Pediatric craniocerebral gunshot injuries: A National Trauma Database study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the outcomes and prognostic factors in pediatric craniocerebral gunshot injury (CGI) patients. Pediatric patients may have significantly different physiology, neuroplasticity, and clinical outcomes in CGI than adults. There is limited literature on this topic, mainly case reports and small case series. METHODS: We queried the National Trauma Data Bank for all pediatric CGI between 2014 and 2017. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. Demographic, emergency department, and clinical data were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was attempted for groups with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 9 to 15 and ages 0 to 8 years. RESULTS: In a 3-year period, there were 209 pediatric patients (aged 0-18 years) presenting to American hospitals with signs of life. The overall mortality rate was 53.11%. A linear relationship was demonstrated showing a mortality rate of 79% by initial GCS in GCS score of 3, 56% in GCS scores of 4 to 8, 22% in GCS scores of 9 to 12, and 5% in GCS scores of 13 to 15. The youngest patients, aged 0 to 8 years, had dramatically better initial GCS and subsequently lower mortality rates. Regression analysis showed mortality benefit in the total population for intracranial pressure monitoring (odds ratio, 0.267) and craniotomy (odds ratio, 0.232). CONCLUSION: This study uses the National Trauma Data Bank to quantify the prevalence of pediatric intracranial gunshot wounds, with the goal to determine risk factors for prognosis in this patient population. Significant effects on mortality for invasive interventions including intracranial pressure monitoring and craniotomy for all patients suggest low threshold for use of these procedures if there is any clinical concern. The presence of a 79% mortality rate in patients with GCS score of 3 on presentation suggests that as long as there is not a declared neurologic death, intracranial pressure monitoring and treatment measures including craniotomy should be considered by the consulting clinician. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.

Pharmacoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant contributor to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic regimens for VTE involve mechanical prophylaxis and pharmacoprophylaxis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of pharmacoprophylaxis in comparison with any nonpharmacoprophylaxis regimen for the prevention of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICRCTN were searched for comparative studies including both pharmacoprophylaxis and nonpharmacoprophylaxis post spinal surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of VTE within the postoperative hospitalized period. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of spinal epidural hematoma, significant bleeding events, and other adverse events associated with VTE. The data was pooled using random-effects models of meta-analysis and relative risk (RR) was calculated. RESULTS: Four retrospective and 3 randomized controlled trials representing a total of 8373 patients were included. Overall, there was a significant decrease in postoperative deep venous thrombosis with pharmacoprophylaxis versus nonpharmacoprophylaxis (RR 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.86, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%); however, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidences of VTE (RR 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.81, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%). The incidences of spinal epidural hematoma and significant bleeding events were rare and comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a potential benefit with pharmacoprophylaxis post spinal surgery in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis. However, there is a need for future randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of pharmacoprophylaxis in spinal surgery across various spinal procedures.

Toward an all-inclusive trauma system in Central South Ontario: development of the Trauma-System Performance Improvement and Knowledge Exchange (T-SPIKE) project.

Background: There is currently no integrated data system to capture the true burden of injury and its management within Ontario's regional trauma networks (RTNs), largely owing to difficulties in identifying these patients across the multiple health care provider records. Our project represents an iterative effort to create the ability to chart the course of care for all injured patients within the Central South RTN. Methods: Through broad stakeholder engagement of major health care provider organizations within the Central South RTN, we obtained research ethics board approval and established data-sharing agreements with multiple agencies. We tested identification of trauma cases from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2017, and methods to link patient records between the various echelons of care to identify barriers to linkage and opportunities for administrative solutions. Results: During 2017, potential trauma cases were identified within ground paramedic services (23 107 records), air medical transport services (196 records), referring hospitals (7194 records) and the lead trauma hospital trauma registry (1134 records). Linkage rates for medical records between services ranged from 49% to 92%. Conclusion: We successfully conceptualized and provided a preliminary demonstration of an initiative to collect, collate and accurately link primary data from acute trauma care providers for certain patients injured within the Central South RTN. Administration-level changes to the capture and management of trauma data represent the greatest opportunity for improvement.

Contexte: On ne dispose actuellement d'aucun système intégré de gestion des données pour évaluer le fardeau réel des traumatismes et de leur gestion dans les réseaux régionaux de traumatologie (RRT) en Ontario, en bonne partie en raison de la difficulté d'identifier les cas parmi la multiplicité des dossiers d'intervenants médicaux. Notre projet représente un effort itératif pour créer la capacité de cartographier le parcours de soin de tous les polytraumatisés du RRT de la région Centre-Sud. Méthodes: Grâce à l'engagement général des intervenants des grandes organisations de santé du RRT de la région Centre-Sud, nous avons obtenu l'approbation d'un comité d'éthique de la recherche et conclu des accords de partage des données avec plusieurs agences. Nous avons testé l'identification des cas de traumatologie du 1er janvier au 31 décembre 2017 et les méthodes de liaison des dossiers de patients entre les divers échelons de soin pour identifier les obstacles à la liaison et leurs solutions administratives possibles. Résultats: Au cours de 2017, les cas de traumatologie potentiels ont été identifiés auprès des services ambulanciers terrestres (23 107 dossiers), des services de transport médical aérien (196 dossiers), des hôpitaux référents (7194 dossiers) et du registre hospitalier principal de traumatologie (1134 dossiers). Les taux de liaison entre les différents services pour les dossiers médicaux variaient de 49 % à 92 %. Conclusion: Nous avons conceptualisé et présenté avec succès la démonstration préliminaire d'un projet visant à recueillir, colliger et relier avec justesse les données primaires des intervenants en traumatologie aiguë pour certains patients blessés du RRT du Centre-Sud. Des changements administratifs centrés sur la saisie et la gestion des données de traumatologie représentent la meilleure voie vers une amélioration.

The mortality benefit of direct trauma center transport in a regional trauma system: a population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: By ensuring timely access to trauma center (TC) care, well-organized trauma systems have the potential to significantly reduce injury-related mortality. However, undertriage continues to be a significant problem in many regional trauma systems. Taking a novel, population-based approach, we estimated the potential detrimental impact of undertriage to a non-TC (NTC) within a regional system. METHODS: We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study of TC effectiveness in a region with urban, suburban, and rural areas. Data were derived from administrative databases capturing all emergency department deaths and admissions in the region. Adult motor vehicle collision occupants presenting to any emergency department in the study region were included (2002-2010). Data were limited to patients with severe injury. The exposure of interest was initial triage destination (TC or NTC), regardless of later transfer to TC. Mortality was compared across groups, using an instrumental variable analysis to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: Among 6,341 motor vehicle collision occupants, 45% (n = 2,857) were triaged from the scene of injury to a TC. Among patients transported from the scene to a NTC, 57% (n = 2,003) were transferred to a TC within 24 hours of initial evaluation. Compared with patients triaged to a NTC, adjusted mortality was lower among patients triaged directly to a TC, both at 24 hours (odds ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.84) and at 48 hours (odds ratio: 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.96). A trend toward reduced mortality with TC triage was also observed at 7 and 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our data are population-based evidence of the early benefits of direct triage to TC. Although many surviving patients are later transferred to a TC, initial triage to a NTC is associated with at least a 30% increase in mortality in the first 48 hours after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.