Corrigendum: Identification and validation of differentially expressed genes for targeted therapy in NSCLC using integrated bioinformatics analysis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1206768.].

Clinical Significance of Disulfidptosis-related Genes and Functional Analysis in Gastric Cancer.

Background: Worldwide, gastric cancer (GC) remains intractable due to its poor prognosis and high morbidity and mortality. Disulfidptosis is a novel kind of cell death mediated by abnormal accumulation of intracellular disulphides. The correlation between disulfidptosis and GC is still unknown. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate the pathogenesis and mechanism of disulfidptosis and GC for clinical diagnosis and intervention. Methods: RNA-sequencing data from several public data portals and clinical samples were collected. We compared the expression levels of four key genes of disulfidptosis, including SLC7A11, SLC3A2, RPN1, and NCKAP1, in GC and selected prognostic genes to build a novel GC prognosis-related nomogram model. The biological functions and immune landscape of the identified prognostic genes were explored. Results: Overexpressed NCKAP1 and SLC7A11 were prognostic disulfidptosis-related genes in GC. We combined these genes and several clinicopathological factors to build a prognostic nomogram model for GC. Meanwhile, the ROC curves showed that NCKAP1 and SLC7A11 were promising biomarkers for GC screening. The biological and cellular functions were focused on actin activities, GTPase and immunoreaction. The tumour immune microenvironment and immune therapy targets were identified. Competing endogenous RNA network was built to explore the downstream regulatory mechanisms. Finally, the elevated NCKAP1 and SLC7A11 expression in GC was validated via qRT-PCR in a cell line and tissue line. Conclusion: In conclusion, NCKAP1 and SLC7A11 are promising prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers for GC that correlate with the activities of actin, energy metabolism of GTPase, immune infiltration and immunotherapy.

Co-Occurring EGFR S645C and EGFR L858R in a Patient with Lung Adenocarcinoma Induced Primary Resistance to Osimertinib.

Approximately 10-20% of patients demonstrate primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs, and different EGFR mutations vary in sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. We report a case of a 78-year-old male with lung adenocarcinoma that EGFR L858R (AF = 1.32%) coexisting with EGFR S645C (AF = 7.13%) in his diagnosed tissues analyzed by NGS. The patient was primarily resistant to first-line osimertinib and rapidly progressed after pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and bevacizumab, as demonstrated by persistently elevated CEA levels during treatment. ctDNA-based NGS analysis revealed loss of EGFR L858R while persistence of highly abundant EGFR S645C in the pleural fluid and plasma after treatment, suggesting that EGFR L858R may be a subclone. We provide the first clinical evidence of the primary resistance of EGFR S645C to osimertinib and emphasize the importance of identifying clones and subclones. Our patient did not respond to immunotherapy either, and preclinical studies have shown that EGFR S645C activates the MEK signaling pathway, the combination of EGFR-TKIs and MEK inhibitors may be effective.

Efficacy and safety of NAHAO® hydrogel in amelioration of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: An preliminary clinical study (ChiCTR2200064766).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of NAHAO® oral mucosal antibacterial care solution (NAHAO® spray) on attenuating oral mucositis (OM) symptoms and related mechanisms investigation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experimental OM models were established by acetic acid and 5-fluorouracil combined with mechanical trauma. We investigated spontaneous pain of conscious OM rats after using NAHAO®. The expression of NF-κB in affected trigeminal ganglion was measured by western blot. In clinical study, 60 patients who developed post-treatment OM of grade 2 or above or persistent mucosal pain with a score equal to or greater than 4 points were selected. All patients were required to receive NAHAO® spray 8 times a day and were examined for OM degrees and oral mucosal pain scores before and after application. RESULTS: Experimental data from experimental model suggested that clinical efficacy of NAHAO® spray was involved in inflammation inhibition via NF-κB pathway. The results of clinical study showed that NAHAO® spray improved the symptoms of OM, there is statistically significant difference in oral mucosal pain scores after treated with NAHAO, and the dietary restrictions were also improved. CONCLUSION: NAHAO® spray alleviates pain and improves the diet situation in OM patients, which is partly mediated through the inhibition of NF-κB pathway.

Identification and validation of differentially expressed genes for targeted therapy in NSCLC using integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Background: Despite the high prevalence of lung cancer, with a five-year survival rate of only 23%, the underlying molecular mechanisms of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unknown. There is a great need to identify reliable candidate biomarker genes for early diagnosis and targeted therapeutic strategies to prevent cancer progression. Methods: In this study, four datasets obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus were evaluated for NSCLC- associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using bioinformatics analysis. About 10 common significant DEGs were shortlisted based on their p-value and FDR (DOCK4, ID2, SASH1, NPR1, GJA4, TBX2, CD24, HBEGF, GATA3, and DDR1). The expression of significant genes was validated using experimental data obtained from TCGA and the Human Protein Atlas database. The human proteomic data for post- translational modifications was used to interpret the mutations in these genes. Results: Validation of DEGs revealed a significant difference in the expression of hub genes in normal and tumor tissues. Mutation analysis revealed 22.69%, 48.95%, and 47.21% sequence predicted disordered regions of DOCK4, GJA4, and HBEGF, respectively. The gene-gene and drug-gene network analysis revealed important interactions between genes and chemicals suggesting they could act as probable drug targets. The system-level network showed important interactions between these genes, and the drug interaction network showed that these genes are affected by several types of chemicals that could serve as potential drug targets. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the importance of systemic genetics in identifying potential drug- targeted therapies for NSCLC. The integrative system- level approach should contribute to a better understanding of disease etiology and may accelerate drug discovery for many cancer types.

Real world experience with camrelizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study (NOAH-LC-101).

Background: Camrelizumab has shown promising survival benefits in treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients when used in combination with chemotherapy. However, its effectiveness and safety outside the clinical trial setting are largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted NOAH-LC-101, a prospective multicenter cohort study, to investigate the real-world effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab on a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients in daily clinical practice. Methods: All consecutive patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed advanced NSCLC scheduled for camrelizumab treatment were screened for inclusion at 43 hospitals in China. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: Between August 2019 and February 2021, 403 patients were included. The median age of participants was 65 years (range, 27-87 years). There were 57 (14.1%) participants with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of ≥2. Most participants received camrelizumab in the second or later lines (68.7%) and plus chemotherapy (64.8%). The median PFS was 12.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7-17.0] months and median OS was 22.3 months [95% CI: 19.3-not reached (NR)]. The ORR was 28.8% (95% CI: 24.4-33.5%) and DCR was 79.9% (95% CI: 75.7-83.7%). Adverse events of any grade occurred in 348 (86.4%) participants. No new safety signals were identified. Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was observed in 75 (18.6%) patients, all of which were grade 1-2. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab in a large sample of real-world NSCLC patients. The results are generally consistent with those previously reported in pivotal clinical trials. This study supports the clinical use of camrelizumab in a broader patient population (ChiCTR1900026089).

Gumarontinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial.

Background: Approximately 3-4% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations. We report primary results from the phase 2 stage of a phase 1b/2 study of gumarontinib, a selective, potent, oral MET inhibitor, in patients with METex14 skipping mutation-positive (METex14-positive) NSCLC. Methods: The single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 stage of the GLORY study was conducted at 42 centres across China and Japan. Adults with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC received oral gumarontinib 300 mg once daily in continuous 21-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Eligible patients had failed one or two prior lines of therapy (not including a MET inhibitor), were ineligible for/refused chemotherapy, and had no genetic alterations targetable with standard therapies. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in patients with a valid baseline tumour assessment, by blinded independent review. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04270591). Findings: Between Aug 2, 2019 and Apr 28, 2021, 84 patients were enrolled and received gumarontinib (median follow-up 13.5 months [IQR 8.7-17.1]), at data cut-off (Apr 28, 2022) five patients whose METex14 status could not be confirmed by a central laboratory were excluded from the efficacy analysis. The objective response rate was 66% (95% CI 54-76) overall (n = 79), 71% (95% CI 55-83) in treatment-naïve patients (n = 44), and 60% (95% CI 42-76) in previously-treated patients (n = 35). The most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) were oedema (67/84 patients, 80%) and hypoalbuminuria (32/84, 38%). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 45 (54%) patients. Treatment-related adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation occurred in 8% (7/84) of patients. Interpretation: Gumarontinib monotherapy had durable antitumour activity with manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC when used in first line or later. Funding: Haihe Biopharma Co., Ltd. Supported in part by grants from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China for "Clinical Research of Gumarontinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor" (2018ZX09711002-011-003); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030045 to S.L. and 82172633 to YF.Y); Shanghai Municipal Science & Technology Commission Research Project (19411950500 to S.L.); Shanghai Shenkang Action Plan (16CR3005A to S.L.) and Shanghai Chest Hospital Project of Collaborative Innovation (YJXT20190105 to S.L.).

Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Treatment-Naive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial (CHOICE-01).

PURPOSE: The CHOICE-01 study investigated the efficacy and safety of toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 465) with treatment-naive, advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive toripalimab 240 mg (n = 309) or placebo (n = 156) once every 3 weeks in combination with chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles, followed by the maintenance of toripalimab or placebo once every 3 weeks plus standard care. Stratification factors included programmed death ligand-1 expression status, histology, and smoking status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: At the final PFS analysis, PFS was significantly longer in the toripalimab arm than in the placebo arm (median PFS, 8.4 v 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.61; two-sided P < .0001). At the interim OS analysis, the toripalimab arm had a significantly longer OS than the placebo arm (median OS not reached v 17.1 months, hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92; two-sided P = .0099). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was similar between the two arms. Treatment effects were similar regardless of programmed death ligand-1 status. Genomic analysis using whole-exome sequencing from 394 available tumor samples revealed that patients with high tumor mutational burden were associated with significantly better PFS in the toripalimab arm (median PFS 13.1 v 5.5 months, interaction P = .026). Notably, patients with mutations in the focal adhesion-PI3K-Akt signaling pathway achieved significantly better PFS and OS in the toripalimab arm (interaction P values ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy significantly improves PFS and OS in patients with treatment-naive advanced NSCLC while having a manageable safety profile. Subgroup analysis showed the OS benefit was mainly driven by the nonsquamous subpopulation.

Immunotherapy for bilateral multiple ground glass opacities: An exploratory study for synchronous multiple primary lung cancer.

Background: Bilateral multiple ground glass opacities (GGOs) are observed in quite a part of patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. For this so-called synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC), targeting immune checkpoint is a favorable option in addition to surgical resection. The purpose of this study is to reveal the safety and efficacy of performing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on patients with sMPLC and to explore the biomarkers of the efficacy. Methods: A total of 21 patients with sMPLC were enrolled and all included cases were pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma after conducting surgical treatment for unilateral GGOs. ICIs of Sintilimab were then used to target programmed death 1 (200mg i.v., Q3W) for up to 10 cycles. Seven patients of them received the other surgery for contralateral GGOs, and multiomics assessments, including neoantigens, somatic mutations, and methylated loci, were further performed to investigate potential biomarkers. Results: Grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in most of the patients (12/21, 57.1%), and one subject withdrawn for grade 3 AEs. For the seven patients underwent twice surgeries, twelve and thirteen GGOs were achieved before and after the use of ICIs separately, and a favorable efficacy was observed among six lesions after immunotherapy (> 50% pathologic tumor regression). Tumor infiltration T-cell and B-cell were further shown to be associated with the biological activity of ICIs. According to mechanism-based multiomics analyses, MUC19- and PCDHB5- mutations were indicated to correlate with a favorable prognosis of sMPLC underwent immunotherapy, and our results suggested that immunogenetic mutation and associated promoter methylation could provide a quantitative explanation for the pathologic response of GGOs. Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that the use of ICIs contributed favorable efficacy and safety to patients with sMPLC. Immune infiltration and immunogenic biomarkers are revealed to be implications of performing ICIs on sMPLC. These preliminary findings exhibit the prospects in performing neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapies on patients with sMPLC. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=36878, identifier ChiCTR1900022159.

