Dynamic evolution of bone marrow adipocyte in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: insights from diagnosis to post-chemotherapy.

Adipocyte is a unique and versatile component of bone marrow microenvironment (BMM). However, the dynamic evolution of Bone Marrow (BM) adipocytes from the diagnosis of B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) to the post-treatment state, and how they affect the progression of leukemia, remains inadequately explicated. Primary patient-derived xenograft models (PDXs) and stromal cell co-culture system are employed in this study. We show that the dynamic evolution of BM adipocytes from initial diagnosis of B-ALL to the post-chemotherapy phase, transitioning from cellular depletion in the initial leukemia niche to a fully restored state upon remission. Increased BM adipocytes retards engraftment of B-ALL cells in PDX models and inhibits cells growth of B-ALL in vitro. Mechanistically, the proliferation arrest of B-ALL cells in the context of adipocytes-enrichment niche, might attribute to the presence of adiponectin secreted by adipocytes themselves and the absence of cytokines secreted by mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs). In summary, our findings offer a novel perspective for further in-depth understanding of the dynamic balance between BMM and B-ALL.

Impact of measurable residual disease in combination with CD19 on postremission therapy choices for adult t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

BACKGROUND: The post-remission therapy (PRT) choices for adult t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) need to be further explored. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the impact of measurable residual disease (MRD) combined with CD19 on PRT choices for adult t(8;21) AML in CR1. METHODS: A total of 150 t(8;21) AML patients were enrolled, including 67 underwent chemotherapy (CMT) and 83 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) as PRT in CR1. Subgroup analyses were performed according to MRD level after three cycles of chemotherapy combined with CD19 expression. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis indicated MRDhigh after three courses of treatment (HR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.03-0.66]; p = 0.013) and CD19 negativity (HR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.96]; p = 0.045) were risk factors for relapse, while allo-SCT was protective factor for relapse (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15-0.75]; p = 0.008). Grouped by MRD after three courses of chemotherapy, allo-SCT had lower CIR (p < 0.001) and better OS (p = 0.003) than CMT for MRDhigh patients, CMT showed a higher CIR (35.99% vs. 15.34%, p = 0.100) but comparable OS (p = 0.588) than allo-SCT for MRDlow patients. Grouped by CD19 expression, allo-SCT demonstrated lower CIR (p < 0.001) and better OS (p = 0.002) than CMT for CD19- patients. CMT had a higher CIR (41.37% vs. 10.48%, p = 0.007) but comparable OS (p = 0.147) than allo-SCT for CD19+ patients. Grouped by MRD combined with CD19, MRDhigh /CD19+ subsets were identified out of CD19+ patients benefiting from allo-SCT with lower CIR (p = 0.002) and superior OS (p = 0.020) than CMT. CMT preserved comparable CIR (p = 0.939) and OS (p = 0.658) with allo-SCT for MRDlow /CD19+ patients. MRDlow /CD19- subsets were also identified from MRDlow patients requiring allo-SCT with lower CIR (p < 0.001) and superior OS (p = 0.008) than CMT. Allo-SCT maintained lower CIR (p < 0.001) and superior OS (p = 0.008) than CMT for MRDhigh /CD19- patients. CONCLUSIONS: MRD combined with CD19 might optimize PRT choices for adult t(8;21) AML patients in CR1.

Sorafenib plus triplet therapy with venetoclax, azacitidine and homoharringtonine for refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD: A multicenter phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) and FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) respond infrequently to salvage chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of sorafenib plus triplet therapy with venetoclax, azacitidine, and homoharringtonine (VAH) as a salvage therapy in this population. METHODS: This multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study was conducted at 12 hospitals across China. Eligible patients had R/R AML with FLT3-ITD (aged 18-65 years) who were treated with VAH. The primary endpoint was composite complete remission (CRc) after two cycles. Secondary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR), safety, and survival. RESULTS: Between July 9, 2020, and March 19, 2022, 58 patients were assessed for eligibility, 51 of whom were enrolled. The median patient age was 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 31-57). CRc was 76.5% with ORR of 82.4%. At a median follow-up of 17.7 months (IQR, 8.7-24.7), the median duration of CRc was not reached (NR), overall survival was 18.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8-NR) and event-free survival was 11.4 months (95% CI, 5.6-NR). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients included neutropenia in 47 (92.2%), thrombocytopenia in 41 (80.4%), anemia in 35 (68.6%), febrile neutropenia in 29 (56.9%), pneumonia in 13 (25.5%), and sepsis in 6 (11.8%) patients. Treatment-related death occurred in two (3.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The sorafenib plus VAH regimen was well tolerated and highly active against R/R AML with FLT3-ITD. This regimen may be a suitable therapeutic option for this population, but larger population trials are needed to be explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry: NCT04424147.

