The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on community violence in Connecticut.

INTRODUCTION: Natural disasters may lead to increases in community violence due to broad social disruption, economic hardship, and large-scale morbidity and mortality. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on community violence is unknown. METHODS: Using trauma registry data on all violence-related patient presentations in Connecticut from 2018 to 2021, we compared the pattern of violence-related trauma from pre-COVID and COVID pandemic using an interrupted time series linear regression model. RESULTS: There was a 55% increase in violence-related trauma in the COVID period compared with the pre-COVID period (IRR: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.34-1.80; p-value<0.001) driven largely by penetrating injuries. This increase disproportionately impacted Black/Latinx communities (IRR: 1.61; 95%CI: 1.36-1.90; p-value<0.001). CONCLUSION: Violence-related trauma increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased community violence is a significant and underappreciated negative health and social consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and one that excessively burdens communities already at increased risk from systemic health and social inequities.

The Role of the Scarecrow in Surgery.

In 1998, a Wyoming cyclist noticed what he initially thought was a scarecrow was actually a person. When he took the time to investigate, he found Matthew Shepherd bound to a fence, beaten and left for dead, attacked for being gay. This heinous act of hatred represented a shift in how the United States treats hate crimes, leveeing severe ramifications for the motivations themselves. Although progress has been made, many in medicine who identify in as LGBTQI+ choose to conceal their truths out of fear. With available evidence suggesting a worsening shortage of surgeons in the country, populations of interested people cannot be excluded. Data on representation is severely lacking but is key to attract candidates; inclusivity, modern vocabularies, and the demonstration of engagement are important. Surgical organizations must understand the importance of being a welcoming, mentoring, and allying environment for interested LGBTQI+ candidates, serving as beacons for their interest, or we will simply remain complicit in seeing only scarecrows.

Safety of Prophylactic Anticoagulation During Bedside Procedures: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are common procedures performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is frequently prescribed to ICU patients and it remains unclear whether pre-procedure discontinuation is necessary. METHODS: This multi-center prospective observational study aimed to describe bleeding rates in patients undergoing bedside PEG or PDT who did or did not have VTE prophylaxis held. Decision to hold prophylaxis was made by the operating physician. The primary endpoint was the rate of peri-procedural bleeding complications. Secondary endpoints included quantification of held doses in the peri-procedural period, rate of venous thromboembolism, and characteristics associated with having prophylaxis held. RESULTS: 91 patients were included over a 2-year period. Patients were on average aged 54 years, 40% female, mostly admitted to the trauma service (59%), and most commonly underwent bedside PDT (59%). Overall, 21% of patients had doses of pre-procedure prophylaxis held. Bleeding events occurred in 1 patient (1.4%) who had prophylaxis continued and in 1 patient (5.0%) who had prophylaxis held, a rate difference of 3.6% (95% CI-9.5%, 16.7%). One bleeding event was managed with bedside surgical repair and one with blood transfusion. There were 10 VTE events, all of whom had prophylaxis continued during the pre-procedure period but 3 had prophylaxis held after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding complications were rare and did not significantly differ depending on whether prophylaxis was held or not. Future research is required to confirm the lack of risk with continuing prophylaxis through bedside procedures.

Firearm Acoustic Detection in Hartford, Connecticut: Outcomes of a Trauma Center - Law Enforcement Collaboration.

Introduction Firearm homicide is a leading cause of violence-related death in the United States.Unfortunately, more than 80% of illegal firearm discharges are never reported to police by traditional means.ShotSpotterTM (Newark, California) is an acoustic firearm event detection system that can localize gunfire, prompting police, and subsequent emergency medical services (EMS) presence. Previously reported healthcare effects of acoustic detection are speculative in nature. We sought to investigate Hartford, Connecticut's experience with ShotSpotter​​​​​​​TM given its smaller size and broad coverage.  Methods The three trauma centers in Hartford (two for adults and one for pediatric) collaborated with the Hartford Police to review outcomes of victims with acoustically detected gunshots and compare them to those who went undetected. We performed a retrospective review of patients who presented with gunshot wounds (GSW) over a 30-month period, from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018. Victim location and acoustic detection were reconciled by the police department and hospital staff independently. Patients were individually matched for location, prehospital response, treatment durations, and hospital outcomes. Results Of 387 GSW, 157 (40.6%) presented via EMS and were included in the sample. Of these, 89 correlated to a detection event (56.7%) and 68 had no correlating event (43.3%). These two groups had no difference in prehospital treatment times, scene and transport duration, and injury severity. Further, the need for surgery or transfusion, lengths of stay, and disposition, including mortality, did not differ. Conclusions Despite limited previous reports demonstrating conferred benefits to acoustic detection of gunshots, Hartford's experience showed no benefit. The potential for such systems to act as early warning systems is evident but may depend on a city's resources, geography, and technology.