A cohort study of the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib versus immune checkpoint inhibitors alone as the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the real world.

Background: Anlotinib is a new multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and has been shown to have antitumor effects and synergistic antitumor effects with immunotherapy only in animal studies and in the 2nd-line treatment in small clinical trials. A real-world study with large sample to compare the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with ICIs alone in the multiline treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was urgently needed. Methods: The data of 535 advanced NSCLC patients were collected from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups: (I) ICI monotherapy (230 patients); (II) ICI + anlotinib (305 patients). After propensity-score matching (PSM) to reduce the effects of biases and confounding variables, the progression-free survival time (PFS), occurrence of adverse events, disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR) of the 2 groups were compared. The effects of clinical factors, including age, gender, gene mutations, tumor proportion score, metastases, and combined radiotherapy, were also analyzed. Results: After PSM, the baseline clinical characteristics were well balanced and the 2 group had a good comparability. Patients in the ICI + anlotinib group had significantly longer median PFS in both the 2nd-line treatment (7.73 vs. 4.70 months; P=0.003) and 3rd-line treatment (5.90 vs. 3.37 months; P=0.020), but the difference lacked statistical significance in the 1st-line treatment (8.40 vs. 5.20 months; P=0.229). The overall median PFS of patients in the ICI + anlotinib group was also much longer than that of patients in the ICI monotherapy group (6.37 vs. 3.90 months; P<0.001). The ICI + anlotinib group also tended to have a higher DCR, a higher ORR, and a higher probability of severe adverse drug reactions during the treatment than the ICI monotherapy group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Combining ICI + anlotinib could improve the outcomes of patients with bone metastasis. Conclusions: Anlotinib + ICI therapy could have greater efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients than ICI monotherapy. The probability of adverse events might increase in the combined treatment, but could be controlled.

An exploration of the clinical progression models of osimertinib in the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Classifying the progression pattern had been proved to be momentous for predicting efficacy and guiding treatment in the 1st/2nd generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), while lack evidence in the 3rd generation EGFR-TKIs. This study aimed to classify tumor progression of osimertinib in EGFR+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), exploring the characteristics and the clinical significance of each progression pattern. Methods: After screening 1,125 lung cancer patients, 168 EGFR T790M+ advanced patients using osimertinib were enrolled and divided into two groups and five clinical progression models according to the time course of the tumor progression. The prognosis and characteristics, such as gender, age, metastases, of each model were analyzed and compared by Kaplan-Meier method, t-test, and linear regression. Results: Complete follow-up data were available for 117 of the 168 patients. Progressive disease (PD) occurred in 89 patients at an average onset of 6.59 months since using osimertinib, with 79.78% of patients experiencing enlargement of some preexisting lesions before PD. Among the five progression models, the 'Rapid Enlargement' (10.11%) model, the 'Rapid New Lesion' model (10.11%), the 'Delayed Enlargement' model (29.21%), the 'Delayed New Lesion' model (15.73%), and the 'Non-targeted Enlargement' model (34.83%), the 'Non-targeted Enlargement' model had the worst prognosis, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.1 months (P=0.046). The mPFS of other models was similar, with the largest difference in the time interval between the beginning of osimertinib treatment to the first appearance of target lesion enlargement (Tm-e). Smoking history (P=0.046) and the location of the initial (P=0.048), enlarged (P=0.003), and progressive lesions (P=0.002) affected the progression models, while gender, age, and treatment lines had no effect. The Tm-e was related to the overall disease control time with a correlation coefficient of 0.667 (P=0.000). The appearance of a malignant pleural effusion had an impact on progression. Conclusions: We tried to create a classification system for describing the failure of the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib including two groups, subdivided into five progression models based on the time course of tumor lesion changes. The system might be conducive to predict the prognosis and be potential to assist in selecting subsequent treatment strategies.

