Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 13(2): 130-135, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32457224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: CT perfusion (CTP) infarct and penumbra estimations determine the eligibility of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for endovascular intervention. This study aimed to determine volumetric and spatial agreement of predicted RAPID, Vitrea, and Sphere CTP infarct with follow-up fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI infarct. METHODS: 108 consecutive patients with AIS and large vessel occlusion were included in the study between April 2019 and January 2020 . Patients were divided into two groups: endovascular intervention (n=58) and conservative treatment (n=50). Intervention patients were treated with mechanical thrombectomy and achieved successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/2 c/3) while patients in the conservative treatment group did not receive mechanical thrombectomy or intravenous thrombolysis. Intervention and conservative treatment patients were included to assess infarct and penumbra estimations, respectively. It was assumed that in all patients treated conservatively, penumbra converted to infarct. CTP infarct and penumbra volumes were segmented from RAPID, Vitrea, and Sphere to assess volumetric and spatial agreement with follow-up FLAIR MRI. RESULTS: Mean infarct differences (95% CIs) between each CTP software and FLAIR MRI for each cohort were: intervention cohort: RAPID=9.0±7.7 mL, Sphere=-0.2±8.7 mL, Vitrea=-7.9±8.9 mL; conservative treatment cohort: RAPID=-31.9±21.6 mL, Sphere=-26.8±17.4 mL, Vitrea=-15.3±13.7 mL. Overlap and Dice coefficients for predicted infarct were (overlap, Dice): intervention cohort: RAPID=(0.57, 0.44), Sphere=(0.68, 0.60), Vitrea=(0.70, 0.60); conservative treatment cohort: RAPID=(0.71, 0.56), Sphere=(0.73, 0.60), Vitrea=(0.72, 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Sphere proved the most accurate in patients who had intervention infarct assessment as Vitrea and RAPID overestimated and underestimated infarct, respectively. Vitrea proved the most accurate in penumbra assessment for patients treated conservatively although all software overestimated penumbra.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico por imagem , Imagem de Perfusão/normas , Software/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Infarto Cerebral/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem de Perfusão/métodos , Reperfusão , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
2.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 12(4): 417-421, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31444288

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Angiographic parametric imaging (API) is an imaging method that uses digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to characterize contrast media dynamics throughout the vasculature. This requires manual placement of a region of interest over a lesion (eg, an aneurysm sac) by an operator. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our work was to determine if a convolutional neural network (CNN) was able to identify and segment the intracranial aneurysm (IA) sac in a DSA and extract API radiomic features with minimal errors compared with human user results. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty angiographic images of IAs were retrospectively collected. The IAs and surrounding vasculature were manually contoured and the masks put to a CNN tasked with semantic segmentation. The CNN segmentations were assessed for accuracy using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard index (JI). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed. API features based on the CNN segmentation were compared with the human user results. RESULTS: The mean JI was 0.823 (95% CI 0.783 to 0.863) for the IA and 0.737 (95% CI 0.682 to 0.792) for the vasculature. The mean DSC was 0.903 (95% CI 0.867 to 0.937) for the IA and 0.849 (95% CI 0.811 to 0.887) for the vasculature. The mean AUROC was 0.791 (95% CI 0.740 to 0.817) for the IA and 0.715 (95% CI 0.678 to 0.733) for the vasculature. All five API features measured inside the predicted masks were within 18% of those measured inside manually contoured masks. CONCLUSIONS: CNN segmentation of IAs and surrounding vasculature from DSA images is non-inferior to manual contours of aneurysms and can be used in parametric imaging procedures.


Assuntos
Angiografia Digital/métodos , Meios de Contraste , Aprendizado Profundo , Aneurisma Intracraniano/diagnóstico por imagem , Redes Neurais de Computação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiografia Digital/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Aprendizado Profundo/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 12(7): 714-719, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31822594

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Angiographic parametric imaging (API), based on digital subtraction angiography (DSA), is a quantitative imaging tool that may be used to extract contrast flow parameters related to hemodynamic conditions in abnormal pathologies such as intracranial aneurysms (IAs). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of using deep neural networks (DNNs) and API to predict IA occlusion using pre- and post-intervention DSAs. METHODS: We analyzed DSA images of IAs pre- and post-treatment to extract API parameters in the IA dome and the corresponding main artery (un-normalized data). We implemented a two-step correction to account for injection variability (normalized data) and projection foreshortening (relative data). A DNN was trained to predict a binary IA occlusion outcome: occluded/unoccluded. Network performance was assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and classification accuracy. To evaluate the effect of the proposed corrections, prediction accuracy analysis was performed after each normalization step. RESULTS: The study included 190 IAs. The mean and median duration between treatment and follow-up was 9.8 and 8.0 months, respectively. For the un-normalized, normalized, and relative subgroups, the DNN average prediction accuracies for IA occlusion were 62.5% (95% CI 60.5% to 64.4%), 70.8% (95% CI 68.2% to 73.4%), and 77.9% (95% CI 76.2% to 79.6%). The average AUROCs for the same subgroups were 0.48 (0.44-0.52), 0.67 (0.61-0.73), and 0.77 (0.74-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the feasibility of using API and DNNs to predict IA occlusion using only pre- and post-intervention angiographic information.


Assuntos
Angiografia Digital/tendências , Aprendizado Profundo/tendências , Aneurisma Intracraniano/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Angiografia Digital/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Redes Neurais de Computação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA