Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Grade I Versus Grade II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is often used to treat low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). No studies have compared surgical outcomes for grade I and II IS following MIS-TLIF. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to compare outcomes between patients with grade I and II IS following MIS-TLIF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent a primary 1-level MIS-TLIF for treatment of IS between 2007 and 2015. Grade I patients underwent a unilateral tubular approach with a single interbody cage and bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Grade II patients underwent a bilateral tubular approach with bilateral interbody cage and pedicle screw placement. Baseline patient demographics and characteristics were compared using Student t test and χ2 analysis. Differences in peri- and postoperative outcomes were assessed using Poisson regression with robust error variance or linear regression adjusted for perioperative variables. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients with IS underwent MIS-TLIF; 21 (36.2%) were grade I and 37 (63.8%) were grade II. The grade I cohort was younger (42.2 versus 50.6 years, P = .029); no other differences in preoperative variables were observed. No significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative visual analogue scale scores, or complication and revision rates were demonstrated between cohorts. Arthrodesis rate was lower in the grade I cohort, though not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the grade I cohort being younger with less-severe diagnoses, the grade II cohort experienced similar outcomes. This finding may be due to the grade II cohort receiving bilateral cages, potentially providing a better fusion environment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that MIS-TLIF provides sufficient stabilization and fusion for treatment of grade II IS despite increased vertebral body displacement. In addition, MIS-TLIF with bilateral approach and interbody cage placement should be examined for treatment of high-grade IS cases.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is a common surgical procedure for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) but remains controversial for treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). Few studies have compared IS and DS outcomes after MIS TLIF. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to compare outcomes of patients with IS and DS after MIS TLIF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent a primary, 1-level MIS TLIF for grade I or II IS or DS. Grade I and II DS and grade I IS patients were treated with MIS TLIF via a unilateral tubular approach, whereas the grade II IS patients were treated via a bilateral tubular approach. Differences in patient demographics and preoperative characteristics were assessed using independent sample t tests and χ2 tests. The type of spondylolisthesis and its effect on postoperative outcomes was analyzed using Poisson regression with robust error variance (binary outcomes) or linear regression (continuous outcomes) adjusted for preoperative characteristics. Subgroup analysis comparing grade I IS versus DS and grade II IS versus DS was performed. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were included (IS: 62 [27.8%]; DS: 161 [72.2%]). IS patients were younger (P < .001), had a lower comorbidity burden (P < .001), and a greater incidence of grade II spondylolisthesis (P < .001) at L5-S1 (P < .001) than the DS cohort. Patients with IS experienced longer operative times (P < .001) and lower, but not statistically significant, arthrodesis rates compared to the DS cohort. No differences were observed in the remaining preoperative patient characteristics, perioperative or postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being younger and having a lower comorbidity burden than the DS cohort, similar outcomes were observed after MIS TLIF for IS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest MIS TLIF is an appropriate treatment option for IS patients despite the increased instability inherent with IS.