Changing epidemiology, microbiology and mortality of bloodstream infections in patients with haematological malignancies before and during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was to explore the changes in bacterial bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with haematological malignancies (HMs) before and during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study between 2018 and 2021. SETTING: The largest haematological centre in southern China. RESULTS: A total of 599 episodes of BSI occurring in 22 717 inpatients from January 2018 to December 2021 were analysed. The frequencies of the total, Gram-negative and Gram-positive BSI before and during the pandemic were 2.90% versus 2.35% (p=0.011), 2.49% versus 1.77% (p<0.001) and 0.27% versus 0.44% (p=0.027), respectively. The main isolates from Gram-negative or Gram-positive BSI and susceptibility profiles also changed. The 30-day mortality caused by BSI was lower during the pandemic (21.1% vs 14.3%, p=0.043). Multivariate analysis revealed that disease status, pulmonary infection and shock were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the incidence of total and Gram-negative organisms BSI decreased, but Gram-positive BSI incidence increased in patients with HMs during the pandemic along with the changes of main isolates and susceptibility profiles. Although the 30-day mortality due to BSI was lower during the pandemic, the new infection prevention strategy should be considered for any future pandemics.

Impact of genetic patterns on sorafenib efficacy in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multi-center, cohort study.

Sorafenib therapy improves overall survival (OS) in patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We explored the efficacy of sorafenib therapy in this population with different concomitant genetic patterns. In this multi-center, cohort study, we enrolled patients with FLT3-ITD AML undergoing allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Patients with sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation for at least four weeks were allocated to the sorafenib group, and otherwise to the control group. Endpoints were OS, disease-free survival, and relapse for the whole cohort and OS for genetic pattern subgroups. Among 613 patients enrolled, 275 were in the sorafenib and 338 the control group. Median follow-up was 36.5 (interquartile range (IQR), 25.2-44.7) months post-transplantation. The 3-year OS post-transplantation was 79.6% (95% confidential interval (CI) 74.8%-84.6%) and 65.2% (95% CI 60.3%-70.6%) (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.69; P < 0.0001) in both groups. Sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation improved OS in the favorable (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77; P = 0.011) and adverse (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.93; P = 0.026) ELN 2017 risk subgroups. Patients with mutated NPM1, DNMT3A, co-occurring NPM1/DNMT3A, "activated signaling" and "DNA methylation" genes benefited in OS from sorafenib maintenance, while those carrying CEBPA, "tumor suppressors" and "myeloid transcription factors" genes did not. Patients with FLT3-ITDhigh and FLT3-ITDlow AML both benefited in OS from sorafenib maintenance. Our results identify the response of genetic patterns to sorafenib maintenance, providing new viewpoints for the optimal use of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD AML in the transplantation setting.

Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia: long-term follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Our open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial showed that sorafenib maintenance after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) improved overall survival and reduced relapse for patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Here, we present a post-hoc analysis on the 5-year follow-up data of this trial. METHODS: This phase 3 trial, done in seven hospitals in China, included patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT, who were aged 18-60 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, had composite complete remission before and after transplantation, and had haematopoietic recovery within 60 days after transplantation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sorafenib maintenance (400 mg orally twice daily) or non-maintenance (control) at 30-60 days after transplantation. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) via an interactive web-based system. Investigators and participants were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse, which was reported previously. For this updated analysis, the 5-year endpoints were overall survival; cumulative incidence of relapse; non-relapse mortality; leukaemia-free survival; graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS); cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD; and late effects in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02474290, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between June 20, 2015, and July 21, 2018, 202 patients were randomly assigned to sorafenib maintenance (n=100) or non-maintenance (n=102). Median follow-up was 60·4 months (IQR 16·7-73·3). Extended follow-up showed improved overall survival (72·0% [95% CI 62·1-79·7] vs 55·9% [45·7-64·9]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·34-0·88; p=0·011), leukaemia-free survival (70·0% [60·0-78·0] vs 49·0% [39·0-58·3]; 0·47, 0·30-0·73; p=0·0007), and GRFS (58·0% [47·7-67·0] vs 39·2% [29·8-48·5]; 0·56, 0·38-0·83; p=0·0030), lower cumulative incidence of relapse (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 36·3% [27·0-45·6]; 0·33, 0·18-0·60; p=0·0003), and no increase in non-relapse mortality (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 14·7% [8·6-22·3]; 0·79, 0·39-1·62; p=0·98) for patients in the sorafenib group compared with those in the control group. The 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (54·0% [43·7-63·2] vs 51·0% [40·8-60·3]; 0·82, 0·56-1·19; p=0·73) did not differ significantly between the two groups and we did not find substantial differences in late effects between the two groups. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: With extended follow-up, sorafenib maintenance after transplantation is associated with improved long-term survival and reduced relapse rates compared with non-maintenance, further supporting this strategy as a standard of care for patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Venetoclax Combined with Azacitidine and Homoharringtonine in Relapsed/Refractory AML: A Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) has a dismal prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the activity and tolerability of venetoclax combined with azacitidine plus homoharringtonine (VAH) regimen for R/R AML. METHODS: This phase 2 trial was done at ten hospitals in China. Eligible patients were R/R AML (aged 18-65 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients received venetoclax (100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg on days 3-14) and azacitidine (75 mg/m2 on days 1-7) and homoharringtonine (1 mg/m2 on days 1-7). The primary endpoint was composite complete remission rate [CRc, complete response (CR) plus complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)] after 2 cycles of treatment. The secondary endpoints include safety and survival. RESULTS: Between May 27, 2020, and June 16, 2021, we enrolled 96 patients with R/R AML, including 37 primary refractory AML and 59 relapsed AML (16 relapsed after chemotherapy and 43 after allo-HSCT). The CRc rate was 70.8% (95% CI 60.8-79.2). In the patients with CRc, measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative was attained in 58.8% of CRc patients. Accordingly, overall response rate (ORR, CRc plus partial remission (PR)) was 78.1% (95% CI 68.6-85.4). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months (95% CI 6.6-22.8) for all patients, median overall survival (OS) was 22.1 months (95% CI 12.7-Not estimated), and event-free survival (EFS) was 14.3 months (95% CI 7.0-Not estimated). The 1-year OS was 61.5% (95% CI 51.0-70.4), and EFS was 51.0% (95% CI 40.7-60.5). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (37.4%), sepsis (11.4%), and pneumonia (21.9%). CONCLUSIONS: VAH is a promising and well-tolerated regimen in R/R AML, with high CRc and encouraging survival. Further randomized studies are needed to be explored. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04424147.

Idarubicin plus BuCy versus BuCy conditioning regimens for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing auto-HSCT: An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial.

We report a randomized prospective phase 3 study, designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of idarubicin plus busulfan and cyclophosphamide (IDA-BuCy) versus BuCy in autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (IR-AML) patients in first complete remission (CR1). One hundred and fifty-four patients were enrolled and randomized to receive IDA-BuCy (IDA 15 mg/m2/day on days -12 to -10, Bu 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, and Cy 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2) or BuCy. The 2-year incidence of relapse was 15.6% and 19.5% in IDA-BuCy and BuCy groups (p = 0.482), respectively. There was no significant overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) benefit for IR-AML patients receiving IDA-BuCy (2-year OS 81.8% in IDA-BuCy vs. 83.1% in BuCy, p = 0.798; 2-year DFS 76.6% in IDA-BuCy vs. 79.2% in BuCy, p = 0.693). Grade 3 or worse regimen-related toxicity (RRT) was reported for 22 (28.9%) of 76 and 9 (12.0%) of 75 patients in two groups (p = 0.015), respectively. AEs within 100 days with an outcome of death were reported for 4 (5.3%) and 0 patients in two groups. In conclusion, IDA-BuCy has higher RRT and similar anti-leukemic activity compared with BuCy in IR-AML patients in CR1 undergoing auto-HSCT. Thus, caution should be taken when choosing IDA-BuCy for IR-AML patients in CR1 with auto-HSCT. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02671708, and is complete.

The effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning on relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Relapse remains high in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB) or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to investigate whether granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and decitabine plus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning reduced relapse compared with busulfan-cyclophosphamide in this population. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at six hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 14-65 years) had myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and HSCT comorbidity index of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) with no stratification and was implemented through an interactive web-based response system, which was independent of study site staff and investigators. G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised G-CSF 5 µg/kg daily subcutaneously (days -17 to -10), decitabine 20 mg/m2 daily intravenously (days -14 to -10), busulfan 3·2 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -7 to -4), and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -3 and -2). Busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised the same dose and duration of busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was 2 year cumulative incidence of relapse. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02744742; the trial is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 18, 2016, and Sept 30, 2019, 297 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) or busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) conditioning. 123 (61%) participants were male and 79 (31%) were female. Median follow-up was 32·4 months (IQR 10·0-43·0). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 10·9% (95% CI 5·8-17·9) in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 24·8% (16·8-33·5) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group (hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·19-0·79]; p=0·011). Within 100 days after transplantation, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group were infections (34 [34%] and 32 [32%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (30 [30%] and 30 [30%]), and gastrointestinal toxicity (28 [28%] and 29 [29%]). 11 (11%) patients in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 13 (13%) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group died of adverse events. There were no treatment related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning is a better choice than busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic HSCT. This conditioning could be a suitable therapuetic option for this patient population. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

XCHT alleviates the pancreatic fibrosis via VDR/NLRP3 signaling pathway in a mouse model of CP.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Xiao Chai Hu Tang (XCHT) derived from the classic medical book Shang Han Lun (Treatise on Febrile Diseases) in the Eastern Han Dynasty, which has been widely used in China and other Asian countries for the treatment of inflammation and fibrosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP), but the therapeutic mechanism of XCHT in pancreatic fibrosis remains unclear. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to evaluate the intervention effects and explore pharmacological mechanism of XCHT on inflammation and fibrosis in cerulein-induced CP model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into five main groups, 10 animals in each: Control, CP model (50 µg/kg cerulein), high dose XCHT-treated CP group (60 g/kg XCHT), medium dose XCHT-treated CP group (30 g/kg XCHT) and low dose XCHT-treated CP group (15 g/kg XCHT). Different doses of XCHT were given to mice by gavage twice a day for 2 weeks after the CP model induction. Pancreatic tissues were harvested and the pancreatic inflammation and fibrosis were evaluated by histological score, Sirius red staining, and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) immunohistochemical staining. ELISA, IHC and RT-qPCR were performed to detect the expression of Vitamin D3 (VD3) and Vitamin D receptor (VDR) in serum and pancreatic tissues, respectively. The expressions of NLRP3 inflammasome related genes and molecules were assayed by WB, IHC and RT-qPCR. RESULTS: The pathohistological results demonstrated that XCHT markedly inhibited the fibrosis and chronic inflammation of cerulein-induced CP, indicated by reduction of collagen I, collagen III, α-SMA, and NLRP3 expressions. XCHT significantly increased VD3 and VDR expression while reduced the pancreatic NLRP3 expression. Correspondingly, XCHT decreased the levels of NLRP3 downstream targets IL-1ß, TNF-α and IL-6. CONCLUSIONS: These results revealed that XCHT suppressed the pancreatic fibrosis and chronic inflammation in cerulein-induced CP model by enhancing the VD3/VDR expression and inhibiting the secretion of NLRP3-assoicated inflammatory factors.

Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide Versus Total Body Irradiation Plus Cyclophosphamide for Adults Acute B Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: It remains controversial whether busulfan-based versus total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimens have comparable outcomes in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) and TBI plus cyclophosphamide (TBI-Cy) conditioning in allo-HSCT for adult standard-risk B-cell-ALL in first complete remission (CR1). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed an open-label, randomized phase III trial at 13 hospitals in China. Eligible patients (age 14-65 years) had standard-risk ALL in CR1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to BuCy (0.8 mg/kg four times per day on days -7 to -4 and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg once daily on days -3 to -2) or TBI-Cy (4.5 Gy TBI on days -5 to -4 and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg once daily on days -3 to -2). The primary end point was 2-year overall survival. Analysis was per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02670252) and is complete. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and February 2020, 275 patients were assigned to receive BuCy (273 assessed) and 275 to TBI-Cy (272 assessed). The 2-year overall survival was 76.6% (95% CI, 71.7 to 81.8) and 79.4% (74.7 to 84.4; P = .457; difference 2.9%; 95% CI, -4.1 to 9.8; P = .022), indicating noninferiority of BuCy. The 2-year relapse was 20.2% (95% CI, 15.6 to 25.1) and 18.4% (14.0 to 23.2; P = .616), and the nonrelapse mortality was 11.0% (95% CI, 7.6 to 15.0) and 11.0% (7.7 to 15.1; P = .988) in the BuCy and TBI-Cy groups, respectively. There were no differences in regimen-related toxicity, graft-versus-host disease, or late effects between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The BuCy regimen has noninferior efficiency and safety as TBI-Cy (4.5 Gy × 2) for patients with adult standard-risk B cell-ALL in CR1 undergoing HLA-matched allo-HSCT.

Effect of sorafenib maintenance on Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus infections in patients with FLT3-ITD AML undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Use of kinase inhibitors such as dasatinib and imatinib might increase the risk of opportunistic infections, especially Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. However, the effect of sorafenib on EBV and CMV infections remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation on the incidence and mortality of EBV and CMV infections in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: This was a follow-up of our randomized controlled trial undertaken at seven hospitals in China. The primary endpoint was EBV and CMV infections within 3 years post-transplantation. Secondary endpoints included the cumulative incidences of relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 3 years. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients were assigned to sorafenib maintenance (n=100) or non-maintenance (control, n=102). Median extended follow-up post-transplantation was 36.8 (range, 2.5-67.1) months. The 3-year cumulative incidences of EBV-DNAemia and EBV-associated diseases were 24.0% (95% CI: 16.1-32.8%) and 5.0% (1.8-10.6%) in the sorafenib group, and 24.5% (16.6-33.2%) and 5.9% (2.4-11.6%) in the control group (P=0.937; P=0.771). The 3-year cumulative incidences of CMV-DNAemia and CMV-associated diseases were 56.0% (45.6-65.1%) and 8.0% (3.7-14.4%) in the sorafenib group, and 52.9% (42.7-62.1%) and 8.8% (4.3-15.3%) in the control group (P=0.997; P=0.826). The 3-year cumulative mortality of EBV- and CMV-associated diseases was 0.0% (0.0-0.0%) and 2.0% (0.4-6.4%) in the sorafenib group, and 1.0% (0.1-4.8%) and 2.0% (0.4-6.3%) in the control group (P=0.322, P=0.980). The 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse, NRM, OS, LFS, and GRFS were 13.0%, 11.1%, 79.0%, 75.9%, and 65.8% in the sorafenib group and 34.8%, 12.7%, 61.4%, 52.5%, and 46.6% in the control group, respectively (P<0.001, P=0.656, P=0.005, P<0.001, P=0.003). The reconstitution of T lymphocyte subsets, B lymphocytes, and natural killer cells was similar between the two groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation does not increase the incidence and mortality of EBV and CMV infections, demonstrating a favorable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02474290 . Registered on June 14, 2015.

Haplo-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Plus Cord Blood Grafts for Hematologic Malignancies Might Lead to Lower Relapse Compared with Haplo-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Plus Bone Marrow Grafts.

