Frail Multiple Myeloma Patients Deserve More Than Just a Score.

Frailty is a hot topic in the field of multiple myeloma (MM). Clinicians have realised that frail myeloma patients can struggle with treatment, resulting in dose reductions and treatment discontinuation, which risk shorter progression-free and overall survival. Efforts have focused on the validity of existing frailty scores and on the development of new indices to identify frail patients more accurately. This review article explores the challenges of the existing frailty scores, including the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score, the revised Myeloma Co-morbidity Index (R-MCI), and the Myeloma Risk Profile (MRP). We conclude that the missing link is for frailty scoring to translate into a tool useful in real-world clinical practice. The future of frailty scores lies in their ability to be woven into clinical trials, to create a robust clinical evidence base for treatment selection and dose modification, and also to identify a cohort of patients who merit additional support from the wider MM multidisciplinary team.

Autologous stem cell transplantation vs bortezomib based chemotheraphy for the first-line treatment of systemic light chain amyloidosis in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: The benefit of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis requires re-evaluation in the modern era. This retrospective case-matched study compares ASCT to bortezomib for the treatment of patients with AL amyloidosis. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis treated with ASCT or bortezomib between 2001 and 2018 were identified. Patients were excluded if the time from diagnosis to treatment exceeded 12 months. Patients were matched on a 1:1 basis, using a propensity-matched scoring approach. RESULTS: A total of 136 propensity score-matched patients were included (ASCT n = 68, bortezomib n = 68). There was no significant difference in overall survival at two years (P = .908, HR: 0.95, CI: 0.41-2.20). For ASCT vs bortezomib: overall haematological response rate at 6 months was 90.6% vs 92.5%; organ response at 12 months: cardiac (70.0% vs 54%, P > .999), renal (74% vs 24%, P = .463) liver (21% vs 22%, P = .048); median progression-free survival (50 vs 42 months P = .058, HR: 0.61, CI: 0.37-1.02) and time to next treatment (68 vs 45 months, P = .145, HR: 0.61, CI: 0.31-1.19). More patients required treatment in the bortezomib group compared to ASCT group at 24 months (41 vs 23, Chi-squared P = .004) and 48 months (57 vs 41, Chi-squared P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: This small retrospective study suggests that there is no clear survival advantage of ASCT over bortezomib therapy. A prospective randomised controlled trial evaluating ASCT in AL amyloidosis is critically needed.

The value of screening biopsies in light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic amyloidosis is a histological diagnosis, often achieved via critical organ biopsy. Screening biopsies represent a low-risk approach to diagnosis. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: All patients with systemic AL and ATTR amyloidosis who underwent abdominal fat aspiration (AFA) and either a bone marrow (BM) or gastrointestinal (GI) biopsy at the UK National Amyloidosis Centre (2006-2019) were identified. We sought to determine diagnostic sensitivity in relation to whole body amyloid burden, amyloid type and organ involvement. RESULTS: Diagnostic sensitivity established in 471 patients with AL (n = 321) and ATTR (n = 150) amyloidosis, respectively, was 73.2% and 27.3% for AFA (P< .001), 59.7% and 42.2% for BM (P< .001), and 74.6% and 44.6% for GI biopsy (P< .001). ATTR amyloid deposits were detected in 35.4% BMs and 33.3% of GI biopsies when AFA did not demonstrate amyloid. In AL amyloidosis, sensitivity of combined AFA and BM biopsy in AL amyloidosis was 82.9%. There was a strong association between whole body amyloid burden and sensitivity of each screening biopsy method. The diagnostic sensitivity of screening biopsies ranged from 80.0% to 90.5% for patients with a large amyloid load on 123 I-SAP scintigraphy in comparison with 53.9%-79.0% in those with no visceral amyloid visible on imaging. CONCLUSION: Performing both AFA and BM biopsy should be considered in suspected AL amyloidosis to substantially reduce the clinical risk associated with critical organ biopsy. The sensitivity of screening biopsies in ATTR amyloidosis is poor.

Pomalidomide and dexamethasone grant rapid haematologic responses in patients with relapsed and refractory AL amyloidosis: a European retrospective series of 153 patients.

