Comparing the performance of a deep learning-based lung gross tumour volume segmentation algorithm before and after transfer learning in a new hospital.

Objectives: Radiation therapy for lung cancer requires a gross tumour volume (GTV) to be carefully outlined by a skilled radiation oncologist (RO) to accurately pinpoint high radiation dose to a malignant mass while simultaneously minimizing radiation damage to adjacent normal tissues. This is manually intensive and tedious however, it is feasible to train a deep learning (DL) neural network that could assist ROs to delineate the GTV. However, DL trained on large openly accessible data sets might not perform well when applied to a superficially similar task but in a different clinical setting. In this work, we tested the performance of DL automatic lung GTV segmentation model trained on open-access Dutch data when used on Indian patients from a large public tertiary hospital, and hypothesized that generic DL performance could be improved for a specific local clinical context, by means of modest transfer-learning on a small representative local subset. Methods: X-ray computed tomography (CT) series in a public data set called "NSCLC-Radiomics" from The Cancer Imaging Archive was first used to train a DL-based lung GTV segmentation model (Model 1). Its performance was assessed using a different open access data set (Interobserver1) of Dutch subjects plus a private Indian data set from a local tertiary hospital (Test Set 2). Another Indian data set (Retrain Set 1) was used to fine-tune the former DL model using a transfer learning method. The Indian data sets were taken from CT of a hybrid scanner based in nuclear medicine, but the GTV was drawn by skilled Indian ROs. The final (after fine-tuning) model (Model 2) was then re-evaluated in "Interobserver1" and "Test Set 2." Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, and recall were used as geometric segmentation performance metrics. Results: Model 1 trained exclusively on Dutch scans showed a significant fall in performance when tested on "Test Set 2." However, the DSC of Model 2 recovered by 14 percentage points when evaluated in the same test set. Precision and recall showed a similar rebound of performance after transfer learning, in spite of using a comparatively small sample size. The performance of both models, before and after the fine-tuning, did not significantly change the segmentation performance in "Interobserver1." Conclusions: A large public open-access data set was used to train a generic DL model for lung GTV segmentation, but this did not perform well initially in the Indian clinical context. Using transfer learning methods, it was feasible to efficiently and easily fine-tune the generic model using only a small number of local examples from the Indian hospital. This led to a recovery of some of the geometric segmentation performance, but the tuning did not appear to affect the performance of the model in another open-access data set. Advances in knowledge: Caution is needed when using models trained on large volumes of international data in a local clinical setting, even when that training data set is of good quality. Minor differences in scan acquisition and clinician delineation preferences may result in an apparent drop in performance. However, DL models have the advantage of being efficiently "adapted" from a generic to a locally specific context, with only a small amount of fine-tuning by means of transfer learning on a small local institutional data set.

Clinical Concept-Based Radiology Reports Classification Pipeline for Lung Carcinoma.

Rising incidence and mortality of cancer have led to an incremental amount of research in the field. To learn from preexisting data, it has become important to capture maximum information related to disease type, stage, treatment, and outcomes. Medical imaging reports are rich in this kind of information but are only present as free text. The extraction of information from such unstructured text reports is labor-intensive. The use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools to extract information from radiology reports can make it less time-consuming as well as more effective. In this study, we have developed and compared different models for the classification of lung carcinoma reports using clinical concepts. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee as a retrospective study with a waiver of informed consent. A clinical concept-based classification pipeline for lung carcinoma radiology reports was developed using rule-based as well as machine learning models and compared. The machine learning models used were XGBoost and two more deep learning model architectures with bidirectional long short-term neural networks. A corpus consisting of 1700 radiology reports including computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) reports were used for development and testing. Five hundred one radiology reports from MIMIC-III Clinical Database version 1.4 was used for external validation. The pipeline achieved an overall F1 score of 0.94 on the internal set and 0.74 on external validation with the rule-based algorithm using expert input giving the best performance. Among the machine learning models, the Bi-LSTM_dropout model performed better than the ML model using XGBoost and the Bi-LSTM_simple model on internal set, whereas on external validation, the Bi-LSTM_simple model performed relatively better than other 2. This pipeline can be used for clinical concept-based classification of radiology reports related to lung carcinoma from a huge corpus and also for automated annotation of these reports.