A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: Final Analysis, with a Focus on Patients Enrolled at Sites in China.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib has been shown as a suitable option for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized controlled trials. However, patients treated in real-world clinical practice, including elderly patients, and those with brain metastases or poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance statuses, are often excluded from these studies. OBJECTIVE: To report the final results, with a particular focus on patients enrolled in China, from a prospective phase IIIb, "near real-world" study of afatinib in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve Asian patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NCT01953913 was conducted at 34 centers across Asia. Entry criteria were broad to reflect real-world settings. Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day until tumor progression, lack of clinical benefit, or poor tolerability. Assessments included safety, time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 541 patients were treated, of whom 412 were enrolled in China. Dose reductions were implemented in 28.7% of patients overall, and 17.7% of patients from China. Safety findings were consistent with phase III studies of afatinib. Median TTSP in all patients was 14.0 months (95% CI 12.9-15.9), and median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI 11.0-13.6). Median TTSP (13.8 months, 95% CI 12.7-16.1) and PFS (11.4 months, 95% CI 10.9-13.7) were similar in patients from China to the overall population. Among patients from China who had dose reductions, TTSP was numerically longer than in those who did not (16.4 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0703), while PFS was significantly longer (13.9 vs. 11.1 months; P = 0.0275). Among patients from China with brain metastases, TTSP was numerically shorter than in those without (11.0 vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.0869), whereas PFS was significantly shorter (9.2 vs. 12.9 months; P = 0.0075). CONCLUSIONS: Safety data for afatinib when used in a "near real-world" setting in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC was consistent with the known safety profile of afatinib. Supporting efficacy data of afatinib were provided in all patients, and in those enrolled in China. Tolerability-guided afatinib dose reduction allowed patients to remain on treatment and continue to experience clinical benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: NCT01953913 (1 October 2013).

Anaphylactic shock in a small cell lung cancer patient receiving atezolizumab therapy: a rare but potentially fatal complication.

Immunotherapy has been a revolutionary innovation in cancer therapy in recent years, but it is accompanied by various unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among these irAEs, anaphylactic shock is very rare. Here, we report a case of a patient who developed anaphylactic shock after receiving one dose of atezolizumab. A 74-year-old male patient with small cell lung cancer experienced recurrence 10 years after surgery. After one cycle of treatment, the patient developed a grade 2 rash and recovered after receiving oral methylprednisolone tablets. In the second cycle, atezolizumab was discontinued. Then, the patient was scheduled to receive atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide again after three weeks, but approximately three minutes after an intravenous infusion of atezolizumab, the patient developed signs and symptoms of anaphylactic shock, such as dyspnea, cold limbs, and loss of consciousness. At this point, the infusion was immediately stopped, and a normal saline infusion was administered. Meanwhile, ECG monitoring, supplemental humidified high-flow supplemental 100% oxygen, epinephrine, dopamine, hormone treatment with methylprednisolone, and other anti-shock treatments were carried out. For better recuperation, this patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for further treatment and was discharged two days later. Anaphylactic shock develops rapidly and is also a very severe complication. Prompt detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic intervention are the basics for survival.

Efficacy and safety of alectinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer and blood markers for prognosis and efficacy: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Alectinib is a second generation of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), which has attracted much attention in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At present, there are few reports on the efficacy and safety of alectinib in Chinese population. Moreover, biomarkers reflecting prognosis and efficacy are exceedingly needed. This study assessed the efficacy of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and analyzed the prognostic factors. Methods: Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who were confirmed by histopathology or cytology at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between October 2018 and October 2021 were enrolled. All patients were treated with alectinib. The clinical characteristics and circulating tumor biomarkers before and after treatment were collected. Kaplan-Meier test was used to calculate the progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to explore the influencing factors on PFS. Incidence of adverse events was observed. Results: Twenty patients progressed after first-line treatment (n=59) with alectinib, and 21 patients progressed following second-line treatment (n=36) with alectinib. The median PFS of first-line treatment patients was not achieved, and the median PFS of patients undergoing second-line treatment was 15.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00-32.23]. The most common adverse reactions were liver dysfunction (37.50%), anemia (37.50%), and constipation (20.83%). The incidence of grade III and above adverse reactions was 6.25%. Univariate analysis showed that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR; hazard ratio (HR) =0.424, P=0.005] carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; HR =0.482, P=0.029), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; HR =0.327, P<0.001), carbohydrate antigen (CA)199 (HR =0.313, P=0.002), and circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA; HR =0.229, P=0.008) concentration levels were associated with PFS, and multivariate analysis showed that NLR (HR =3.058, P=0.034) was independent prognostic factor. After three months of treatment, CEA, CA199, NLR, and LDH, could further predict the prognosis of alectinib treatment. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of alectinib as a first-line or second-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC in keeping with published prospective studies. CEA, CA199, NLR, and LDH within the normal range after three months of treatment were associated with good prognosis. Detection of serum tumor markers can indicate therapeutic success in patients treated with alectinib.

A large-scale, multicentered trial evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of digital PCR versus ARMS-PCR for detecting ctDNA-based EGFR p.T790M in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Developing liquid biopsy technology with higher sensitivity and specificity especially for low-frequency mutations remains crucial. This study demonstrated superior performance of the newly developed digital PCR (dPCR) kit for ctDNA-based EGFR p.T790M detection in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) against ARMS-PCR. METHODS: This large-scale, multi-centered diagnostic study recruited 1,045 patients including 1,029 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and 16 patients with specific samples between April 1st 2018 and November 30th 2019. EGFR p.T790M in plasma samples from mNSCLC patients were tested using dPCR with ADx-ARMS PCR and Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test V2 as comparator assays to confirm cut-off value for dPCR and evaluate its performance against ARMS-PCR-based assays. Efficacy was evaluated for patients with EGFR p.T790M detected by dPCR or ARMS-PCR, who underwent Osimertinib treatment. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of dPCR against ADx-ARMS PCR was 98.15%, 88.66% and 90.16%, respectively for 1,026 plasma samples. Additional 9.26% patients were detected positive by dPCR. The majority of those samples had a mutation allele frequency between 0.1% and 1%. In 45 paired tissue and plasma samples, the sensitivity improved from 30.77% to 53.85% by dPCR with the specificity over 90%. The response of Osimertinib in 74 EGFR p.T790M-positive patients detected by dPCR, including 26 determined as negative by ARMS-PCR, were evaluated to have an ORR of 44.59% and a DCR of 90.54%. CONCLUSIONS: dPCR is a sensitive and accurate tool for ctDNA-based EGFR p.T790M detection due to its significantly improved sensitivity without compromising specificity, and dPCR is equivalent to ARMS-PCR as a companion diagnostic tool while benefiting more patients under Osimertinib treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2100043147.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy for patients with advanced lung cancer and heavily treated with EGFR mutation: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: EGFR-mutated lung cancer poorly responded to anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy. Whether patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer can benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with other drugs remains controversial. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitor combined with other drugs (chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab) in patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, who have progressed on EGFR-TKI treatment to determine the activity of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy or/and bevacizumab therapy in heavily treated patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. METHODS: We identified 56 patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy. The objective response rates were assessed using RECIST v1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Academic Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. (NO. 2019 160), and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in 6 of 56 (10.7%) patients, and the disease control rate was 53.6% (30/56). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.33 months with 95% CI of 1.58-5.08 months. No patient achieved a complete response. All six patients that achieved PR were treated with the PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy or bevacizumab therapy. Three of the six patients who achieved PR were treated with radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy. Patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as second-line therapy showed relatively longer PFS and higher objective response rates than those treated with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as third- or late-line therapy (PFS: 5.50 vs. 3.27 months, P=0.301; objective response rates: 25.0% vs. 6.82%, P=0.071). No additional AE profile was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The PD-1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy showed acceptable toxicity profile and moderate efficacy on heavily treated advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer after the exhaustion of target therapy.