Pomalidomide demonstrated activity in the treatment of AL amyloidosis in three phase II clinical trials. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of 28-day cycles of pomalidomide and dexamethasone in 153 previously treated patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Ninety-nine (65%) were refractory to the last line of therapy and 54 (35%) had relapsed. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (range: 2-7): 143 patients (93%) previously received bortezomib, 124 (81%) lenalidomide, 114 (75%) oral melphalan, and 37 (24%) underwent autologous stem cell transplant. At the completion of cycle 6, 68 (44%) patients obtained at least partial haematologic response, with 5 complete responses (CR, 3%), 35 very good partial responses (VGPR, 23%). Haematologic response resulted in improved overall survival (median survival 50 vs. 27 months, p = .033) in a 6 months landmark analysis. Obtaining at least partial response was also associated with a significant improvement of the progression-free survival (median PFS 37 vs. 18 months, p < .001). Pomalidomide is an effective treatment for heavily pre-treated patients with AL amyloidosis. Haematologic responses are associated with an overall survival advantage.

Amyloidosis Diagnosed in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Development of amyloidosis post solid-organ transplantation has not been reported, although plasma cell neoplasms are a rare form of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, which could be complicated by light chain amyloidosis (AL) amyloidosis. METHODS: We searched our database of 5112 patients seen between 1994 and 2018 with a diagnosis of amyloidosis post solid-organ transplant. Patients were excluded if the amyloid diagnosis preceded the transplant date. The indication and type of organ transplant were recorded in addition to the amyloidosis type, organs involved, treatment given, and survival. RESULTS: Thirty patients were identified. The median age at diagnosis with amyloidosis was 52 years (range 33-77). The median time from transplantation to diagnosis was 10.5 years (0.58-36). The grafts were kidney (N = 25, 83.3%), liver (N = 2, 6.7%), heart (N = 2, 6.7%), and combined heart, lung, and kidney (N = 1, 3.3%). The type of amyloidosis was systemic AL (N = 14, 47%), serum amyloid A amyloidosis (AA) (N = 11, 37%), localized AL (N = 3, 10%), wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) (N = 1, 3.3%), and amyloid of uncertain type (N = 1, 3.3%). Renal graft dysfunction was seen in 11 of 25 (44%) cases. Median graft survival was 185 months (96-269), and median survival from diagnosis with amyloidosis was 45 months (2-89); median survival by amyloidosis type was localized AL: 64 months (20-67), systemic AL: 23.5 months (0-95), ATTR amyloidosis: 17 months, and AA, 15 months (0-77). CONCLUSIONS: This series is the first description of amyloidosis post solid-organ transplant; 30 cases among 5112 amyloid patients >24 years suggests that amyloidosis may occur post solid-organ transplantation with an overall poor survival.

Treatment-free interval as an additional measure of efficacy in a large UK dataset of transplant ineligible myeloma patients.

Treatment of transplant-ineligible (TNE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) requires a balance between disease control and maintaining quality of life (QoL). Patients value treatment-free remission periods in this incurable condition, as they are associated with better QoL. We set out to study clinical outcomes of consecutive TNE NDMM patients in routine care treated in Thames Valley Cancer Network between 2009 and 2017. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the treatment-free interval (TFI) after 1st and subsequent lines of therapy in the total cohort and in individual subgroups, according to age (≤75 vs. >75 years), and co-morbidities using Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI): mild: 0-2 vs. moderate: 3-4 vs. severe: ≥5). Secondary outcomes include response rates, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between subgroups: according to age and according to co-morbidities. In a total cohort of 292 patients, median TFI (IQR) was longest after first-line therapy 6.9 months (1.4-16.9), reducing after second line therapy to 1.8 months (.7-6.9), and after third line therapy to 0.6 months (0.2-1.5). Median TFI followed the same trend across the different subgroups, by age (≤75, >75 years) and by CCI (0-2, 3-4, ≥5). Overall response rate (ORR) to first line therapy for total cohort was 67%, with responses categorised as complete response (CR): 21%, very good partial response: 16%, partial response: 30%, stable disease: 18%, and progressive disease: 8%. ORR in individual subgroups by age were (≤75: 70% vs. >75: 63%), and by CCI (0-2: 65% vs. 3-4: 71% vs. ≥5: 77%). Median OS and PFS for the total cohort were (30.2 months, 95% CI: 23.8-36.9), and (9 months, 95% CI: 7.9-9.8), respectively. Patients aged >75 years showed a significant reduction in OS and PFS compared to those ≤75 years of age: OS (49.0 vs. 22.4 months, p<0.0001, HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.5-2.8), PFS (9.7 vs. 8.0 months, p<0.01, HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.1-1.9). Median OS was significantly reduced with worsening co-morbidities: (CCI 0-2: 52.4 months vs. CCI 3-4: 33.0 months vs. CCI ≥5: 24.0 months, p = 0.01, HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.1-1.9). Median PFS was significantly reduced in the severely co-morbid subgroup (CCI 0-2: 9.4 months vs. CCI 3-4: 9.6 months vs. CCI ≥5: 7.1 months, p = 0.025, HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.6). This study demonstrated that first line therapy in the TNE NDMM setting resulted in the longest TFI which was modest at a median of 6.9 months, and decreased significantly following subsequent lines of therapy and across the different subgroups by age and by co-morbidities. Therapy objective should be to maximise the benefit of first line treatment. We envisage that the recent shift towards a continuous therapeutic approach will benefit TNE patients in view of improved survival data demonstrated by a number phase 3 trials. When continuous therapy is not appropriate due to patient choice or toxicities, an efficacious (not limited to thalidomide and bortezomib) but tolerable first line FDT strategy, which can maximise TFI and maintain a good QoL, remains a reasonable alternative approach.

