able to suppress immune cells in presence of TNFα. The other category of rare cells that express TNFR2 is neural cells (NCs). Although little is known about the immunological function of these latter cells, few studies showed their progenitors are able to suppress T cells. Therefore, we hypothesize that the immunosuppressive effect of neural stem cells (NSCs) is potentially TNFα-TNFR2 dependent. CONCLUSIONS: NSCs are among the rare cells that express TNFR2 marker and are able to supress T cells. We believe TNFα-TNFR2 immune checkpoint signaling pathway could be responsible for this immunosuppressive effect.

Different approaches for transformation of mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells.

Due to the prominent role of the liver in the body and detoxification, its functionality can be affected in an irreversible manner by diseases. This phenomenon renders the liver to stop working, leading to morbidity and mortality. Therefore, liver transplantation is the only way to tackle this issue.In order to compensate for the lack of adequate healthy liver tissue for transplantation, therapeutic approaches such as hepatocyte transplantation have been proposed as an alternative. Recognizing the fact that mesenchymal stem cells are adult stem cells with the capacity to differentiate into several cell types, different methods have been invented to produce hepatocyte-like cells from mesenchymal stem cells. They can be divided into three main categories, such as addition of cytokines and growth factors, genetic modifications, and adjustment of microenvironment as well as physical parameters.In this review, we attempted to introduce diverse efficient methods for differentiating mesenchymal stem cells and their capability for transformation into hepatocyte-like cells.

Current Preventions and Treatments of aGVHD: From Pharmacological Prophylaxis to Innovative Therapies.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is one of the main causes of mortality and the reason for up to 50% of morbidity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) which is the treatment of choice for many blood malignancies. Thanks to years of research and exploration, we have acquired a profound understanding of the pathophysiology and immunopathology of these disorders. This led to the proposition and development of many therapeutic approaches during the last decades, some of them with very promising results. In this review, we have focused on the recent GVHD treatments from classical chemical and pharmacological prophylaxis to more innovative treatments including gene therapy and cell therapy, most commonly based on the application of a variety of immunomodulatory cells. Furthermore, we have discussed the advantages and potentials of cell-free therapy as a newly emerging approach to treat GVHD. Among them, we have particularly focused on the implication of the TNFα-TNFR2 axis as a new immune checkpoint signaling pathway controlling different aspects of many immunoregulatory cells.

A clinical-grade acellular matrix for esophageal replacement.

In pathologies of the esophagus such as esophageal atresia, cancers, and caustic injuries, methods for full thickness esophageal replacement require the sacrifice of healthy intra-abdominal organs such as the stomach and the colon and are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and poor functional results. To overcome these problems, tissue engineering methods are developed to create a substitute with scaffolds and cells. The aim of this study was to develop a simple and safe decellularization process in order to obtain a clinical grade esophageal extracellular matrix. Following the decontamination step, porcine esophagi were decellularized in a bioreactor with sodium dodecyl sulfate and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 3 days and were rinsed with deionized water. DNA was eliminated by a 3-hr DNase treatment. To remove any residual detergent, the matrix was then incubated with an absorbing resin. The resulting porcine esophageal matrix was characterized by the assessment of the efficiency of the decellularization process (DNA quantification), evaluation of sterility and absence of cytotoxicity, and its composition and biomechanical properties, as well as the possibility to be reseeded with mesenchymal stem cells. Complete decellularization with the preservation of the general structure, composition, and biomechanical properties of the native esophageal matrix was obtained. Sterility was maintained throughout the process, and the matrix showed no cytotoxicity. The resulting matrix met clinical grade criteria and was successfully reseeded with mesenchymal stem cells..

Differentiation of umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells to hepatocyte cells by transfection of miR-106a, miR-574-3p, and miR-451.

Studying the profile of micro RNAs (miRs) elucidated the highest expressed miRs in hepatic differentiation. In this study, we investigated to clarify the role of three embryonic overexpressed miRs (miR-106a, miR-574-3p and miR-451) during hepatic differentiation of human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs). We furthermore, aimed to explore whether overexpression of any of these miRs alone is sufficient to induce the differentiation of the UC-MSCs into hepatocyte-like cells. UC-MSCs were transfected either alone or together with miR-106a, miR-574-3p and miR-451 and their potential hepatic differentiation and alteration in gene expression profile, morphological changes and albumin secretion ability were investigated. We found that up-regulation of any of these three miRs alone cannot induce expression of all hepatic specific genes. Transfection of each miR alone, led to Sox17, FoxA2 expression that are related to initiation step of hepatic differentiation. However, concurrent ectopic overexpression of three miRs together can induce UC-MSCs differentiation into functionally mature hepatocytes. These results show that miRs have the capability to directly convert UC-MSCs to a hepatocyte phenotype in vitro.