To compare the outcomes between peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)+cord blood and PBSC+bone marrow (BM) grafts in the setting of haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation, 110 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 54 recipients of haplo-PBSC+cord transplants and 56 recipients of haplo-PBSC+BM transplants. Chimerism analyses revealed that by day 30 post-transplantation, 94.3% of surviving patients in the haplo-PBSC+cord group had achieved full haploidentical chimerism and 5.7% had <10% cord chimerism, whereas 100% of surviving patients in the haplo-PBSC+BM group had achieved full donor chimerism. The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment at 30 days was 92.6% in the haplo-PBSC+cord group versus 89.3% in the haplo-PBSC+BM group (P =.024), that of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days was 31.5% versus 48.2% (P =.060), and 1-year relapse was 13.0% versus 25.0% (P =.027), nonrelapse mortality was 9.3% versus 12.5% (P =.76), disease-free survival (DFS) was 77.7% versus 62.5% (P =.028), and overall survival (OS) was 81.4% versus 69.6% (P =.046). Multivariate analysis identified haplo-PBSC+cord transplantation as a protective factor for relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .31; P =.007), DFS (HR, .40; P =.007), and OS (HR, .44; P =.016). Overall, haplo-PBSC+cord transplantation led to faster platelet engraftment, lower relapse, and superior DFS and OS compared with haplo-PBSC+BM transplantation and thus might be a better transplant mode in the setting of HID transplantation.

Haploidentical transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia effect than HLA-matched sibling transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Compared with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplantation, it remains unclear whether haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation has a superior graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect for Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This study aimed to compare the GVL effect between HID and MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL. METHODS: This study population came from two prospective multicenter trials (NCT01883180, NCT02673008). Immunosuppressant withdrawal and prophylactic or pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were administered in patients without active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to prevent relapse. All patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity posttransplantation (post-MRD+) or non-remission (NR) pre-transplantation received prophylactic/pre-emptive interventions. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-MRD+. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients with Ph- high-risk B-ALL were enrolled, including 145 and 190, respectively, in the HID and MSD groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence of post-MRD+ was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.2%-34.7%) and 42.6% (35.5%-49.6%) in the HID and MSD groups (P = 0.003), respectively. A total of 156 patients received DLI, including 60 (41.4%) and 96 (50.5%), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups (P = 0.096). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.6% (95% CI: 12.7%-25.4%) and 25.9% (19.9%-32.3%; P = 0.116) in the two groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 67.4% (95% CI: 59.1%-74.4%) and 61.6% (54.2%-68.1%; P = 0.382), leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 63.4% (95% CI: 55.0%-70.7%) and 58.2% (50.8%-64.9%; P = 0.429), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 51.7% (95% CI: 43.3%-59.5%) and 37.8% (30.9%-44.6%; P = 0.041), respectively, in the HID and MSD groups. CONCLUSION: HID transplantation has a lower incidence of post-MRD+ than MSD transplantation, suggesting that HID transplantation might have a superior GVL effect than MSD transplantation for Ph- high-risk B-ALL patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01883180, NCT02673008.

A phase 2 study of sorafenib combined with conventional therapies in refractory central nervous system leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with refractory central nervous system leukemia (CNSL) have a dismal prognosis and lack effective therapy. Case reports have shown that sorafenib is effective against brain metastases, including leukemia. METHODS: To explore the efficacy of sorafenib combined with conventional therapies for refractory CNSL, a phase 2 study was conducted. The primary end point was the complete remission rate (CRR) within 8 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included the overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with refractory CNSL were enrolled; they included 17 with isolated CNSL, 7 with hematological relapse, and 2 with another extramedullary relapse. After 8 weeks of treatment, 21 patients achieved complete remission, 2 achieved partial remission, and 3 achieved no remission for a CRR of 80.8% (95% CI, 62.1%-91.5%) and an ORR of 88.5% (95% CI, 71.0%-96.0%). Twenty patients survived, and 6 died. The 2-year EFS and OS rates were 75.0% (95% CI, 54.5%-88.3%) and 76.9% (95% CI, 54.2%-90.4%), respectively. Six patients experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs, including moderate chronic graft-vs-host disease (n = 3), grade 3 or 4 acute graft-vs-host disease (n = 2), and grade 3 skin rash (n = 1). No treatment-related deaths occurred during the therapy of refractory CNSL. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib combined with conventional therapies is effective and safe for refractory CNSL. LAY SUMMARY: Sorafenib combined with conventional therapies is effective and safe for refractory central nervous system leukemia.

