Comparison of two gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression protocols for in vitro fertilization in young patients with low body mass index.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two different gonadotropin-releasing (pituitary downregulating) hormones used in in vitro fertilization (IVF) on the live birth rate in young patients with low body mass index (BMI) undergoing their first IVF cycle. METHODS: In a retrospective study in a single public medical center, 555 long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocols were compared with 431 prolonged GnRH-a protocols between 2016 and 2018. All analyses were performed using the SPSS version 22.0. The primary measured outcome was live birth rate. RESULTS: Compared with the long protocol, the prolonged protocol required more doses of gonadotropin and a longer duration of ovarian stimulation. Lower levels of serum luteinizing hormone and serum estrogen were detected on the day of chorionic gonadotropin administration, and a lower fertilization rate was found in the prolonged protocol. Although more oocytes were retrieved and more frozen embryos were recorded in the prolonged protocol, the live birth rate per fresh cycle was comparable between the two protocols (P = 0.057). The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was higher in the prolonged protocol group. In the subgroup of women with antral follicle count (AFC) of 12 or less, there was no difference in the live birth rate between the two protocols (P = 0.688). However, for women with AFC > greater than 12, the prolonged protocol was still a positive predictor of live birth rate. The odds ratio was 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.04-2.89). CONCLUSION: The prolonged protocol might not increase the live birth rate in women with low BMI who are undergoing their first IVF cycle. However, for women with AFC greater than 12, a prolonged protocol could be a good choice to improve the live birth rate.

Association of IL-6 -174G>C (rs1800795) polymorphism with cervical cancer susceptibility.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a multifunctional cytokine that has been implicated in the etiology of cancer. Several case-control studies have been conducted to assess the association of IL-6 -174G>C (rs1800795) polymorphism with the risk of cervical cancer, yet with conflicting conclusions. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed this meta-analysis updated to June 2018. A total of seven original publications were identified covering IL-6 -174G>C (rs1800795) polymorphism. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the relationship strengths. Statistically significant relationship was observed between IL-6 -174G>C polymorphism and cervical cancer risk (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40-0.94 for GG vs. CC, and OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.93 for G vs. C). Moreover, the significant association was found among Asians (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.75 for GG vs. CC, and OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.57-0.89 for G vs. C); hospital-based subgroup (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38-0.72 for GG vs. CC, and OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.87 for G vs. C); and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ≤0.05 (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.86 for GG vs. GC, and OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.93 for G vs. C). This meta-analysis showed the evidence that the IL-6 -174G>C polymorphism was a low-penetrance susceptibility variant for cervical cancer. Further large-scale case-control studies are needed to confirm these results.

[Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of domestic urine-derived high-purity follicle- stimulating hormone (HP-FSH, Lishenbao) on the outcome of in vitro fertilization(IVF) embryo transfer (ET) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). METHODS: From 1 September 2010 to 31 March 2011, total of 3178 infertility patients from 14 Reproductive Center with IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) indications who accepted first IVF or ICSI cycle were studied retrospectively. Their causes of infertility include all infertility factors except ovulatory dysfunction infertility and uterine factor infertility. The only long luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol was included. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) agents used: 1932 cases in HP-FSH group and 1246 cases in recombinant FSH (rFSH)group. Patients in both groups were combined with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) at doses of 150 U when follicle with diameter reached to 14-16 mm. When 3 dominate follicle with diameter reached 18 mm, hCG at dose of 5000 to 10 000 U or recombinant hCG at dose of 250 µg was administered by intramuscular injection. After 34 to 36 hours, oocytes were obtained guided by ultrasound, then IVF-ET were underwent in their Reproductive Center. The primary endpoint was comparison of live birth rate between the two groups. The secondary endpoints were comparisons of clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and implantation rate, as well as COS and IVF outcome between the two groups. RESULTS: (1) There were significantly differences in baseline characteristics of the patients between two groups. The mean age was elder(32 ± 4 versus 30 ± 4, P < 0.01) , the infertility duration was longer (5 ± 4 versus 5 ± 3, P < 0.01) , and antral follicle count (AFC) was less (11 ± 5 versus 13 ± 7, P < 0.01) in patients of HP-FSH group compared with those in patients of rFSH group. (2) As compared with rFSH, the total doses of gonadotropin needed was (2348 ± 1011) U in HP-FSH group versus (2022 ± 659) U in rFSH group, the number of oocytes 13 ± 6 in HP-FSH group and 14 ± 7 in rFSH group, the rate of embryo frozen cycle of 66.30% (1281/1932) in HP-FSH group and 74.88% (933/1246) in rFSH group, which all reached statistical difference (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant different implantation rate [30.49% (1111/3644) versus 32.45% (737/2271)] between two groups. The other clinical parameters did not show significant difference, including clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle [41.61% (804/1932) versus 41.97% (523/1246) ] , clinical pregnancy rate per ET cycle[46.58% (804/1726) versus 48.47% (523/1079)], live birth rate per started cycle[34.21% (661/1932) versus 34.19% (426/1246)], live birth rate per ET cycle [38.30% (661/1726) versus 39.48% (426/1079)], miscarriage rate[13.6% (109/804) versus 16.4% (86/523)], and moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate [5.80% (112/1932) versus 7.78% (97/1246)](P > 0.05).(3) Treatment cost: the cost of gonadotropins needed for the patients in HP-FSH group was lower than that in rFSH group (4005 ± 1650 versus 6482 ± 2095, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In IVF/ICSI treatment cycles, domestic HP-FSH has similar live birth rate and lower financial burden when compared with rFSH.