Use of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed amyloid light-chain amyloidosis.

With improving outcomes in amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, there is a need to study novel agents in this setting. We report outcomes of 40 patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis treated with ixazomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (IRd). Haematological responses were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis at three months: complete response (CR) - 8 (20·5%), very good partial response (VGPR) - 8 (20·5%), partial response (PR) - 7 (17·9%) and no response (NR) - 16 (41·0%). One patient had missing data. Six patients subsequently improved response. Best responses were: CR - 10 (25·6%), VGPR - 8 (20·5%), PR - 7 (17·9%), NR - 14 (35·9%). Cardiac and renal organ responses occurred in 5·6% and 13·3% respectively. Median progession-free survival (PFS) was 17·0 months (95% CI 7·3-20·7 months), improving to 28·8 months (95% CI 20·6-37·0 months) in those achieving CR/VGPR. Median overall survival was 29·1 months (95% CI 24-33 months). Serious adverse events were seen in 14 (35·0%) patients inclusive of 15 admissions due to: infection (6/15, 40·0%), fluid overload (5/15, 33·3%), cardiac arrhythmia (2/15, 13·3%), renal dysfunction (1/15, 6·6%) and anaemia (1/15, 6·6%). In summary, IRd is an oral treatment option with a manageable toxicity profile leading to deep responses in 47% of patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis.

Cardiac biomarkers are prognostic in systemic light chain amyloidosis with no cardiac involvement by standard criteria.

Patients with systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) with no evidence of cardiac involvement by consensus criteria have excellent survival, but 20% will die within 5 years of diagnosis and prognostic factors remain poorly characterised. We report the outcomes of 378 prospectively followed Mayo stage I patients (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide <332 ng/L, high sensitivity cardiac troponin <55 ng/L). The median presenting N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide was 161 ng/L, high sensitivity cardiac troponin 10 ng/L, creatinine 76 µmol/L and mean left ventricular septal wall thickness, 10 mm. Median follow up was 42 (1-117 months), with 71 deaths; median overall survival was not reached (78% survival at 5 years). Although no patients had cardiac involvement by echocardiogram, a proportion (n=25/90, 28%) had cardiac involvement by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Age, autonomic nervous system involvement, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide >152 ng/L, high sensitivity cardiac troponin >10 ng/L and cardiac involvement by magnetic resonance imaging were predictive for survival; on multivariate analysis only N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide >152 ng/L (P<0.008, hazard ratio [HR] 3.180, confidence interval [CI]: 1.349-7.495) and cardiac involvement on magnetic resonance imaging (P=0.026, HR=5.360, CI: 1.219-23.574) were prognostic. At 5 years, 70% of patients with N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide >152 ng/L were alive. In conclusion, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide is prognostic for survival in patients with no cardiac involvement by consensus criteria and cardiac involvement is detected by magnetic resonance imaging in such cases. This suggests that N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide thresholds for cardiac involvement in AL may need to be redefined.

Cytomegalovirus reactivation after bortezomib treatment for multiple myeloma and light chain amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVE: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic herpesvirus, and reactivation of infection is possible in immunocompromised patients. Historically, the risk for haematology patients is restricted to those treated with an allogeneic transplant or T-cell depleting agents. Bortezomib is a highly efficacious proteasome inhibitor widely used to treat multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis patients. The objective of this small prospective study was to quantify the risk of CMV reactivation associated with bortezomib treatment. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive multiple myeloma or AL amyloidosis patients commencing bortezomib-based therapy were included. Viral copy numbers were established at baseline and then at fortnightly intervals during treatment. Pre-emptive anti-viral treatment was initiated in patients with a viral load >7500 copies/mL. RESULTS: Reactivation of CMV was detected in 39% (n = 12/31) of seropositive bortezomib treated patients compared with 0% of CMV seronegative patients. Detectable DNAemia developed during the first two cycles of treatment in 83% (n = 10/12) patients. Anti-viral treatment was initiated in 42% (n = 5/12), but no cases of active CMV disease were seen. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there is a substantial risk of CMV reactivation in CMV-seropositive plasma cell dyscrasia patients treated with bortezomib.

A prospective observational study of 915 patients with systemic AL amyloidosis treated with upfront bortezomib.

Bortezomib is a standard therapy in light-chain amyloidosis (AL), but little is known about response duration. A difference in involved amyloidogenic and uninvolved serum-free light chains (dFLC) < 10 mg/L (low dFLC response) predicts survival in AL patients with low presenting dFLC (20-50 mg/L). We report outcomes in the largest AL cohort treated with upfront bortezomib and explore the impact of posttreatment dFLC < 10 mg/L ("stringent dFLC response"). A total of 915 newly diagnosed AL patients treated with bortezomib and assessed at our center were included. Hematologic responses, 6-month dFLC, organ responses, overall survival (OS), and time-to-next-treatment (TNT) (excluded patients who died without starting second-line treatment) were evaluated. Overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 65%, with 49% complete response (CR)/very good partial response/low dFLC response and with a stringent dFLC response, dFLC 10-40 mg/L, and dFLC > 40 mg/L was 30%, 22%, and 48%, respectively. Median OS was 72 months. A total of 289 patients died without progressing to second-line treatment. Median TNT was not reached, and 55% had not progressed to further treatment at 7 years. Patients with stringent dFLC responses had significantly better OS and TNT than did those with lesser responses. A total of 72% of CR patients did not progress to further treatment at 3 years compared with 84% with stringent dFLC responses. Cardiac responses were better in those with stringent dFLC responses (61%) compared with lesser responses (45%; P = .005). Upfront bortezomib confers durable hematologic responses. A stringent dFLC response predicts prolonged TNT and impressive organ responses.

Carfilzomib is an effective upfront treatment in AL amyloidosis patients with peripheral and autonomic neuropathy.

Bortezomib is standard treatment in AL amyloidosis (AL), but is contraindicated in patients with significant neuropathy. Carfilzomib, a second-generation proteosomal inhibitor, results in a lower incidence of neuropathy than bortezomib, but data in AL is scant. We report a cohort of five AL patients treated with upfront carfilzomib. All had cardiac, peripheral and autonomic neuropathy at presentation. All achieved at least a very good partial haematological response. There was no worsening in cardiac function, peripheral or autonomic neuropathy. Carfilzomib is an effective upfront treatment option in AL patients with peripheral and/or autonomic neuropathy (without severe cardiac or renal involvement).

A 24-year experience of autologous stem cell transplantation for light chain amyloidosis patients in the United Kingdom.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered to be the best method to achieve deep haematological/organ responses and improve survival in selected patients with AL amyloidosis. This field has been led by US centres and is less utilised in Europe. The introduction of effective chemotherapy agents for AL prompted us to re-evaluate UK outcomes of ASCT in affected patients. A total of 264 AL amyloidosis patients treated with an ASCT between 1994 and 2018 were identified. Patient baseline characteristics, transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. The median OS post-ASCT was 87 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 77-106 months]. The median time from ASCT to next treatment was 48 months (95% CI: 29-55 months). A haematological response was achieved in 94·8% of patients and was a strong predictor of time to next treatment [P < 0·0001, hazard ratio (HR) = 1·75, 95% CI = 1·35-2·28] and OS (P = 0·007, HR = 1·91, 95% CI = 1·19-3·07). Organ response was: cardiac (n = 28, 60·9%), renal (n = 101, 76%) and liver (n = 7, 13·5%). Overall TRM was 8·7%, with a significant reduction over time (1994-2000: 18·8%; 2001-2006: 13·6%; 2007-2012: 6·2%; 2013-2018: 1·1%). In conclusion, ASCT is significantly safer and remains a highly effective treatment with excellent long-term survival; it should be more widely considered as a treatment option for systemic AL amyloidosis.