Risk Factors for Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To report culturing patterns and results in the setting of presumed aseptic revision spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The indications for obtaining cultures in revision spinal surgery remain unclear in the absence of a definitive diagnosis of infection. Culture results and risk factors for having positive cultures in this setting have not been previously studied. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 595 consecutive revision spine surgeries performed by four senior spine surgeons between 2008 and 2013. Preoperative workup revealed the diagnosis of infection in 17 cases which were excluded from review. The remaining 578 presumed aseptic cases were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with obtaining cultures and risk factors for positive cultures. RESULTS: Cultures were obtained in 112 (19.4%) cases and were positive in 40.2%. Pseudarthrosis was the most common revision diagnosis when cultures were obtained (49.1%) and Propionibacterium acnes was the most common organism isolated from positive cultures (48.8%). Regarding culture results, multivariate analysis demonstrated that male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4) and pseudarthrosis (OR = 4.1) were significantly associated with having positive cultures while fusion procedures (OR = 0.3) were negatively correlated, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.71. CONCLUSION: Unexpected positive cultures occurred commonly and P. acnes was the predominant isolated organism. Male sex, pseudarthrosis, and non-fusion cases predicted positive cultures. Considering these results, we recommend cultures be obtained in revision cases for pseudarthrosis, even in the setting of negative infectious work-up preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Revision posterior decompression and fusion surgery for patients with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is associated with significant morbidity and is technically challenging. The use of a stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in patients with symptomatic ASD may prevent many of the complications associated with revision posterior surgery. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF for symptomatic ASD. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: We retrospectively reviewed patients with a prior posterior instrumented fusion who underwent a subsequent stand-alone LLIF for ASD by a single surgeon. All patients had at least 18 months of follow-up. Patients were diagnosed with symptomatic ASD if they had a previous lumbar fusion with the subsequent development of back pain, neurogenic claudication, or lower extremity radiculopathy in the setting of imaging, which demonstrated stenosis, spondylolisthesis, kyphosis, or scoliosis at the adjacent level. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes were obtained at preoperative and final follow-up visits using the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], visual analog scale (VAS)-back, and VAS-leg. Radiographic parameters were measured, including segmental and overall lordoses, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, coronal alignment, and intervertebral disc height. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared between preoperative and final follow-up using paired t tests. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62.0±11.3 years. The average follow-up was 34.8±22.4 months. Fifteen (60%) underwent stand-alone LLIF surgery for radicular leg pain, 7 (28%) for symptoms of claudication, and 25 (100.0%) for severe back pain. Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved from preoperative values (46.6±16.4) to final follow-up (30.4±16.8, p=.002). Visual analog scale-back (preop 8.4±1.0, postop 3.2±1.9; p<.001), and VAS-leg (preop 3.6±3.4, postop 1.9±2.6; p<.001) scores significantly improved following surgery. Segmental and regional lordoses, as well as intervertebral disc height, significantly improved (p<.001) and remained stable (p=.004) by the surgery. Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch significantly improved at the first postoperative visit (p=.029) and was largely maintained at the most recent follow-up (p=.45). Six patients suffered from new-onset thigh weakness following LLIF surgery, but all showed complete resolution within 6 weeks. Three patients required subsequent additional surgeries, all of which were revised to include posterior instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: Stand-alone LLIF is a safe and effective approach with low morbidity and acceptable complication rates for patients with symptomatic ASD following a previous lumbar fusion.

Postoperative pain following posterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative pain at the site of bone graft harvest for posterior spine fusion is reported to occur in 6%-39% of cases. However, the area around the posterior, superior iliac spine is a frequent site of referred pain for many structures. Therefore, many postoperative spine patients may have pain in the vicinity of the posterior iliac crest that may not in fact be caused by bone graft harvesting. The literature may then overestimate the true incidence of postoperative iliac crest pain. PURPOSE: We performed a prospective study testing the hypothesis that patients will not report significantly higher visual analog scores over the graft harvest site when compared with the contralateral, non-harvested side. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a prospective, randomized cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients aged 18-75 years undergoing elective spinal fusion of one to two levels between L4 and S1 for spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis were randomized to left-sided or right-sided iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) donor sites and blinded to the side of harvest. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) for pain over the left and right posterior superior iliac spine. METHODS: Bone graft was harvested via spinal access incisions without making a separate skin incision over the crest. Each patient's non-harvested side served as an internal control. Data points were recorded by patients on their study visit sheets preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in the study (23 females) with an average follow-up of 8.1 months (1.5-12 months). Mean age was 51.7 years (23-77 years). Left- and right-side ICBG harvesting was performed equally between the 40 patients. The average volume of graft harvested from the left was 35.3 mL (15-70 mL) and 36.1 mL (15-60 mL) from the right. There was no statistical difference between preoperative VAS score on the harvested side compared with the non-harvested side (p=.415). Postoperatively, there were consistently higher VAS scores on the operative side; however, these differences were not statistically significant at 6 weeks (p=.111), 3 months (p=.440), 6 months (p=.887), or 12 months (p=.240). Both groups did, however, show statistically significant improvements in VAS scores over time within the operative and nonoperative sides (p<.05). Graft volume had no effect on the VAS scores (p=.382). CONCLUSIONS: The current literature does not adequately illuminate the incidence of postoperative pain at the site of harvest and the relative magnitude of this pain in comparison with the patient's residual low back pain. This is the first study to blind the patient to the laterality of bone graft harvesting. Our randomized investigation showed that although pain on the surgical side was slightly higher, it was neither clinically nor statistically different from the nonsurgical side. Our conclusion supports surgeons' use of autologous bone graft, which offers a cost-effective, efficacious spinal fusion supplement.

UPPER CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY: THE HIDDEN PATHOLOGY OF THE SPINE.