Novel risk scoring system for immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcome of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, current indicators, such as programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors or tumor mutational burden (TMB), are not considered ideal biomarkers for prognosis. Thus, there is an urgent requirement for a comprehensive risk scoring system. METHODS: In this study, we enrolled 464 NSCLC patients who received ICIs between March 2017 and January 2020 at four clinical centers. Univariate and multivariate (the logistic and the Cox regression) analyses were conducted to screen clinically relevant variables. Significant parameters (P<0.05) including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC, L), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS, E) and lung/pleural metastasis (M) were selected for LEM score. Weighted values based on odds ratio and hazard ratio of multiple analyses were assigned to each parameter. LEM score was the sum of weighted values of each variable (Good, 0-1; Intermediate, 2-3; Poor, 4-6). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the association between LEM score and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In total, 258 patients were pooled and stratified into three risk categories based on the LEM score. Objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the good-risk group compared with the poor-risk group [55.9% vs. 7.3%, odds ratio (OR), 0.023; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.005-0.099; P<0.001]. Patients with good risk [hazard ratio (HR), 0.130; 95% CI, 0.084-0.203; median PFS, 12.5 months; P<0.001] or intermediate risk (HR, 0.330; 95% CI, 0.222-0.490; median PFS, 4.2 months; P<0.001) had longer PFS than those with poor risk (median PFS, 2.1 months). DNA sequencing was performed in 41 patients [no durable benefit (NDB): n=29; durable clinical benefit (DCB): n=12] and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were enriched in samples of the NDB group vs. the DCB group (11/29 vs. 1/12; Fisher's exact P=0.073; OR, 6.722; 95% CI, 0.760-59.479). Additionally, patients with EGFR mutations had higher LEM scores than those with wild-type EGFR. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the LEM score provided a potential prognostic biomarker for NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

The prognostic value of longitudinal circulating tumor DNA profiling during osimertinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: Serial profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could reflect dynamic molecular changes in response to treatment and potentially predict impending disease progression (PD). Herein, we investigated the molecular factors and dynamic changes in ctDNA that can serve as predictors of survival outcomes of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received osimertinib therapy after progression from prior EGFR inhibitor regimen. METHODS: Capture-based targeted sequencing was performed on the baseline and longitudinal plasma samples collected from 72 and 57 patients, respectively, using a 168-gene panel. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that inferior overall survival (OS) was correlated with various baseline molecular features including high allelic fraction (AF) of EGFR sensitizing mutations (P=0.045), high maximum AF (maxAF, P=0.060), or harboring concurrent genomic alterations such as copy number amplification (CNA) in EGFR (P=0.026) or in other genes (P=0.026), and genes involved in the cell cycle (P=0.004) or TP53 signaling pathway (P=0.032). Moreover, ctDNA clearance at first follow-up after 6 weeks of osimertinib therapy was correlated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.022) and OS (P=0.009). Molecular PD, reflected by the emergence of new mutation or increased AF of existing mutations, was detected at an average lead time of 2.5 months prior to radiological PD. Patients with molecular PD were more likely to harbor CNA (P=0.035) and TP53 mutations (P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular factors derived from serial ctDNA profiling can serve as predictive and prognostic markers, which could allow early detection of PD, preceding imaging modalities by 2.5 months.

Combination of apatinib and docetaxel in treating advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with wild-type EGFR: a multi-center, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: This trial aimed to investigate the treatment response, survival profiles and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of apatinib plus docetaxel in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHODS: Thirty advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR were recruited in this multi-center, phase II trial. All patients received apatinib (orally 500 mg, once daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death) plus docetaxel (intravenously 60 mg/m2 at day 1 every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles). The treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related AEs were evaluated. RESULTS: One patient lacked response and survival assessment due to early lost follow-up, therefore, 29 patients were included in response and survival analysis. There was no (0.0%) patient achieved complete remission, 8 (27.6%) patients achieved partial remission, 20 (69%) patients with stable disease, and 1 (3.4%) patient with progressive disease, resulting in objective response rate and disease control rate of 27.6% and 96.6%, respectively. According to the survival data, median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.9 months) and median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI: 6.33-12.9 months). For safety, totally 30 patients were included in the analysis. Common non-hematologic AEs included hypertension (66.7%), hand-foot syndrome (40.0%), proteinuria (36.7%); common hematologic AEs included leukopenia (26.7%), thrombocytopenia (23.3%), neutropenia (16.7%). Notably, majority of AEs were at grade 1-2, and the overall AEs were tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib plus docetaxel is an effective and tolerable treatment option for advanced non-squamous NSCLC with wild-type EGFR.