Natural History, Quality of Life, and Outcome in Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is an increasingly recognized cause of heart failure in older individuals. We sought to characterize the natural history of ATTR-CM and compare outcomes and quality of life among patients with acquired and hereditary forms of the disease. METHODS: We studied 711 patients with wild-type ATTR-CM, 205 with hereditary ATTR-CM associated with the V1221 variant (V122I-hATTR-CM), and 118 with non-V122I-hATTR-CM at the UK National Amyloidosis Center between 2000 and 2017. Patients underwent prospective protocolized evaluations comprising assessment of cardiac parameters, functional status by 6-minute walk test, quality of life according to the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, and survival. Hospital service usage pre- and postdiagnosis was established using English central health records in a subset of patients. RESULTS: There was substantial diagnostic delay, with patients using hospital services a median (interquartile range) of 17 (9-27) times during the 3 years before diagnosis, by which time quality of life was poor; diagnosis of wild-type ATTR-CM was delayed >4 years after presentation with cardiac symptoms in 42% of cases. Patients with V122I-hATTR-CM were more impaired functionally ( P<0.001) and had worse measures of cardiac disease ( P<0.001) at the time of diagnosis, a greater decline in quality of life, and poorer survival ( P<0.001) in comparison with the other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: ATTR-CM is an inexorably progressive and eventually fatal cardiomyopathy associated with poor quality of life. Diagnosis is often delayed for many years after symptoms develop. Improved awareness and wider use of recently validated diagnostic imaging methods are urgently required for patients to benefit from recent therapeutic developments.

Analysis of the TTR gene in the investigation of amyloidosis: A 25-year single UK center experience.

Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is caused by deposition of either wild-type (ATTRwt) or variant (ATTRm) transthyretin. ATTRwt presents with restrictive cardiomyopathy, while ATTRm displays a range of organ involvement. This retrospective analysis includes all patients referred to a single UK center in the last 25 years for clinical and laboratory assessment of known or suspected amyloidosis who underwent TTR gene sequencing. A total of 4459 patients were included in this study; 37% had final diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis; 27% light chain amyloidosis; 0.7% other types of amyloidosis; 21.3% had no amyloid and 14% had no data. TTR variants were found in 770 (17%) cases; the most prevalent were p.V142I, p.T80A, and p.V50M identified in 42, 25, and 16%, respectively. The median age at referral in each group was: 76 (range 47-93), 66 (40-81), and 45 years (21-86), respectively. Overall 42 rare or novel variants were identified. Forty-two percent patients with ATTRm died at a median age of 73 years (33-89) with a median survival from diagnosis of 50 months. ATTRwt was the final diagnosis in 20% of patients undergoing genetic testing. Our findings of TTR variants in 17% of screened patients highlight the need for routine genetic testing in the evaluation of suspected ATTR amyloidosis.

Real world outcomes of pomalidomide for treatment of relapsed light chain amyloidosis.

Pomalidomide is a next-generation immunomodulatory agent with activity in relapsed light chain (AL) amyloidosis, but real world outcomes are lacking. We report the experience of the UK National Amyloidosis Centre. All patients with AL amyloidosis treated with pomalidomide between 2009 and 2017 were included. Data was collected on treatment toxicity and clonal response. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and outcomes reported on an intent-to-treat (ITT) basis. A total of 29 patients treated with pomalidomide were identified. Haematological responses at 3 months were: complete response (CR) nil, very good partial response (VGPR) 10 (35%), partial response (PR) 9 (31%), stable or progressive disease 7 (24%), unevaluable 3 (10%). On an ITT basis (n = 28), responses at 6 months were: CR- nil, VGPR-11 (39%), PR-2 (7%) and the remaining patients were non-responders 15 (53%). Median overall survival was 27 months (95% confidence interval 15·7-38·1 months). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 15 months (95% confidence interval 6·24-23·77). In conclusion, pomalidomide has activity in patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis. Responses are rapid and early responses may be predictive of a sustained overall response. Deep responses (VGPR or better) are seen in only a third of all patients and combination therapy needs to be explored.