Axial neck pain can frequently be a vexing clinical problem for practitioners. Cervical spine surgery is generally regarded as less successful for axial neck pain than arm complaints. Although only few case series exist in the literature, there is evidence to suggest that upper cervical radiculopathy could be an important, treatable source of axial neck pain. Unlike patients with axial neck pain, patients with radiculopathy usually present with unilateral pain, particularly in the trapezial, parascapular, mid clavicular, or even in the form of suboccipital headaches. Similar to other regions of the cervical spine, initial imaging often consists of plain radiographs of the cervical spine, with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) if further evaluation of the pathology is warranted. Selective injections and electromyography can be used in conjunction with the imaging studies to aid with proper diagnosis. The surgical management of upper cervical radiculopathy is reserved for patients who fail to improve with non-operative modalities. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remain the most commonly performed and most reliable procedure for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Wide decompression of disc material from uncinate to uncinate is performed with or without a foraminotomy on the symptomatic side to address anterior compressive pathology. Artificial disc replacement (ADR) has been recently introduced in hopes of maintaining motion at the pathologic levels. Young patients (<40 years old) with minimal facet joint arthrosis are best indicated for this surgery. Posterior cervical foraminotomy avoids many approach related complications associated with anterior surgery and is the preferred approach when anterior surgery is contraindicated. Very few studies with small sample sizes (likely due to underdiagnosis) make it difficult to perform a comparative analysis of the different types of procedures. Ultimately, an accurate diagnosis is likely the most important predictor of a positive surgical outcome.

There is no increased risk of adjacent segment disease at the cervicothoracic junction following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to C7.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a very common operative intervention for the treatment of cervical spine degenerative disease in those who have failed non-operative measures. However, studies examining long-term follow-up on patients who underwent ACDF reveal evidence of radiographic and clinical degenerative disc disease at the levels adjacent to the fusion construct. Consistent with other junctional regions of the spine, the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) has significant morphologic variations. As a result, the CTJ undergoes significant static and dynamic stress. Given these findings, there has been some thought that ACDF down to C7 may experience additional risks for adjacent segment degeneration/disease (ASD) when compared with ASDFs that are cephalad to C7. PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to evaluate the rate of radiographic and clinical ASD in patients who have undergone single- or multilevel ACDF, down to C7. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample included consecutive patients from a single orthopedic surgeon at one quaternary referral medical center who underwent an ACDF between January 2008 and November 2014. Indications for surgery included radiculopathy, myelopathy, or myeloradiculopathy in the setting of failed conservative treatments. Patients were excluded if they had an ACDF of which the caudal level was cephalad to C7 or if they had undergone a previous cervical fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic diagnosis of ASD was determined by the presence of disc space narrowing >50%, new or enlarged osteophytes, end plate sclerosis, or increased calcification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). Postoperatively, data were collected on the presence of new radicular or myelopathic symptoms indicative of pathology at C7-T1, indicating a diagnosis of clinical ASD. METHODS: Demographic information was collected for all patients, which included age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI). Several radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the last follow-up: C2-C7 lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and T1 slope C2-C7 lordosis were measured using the Cobb angle between the inferior end plate of C2 to the inferior end plate of C7. Radiographic and clinical factors associated with ASD were analyzed postoperatively. RESULTS: Four patients (4.8%) presented with clinical evidence of ASD, all of whom also showed signs of radiographic ASD and improved with conservative measures. No patients underwent reoperation for ASD at the C7-T1 junction. Thirty patients (36.1%) presented radiographic evidence of ASD. These were generally older (54.4 vs. 48.4 years; p=.014). There were neither significant differences in radiographic parameters nor between single- versus multilevel ACDFs and the development of ASD. CONCLUSIONS: The cervicothoracic junction may present with vulnerability to ASD given the junctional biomechanics. However, this study provides evidence that an ACDF with the caudal level of C7 does not incur additional risk of ASD, showing similar outcomes to ACDFs at other levels.

