Clinical outcomes of globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: a comparison of intraoperative MRI- and MER-guided lead placement.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead placement is increasingly performed with the patient under general anesthesia by surgeons using intraoperative MRI (iMRI) guidance without microelectrode recording (MER) or macrostimulation. The authors assessed the accuracy of lead placement, safety, and motor outcomes in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) undergoing DBS lead placement into the globus pallidus internus (GPi) using iMRI or MER guidance. METHODS: The authors identified all patients with PD who underwent either MER- or iMRI-guided GPi-DBS lead placement at Emory University between July 2007 and August 2016. Lead placement accuracy and adverse events were determined for all patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor scores for patients completing 12 months of follow-up. The authors also assessed the levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) and stimulation parameters. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were identified (MER, n = 28; iMRI, n = 49), in whom 131 leads were placed. The stereotactic accuracy of the surgical procedure with respect to the planned lead location was 1.94 ± 0.21 mm (mean ± SEM) (95% CI 1.54-2.34) with frame-based MER and 0.84 ± 0.007 mm (95% CI 0.69-0.98) with iMRI. The rate of serious complications was similar, at 6.9% for MER-guided DBS lead placement and 9.4% for iMRI-guided DBS lead placement (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.13%-3.9%]; p = 0.695). Fifty-seven patients were included in clinical outcome analyses (MER, n = 16; iMRI, n = 41). Both groups had similar characteristics at baseline, although patients undergoing MER-guided DBS had a lower response on their baseline levodopa challenge (44.8% ± 5.4% [95% CI 33.2%-56.4%] vs 61.6% ± 2.1% [95% CI 57.4%-65.8%]; t = 3.558, p = 0.001). Greater improvement was seen following iMRI-guided lead placement (43.2% ± 3.5% [95% CI 36.2%-50.3%]) versus MER-guided lead placement (25.5% ± 6.7% [95% CI 11.1%-39.8%]; F = 5.835, p = 0.019). When UPDRS III motor scores were assessed only in the contralateral hemibody (per-lead analyses), the improvements remained significantly different (37.1% ± 7.2% [95% CI 22.2%-51.9%] and 50.0% ± 3.5% [95% CI 43.1%-56.9%] for MER- and iMRI-guided DBS lead placement, respectively). Both groups exhibited similar reductions in LEDDs (21.2% and 20.9%, respectively; F = 0.221, p = 0.640). The locations of all active contacts and the 2D radial distance from these to consensus coordinates for GPi-DBS lead placement (x, ±20; y, +2; and z, -4) did not differ statistically by type of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: iMRI-guided GPi-DBS lead placement in PD patients was associated with significant improvement in clinical outcomes, comparable to those observed following MER-guided DBS lead placement. Furthermore, iMRI-guided DBS implantation produced a similar safety profile to that of the MER-guided procedure. As such, iMRI guidance is an alternative to MER guidance for patients undergoing GPi-DBS implantation for PD.

Does post-operative symptomatic lead edema associated with subthalamic DBS implantation impact long-term clinical outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Post-operative, non-hemorrhagic, non-infectious symptomatic delayed edema around the DBS lead is an uncommon complication of DBS surgery. We investigated whether this complication impacts clinical outcomes or has long-term sequelae. METHODS: All Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS implantation who developed delayed symptomatic lead edema were identified. UPDRS part III motor, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) total and MoCA scores were analyzed to assess motor outcome, quality of life and cognitive status at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients underwent 482 STN lead placements. Of these, 16 patients (20 leads, 4.1% of total 482 leads) developed this delayed complication. None of the patients had edema on immediate post-operative scan. Patients presented with varied symptoms including speech difficulty (n = 8), mild confusion (n = 6), headaches (n = 4), gait difficulty (n = 4) and seizures (n = 3). The mean duration for the diagnosis was 5.8 days after lead implantation and the mean duration for which follow-up CT scans reported complete/near complete resolution or improvement of edema was 4.7 weeks (range 2-10 weeks). At 1-year post-DBS, UPDRS motor scores improved significantly (42.5%, p < .001); quality of life improved, but the change was not statistically significant (21.3%, p = .197). There was no decline in cognitive function at 1 year (26.6 vs 26.4, p = .567). No long-term complication related to lead edema occurred in these patients. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic lead edema after DBS surgery is an uncommon complication which typically resolves over time. In our series, there were no long-term sequelae of this complication and clinical outcomes were comparable to that reported in the literature.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease patients over 75 years of age.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, its effect in older patients is not extensively studied, as they are often excluded from DBS surgery due to concerns of complications or reduced benefit. We assessed clinical outcomes after subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in older patients (age > 75 years) with PD. METHODS: All PD patients above 75 years who underwent STN-DBS between 1999 and 2015 were included. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores were assessed up to 4 years after surgery. Other measures included were complications/adverse events, levodopa equivalent dose, and cognitive function. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients underwent 52 lead placements. Mean age at surgery was 77.5 years (range 75.0-84.5 years). Post-DBS, motor scores improved by 30.8% after 1-year and 27.3% after a mean of 2.5 years (p < .001). All motor sub-scores improved, however axial signs did not change over time. OFF time and dyskinesia duration reduced significantly (p < .001), whereas quality of life, activities of daily living and cognitive function did not significantly change. The following adverse events were noted: transient post-operative confusion (36% of patients), gait difficulty (13.3% of patients), hemorrhage (3.8% of leads), personality changes (3.3% of patients), lead revision (1.9% of leads), seizure (1.9% of leads), and infection (1.9% of leads). CONCLUSIONS: STN-DBS improves motor outcomes in patients over 75 years of age; however, there was no change in quality of life. Although post-surgical transient confusion was common, there were no serious adverse events and the incidence of other complications was typical for DBS surgery.

Cystic Lesions as a Rare Complication of Deep Brain Stimulation.

DBS is a typically well-tolerated operation for treatment of Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor (ET). Complications related to the surgical procedure and implanted hardware may occur. More commonly reported complications include hemorrhage, seizure, confusion, and infection. In this article, we report on a rare, but important, complication of DBS surgery, a brain cyst formation at the tip of the implanted ventralis intermedius nucleus (VIM) DBS lead in 2 patients who underwent the procedure at 2 different centers. The indication for surgery was debilitating ET, and in both cases, there was development of a delayed-onset neurological deficit associated with an internal capsule/thalamic cystic lesion formation located at the tip of the DBS lead. Case 1 presented within a few months post-DBS, whereas case 2 had a 10-mo delay to onset of symptoms. No clinical and radiological signs of infection were observed and both DBS systems were explanted with uneventful recovery.