Survey of American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma members on firearm injury: Consensus and opportunities.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, there is a perceived divide regarding the benefits and risks of firearm ownership. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Injury Prevention and Control Committee designed a survey to evaluate Committee on Trauma (COT) member attitudes about firearm ownership, freedom, responsibility, physician-patient freedom and policy, with the objective of using survey results to inform firearm injury prevention policy development. METHODS: A 32-question survey was sent to 254 current U.S. COT members by email using Qualtrics. SPSS was used for χ exact tests and nonparametric tests, with statistical significance being less than 0.05. RESULTS: Our response rate was 93%, 43% of COT members have firearm(s) in their home, 88% believe that the American College of Surgeons should give the highest or a high priority to reducing firearm-related injuries, 86% believe health care professionals should be allowed to counsel patients on firearms safety, 94% support federal funding for firearms injury prevention research. The COT participants were asked to provide their opinion on the American College of Surgeons initiating advocacy efforts and there was 90% or greater agreement on 7 of 15 and 80% or greater on 10 of 15 initiatives. CONCLUSION: The COT surgeons agree on: (1) the importance of formally addressing firearm injury prevention, (2) allowing federal funds to support research on firearms injury prevention, (3) retaining the ability of health care professionals to counsel patients on firearms-related injury prevention, and (4) the majority of policy initiatives targeted to reduce interpersonal violence and firearm injury. It is incumbent on trauma and injury prevention organizations to leverage these consensus-based results to initiate prevention, advocacy, and other efforts to decrease firearms injury and death. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level I; therapeutic care, level II.

Can a Quality Collaborative Build Value in Global Surgery? Results From a Single State Experience.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a critical component of global health care worldwide. Little is known about global surgery participation among surgeons in Connecticut. The goal of this pilot survey project was to determine the breadth of global surgery experience in our state. STUDY DESIGN: An electronic survey was distributed to surgeons in the state of Connecticut via the Connecticut Chapter of the American College of Surgeons (CTACS) and to departments of surgery throughout the state. RESULTS: Seventy-four surgeons and surgical residents completed the online survey from 17 different hospitals. Nineteen (25.7%) of the respondents had participated in global surgery. Most participated in yearly (56.3%), short-term experiences (94.5%). Nearly half of this group reported no formal record of outcomes (52.9%), but 17/19 (89.5%) respondents reported that accurate outcomes measures are beneficial to surgical care in resource-poor areas. Eighty-nine percent reported a willingness to participate in a surgical quality and outcomes database. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of surgeons in Connecticut participate in global surgery. Most surgeons value qualityin surgical care, yet outcomes are not routinely measured. This discordance may be addressed through the development of a quality improvement collaborative for global surgery.

Thirty-day outcomes support implementation of a surgical safety checklist.

BACKGROUND: Thirty-day postoperative complications from unintended harm adversely affect patients and their families and increase institutional health care costs. A surgical checklist is an inexpensive tool that will facilitate effective communication and teamwork. Surgical team training has demonstrated the opportunity for stakeholders to professionally engage one another through leveling of the authority gradient to prevent patient harm. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database is an outcomes reporting tool capable of validating the use of surgical checklists. STUDY DESIGN: Three 60-minute team training sessions were conducted and participants were oriented to the use of a comprehensive surgical checklist. The surgical team used the checklist for high-risk procedures selected from those analyzed for the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Trained observers assessed the checklist completion and collected data about perioperative communication and safety-compromising events. RESULTS: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were compared for 2,079 historical control cases, 246 cases without checklist use, and 73 cases with checklist use. Overall completion of the checklist sections was 97.26%. Comparison of 30-day morbidity demonstrated a statistically significant (p = 0.000) reduction in overall adverse event rates from 23.60% for historical control cases and 15.90% in cases with only team training, to 8.20% in cases with checklist use. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a comprehensive surgical safety checklist and implementation of a structured team training curriculum produced a statistically significant decrease in 30-day morbidity. Adoption of a comprehensive checklist is feasible with team training intervention and can produce measurable improvements in patient outcomes.

Preoperative stress conditioning prevents paralysis after experimental aortic surgery: increased heat shock protein content is associated with ischemic tolerance of the spinal cord.

BACKGROUND: All forms of surgical therapy are stressful and injurious. The problems of paralysis, renal dysfunction, and colonic ischemia associated with aortic occlusion are due to acute ischemia-reperfusion injury at the cellular level. Acute-anterior spinal cord ischemia is the most devastating outcome of these iatrogenic-ischemic events. The majority of surgical procedures are performed electively and therefore provide an opportunity to preoperatively condition the patient to minimize these ischemia-related morbidities. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether acute spinal cord injury associated with aortic occlusion can be prevented by induction of the cellular stress response by means of preoperative administration of whole-body hyperthermia or stannous chloride. METHODS: The study consisted of an experimental rabbit model of infrarenal aortic occlusion for 20 minutes at normothermic body temperature. RESULTS: Control rabbits experienced an 88% (7/8) incidence of paralysis after spinal cord ischemia induced by 20 minutes of aortic occlusion, whereas animals treated preoperatively with either whole-body hyperthermia (0/9) or stannous chloride (0/4) never became paralyzed (P <.001 for control vs treated groups). Ischemic protection of the spinal cord was associated with increased content of stress proteins within tissues of pretreated animals. CONCLUSION: Prior induction of the heat shock response in the whole animal will increase the content of stress proteins within the spinal cord and other tissues and result in the prevention of hind-limb paralysis associated with aortic occlusion. We have designated the preoperative induction of the cellular stress response for the prevention of ischemic tissue injury stress conditioning. We suggest that stress-conditioning protocols represent the opportunity to practice preventative medicine at the molecular level.