Return to Golf After Lumbar Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Spinal fusion surgery is being increasingly performed, yet few studies have focused on return to recreational sports after lumbar fusion and none have specifically analyzed return to golf. HYPOTHESIS: Most golfers successfully return to sport after lumbar fusion surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: All patients who underwent 1- or 2-level primary lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative pathologies performed by a single surgeon between January 2008 and October 2012 and had at least 1-year follow-up were included. Patients completed a specifically designed golf survey. Surveys were mailed, given during follow-up clinic, or answered during telephone contact. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 200 responses (57%) to the questionnaire producing 34 golfers. The average age of golfers was 57 years (range, 32-79 years). In 79% of golfers, preoperative back and/or leg pain significantly affected their ability to play golf. Within 1 year from surgery, 65% of patients returned to practice and 52% returned to course play. Only 29% of patients stated that continued back/leg pain limited their play. Twenty-five patients (77%) were able to play the same amount of golf or more than before fusion surgery. Of those providing handicaps, 12 (80%) reported the same or an improved handicap. CONCLUSION: More than 50% of golfers return to on-course play within 1 year of lumbar fusion surgery. The majority of golfers can return to preoperative levels in terms of performance (handicap) and frequency of play. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This investigation offers insight into when golfers return to sport after lumbar fusion surgery and provides surgeons with information to set realistic expectations postoperatively.

Microbiologic profile of infections in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery.

PURPOSE: Intra-operative cultures may be obtained in revision spine surgery despite the absence of pre-operative clinical markers of infection. The microbiologic profile of culture positive cases in which there is no clear evidence of infection preoperatively has not been described. The aim of this investigation is to report on the microbiologic profile of unexpected culture positive revision spine surgery cases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 595 consecutive revision spine surgeries performed between 2008 and 2013. Five hundred and seventy-eight revision surgeries were performed for diagnoses other than infection and were included in the study. RESULTS: Operative cultures were obtained in 112 cases (19.4 %). Cultures were positive in 45 cases. Pseudarthrosis was not only the most common diagnosis overall (49.1 %) in which intra-operative cultures were obtained, it was also the most common revision surgical diagnosis where cultures were positive (55.6 %). Propionibacterium acnes was cultured in 54.2 % of cases with the primary diagnosis of pseudarthrosis, but only in 40.9 % of cases with other diagnoses (P = 0.554). Overall, staphylococcal species were found most commonly (57.8 % of cases), but P. acnes was at least one of the isolates in 48.9 % of cases and was three times more common than any other organism. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one in five patients with the diagnosis of pseudarthrosis were culture positive. More specifically, pseudarthrosis was the most common culture positive diagnosis and P. acnes species predominated in this patient population. Propionibacterium acnes was overwhelmingly the most common single organism cultured in revision spine surgery. Given this, we recommend all cultures be held for P. acnes, particularly in the setting of pseudarthrosis.

Maintenance of Derotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Novel Technique Measuring Postoperative Vertebral Rotation by Pedicle Screw Position.

BACKGROUND: Current methods of measuring vertebral rotation by plain radiographs rely on anatomic landmarks that are not present in the postoperative spine or require advanced imaging. Furthermore, there are few studies on the incidence of crankshaft with modern pedicle instrumentation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to (1) describe and validate a method of vertebral rotation measurement using plain radiographs and (2) measure postoperative rotation in a series of patients treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with surgery over a 6-year period were reviewed. Patients with computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs within 60 days of another were included. Vertebral rotation was calculated by radiographic measurements and measured directly by CT scan. As an internal control, patients with two apical pedicle screws on all radiographs were analyzed. Rotation was measured for all patients with at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred fifty-two instrumented spinal levels in 308 consecutive patients were reviewed. Ten patients with 93 screws were analyzed by CT and radiographs. The average discrepancy between computed tomography (CT) and radiographs was 3.3 ± 1.9°, with 81.7% (76/93) within 5°. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities for measured axial rotation were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.879 and 0.900, respectively). One hundred swventy-eight patients were eligible with an average follow-up of 2.3 ± 1.2 years; 84.8% (151/178) had screw(s) visible on all images at the major curve apex. The average postsurgical rotation was 3.5 ± 2.9°; 19.2% (29/151) were measured to have a rotation over 5°, and 4.0% (6/151) demonstrated a rotation over 10°. Only 4.6% (7/151) of patients demonstrated a postoperative Cobb angle change over 10°. CONCLUSIONS: Most major curves have apical pedicle screw instrumentation that can be followed by radiographs alone to measure rotation. Vertebral rotation measurement requires only plain radiographs and is a more sensitive determination for subtle postoperative crankshaft than change in Cobb angle.

