A multi-centre Canadian pilot study of metronomic temozolomide combined with radiotherapy for newly diagnosed paediatric brainstem glioma.

PURPOSE: Survival rates for paediatric diffuse intrinsic brainstem glioma (DIBSG) are dismal. Metronomic dosing of temozolomide (TMZ) combined with standard radiotherapy may improve survival by increasing the therapeutic index and anti-angiogenic effect of TMZ. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen in paediatric DIBSG patients. METHODS: Children aged 18 years or younger with newly diagnosed DIBSG were treated with standard radiotherapy and concomitant metronomic TMZ at 85 mg/m(2)/day for 6 weeks, followed by metronomic TMZ monotherapy at the same dose. Treatment was continued until tumour progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Primary endpoints included overall survival and toxicities. For patients who consented, plasma and urine samples were collected at diagnosis, post-induction and prior to each course of maintenance therapy for the quantification of angiogenesis markers. RESULTS: Fifteen eligible patients were enrolled, with a median age of 6.4 years. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression, most notably prolonged lymphopaenia and thrombocytopaenia. The only dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopaenia. Intratumoural haemorrhage was confirmed in one patient. Median time to progression was 5.13 months (95% CI = 6.4, 10.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 9.8 months (95% CI = 6.4, 10.8). Six-months OS was 80% ± 10.3%, with a 1-year OS of 20% ± 10.3%. Serum levels of both VEGF and endoglin tended to decrease during the first two cycles of therapy. CONCLUSION: Chemoradiotherapy with metronomic dosing of TMZ showed similar toxicity to previous TMZ regimens, and does not appear to improve survival in paediatric DIBSG.

A Canadian paediatric brain tumour consortium (CPBTC) phase II molecularly targeted study of imatinib in recurrent and refractory paediatric central nervous system tumours.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of imatinib in children with recurrent or refractory central nervous system (CNS) tumours expressing KIT and/or PDGFRA. METHODS: Nineteen patients aged 2-18 years, with recurrent or refractory CNS tumours expressing either of the target receptors KIT and/or PDGFRA (by immunohistochemistry) were eligible. Participants received imatinib orally at a dose of 440 mg/m(2)/day and toxicities and tumour responses were monitored. Serial blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples for pharmacokinetics were obtained in a subset of consenting patients. Frozen tumour samples were analysed retrospectively for KIT and PDGFRA gene amplification in a subset of patients for whom samples were available. RESULTS: Common toxicities were lymphopaenia, neutropaenia, leucopaenia, elevated serum transaminases and vomiting. No intratumoural haemorrhages were observed. Although there were no objective responses to imatinib, four patients had long-term stable disease (SD) (38-104 weeks). Our results suggest a possible relationship between KIT expression and maintenance of SD with imatinib treatment; KIT immunopositivity was seen in only 58% (11/19) of study participants overall, but in 100% of patients with SD at 38 weeks. All patient tumours showed PDGFRA expression. Pharmacokinetic data showed a high interpatient variability, but corresponded with previously reported values. CONCLUSIONS: Imatinib at 440 mg/m(2)/day is relatively safe in children with recurrent CNS tumours, but induced no objective responses. Demonstration of SD in previously progressing patients (KIT-expressing) suggests cytostatic activity of imatinib.