Cidofovir, a choice for salvage treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cidofovir (CDV) is a nucleotide analogue with broad antiviral activities. It remains unclear about the CDV administration for anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatment in patients with haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 31 out of 101 haplo-HSCT recipients who suffered CMV infection in the CT group (conventional treatment) were enrolled into the CDV-ST group (CDV second-line treatment). These patients were treated with CDV as they failed conventional treatment or they were unavailable to the preemptive antiviral therapy. Nine patients with CMV infection were enrolled into the CDV-FT group (CDV-frontline treatment) and received CDV preemptive therapy. RESULTS: In the CDV-ST group, 23 of 28 (82.1%) patients were observed treatment response with a median time of 9 (2-23) days, and 20 (71.8%) among these patients obtained complete response (CR). In the CDV-FT group, six of eight (75.0%) patients acquired CR with a median of 6 (4-25) days. The treatment response in CDV-treated groups was comparable with those in CT groups. Besides, there was no statistical difference in CMV-related mortality between the three groups (p > .05). During the follow-up period (median follow-up:10 [1-28] months), a total of 8 of 22 (36.4%) patients experienced CMV reactivation in the CDV-ST group versus 23 of 62 (37.1%) in the CT group (p > .05). CDV-related toxicities occurred in 13 of 40 (32.5%) patients, including six (15%) reversible nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that CDV is potentially an option for the salvage treatment of CMV infection in the haplo-HSCT patients.

Dynamic assessment of measurable residual disease in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission, treatment, and outcomes.

We aimed to investigate outcomes of different post-remission treatment (PRT) choices based on dynamic measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry in favorable-risk AML (FR-AML). Four hundred and three younger patients with FR-AML in first complete remission (CR1) were enrolled in this registry-based cohort study, including 173 who received chemotherapy (CMT), 92 autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), and 138 allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT). The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on dynamic MRD after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd courses of chemotherapy. In subgroups of patients with negative MRD after 1 or 2 course of chemotherapy, comparable OS was observed among the CMT, auto-SCT, and allo-SCT groups (p = 0.340; p = 0.627, respectively). But CMT and auto-SCT had better graft-versus-host-disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) than allo-SCT in both subgroups. For patients with negative MRD after three courses of chemotherapy, allo-SCT had better disease-free-survival than CMT (p = 0.009). However, OS was comparable among the three groups (p = 0.656). For patients with persistently positive MRD after 3 courses of chemotherapy or recurrent MRD, allo-SCT had better OS than CMT and auto-SCT (p = 0.011; p = 0.029, respectively). Dynamic MRD might improve therapy stratification and optimize PRT selection for FR-AML in CR1.

Haploidentical donor transplant is associated with secondary poor graft function after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Secondary poor graft function (sPGF) is a serious complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) related to poor outcome. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the morbidity and hazard elements of sPGF after allo-HSCT. METHODS: Eight hundred and sixty-three patients who achieved initial engraftment of both neutrophils and platelets were retrospectively reviewed in this study. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients developed sPGF within 180 days post-transplants, with the median onset time was 62 days (range, 34-121 days) post-transplants. The overall cumulative incidence of sPGF within 180 days post-transplantation was 6.0%, with 3.4%, 3.4%, and 10.1%, respectively, in matched sibling donor (MSD), matched unrelated donor (MUD), and haploidentical donor (HID) transplant (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that HID (HID vs. MSD: hazard ratio [HR] 2.525, p = 0.004; HID vs. MUD: [HR] 3.531, p = 0.017), acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) within +30 days ([HR] 2.323, p = 0.003), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation ([HR] 8.915, p < 0.0001) within +30 days post-transplants were hazard elements of sPGF. The patients with sPGF had poorer survival than good graft function (51.7±8.1% vs. 62.9±1.9%, p < 0.0001). Our results also showed that only CMV reactivation was the hazard element for the development of PGF in HID transplant ([HR] 12.521 p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: HID transplant is also an independent hazard element of sPGF except for aGVHD and CMV reactivation.