Growth Arrest Following ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft in Skeletally Immature Patients: A Review of 4 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are becoming more common in the skeletally immature population as participation in high-risk sports continues to grow. This presents a challenge for the treating surgeon as ACL reconstruction in this patient set has the added aim of preservation of the growth plate anatomy. The purpose of this investigation is to report on 4 patients who developed growth arrest following ACL reconstruction and offer a review of the available literature. METHODS: Four skeletally immature patients (2 male and 2 female) were identified who underwent ACL reconstruction at mean age of 14.2 years (range, 13.5 to 14.8 y) and developed growth arrests. Bone ages at the time of reconstruction were 14 and 16 years for the boys and 13 years 6 months and 14 years for the girls. All patients had a transphyseal reconstruction with a hamstring autograft. Standard postoperative care was provided including clinical and radiographic follow-up at regular intervals. Clinically significant postoperative physeal arrest was confirmed on MRI or CT scan. Detailed chart review examined demographics, operative variables, and postoperative subjective and objective clinical measures. RESULTS: Two patients developed tibial recurvatum; 2 patients developed genu valgum. Three patients required further surgery. One patient underwent distal femoral-guided growth procedure, 2 underwent proximal tibial epiphysiodesis, and 1 patient was skeletally mature at presentation and did not require deformity correction. CONCLUSIONS: This report of 4 patients demonstrates that growth arrest following ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients is a real concern and highlights the importance of careful preoperative evaluation and discussion with patients and family members. We routinely obtain long-leg AP and lateral hip-to-ankle films on skeletally immature patients before performing an ACL reconstruction and then at 6 and 12 months postoperatively or every 6 months until the growth plates are closed to assess leg lengths and lower extremity alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic study, case series.

The value of intraoperative Gram stain in revision spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Intraoperative cultures and Gram stains are often obtained in cases of revision spine surgery even when clinical signs of infection are not present. The clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of this behavior remain unproven. PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine intraoperative Gram stains in revision spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective clinical review performed at an academic center in an urban setting. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred twenty-nine consecutive adult revision spine surgeries were performed. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures included intraoperative Gram stains. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 594 consecutive revision spine surgeries performed by four senior surgeons between 2008 and 2013 to identify patients who had operative cultures and Gram stains performed. All revision cases including cervical, thoracic, and lumbar fusion and non-fusion, with and without instrumentation were reviewed. One hundred twenty-nine (21.7%) patients had operative cultures obtained and were included in the study. RESULTS: The most common primary diagnosis code at the time of revision surgery was pseudarthrosis, which was present in 41.9% of cases (54 of 129). Infection was the primary diagnosis in 10.1% (13 of 129) of cases. Operative cultures were obtained in 129 of 595 (21.7%) cases, and 47.3% (61 of 129) were positive. Gram stains were performed in 98 of 129 (76.0%) cases and were positive in 5 of 98 (5.1%) cases. Overall, there was no correlation between revision diagnosis and whether or not a Gram stain was obtained (p=.697). Patients with a history of prior instrumentation were more likely to have a positive Gram stain (p<.0444). Intraoperative Gram staining was found to have a sensitivity of 10.9% (confidence interval [CI] 3.9%-23.6%) and specificity of 100% (CI 93.1%-100%). The positive and negative predictive values were 100% (CI 48.0%-100%) and 57.3% (CI 45.2%-66.2%), respectively. Kappa coefficient was calculated to be 0.1172 (CI 0.0194-0.2151). The cost per discrepant diagnosis (total cost/number discrepant) was $172.10. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that while very specific for infection, the sensitivity of intraoperative Gram staining is low, and agreement between positive cultures and Gram stains is very poor. Gram staining demonstrated limited cost-effectiveness because of the low prevalence of findings that altered patient management.

Do Current Recommendations for Upper Instrumented Vertebra Predict Shoulder Imbalance? An Attempted Validation of Level Selection for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder balance for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients is associated with patient satisfaction and self-image. However, few validated systems exist for selecting the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) post-surgical shoulder balance. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose is to examine the existing UIV selection criteria and correlate with post-surgical shoulder balance in AIS patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent spinal fusion at age 10-18 years for AIS over a 6-year period were reviewed. All patients with a minimum of 1-year radiographic follow-up were included. Imbalance was determined to be radiographic shoulder height |RSH| ≥ 15 mm at latest follow-up. Three UIV selection methods were considered: Lenke, Ilharreborde, and Trobisch. A recommended UIV was determined using each method from pre-surgical radiographs. The recommended UIV for each method was compared to the actual UIV instrumented for all three methods; concordance between these levels was defined as "Correct" UIV selection, and discordance was defined as "Incorrect" selection. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients were included with 2.3 ± 1.1 year follow-up. For all methods, "Correct" UIV selection resulted in more shoulder imbalance than "Incorrect" UIV selection. Overall shoulder imbalance incidence was improved from 31.0% (53/171) to 15.2% (26/171). New shoulder imbalance incidence for patients with previously level shoulders was 8.8%. CONCLUSIONS: We could not identify a set of UIV selection criteria that accurately predicted post-surgical shoulder balance. Further validated measures are needed in this area. The complexity of proximal thoracic curve correction is underscored in a case example, where shoulder imbalance occurred despite "Correct" UIV selection by all methods.

