Relationship between femoral anteversion and tibial torsion: CT evaluation of 38 unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) present with a wide spectrum of deformities. Few studies have assessed the relationship between femoral anteversion (FA) and rotational profile. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of FA on the lower extremity rotational profile by comparing tibial torsion (TT) between the extremities on both sides in patients with unilateral DDH, using computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty eight patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip, who underwent a preoperative rotational profile CT scan at our institution, were evaluated. 3D rotational profile CT was performed, and FA and TT of the extremities on both sides were measured. RESULTS: On individual comparison of the rotational profile, mean FA of the affected extremity showed a significantly higher value ( p = 0.006). But, there was no significant difference in mean TT between the 2 extremities. On group analysis, the excessive FA group (group B) showed significantly higher values of tibial torsion and tibial torsion side-to-side difference compared to the normal FA group (group A) ( p = 0.000, p = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that patients with DDH can present with excessive FA. Therefore, while treating patients who show excessive FA, surgeons must consider the possibility of a higher rotational profile of the affected extremity, before performing surgical treatments for DDH.

Treatment outcome of dome osteotomy of the pelvis combined with trochanteric advancement for sequelae of Perthes' disease.

OBJECTIVE: Disparity in size between femoral head and acetabulum could promote premature degeneration of the hip joint. The purpose of this study was to report the results of Kawamura's dome osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia due to sequelae of Perthes' disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (14 hips) operated between 1999 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 9 males and 5 females with a mean age of 29 years (range, 15-54 years). Functional and radiological results were reviewed at mean follow-up of 9 years (range, 4-12 years). RESULTS: Pain relief was obtained in 13 of 14 (92.8%) patients postoperatively. Good to excellent functional outcome was obtained in 10 of 14 (71.4%) patients. Mean Harris hip score was improved from 63 to 84 (p < 0.05) at the final follow-up. Improvement of limping gait was observed in 10 of 14 (71.4%) patients. Center edge angle improved from mean 24° (11-36°) preoperatively to mean 35° (27-46°) postoperatively (p < 0.05), acetabular angle improved from mean 43° (36-49°) preoperatively to mean 37° (32-44°) postoperatively (p < 0.05), acetabular head index improved from mean 69% (50-83%) preoperatively to mean 85% (73-100%) postoperatively (p < 0.05). Progression of arthrosis stage occurred in 3 of 14 (21%) patients. None of the hip with preoperative Stulberg III, 2 of 9 hips with Stulberg IV and 2 of 2 hips with Stulberg V needed conversion to total hip arthroplasty during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Dome osteotomy of the pelvis combined with trochanteric advancement could give a reasonable treatment outcome for acetabular dysplasia due to Perthes' disease at mid to long-term follow-up. Advanced stage of arthrosis, preoperative Stulberg V and no improvement of limping gait after the surgery possibly associated with poor outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

New strategy of closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of late applied negative pressure on postoperative drain output after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 patients (100 hips) were treated by closed suction drainage applying negative pressure immediately after THA (group I). The remaining 100 patients (100 hips) were treated by the same drainage system, but the negative pressure was not applied in the first 24 h after THA and then negative pressure was applied (group II). RESULTS: The mean total drain output was different between the two groups (group I: 597 ± 200.1 mL, group II: 403 ± 204.1 mL; p < 0.05). Reported drain output from immediate postoperative to postoperative day one was 369 ± 125.5 ml in group I and 221 ± 141.3 ml in group II (p < 0.05). The change of hemoglobin from immediate postoperative to 24 h after THA was lower in group II (group I: 1.5 ± 0.62 g/dL, group II: 1.1 ± 0.73 g/dL; p = 0.004). The mean unit number of blood transfusions was 1.0 (range, 0.0-5.0) in group I and 0.3 (range, 0.0-2.0) in group II (p < 0.05). There was no difference in Harris hip score between the two groups at postoperative 1 year or last follow-up (p = 0.073). CONCLUSION: The minor change in drain system management can reduce postoperative blood loss after primary THA and the need for transfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings after ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft or a tibialis allograft.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, including tibial tunnel widening and the progression of osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft or a tibialis allograft. In addition, we compared the graft tear and synovial coverage of grafts in patients that underwent the second-look arthroscopy. METHODS: Among 184 patients with an ACL injury who underwent ACL reconstruction, 68 patients of autograft group and 64 patients of tibialis allograft group were included for this study after minimum of 2-year follow-up. The Lachman and pivot-shift tests, Tegner activity score, Lysholm knee score, and IKDC score were compared between the two groups. The quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic strengths using dynamometer were also compared. Degree of OA was determined using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system on the weight-bearing radiographs. In total, 51 patients (26 patients in autograft group and 25 in the tibialis allograft group) underwent the second-look arthroscopy, in which we compared the apparent tear of graft and synovial coverage of grafts. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, there were no statistical significances in the two groups in Lachman and pivot-shift tests (n.s.). The Tegner activity, Lysholm knee score, and IKDC scores were similar in the two groups. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in the muscle power (n.s.). Some patients showed the progression of OA (five in autograft and four in allograft groups) without intergroup difference (n.s.). Regarding the findings of second-look arthroscopy, although there was no significant difference in graft tear, synovial coverage was better in autograft group than in allograft group. CONCLUSION: Even though hamstring autografts and tibialis allografts provided good functional outcomes without significant differences, the second-look arthroscopy revealed that hamstring autografts produced better synovial coverage than tibialis allograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.