Proximal migration of hardware in patients undergoing midcarpal fusion with headless compression screws.

Background Scaphoid excision and limited intercarpal fusion is a common surgical procedure performed for degenerative disorders of the wrist including scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist deformities. Postoperative screw migration is a rare but devastating complication that can result in severe degenerative changes in the radiocarpal joint. Questions/Purposes The purpose of this study is to report on a series of patients who developed proximal migration of their hardware following limited intercarpal fusions with headless compression screws. Patients and Methods Four patients were identified between 2001 and 2012 who were indicated for and underwent scaphoid excision and midcarpal fusions with headless compression screw fixation and subsequently developed hardware migration with screw protrusion into the radiocarpal joint. Detailed chart review was performed. Results Mean age at surgery was 64 years (57-69 years). All patients had the diagnosis of SLAC wrist. Mean time to detection of failure was 6 months (4-8 months). All patients demonstrated radiographic union prior to failure based on plain films. Radiographs revealed screw backout with erosion of the radial lunate facet in all patients. Calculated carpal height ratios demonstrated a drop from an average 44.2% to 39.5% at the time of hardware migration. All four patients underwent hardware removal. One patient was not indicated for any further surgery, and two patients underwent further revision surgery. All three patients reported complete pain relief. One patient refused a salvage procedure and had subsequent persistent pain. Conclusions This study reports a serious complication of scaphoid excision and midcarpal fusion performed with headless compression screws. We advise surgeons to be aware of this potential complication and consider employing methods to reduce the risk of hardware migration. Additionally, we recommend at least 8 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up postoperatively to enable early intervention if necessary. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.

Carpal tunnel surgery: patient preferences and predictors for satisfaction.

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a debilitating disease of the upper extremity affecting patient function and quality of life. Surgical interventions have been developed that effectively treat this disease. However, there remains a subset of patients who are not fully satisfied with their outcome. Extensive investigation has been undertaken to analyze preoperative factors predictive of higher patient satisfaction. This review summarizes the role of unique patient characteristics and patient psychology, worker's compensation, patient demographics, certain clinical features, and patient preferences and expectations regarding patient satisfaction following carpal tunnel surgery. Understanding the complex nature of patient satisfaction will enable surgeons to indicate patients for surgical intervention better, provide appropriate preoperative counseling, and manage expectations postoperatively.

Inflammatory lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass is attenuated by adenosine A(2A) receptor activation.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary bypass has been shown to exert an inflammatory response within the lung, often resulting in postoperative pulmonary dysfunction. Several studies have shown that adenosine A(2A) receptor activation attenuates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury; however, the effect of adenosine A(2A) receptor activation on cardiopulmonary bypass-induced lung injury has not been studied. We hypothesized that specific adenosine A(2A) receptor activation by ATL313 would attenuate inflammatory lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: 1) SHAM group (underwent cannulation + heparinization only); 2) CONTROL group (underwent 90 minutes of normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with normal whole-blood priming solution; and 3) ATL group (underwent 90 minutes of normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with ATL313 added to the normal priming solution). RESULTS: There was significantly less pulmonary edema and lung injury in the ATL group compared with the CONTROL group. The ATL group had significant reductions in bronchoalveolar lavage interleukin-1, interleukin-6, interferon-gamma, and myeloperoxidase levels compared with the CONTROL group. Similarly, lung tissue interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma were significantly decreased in the ATL group compared with the CONTROL group. There was no significant difference between the SHAM and ATL groups in the amount of pulmonary edema, lung injury, or levels of proinflammatory cytokines. CONCLUSION: The addition of a potent adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist to the normal priming solution before the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass significantly protects the lung from the inflammatory effects of cardiopulmonary bypass and reduces the amount of lung injury. Adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists could represent a new therapeutic strategy for reducing the potentially devastating consequences of the inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.